I am struggling to find the easiest solution for associating three models:
User
Organization
Role
User and Organization is a HABTM association - one user can have multiple organizations and vice versa.
One user can also have multiple roles, but just one per organization.
Right now I have this in my model:
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, through: :organizations
has_and_belongs_to_many :organizations, :join_table => :organizations_users
end
organization.rb
class Organization < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users, :join_table => :organizations_users
has_many :roles
end
role.rb
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, through: :organizations
belongs_to :organizations
end
Does that make sense?
Here are my though:
Given that you're using the has_and_belongs_to_many and given Rails' defaults, your specification of the join_table is redundant
Your has_many :roles, through: :organizations will only work if you have both a role and a user field in the organizations tables, as Rails will expect to do a SQL select of that table looking for those fields.
Since you want users to have up to one one role per organization, then I would think the most straightforward thing would be to add a role field to the organizations_users model, as follows:
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, through: :organizations_users
has_many :organizations, :through => :organizations_users
has_many :organizations_users
end
organization.rb
class Organization < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :organizations_users
has_many :roles, :through => :organizations_users
has_many :organizations_users
end
organization_user.rb
class OrganizationUser < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :organization
belongs_to :role
end
role.rb
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
end
The above assumes that you have some reason to want Role to continue to be an ActiveModel as opposed to just a string field in the organizations_users table.
Related
I have a complex model association in mind, and was wondering how I could accomplish it. This is what i want to accomplish.
I have a User and a Document model
A User can create documents. He is now the document admin.
He can add other users to his document, and give them permissions such as Editor, Viewer, Admin
He can also make a team, a group of users, and add multiple teams to his document. Each user on a team that the User has added to his document will also have permissions. A user can belong to many teams.
I am a little bit confused about the associations I will have to setup. This is the code I have so far, which has not incorporated the team aspect:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :documents, through: :participations
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :document
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
I would recommend introducing a Team and TeamMembership models in a similary way to existing models. Also change the belongs_to association on Participation from user to a polymorphic participant.
class Team < ApplicationRecord
has_many :team_memberships
has_many :users, through: :team_memberships
has_many :participations, as: :participant
end
class TeamMembership < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :team
belongs_to :user
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :team_memberships
has_many :teams, through: :team_memberships
has_many :participations, as: :participant
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :participant, polymorphic: true
belongs_to :document
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
# if desired create a users method to conveniently get a list of users with access to the document
def users
#users ||= participations.flat_map do |participation|
case participation.partipant
when User
[participation.participant]
when Team
participation.participant.users
end
end
end
end
I would only add has_many :through associations as you discover a benefit/need to having them. That will reduce complexity of maintaining them unless you have specific use case for them. In the case of User having a teams association, it's pretty obvious that you'll be likely to want to get the teams that the user is a part of and since there's no specific information in the TeamMembership object that you are likely to need in that determination, it's a good has_many :through to have.
EDIT: Added Document model.
Since you already have a participation model, you can use that as the join model between users and teams. Since a user can belong to multiple teams, and a document can have multiple teams, you can use a has_many through relationship between teams and documents. We'll call it the DocumentTeam model.
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :documents, through: :participations
has_many :teams, through: :participations
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :document
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :team, optional: true
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
class Team < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
has_many :document_teams
has_many :document, through: :document_teams
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
has_many :document_teams
has_many :teams, through: :document_teams
end
class DocumentTeam < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :document
belongs_to :team
end
The Ruby on Rails app I am working on allows users to create and share agendas with other users.
In addition, we must be able to:
Display a list of agendas for each user, on his profile
Display a list of users associated with an agenda, on the agenda's page
When sharing an agenda with another user, define a role for this user, and display the role of this user on the list mentioned right above
I was going to go with a has_and_belongs_to_many association between the user and the agenda models, like that:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :agendas
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
But then I wondered whether this would let me get and display the #user.agenda.user.role list of roles on the given agenda page of a given user.
And I thought I should probably go with a has_many :through association instead, such as:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :agendas, through: :roles
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :users, through: :roles
end
And although I was pretty comfortable about the idea of a user having several roles (one for each agenda), I am not sure about the idea of an agenda having several roles (one for each user?).
Finally, to add to the confusion, I read about the polymorphic association and thought it could also be a viable solution, if done this way for instance:
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :definition, polymorphic: true
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, as: :definition
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, as: :definition
end
Does any of the above solutions sound right for the situation?
UPDATE: Doing some research, I stumbled upon this article (from 2012) explaining that has_many :through was a "smarter" choice than has_and_belongs_to_many. In my case, I am still not sure about the fact that an agenda would have many roles.
UPDATE 2: As suggested in the comments by #engineersmnkyn, a way of solving this would be to go with two join tables. I tried to implement the following code:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :agendas, through: :jointable
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Jointable < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
has_many :agendaroles through :jointable2
end
class Jointable2 < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :roles
belongs_to :useragenda
end
I am not sure about the syntax though. Am I on the right track? And how should I define the Agenda and the Role models?
