Consider an Core Data entity with two properties: text and -for the sake of simplicity- textLength. textLength is a property that is calculated every time text changes. I have three requirements:
Update textLength every time text changes, ideally inside the NSManagedObject subclass.
textLength cannot be calculated on demand for performance reasons (the actual calculated property that I'm using is much more expensive to calculate).
Update the UI every time text changes.
My solution is almost there. I'm providing a custom accessor for setText:, like this:
- (void)setText:(NSString *)text
{
static NSString *key;
if (!key) key = NSStringFromSelector(#selector(text));
[self willChangeValueForKey:key];
[self setPrimitiveText:text];
self.textCount = text.count;
[self didChangeValueForKey:key];
}
And using KVO in the UI to observer text changes:
[someObject addObserver:self forKeyPath:NSStringFromSelector(#selector(text)) options:NSKeyValueObservingOptionNew context:someContext];
This works fine in most cases, except when I perform undo. I take that Core Data calls setPrimiteValue:forKey: directly, and this does not trigger my calculation logic. As a consequence, when the UI is notified of the change, the textLength value is outdated.
Short of calculating textLength on demand, where should the calculation logic be?
This is the purpose of the - (void)awakeFromSnapshotEvents:(NSSnapshotEventType)flags method. It tells you the reason for the snap shot change and allows you to update computed / derived data.
(when you update the derived value you should set it using the appropriate primitive method)
Related
Ever since their introduction in iOS 4, I have been wondering about the internal implementation of the UIView's block-based animation methods. In particular I would like to understand what mystical features of Objective C are used there to capture all the relevant layer state changes before and after execution of the animation block.
Observing the black-box implementation, I gather that it needs to capture the before-state of all layer properties modified in the animation block, to create all the relevant CAAnimations. I guess it does not do a snapshot of whole view hierarchy, as that would be horribly inefficient. The animation block is opaque code blob during runtime, so I don't think it can analyze that directly. Does it replace the implementation of property setters on CALayer with some kind of recoding versions? Or is the support for this property change recoding baked-in somewhere deep inside the CALayers?
To generalize the question a little bit, is it possible do create similar block-based API for recording state changes using some Objective C dark magic, or does this rely on knowing and having the access to the internals of the objects being changed in the block?
It is actually a very elegant solution that is built around the fact that the view is the layers delegate and that stand-alone layers implicitly do animate on property changes.
It just happens to be that I gave a BLITZ talk about this at NSConference just a couple of days ago and I posted my slides on GitHub and tried to write down more or less what I said in the presenter notes.
That said: it is a very interesting question that I don't see being asked very often. It may be a bit to broad but I really like curiosity.
UIView animations existed before iOS 4
Ever since their introduction in iOS 4, I have been wondering about the internal implementation of the UIView's block-based animation methods.
UIView animations existed before iOS 4 but in a different style (that is no longer recommended to use because it is more cumbersome to use). For example, animating position and color of a view with a delay could be done like this. Disclaimer: I did not run this code so it may contains bugs.
// Setup
static void *myAnimationContext = &myAnimationContext;
[UIView beginAnimations:#"My Animation ID" context:myAnimationContext];
// Configure
[UIView setAnimationDuration:1.0];
[UIView setAnimationDelay:0.25];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveEaseInOut];
// Make changes
myView.center = newCenter;
myView.backgroundColor = newColor;
// Commit
[UIView commitAnimations];
The view-layer synergy is very elegant
In particular I would like to understand what mystical features of Objective C are used there to capture all the relevant layer state changes before and after execution of the animation block.
It is actually the other way around. The view is built on top of the layer and they work together very closely. When you set a property on the view it sets the corresponding property on the layer. You can for example see that the view doesn't even have it's own variable for the frame, bounds or position.
Observing the black-box implementation, I gather that it needs to capture the before-state of all layer properties modified in the animation block, to create all the relevant CAAnimations.
It does not need to do that and this is where it all gets very elegant. Whenever a layer property changes, the layer looks for the action (a more general term for an animation) to execute. Since setting most properties on a view actually sets the property on the layer, you are implicitly setting a bunch of layer properties.
The first place that the layer goes looking for an action is that it asks the layer delegate (it is documented behaviour that the view is the layers delegate). This means that when the layer property changes, the layers asks the view to provide an animation object for that each property change. So the view doesn't need to keep track of any state since the layer has the state and the layer asks the view to provide an animation when the properties change.
Actually, that's not entirely true. The view needs to keep track of some state such as: if you are inside of the block or not, what duration to use for the animation, etc.
You could imagine that the API looks something like this.
