I have a controller (MyController), which requests data from a websocket connection (wsService) while initialising.
What is the best way to detect and wait that the websocket connection is open and then place the request from the controller?
Now I'm using following solution:
my_controller.dart:
MyController(wsService ws){
// when refresh() in wsService is called,
// the call is redirected to MyController's load()
ws.refresh = load;
}
load(){
ws.send(request);
}
ws_service.dart:
onConnect(){ //this is called when websocket connection is opened
refresh(); //this calls MyController's load()
}
I still think you should do something like this instead of make Angular polling the state.
MyController(wsService ws){
if(ws.readyState == WebSocket.OPEN) {
load();
} else {
ws.onOpen.first.then((_) => load());
}
}
load(){
ws.send(request);
}
This solution is still using polling, but with this solution the handling of websocket connection is kept in one place (wsService) and there is no duplicates in function calls.
MyController(wsService ws){
new Timer.periodic(new Duration(milliseconds: 100), (t){
if(ws.webSocket.readyState == WebSocket.OPEN) {
t.cancel();
load();
}
});
}
load(){
ws.send(request);
}
Related
I am trying to pass messages between content script and the extension
Here is what I have in content-script
chrome.runtime.sendMessage({type: "getUrls"}, function(response) {
console.log(response)
});
And in the background script I have
chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener(
function(request, sender, sendResponse) {
if (request.type == "getUrls"){
getUrls(request, sender, sendResponse)
}
});
function getUrls(request, sender, sendResponse){
var resp = sendResponse;
$.ajax({
url: "http://localhost:3000/urls",
method: 'GET',
success: function(d){
resp({urls: d})
}
});
}
Now if I send the response before the ajax call in the getUrls function, the response is sent successfully, but in the success method of the ajax call when I send the response it doesn't send it, when I go into debugging I can see that the port is null inside the code for sendResponse function.
From the documentation for chrome.runtime.onMessage.addListener:
This function becomes invalid when the event listener returns, unless you return true from the event listener to indicate you wish to send a response asynchronously (this will keep the message channel open to the other end until sendResponse is called).
So you just need to add return true; after the call to getUrls to indicate that you'll call the response function asynchronously.
The accepted answer is correct, I just wanted to add sample code that simplifies this.
The problem is that the API (in my view) is not well designed because it forces us developers to know if a particular message will be handled async or not. If you handle many different messages this becomes an impossible task because you never know if deep down some function a passed-in sendResponse will be called async or not.
Consider this:
chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener(function (request, sender, sendResponseParam) {
if (request.method == "method1") {
handleMethod1(sendResponse);
}
How can I know if deep down handleMethod1 the call will be async or not? How can someone that modifies handleMethod1 knows that it will break a caller by introducing something async?
My solution is this:
chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener(function (request, sender, sendResponseParam) {
var responseStatus = { bCalled: false };
function sendResponse(obj) { //dummy wrapper to deal with exceptions and detect async
try {
sendResponseParam(obj);
} catch (e) {
//error handling
}
responseStatus.bCalled= true;
}
if (request.method == "method1") {
handleMethod1(sendResponse);
}
else if (request.method == "method2") {
handleMethod2(sendResponse);
}
...
if (!responseStatus.bCalled) { //if its set, the call wasn't async, else it is.
return true;
}
});
This automatically handles the return value, regardless of how you choose to handle the message. Note that this assumes that you never forget to call the response function. Also note that chromium could have automated this for us, I don't see why they didn't.
You can use my library https://github.com/lawlietmester/webextension to make this work in both Chrome and FF with Firefox way without callbacks.
Your code will look like:
Browser.runtime.onMessage.addListener( request => new Promise( resolve => {
if( !request || typeof request !== 'object' || request.type !== "getUrls" ) return;
$.ajax({
'url': "http://localhost:3000/urls",
'method': 'GET'
}).then( urls => { resolve({ urls }); });
}) );
I am using WebSocketChannel as a socket server:
var handler = webSocketHandler((WebSocketChannel webSocket) async {
}
How can I know when the webSocket above gets disconnected?
You have to listen on the channel stream and intercept the close event with the onDone callback.
closeCode and closeReason properties give you details about the close.
webSocketHandler((channel) {
channel.stream.listen((data) {
channel.sink.add('Echo: $data');
},
onDone: () {
print('socket closed: reason=[${channel.closeReason}], code:[${channel.closeCode}]');
});
});
Even thought there is a correct answer to this thread, I ended up using another package for handling socket connections:
https://pub.dartlang.org/packages/socket_io
I use my postgres database query to determine my next action. And I need to wait for the results before I can execute the next line of code. Now my conn.query returns a Future but I can't manage to get it async when I place my code in another function.
main() {
// get the database connection string from the settings.ini in the project root folder
db = getdb();
geturl().then((String url) => print(url));
}
Future geturl() {
connect(db).then((conn) {
conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) { return result[0].toString(); })
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
}
I just want geturl() to wait for the returned value but whatever I do; it fires immediately. Can anyone point me a of a piece of the docs that explains what I am missing here?
