I would like to use gems 'better_errors' and 'binding_of_caller' for my debugging in rails app, but i DON'T want to include those in Gemfile. Is it possible to do? My first thought was to simply
gem install better_errors
gem install binding_of_caller
but it doesnt work, i mean installation finishes without problems, but thats it, gem doesnt seem to work at all when i run my app on localhost. Do I need some kind of config set, anybody?
but i DON'T want to include those in Gemfile. Is it possible to do?
Yes, it is possible. You can just download the respective directories in desire folder (ex. lib) and add that gem class in your initializer so it will be loaded at the time of starting. Configuration varies as per gem.
My first thought was to simply .... but it doesnt work,
Ofcourse, it wont. How can your rails app magically detects without knowing it that you have better way to show error. It is simply saying like you have cancer formula and doctors automatically applied that formula to there patient without you telling them. There should be some commucaition between two parties rails-app and gem so they can coordinate and work better.
Do I need some kind of config set, anybody?
Yes, explained above.
i dont want to force those gems on my coworkers. KRUKUSA any more details? // said in comment
Yes, including this gems in your rails app can do this job. This extension will be available automatically to your worked. (no force applied :P)
it looks like all you want to not show those gems to other co-worker, if so, you can use this trick with git.
To achieve this thing, first simply add the gems in your gemfile, run bundle and then make it untrackable with git. You can put Gemfile and Gemfile.lock in your .gitignore file. or you can add the first add the gems and mark it ignore with below command. Read more here
git update-index --assume-unchanged Gemfile Gemfile.lock
Another possibility would be to create your own environment and use it accordingly.
Have your own configuration for myenv:
$ cp config/environments/{development,myenv}.rb
In config/database.yml, add the environment myenv and use the same config as development:
development: &development
<rest of the code you have on config/databases.yml>
...
myenv:
<< *development
In Gemfile add your custom gems to use on your mydev group:
group :myenv do
gem 'better_errors'
gem 'binder_of_caller'
end
Run rails and rake with RAILS_ENV like this: RAILS_ENV=myenv rails c
The advantage of this approach is that you still get the updates from Gemfile from the repo, and if you need to add a gem in the Gemfile for everybody to see, you still can.
Also, nobody will see the gems you installed inside the myenv group in your Gemfile.
Related
I am trying to push into rubygems.orge a simple gem following this tutorial. Basically I am using bundler and I have write a simple Hello World class. Then, I try to push the gem as follows:
bundle gem my_first_gem
gem build my_first_gem-0.0.1.gem
and I get:
Signed in.
Pushing gem to https://rubygems.org...
Repushing of gem versions is not allowed.
Please use `gem yank` to remove bad gem releases.
So, I have checked and there is already a gem with such name. So, is there an easy way to rename the gem I have including changing the gem name in all generate by bulder files:
or if I should rename the files by hand, could you tell which are the critical ones?
Instead of renaming files by hand. As it is just a tutorial gem, I would suggest you to create a new gem with
bundle gem gotqn_first_gem
and just move your HelloWorld class in lib. And follow the rest of the commands suggested in Railscasts.
Don't forget that after renaming you need to call git add -A to update your files list.
The reason for that is because (unless that you have changed) your my_first_gem.gemspec have a line like that:
spec.files = `git ls-files -z`.split("\x0")
So, when you call gem build my_first_gem-0.0.1.gem, the above command will search for your older files and ignore the renamed ones.
I've added awesome_print to my ~/.irbrc file like so:
require 'ap'
Inside a Rails project directory, if I run irb it loads the gem fine, because I've already installed the gem locally. But if I run rails console, it spits out this error:
cannot load such file -- ap
How can I resolve this? I am guessing that it's looking for the gem in the app's Gemfile, but I don't want to add it to the Gemfile because I don't want other developers requiring that dependency. I only want to use awesome_print on my machine.
I am also using rbenv, if that is of any help.
There is this trick.
What you need to do is
# Copy the definition of the debundle! method into your ~/.irbrc
# Call 'debundle!' from IRB when you need to.
(as explained at the top of the file)
The text as it appears on the referred to site:
debundle.rb allows you to require gems that are not in your Gemfile when inspecting
programs that are run with Bundler.
Use at your own risk!
Paste the code of debundle.rb and you are done! A good place would be your .irbrc file
before requiring irbtools.
The code is directly taken from pry-debundle.
Please look there for any further information. This repo exists to simplify debundling
without using the pry repl.
In the Gemfile of my Rails project, I am starting to have auxiliary gems like "ruby-debug19", "perftools.rb", or "irbtools". All of these really have nothing to do with the project, but rather are part of my local development setup. But since I'm using bundler, I cannot load these gems (even though they are installed system-wide) unless I add them to the Gemfile. In my view that is a bit of a code smell.
