OK, so I downloaded this plugin:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Extended+Choice+Parameter+plugin
And select Multi-Level Single Select as the type of parameters.
The problem is that when I have multiple parameters selected and I want to use these parameters in shell in a build, I can only select the LAST parameter
So if I do $PARAM_NAME it only outputs the last parameters, but I want all the parameters that I selected, not just the last one.
Here is a picture for demonstration
You aren't building the parameter based on the selections, you are navigating to the value that you want. I.E. Country --->State ---->City
You aren't building a CountryStateCity variable, you are stating that the City variable is the value you select.
I could get the nearest to this by using Extended Choice Parameter > JSON Parameter Type > JSON Parameter Config Groovy Script.
import org.boon.Boon;
def jsonEditorOptions = Boon.fromJson(/{
disable_edit_json: true,
disable_properties: true,
no_additional_properties: true,
disable_collapse: true,
disable_array_add: false,
disable_array_delete: false,
disable_array_reorder: false,
theme: "bootstrap3",
iconlib: "fontawesome5",
schema: {
"type": "object",
"title": "",
"required": [
"Locations"
],
"properties": {
"Locations": {
"type": "array",
"format": "table",
"title": "",
"uniqueItems": true,
"items": {
"type": "object",
"title": "Location",
"properties": {
"Country": {
"type": "string",
"propertyOrder" : 1,
"enum": [
"USA",
"Germany",
"India"
]
},
"City": {
"type": "string",
"propertyOrder" : 2,
"enum": [
"New York",
"Frankfurt",
"Mumbai"
]
},
"Neighborhood": {
"type": "string",
"propertyOrder" : 3
}
}
},
"default": [{
"Country": "USA",
"City": "New York",
"Neighborhood": "Times Square"
}]
}
}
}
/);
You can visit the plugin page and json-editor.github.io to create and validate your
JSON schemas as seen above.
This is how it appears in Jenkins:
Note that however, it still does not provide a context sensitive
second column based on what is selected in the first column. The
second column rather behaves exactly like the first column where you
select from a pre-defined list without any filters.
On printing the variable Location, it returns this JSON:
{"Locations":[{"City":"New York","Country":"USA","Neighborhood":"Times Square"},{"City":"Frankfurt","Country":"Germany","Neighborhood":"Bornheim"},{"City":"Mumbai","Country":"India","Neighborhood":"Vile Parle"}]}
I met the same problem, so I added a 'row number' column to the parameters file:
Country City Row
United States San Francisco 1
United States Chicago 2
Mexico Mexico City 3
Mexico Cancun 4
This way, the plugin returns the row number and I can address that row from the parameters file.
Related
We have an Microsoft Search instance for crawling one custom app : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftsearch/connectors-overview
Query & display is working as expected but aggregation provides wrong results
query JSON : https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/search/query
select title + submitter and aggregation on submitter
"fields": [
"title",
"submitter"
],
"aggregations": [
{
"field": "submitter",
"size": 1,
"bucketDefinition": {
"sortBy": "keyAsString",
"isDescending": true,
"minimumCount": 0
}
}
]
JSON response
submitter property is correctly returned with Firstname Lastname on row 0 but aggregate is lowercase and middle space trimmed firstnamelastname
"hitsContainers": [
{
"total": 1,
"moreResultsAvailable": false,
"hits": [
{
"hitId": "xxxx",
"contentSource": "ConnectionId",
"rank": 1,
"summary": "New service / <c0>business</c0> <c0>model</c0> <c0>design</c0> <ddd/>",
"resource": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.externalConnectors.externalItem",
"properties": {
"title": "New service / business model design",
"submitter": "Firstname Lastname"
}
}
}
],
"aggregations": [
{
"field": "submitter",
"buckets": [
{
"key": "firstnamelastname",
"count": 1,
"aggregationFilterToken": "\"ǂǂ696c736573706f656c73747261\""
}
]
}
]
}
]
reproducible in Microsoft Graph Explorer (a bit obfuscated)
result with space
aggregation concatenated in lowercase
Rootcause has been identified as submitter property wasn't created with flag refinable
{
"name": "submitter",
"type": "String",
"isSearchable": "true",
"isQueryable": "true",
"isRetrievable": "true"
"isRefinable": "false"
}
as a consequence, output was incorrect.
testing with refinable = true provides correct aggregation value (1 = non refinable, 2 = refinable).
small note : refinable properties can't be searchable
I'm building a simple slack bot and I am playing with the checkboxes element.
When I return the following from my API in a JSON response to a slash-command I get an error failed with the error "invalid_blocks", however, when I put this in the block-kit-builder it works perfectly (including "sending to slack" button)
Any ideas why this is failing when I run my slash command - and is it possible to see more detailed error messages from slack?