You're not actually returning a Future in geturl currently. You have to actually return the Futures that you use:
Future geturl() {
return connect(db).then((conn) {
return conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) { return result[0].toString(); })
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
}
To elaborate on John's comment, here's how you'd implement this using async/await. (The async/await feature was added in Dart 1.9)
main() async {
try {
var url = await getUrl();
print(url);
} on Exception catch (ex) {
print('Query error: $ex');
}
}
Future getUrl() async {
// get the database connection string from the settings.ini in the project root folder
db = getdb();
var conn = await connect(db);
try {
var sql = "select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL";
var result = await conn.query(sql).toList();
return result[0].toString();
} finally {
conn.close();
}
}
I prefer, in scenarios with multiple-chained futures (hopefully soon a thing of the past once await comes out), to use a Completer. It works like this:
Future geturl() {
final c = new Completer(); // declare a completer.
connect(db).then((conn) {
conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) {
c.complete(result[0].toString()); // use the completer to return the result instead
})
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
return c.future; // return the future to the completer instead
}
To answer your 'where are the docs' question: https://www.dartlang.org/docs/tutorials/futures/
You said that you were trying to get your geturl() function to 'wait for the returned value'. A function that returns a Future (as in the example in the previous answer) will execute and return immediately, it will not wait. In fact that is precisely what Futures are for, to avoid code doing nothing or 'blocking' while waiting for data to arrive or an external process to finish.
The key thing to understand is that when the interpreter gets to a call to then() or 'catchError()' on a Future, it does not execute the code inside, it puts it aside to be executed later when the future 'completes', and then just keeps right on executing any following code.
In other words, when using Futures in Dart you are setting up chunks of code that will be executed non-linearly.
I have a WCF service running in a server and a Windows Application which has a timer each 30 seconds checking by WCF some news values from database.
Everything is going well but if my server (when WCF is running) get offline or out for some reason, I get the Exception System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException or System.Net.WebExceptionStatus.ConnectFailure.
What I want is, well, my timer will check every 30 seconds and I want reestablish the connection when my server come back. Actually the only way to do it is close and open the WinForm app.
How can I check if the connection is back or reconnect without close my app?
public MyClass()
{
proxy = new TaskService.Service1Client();
proxy.GetTarefasCompleted += new EventHandler<GetTarefasCompletedEventArgs>
(proxy_GetTarefasCompleted);
timer = new System.Threading.Timer(Callback, null, 0, 30000);
}
private void Callback(Object state)
{
timer.Change(30000, Timeout.Infinite);
proxy.GetTarefasAsync(Environment.UserDomainName, Environment.UserName);
}
void proxy_GetTarefasCompleted(object sender, GetTarefasCompletedEventArgs e)
{
try
{
tarefas = e.Result.OrderByDescending(t => t.Id).ToList();
//code code code
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
if (ex.GetType().ToString() == "System.Net.WebExceptionStatus.ConnectFailure" ||
ex.GetType().ToString() == "System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException")
{
//treat the error
}
}
}
if (proxy.State != System.ServiceModel.CommunicationState.Opened)
{
proxy.Abort();
proxy.Open();
}
I believe this should do the trick.
I want to store position coords (latitude, longitude) in a table in my MySQL DB querying a url in a way similar to this one: http://locationstore.com/postlocation.php?latitude=var1&longitude=var2 every ten seconds. PHP script works like a charm. Getting the coords in the device ain't no problem either. But making the request to the server is being a hard one. My code goes like this:
public class LocationHTTPSender extends Thread {
for (;;) {
try {
//fetch latest coordinates
coords = this.coords();
//reset url
this.url="http://locationstore.com/postlocation.php";
// create uri
uri = URI.create(this.url);
FireAndForgetDestination ffd = null;
ffd = (FireAndForgetDestination) DestinationFactory.getSenderDestination
("MyContext", uri);
if(ffd == null)
{
ffd = DestinationFactory.createFireAndForgetDestination
(new Context("MyContext"), uri);
}
ByteMessage myMsg = ffd.createByteMessage();
myMsg.setStringPayload("doesnt matter");
((HttpMessage) myMsg).setMethod(HttpMessage.POST);
((HttpMessage) myMsg).setQueryParam("latitude", coords[0]);
((HttpMessage) myMsg).setQueryParam("longitude", coords[1]);
((HttpMessage) myMsg).setQueryParam("user", "1");
int i = ffd.sendNoResponse(myMsg);
ffd.destroy();
System.out.println("Lets sleep for a while..");
Thread.sleep(10000);
System.out.println("woke up");
} catch (Exception e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
System.out.println("Exception message: " + e.toString());
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
I haven't run this code to test it, but I would be suspicious of this call:
ffd.destroy();
According to the API docs:
Closes the destination. This method cancels all outstanding messages,
discards all responses to those messages (if any), suspends delivery
of all incoming messages, and blocks any future receipt of messages
for this Destination. This method also destroys any persistable
outbound and inbound queues. If Destination uses the Push API, this
method will unregister associated push subscriptions. This method
should be called only during the removal of an application.
So, if you're seeing the first request succeed (at least sometimes), and subsequent requests fail, I would try removing that call to destroy().
See the BlackBerry docs example for this here
Ok so I finally got it running cheerfully. The problem was with the transport selection; even though this example delivered WAP2 (among others) as an available transport in my device, running the network diagnostics tool showed only BIS as available. It also gave me the connection parameters that I needed to append at the end of the URL (;deviceside=false;ConnectionUID=GPMDSEU01;ConnectionType=mds-public). The code ended up like this:
for (;;) {
try {
coords.refreshCoordinates();
this.defaultUrl();
this.setUrl(stringFuncs.replaceAll(this.getUrl(), "%latitude%", coords.getLatitude() + ""));
this.setUrl(stringFuncs.replaceAll(this.getUrl(), "%longitude%", coords.getLongitude() + ""));
cd = cf.getConnection(this.getUrl());
if (cd != null) {
try {
HttpConnection hc = (HttpConnection)cd.getConnection();
final int i = hc.getResponseCode();
hc.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
//dormir
Thread.sleep(15000);
} catch (Exception e) {
} finally {
//cerrar conexiones
//poner objetos a null
}
Thanks for your help #Nate, it's been very much appreciated.