Note: I don't know what the actual implementation does and this is obviously a huge simplification to prove a point
// static variables since this is a class method
static NSTimeInterval _durationToUseWhenAsked;
static BOOL _isInsideAnimationBlock;
// Oversimplified example implementation of how it _could_ be done
+ (void)animateWithDuration:(NSTimeInterval)duration
animations:(void (^)(void))animations
{
_durationToUseWhenAsked = duration;
_isInsideAnimationBlock = YES;
animations();
_isInsideAnimationBlock = NO;
}
// Running the animations block is going to change a bunch of properties
// which result in the delegate method being called for each property change
- (id<CAAction>)actionForLayer:(CALayer *)layer
forKey:(NSString *)event
{
// Don't animate outside of an animation block
if (!_isInsideAnimationBlock)
return (id)[NSNull null]; // return NSNull to don't animate
// Only animate certain properties
if (![[[self class] arrayOfPropertiesThatSupportAnimations] containsObject:event])
return (id)[NSNull null]; // return NSNull to don't animate
CABasicAnimation *theAnimation = [CABasicAnimation animationWithKeyPath:event];
theAnimation.duration = _durationToUseWhenAsked;
// Get the value that is currently seen on screen
id oldValue = [[layer presentationLayer] valueForKeyPath:event];
theAnimation.fromValue = oldValue;
// Only setting the from value means animating form that value to the model value
return theAnimation;
}
Does it replace the implementation of property setters on CALayer with some kind of recoding versions?
No (see above)
Or is the support for this property change recoding baked-in somewhere deep inside the CALayers?
Yes, sort of (see above)
Creating similar API yourself
To generalize the question a little bit, is it possible do create similar block-based API for recording state changes using some Objective C dark magic, or does this rely on knowing and having the access to the internals of the objects being changed in the block?
You can definitely create a similar block based API if you want to provide your own animations based on property changes. If you look at the techniques I showed in my talk at NSConference for inspecting UIView animations (directly asking the layer for the actionForLayer:forKey: and using layerClass to create a layer that logs all addAnimation:forKey: information) then you should be able to learn enough about how the view is using the layer to create this abstraction.
I'm not sure if recording state changes is you end goal or not. If you only want to do your own animation API then you shouldn't have to. If you really want to do it, You could probably could, but there wouldn't be as much communication infrastructure (delegate methods and callbacks between the view and the layer) available to you as there is for animations.
David's answer is awesome. You should accept it as the definitive answer.
I do have a minor contribution. I created a markdown file in one of my github projects called "Sleuthing UIView Animations." (link) It goes into more detail on how you can watch the CAAnimation objects that the system creates in response to UIView animations. The project is called KeyframeViewAnimations. (link)
It also shows working code that logs the CAAnimations that are created when you submit UIView animations.
And, to give credit where credit is due, it was David who suggested the technique I use.
I have created a subclass of a UICollectionViewCell that shows some information. I have one property in with type Weather. When an instance of that is set I want to update the cell. Is the approach below bad? I am thinking of that I may trigger the view to be created to early if I access the UI components before it is loaded. Or is that non sense and only applies to UIViewController (with regard to using view property to early)?
If this is bad, what would be the correct way?
var weather: Weather? {
didSet {
if let weather = weather {
dayLabel.text = dayFormatter.stringFromDate(weather.fromDate)
// ... more code like this
}
}
}
You may want an else clause, though, clearing the text field if weather was nil. Likewise, if you might update this from a background thread, you might want to dispatch that UI update back to the main thread.
Be aware that this observer is not called when you set weather in the cell's init (nor would be the #IBOutlet be configure at that point, anyway). So make sure that you're not relying upon that.
Also, if Weather is mutable, recognize that if you change the fromDate of the existing Weather object, this won't capture that. (If Weather was mutable, you'd really want to capture its changing properties via KVO, a delegate-protocol pattern, or what have you.) But if you make Weather immutable, you should be fine.
So, technically, that's the answer to the question, but this raises a few design considerations:
One generally should strive to have different types loosely coupled, namely that one type should not be too reliant on the internal behavior of another. But here we have an observer within the cell which is dependent upon the mutability of Weather.
This use of a stored property to store a model object within view is inadvisable. Cells are reused as they scroll offscreen, but you probably want a separate model that captures the relevant model objects, the controller then handles the providing of the appropriate model object to the view object (the cell) as needed.
Bottom line, it's not advisable to use a stored property for "model" information inside a "view".
You can tackle both of these considerations by writing code which makes it clear that you're only using this weather parameter solely for the purpose of updating UI controls, but not for the purposes of storing anything. So rather that a stored property, I would just use a method:
func updateWithWeather(weather: Weather?) {
if let weather = weather {
dayLabel.text = dayFormatter.stringFromDate(weather.fromDate)
// ... more code like this
} else {
dayLabel.text = nil
// ... more code like this
}
}
And this would probably only be called from within collectionView:cellForItemAtIndexPath:.