UPDATE 3: What if I went with something like:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :agendas, through: :roles
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :users, through: :roles
end
and then, in the migration file, go with something like:
class CreateRoles < ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
create_table :roles do |t|
t.belongs_to :user, index: true
t.belongs_to :agenda, index: true
t.string :privilege
t.timestamps
end
end
end
Would I be able to call #user.agenda.privilege to get the privilege ("role" of creator, editor or viewer) of a given user for a given agenda?
Conversely, would I be able to call #agenda.user.privilege ?
Okay I will preface by saying I have not tested this but I think one of these 2 choices should work well for you.
Also if these join tables will never need functionality besides a relationship then has_and_belongs_to_many would be fine and more concise.
Basic Rails rule of thumb:
If you need to work with the relationship model as its own entity, use has_many :through. Use has_and_belongs_to_many when working with legacy schemas or when you never work directly with the relationship itself.
First using your example (http://repl.it/tNS):
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :agendas, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles, through: :user_agendas
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def agenda_roles(agenda)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{agenda:agenda})
end
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :users, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles, through: :user_agendas
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def user_roles(user)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{user: user})
end
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgenda < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgendaRoles < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :role
belongs_to :user_agenda
end
This uses a join table to hold the relationship of User <=> Agenda and then a table to join UserAgenda => Role.
The Second Option is to use a join table to hold the relationship of User <=> Agenda and another join table to handle the relationship of User <=> Agenda <=> Role. This option will take a bit more set up from a CRUD standpoint for things like validating if the user is a user for that Agenda but allows a little flexibility.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :agendas, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def agenda_roles(agenda)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{agenda: agenda})
end
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :users, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def user_roles(user)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{user: user})
end
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgenda < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class UserAgendaRoles < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :role
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
I know this is a long answer but I wanted to show you more than 1 way to solve the problem in this case. Hope it helps
A list has one owner (a user). A list also has a number of panelists (also users). I have tried defining the relationships between the three models: User, List, and Panelist. But I'm getting nowhere.
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :lists
has_many :panelMemberships, :through => :panelists, :source => :lists
end
list.rb
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :panelMembers, :through => :panelists, :source => :user
end
panelist.rb
class Panelist < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :list
belongs_to :user
end
I've tried all different combinations but nothing seems to work. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
The model also has to have a has_many relationship for whatever the through model is, so wherever you have has_many :x, through: :y, you also need to say has_many :y. You also shouldn't have a panelist model separate from your user model if panelists are users (unless you're doing STI, which you're not). From what I understand, you're trying to do something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_and_belongs_to_many :lists # for the normal panelist / list relationship
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
Then you'll need to make a migration for a users_lists (with user id and list id) table which will be your join table but won't need its own model. But if you really want to keep the through relationship (good for if you do other stuff with the join model), then you'd do:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :lists, through: :panel_memberships
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :users, through: :panel_memberships
end
class PanelMembership < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :list
I am implementing an authentication+authorization system in my Rails 3 Application.
I have a HABTM relationship with between Users and Roles.
The roles I will have are : manager,dealer,operator,admin
Now a manager can have many dealers under him. How do I model this relationship?
It is a simple question but I could not find an answer. Also a similar question here: Role-dependent associations but it does not clear things properly.
EDIT:
I am thinking my requirement is further simple. For me a user can only be either an Admin, Operator, Dealer or Manager.
For this I can simply add a role column to User table. How will the relationship between Managers and Dealers be enforced now?
I think you're looking for something more like
class Organization < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
has_many :managers
has_many :dealer
has_many :admins
has_many :operators
has_many :dealer_users, :through => :managers, :class_name=>"User"
end
class Admin < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :organizations
belongs_to :user
end
class Dealer
has_many :organizations
belongs_to :user
end
class Operator < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :organizations
belongs_to :user
end
class Manager < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :dealers
belongs_to :organization
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :organizations
has_many :admins
has_many :operators
has_many :managers
has_many :dealers
end
Im working on a Rails app where users can create projects. There are two types of users Admins and Collaborators. Both Admins and Collaborators has_many :accounts, through: :account_users, where account_users is a join table. When Admins deletes their accounts, I also want to delete their created account and it's project, but I can't get this to work. My models currently looks like this:
class Collaborator < User
[...]
has_many :account_users
has_many :accounts, through: :account_users
[...]
end
class Admin < User
has_many :account_users
has_many :accounts, through: :account_users, :dependent => :destroy
[...]
end
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
[...]
belongs_to :admin
has_many :account_users
has_many :collaborators, through: :account_users
[...]
end
class AccountUser < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :admin
belongs_to :account
belongs_to :collaborator
end
When a Admin users deletes it's account, only the row in the join table and user table is deleted, their projects isn't deleted.
Note, I use devise for handling authentication.
How could I solve this?
I don't see a project association, so I'm thinking you could do it in one of two ways:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
after_save :destroy_projects
private
def destroy_projects
self.projects.delete_all if self.destroyed?
end
end
or
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
[...]
belongs_to :admin
has_many :account_users
has_many :collaborators, through: :account_users
has_many :projects, :dependent => :destroy
[...]
end