{
"blocks": [
{
"elements": [
{
"style": "primary",
"text": {
"emoji": true,
"text": "Create new TODO list",
"type": "plain_text"
},
"type": "button",
"value": "value"
},
{
"style": "primary",
"text": {
"emoji": true,
"text": "Help",
"type": "plain_text"
},
"type": "button",
"value": "value"
}
],
"type": "actions"
},
{
"text": {
"text": "Today",
"type": "mrkdwn"
},
"type": "section"
},
{
"elements": [
{
"initial_options": [
{
"text": {
"text": "Get Into the garden",
"type": "mrkdwn"
},
"value": "foo"
}
],
"options": [
{
"text": {
"text": "Get Into the garden",
"type": "mrkdwn"
},
"value": "foo"
}
],
"type": "checkboxes"
},
{
"style": "primary",
"text": {
"emoji": true,
"text": "Add new Task",
"type": "plain_text"
},
"type": "button",
"value": "value"
}
],
"type": "actions"
}
],
"type": "home"
}
I am using the Slack Web API. I was getting the similar error. After a lot of looking around, here's how I solved it.
import json
blocks = [{...}]
payload = {
"blocks": json.dumps(blocks)
}
You will then send this payload.
in the api, the "blocks" parameter need to be string type. Did you convert it to string or you use it as a JSON ?
https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage
In the Block Kit Builder, the data is a JSON with a blocks key.
In the Slack API, the blocks param is only the list of JSON objects.
blocks = [
{
"text": {
"text": "Its the list of your blocks",
"type": "mrkdwn"
},
"type": "section"
}
]
text = 'Alternative data in text'
client.chat_postMessage(channel=channel_id, blocks=blocks, text=text)
Another cause of this problem seems to be too many blocks being returned. I can't find any documentation about this whatsoever, but personal experience seems to indicate about 20 blocks is the maximum.
An alternative is to return fewer blocks, with paging actions -- paging works well with the "replace" message so that the content being paged through does not result in many separate messages.
It appears that not all valid elements in block kit tool can be posted as a message, despite the fact that message preview works fine in the Block Tool.
In my case, the code failed when I included an input block and passed when i removed it. The input block was generated by the Block Kit tool.
{
"type": "input",
"element": {
"type": "plain_text_input",
"action_id": "plain_text_input-action"
},
"label": {
"type": "plain_text",
"text": "Feedback",
"emoji": true
}
}
The error was
{'ok': False, 'error': 'invalid_blocks'}
Also, although the documentation for python says you need to urlEncode the JSON-based array, there is no example, and it is incorrect. https://api.slack.com/methods/chat.postMessage
You can see on line 29 in the SDK test code below that blocks= takes a regular list of dicts not a string.
https://github.com/slackapi/python-slack-sdk/blob/c9dc6aa0907a72c16cf36aa15e7e80031a9fdce2/integration_tests/samples/basic_usage/sending_a_message.py
There is already an existing CouchDB database which was created based on existing records from a MySQL database.
I have a set of documents like this:
[
{
"_id": "lf_event_users_1247537_11434",
"_rev": "1-19e90d3f19e9da7cc5adab44ebbe3894",
"TS_create": "2018-12-17T10:29:20",
"emm_id": 204662,
"eu_user_id": 201848611,
"type": "lf_event_users",
"uid": 1247537,
"vendor_id": 11434
},
{
"_id": "lf_event_users_1247538_11434",
"_rev": "1-0d0d1e9f1fb5aad9bafd4c53a6cada17",
"TS_create": "2018-12-17T10:29:20",
"emm_id": 204661,
"eu_user_id": 201848611,
"type": "lf_event_users",
"uid": 1247538,
"vendor_id": 11434
},
{
"_id": "lf_event_users_1247539_11434",
"_rev": "1-09bc2bfc709ee9c6e6cac9cb34964ac4",
"TS_create": "2018-12-17T10:29:20",
"emm_id": 204660,
"eu_user_id": 201848611,
"type": "lf_event_users",
"uid": 1247539,
"vendor_id": 11434
}
]
As you can see, all of them are for the same "eu_user_id" = 201848611, and each one has a different "emm_id".