But, this makes it clear that you're just updating controls based upon the weather parameter, but not trying to do anything beyond that. And, coincidentally, the mutability of the weather object is now irrelevant, as it should be. And if the model changes, call reloadItemsAtIndexPaths:, which will trigger your collectionView:cellForItemAtIndexPath: to be called.
There are times where a stored property with didSet observer is a useful pattern. But this should be done only when the property is truly a property of view. For example, consider a custom view that draws some shape. You might have stored properties that specify, for example, the width and the color of the stroke to be used when drawing the path. Then, having stored properties for lineWidth and strokeColor might make sense, and then you might have a didSet that calls setNeedsDisplay() (which triggers the redrawing of the view).
So, the pattern you suggest does have practical applications, it's just that it should be limited to those situations where the property is truly a property of the view object.
I would use a property observer if I planned up updating the value during the users session. If this is a value that only gets updated when the user first loads, I would just simply call a method when my view is initially loaded.
If you use a property observer, you can give it an initial value when you define it so the data is there when the user needs it. Also, if you're updating the user interface, make sure you do it on the main queue.
var weather: Weather = data {
didSet {
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(),{
if let weather = weather {
dayLabel.text = dayFormatter.stringFromDate(weather.fromDate)
// ... more code like this
}
})
}
}
I've created a UITableView which works as a setting viewcontroller. this means there are different values that i would like to save. I would like to avoid creating a save button and instead just automatically update to my database. I could update every time a value has changed, but that would be a lot of update calls, since it would update every time a char has changed. Is there a smoother way to do this?
i see a lot of different bigger apps which are not using a save button, where it just saves automatically.
create one dictionary and save your all settings into that:
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
NSMutableDictionary * settingsDictionary = [[NSMutableDictionary allo]init];
}
create one method to save settings into created dictionary
-(void)saveSettingValues:(NSString *)setting forKey:(NSString *)key
{
[settingsDictionary addObjectForKey:key];
}
call this method on every element status change.for example if textfield value is changed then by using textField delegate method send the value into dictionary
-(void)textFieldDidEndEditing:(UITextField *)textField
{
[self saveSettingValues:textField.text forKey:yorKey];
}
then send the dictionary where do you want to store the setting values on every call of saveSettingValues:forKey method
I'm not sure to understand well your problem but for me you could save data when the viewController will be remove of the screen (application in background or viewcontroller pop).
Ever since their introduction in iOS 4, I have been wondering about the internal implementation of the UIView's block-based animation methods. In particular I would like to understand what mystical features of Objective C are used there to capture all the relevant layer state changes before and after execution of the animation block.
Observing the black-box implementation, I gather that it needs to capture the before-state of all layer properties modified in the animation block, to create all the relevant CAAnimations. I guess it does not do a snapshot of whole view hierarchy, as that would be horribly inefficient. The animation block is opaque code blob during runtime, so I don't think it can analyze that directly. Does it replace the implementation of property setters on CALayer with some kind of recoding versions? Or is the support for this property change recoding baked-in somewhere deep inside the CALayers?
To generalize the question a little bit, is it possible do create similar block-based API for recording state changes using some Objective C dark magic, or does this rely on knowing and having the access to the internals of the objects being changed in the block?
It is actually a very elegant solution that is built around the fact that the view is the layers delegate and that stand-alone layers implicitly do animate on property changes.
It just happens to be that I gave a BLITZ talk about this at NSConference just a couple of days ago and I posted my slides on GitHub and tried to write down more or less what I said in the presenter notes.
That said: it is a very interesting question that I don't see being asked very often. It may be a bit to broad but I really like curiosity.
UIView animations existed before iOS 4
Ever since their introduction in iOS 4, I have been wondering about the internal implementation of the UIView's block-based animation methods.
UIView animations existed before iOS 4 but in a different style (that is no longer recommended to use because it is more cumbersome to use). For example, animating position and color of a view with a delay could be done like this. Disclaimer: I did not run this code so it may contains bugs.
// Setup
static void *myAnimationContext = &myAnimationContext;
[UIView beginAnimations:#"My Animation ID" context:myAnimationContext];
// Configure
[UIView setAnimationDuration:1.0];
[UIView setAnimationDelay:0.25];
[UIView setAnimationCurve:UIViewAnimationCurveEaseInOut];
// Make changes
myView.center = newCenter;
myView.backgroundColor = newColor;
// Commit
[UIView commitAnimations];
The view-layer synergy is very elegant
In particular I would like to understand what mystical features of Objective C are used there to capture all the relevant layer state changes before and after execution of the animation block.
It is actually the other way around. The view is built on top of the layer and they work together very closely. When you set a property on the view it sets the corresponding property on the layer. You can for example see that the view doesn't even have it's own variable for the frame, bounds or position.