For example, I would like to be able to require 'irbtools' in rails console without adding "irbtools" to my Gemfile.
Is there a way to keep auxiliary gems out of the Gemfile and still be able to load them for debugging, profiling, etc. when I need them?
Actually, you can create a group in you Gemfile like:
group :auxiliary do
gem 'irbtools'
end
And then use bundle install --without auxiliary if you don't want to use irbtools. Why do you think adding them to Gemfile is a code smell? And if it possible to do this without adding gems to the Gemfile it will be many more code smell I think.
Thanks to this post I have a great solution.
Add this line at the end of your Gemfile:
eval(File.read(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/Gemfile.local'), binding) rescue nil
Create a file called Gemfile.local.
Add your development gems to Gemfile local. For example:
group :development do
gem 'cucumber'
end
Add Gemfile.local to .gitignore.
Now you can add your auxiliary development gems without changing the Gemfile for other folks on the team. Very cool.
I put the code below in a file in my app root, so it's easy to load from irb.
If you want it in something like a rails server, you probably need to add the load statement to environments/development.rb etc. That still creates problems if you accidentally check that in, but it's less annoying than having to add it to the Gemfile and causing your Gemfile.lock to change also.
# Example usage:
# add_more_gems("ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26", "linecache19-0.5.13")
# or
# add_more_gems(%w(ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26 linecache19-0.5.13))
#
# Note that you are responsible for:
# - adding all gem dependencies manually
# - making sure manually-added gem versions don't conflict with Gemfile.lock
# To list deps, run e.g. "gem dep ruby-debug-base19 -v 0.11.26"
#
def add_more_gems(*gem_names_and_vers)
gem_names_and_vers.flatten!
gem_base = File.expand_path(Gem.dir)
gem_names_and_vers.each do |gem_name_and_ver|
# uncomment if desired
###puts "Adding lib paths for #{gem_name_and_ver.inspect}"
spec_file = File.join(gem_base, 'specifications', "#{gem_name_and_ver}.gemspec")
spec = Gem::Specification.load spec_file
this_gem_dir = File.join(gem_base, 'gems', gem_name_and_ver)
spec.require_paths.each {|path|
dir_to_add = File.join(this_gem_dir, path)
$: << dir_to_add unless $:.member?(dir_to_add)
}
end
end
# put your often-used gems here
add_more_gems(
%w(
ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26
ruby-debug-ide19-0.4.12
linecache19-0.5.13
)
)
Not sure if this would work for you. It depends on whether or not you're using RVM. If you are, then you could install those auxiliary gems into the #global gemset that is created automatically for every Ruby interpreter. The gems in the #global gemset are available to all project-specific gemsets by default. This way you won't need to clutter up your Gemfiles.
Without a file extension I can't get syntax highlighting to persist. That's not the end of the world, but I'd appreciate having it.
Will it break Rails if I rename Gemfile as Gemfile.rb ?
It looks like you can rename it, but bundler will not automatically find it.
However, you can just prepend every bundler command with BUNDLE_GEMFILE=Gemfile.rb and it'll work:
BUNDLE_GEMFILE=Gemfile.rb bundle install
You might also look at http://gembundler.com/man/bundle-config.1.html -- It mentions a gemfile option, but I couldn't get it to work (even after manually setting it to Gemfile.rb, it still tried to look for Gemfile).
Let's say in a Rails app you have some gems that you use in your app (we'll call them "primary gems") and you have vendored them for portability.
Let's say that those "primary gems" also require gems of their own - we'll call these "secondary gems".
When you are setting up your environment.rb, you have to say:
config.gem 'primary-gem'
for any of the gems you are using directly.
But, do you also need to say . . .
config.gem 'secondary-gem'
even if you are not using that gem explicitly in your app?
Or is it simply enough to include the gem in your vendor/gems directory for it to get picked up by your app?
At deploy time rails knows about your dependencies, so if you want to freeze your gems then you can run
rake gems:unpack:dependencies
to freeze them into the vendor directory.
At runtime however it's the gems job to load it's dependencies, and usually the gems do this, so a config.gem 'primary' should work.
No, you don't or at least you shouldn't. Each GEM specification should include it's own list of dependencies. When primary gem is installed, RubyGems automatically will install each gem dependency on cascade.
In other words, if A requires B that requires C+D, you only need to write
config.gem 'A'
When the command
gem install A
is run, RubyGems will resolve all the dependencies and install them.
You can view all A dependencies running (from a Rails project)
rake gems
Sometimes, a GEM author may forget to include some GEM dependencies in the specification. In this case you should specify them in your environment.rb to force the application to install them. Off course, it's also a good idea to contact the GEM maintainer so that it can fix the problem.