Observing the black-box implementation, I gather that it needs to capture the before-state of all layer properties modified in the animation block, to create all the relevant CAAnimations.
It does not need to do that and this is where it all gets very elegant. Whenever a layer property changes, the layer looks for the action (a more general term for an animation) to execute. Since setting most properties on a view actually sets the property on the layer, you are implicitly setting a bunch of layer properties.
The first place that the layer goes looking for an action is that it asks the layer delegate (it is documented behaviour that the view is the layers delegate). This means that when the layer property changes, the layers asks the view to provide an animation object for that each property change. So the view doesn't need to keep track of any state since the layer has the state and the layer asks the view to provide an animation when the properties change.
Actually, that's not entirely true. The view needs to keep track of some state such as: if you are inside of the block or not, what duration to use for the animation, etc.
You could imagine that the API looks something like this.
Note: I don't know what the actual implementation does and this is obviously a huge simplification to prove a point
// static variables since this is a class method
static NSTimeInterval _durationToUseWhenAsked;
static BOOL _isInsideAnimationBlock;
// Oversimplified example implementation of how it _could_ be done
+ (void)animateWithDuration:(NSTimeInterval)duration
animations:(void (^)(void))animations
{
_durationToUseWhenAsked = duration;
_isInsideAnimationBlock = YES;
animations();
_isInsideAnimationBlock = NO;
}
// Running the animations block is going to change a bunch of properties
// which result in the delegate method being called for each property change
- (id<CAAction>)actionForLayer:(CALayer *)layer
forKey:(NSString *)event
{
// Don't animate outside of an animation block
if (!_isInsideAnimationBlock)
return (id)[NSNull null]; // return NSNull to don't animate
// Only animate certain properties
if (![[[self class] arrayOfPropertiesThatSupportAnimations] containsObject:event])
return (id)[NSNull null]; // return NSNull to don't animate
CABasicAnimation *theAnimation = [CABasicAnimation animationWithKeyPath:event];
theAnimation.duration = _durationToUseWhenAsked;
// Get the value that is currently seen on screen
id oldValue = [[layer presentationLayer] valueForKeyPath:event];
theAnimation.fromValue = oldValue;
// Only setting the from value means animating form that value to the model value
return theAnimation;
}
Does it replace the implementation of property setters on CALayer with some kind of recoding versions?
No (see above)
Or is the support for this property change recoding baked-in somewhere deep inside the CALayers?
Yes, sort of (see above)
Creating similar API yourself
To generalize the question a little bit, is it possible do create similar block-based API for recording state changes using some Objective C dark magic, or does this rely on knowing and having the access to the internals of the objects being changed in the block?
You can definitely create a similar block based API if you want to provide your own animations based on property changes. If you look at the techniques I showed in my talk at NSConference for inspecting UIView animations (directly asking the layer for the actionForLayer:forKey: and using layerClass to create a layer that logs all addAnimation:forKey: information) then you should be able to learn enough about how the view is using the layer to create this abstraction.
I'm not sure if recording state changes is you end goal or not. If you only want to do your own animation API then you shouldn't have to. If you really want to do it, You could probably could, but there wouldn't be as much communication infrastructure (delegate methods and callbacks between the view and the layer) available to you as there is for animations.
David's answer is awesome. You should accept it as the definitive answer.
I do have a minor contribution. I created a markdown file in one of my github projects called "Sleuthing UIView Animations." (link) It goes into more detail on how you can watch the CAAnimation objects that the system creates in response to UIView animations. The project is called KeyframeViewAnimations. (link)
It also shows working code that logs the CAAnimations that are created when you submit UIView animations.
And, to give credit where credit is due, it was David who suggested the technique I use.
I am trying to learn Objective-C for iOS. I have tried researching this, but I must not be using the right keywords.
I have several labels that are simply named, Label1, Label2, etc. I also have a ton of code that basically looks the same except the Label# changes. Can I build one method and pass the number to it and shrink my app significantly?
You probably want to have those object in an NSArray or another type of collection. Then you will be able to loop through the content and do the same operation on each element.
Consider defining a new class, CisonLabel, which abstracts out the shared behavior of these labels. The CisonLabel holds the control, and also its associated data. So you'd say
CisonLabel *label1=[CisonLabel for: self.labelControl1 withIdentifier: 1];
CisonLabel *label2=[CisonLabel for: self.labelControl2 withIdentifier: 2];
The CisonLabel would have methods like:
- (void) update; // sets the label text, based on the identifier
As DRiis suggests, you can collect all your CisonLabels in a collectionm perhaps an NSArray.
- (void) updateLabels: (NSArray*) theLabels
{
for(CisonLabel *label in theLabels) [label update];
}
Your instinct is sound: abstract out shared behavior into a class, and avoid repeating yourself.