Now, I have another set of document like this in the same CouchDB database:
[
{
"_id": "lf_event_management_master_204660_11434",
"_rev": "2-320111a3814a3efd6838baa0fb5412bb",
"emm_disabled": "n",
"emm_title": "Scanned for local delivery",
"settings": {
"event_view": "ScannedForLocalDeliveryEvent",
"sort_weight": 0
},
"type": "lf_event_management_master",
"uid": 204660,
"vendor_id": 11434
},
{
"_id": "lf_event_management_master_204661_11434",
"_rev": "2-e6d6ebbd4dc4ca473a376d3d16a58e93",
"emm_disabled": "n",
"emm_title": "Local Delivery Cancelled",
"settings": {
"event_view": "CancelDeliveryEvent",
"sort_weight": 4
},
"type": "lf_event_management_master",
"uid": 204661,
"vendor_id": 11434
},
{
"_id": "lf_event_management_master_204662_11434",
"_rev": "2-53cb3d3eba80704e87ea5ff8d5c269df",
"emm_disabled": "n",
"emm_title": "Local Delivery Exception",
"settings": {
"event_view": "DeliveryExceptionEvent",
"sort_weight": 3
},
"type": "lf_event_management_master",
"uid": 204662,
"vendor_id": 11434
}
]
As you can see, each document in this last set has a "uid" matching the "emm_id" in the previous set of documents. Basically this means:
A "user" has many allowed "events".
You can see also that the documents of type "lf_event_management_master" has no "eu_user_id" value or any other key matching this.
My question is:
How can I get all documents of type "lf_event_management_master" allowed for user "201848611" in a single query?
In my case, I only have the User ID (201848611) available at the point where I need to get the allowed events. Currently what is happening is:
I get all the "lf_event_users" records for this user.
Loop all results from previous query and build a new query, extracting this time to find all the "lf_event_management_master" where the "uid" includes any of the "emm_id" values found with the previous query.
Thank you in advance.
Is it possible (and how) to specify additional parameters that depend on the value of another given parameter?
Example
I have a call PUT /accounts/<account_id>/payment_method which takes some parameters besides the path parameter.
One is payment_method_type which defines the payment method to be set.
Now: if payment_method_type is DD for direct debit, there are some more parameters allowed (and needed) like account_holder and iban.
If it is something else, e. g. PP, other parameters are needed.
Excerpt from the json
"parameters": {
"payment_method_type": {
"name": "type",
"description": "Payment method type.",
"in": "query",
"required": true,
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"DD", "IV", "PP"
]
},
"payment_method_data_dd_account_holder": {
"name": "account_holder",
"description": "Name of account holder",
"in": "query",
"required": false, # but true if payment_method_type == DD
"type": "string"
},
"payment_method_data_dd_iban": {
"name": "iban",
"description": "IBAN",
"in": "query",
"required": false, # but true if payment_method_type == DD
"type": "string"
},
"payment_method_data_pp_some_info": {
"name": "some_info",
"description": "Some info needed for PP",
"in": "query",
"required": false, # but true if payment_method_type == PP
"type": "string"
},
}
"paths": {
"/accounts/{account_id}/payment_method": {
"put": {
"summary": "Update Payment Method",
"description": "...",
"parameters": {
{
"$ref": "#/parameters/path_psp_account_id"
},
{
"$ref": "#/parameters/payment_method_type"
},
{
"$ref": "#/parameters/payment_method_data_dd_account_holder"
},
{
"$ref": "#/parameters/payment_method_data_dd_iban"
},
{
"$ref": "#/parameters/payment_method_data_pp_some_info"
},
}
}
}
}
I'd like to get rid of the long parameter list (since there are more parameters left out here) but group them as described above and document that some parameters are required (and allowed) only for special types.
Is there a way to describe this?
Is there a way to define sets of parameters like all the direct debit parameters in one definition and reference it? Remark: those parameters are given next to the payment_method_type parameter and not inside a sub-object.
There is no way to have conditional parameters in the current swagger specification.
Yes, the parameters array allows a $ref pointer.
This is the description of a certain parameter I have:
{
"name": "myParam",
"description": "My param description",
"required": true,
"paramType": "query",
"type": "string",
"defaultValue":"myValue"
}
The defaultValue is the only value the parameter can have, so is there a way to declare this? Seen in the context of the swagger-ui, I need the parameter's textbox to be read-only. I'm using swagger 1.2.
Thanks
The proper way to declare this would be:
{
"name": "myParam",
"description": "My param description",
"required": true,
"paramType": "query",
"type": "string",
"enum": [ "myValue" ]
}
The "enum" property sets the possible values. Once you set a single value to it, that's the only one that could be used and that would be available in the UI for the user to choose from.
I'm a bit late to the game but with OpenAPI 3.1 you can do the following:
defaultValue:
type: string
const:
- myValue
You can also use 'pattern' of the string to avoid the enum - this could look better in Swagger:
{
"openapi": "3.0.0",
"components": {
"schemas": {
"object": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"myParam"
],
"properties": {
"myParam": {
"type": "string",
"pattern": "onlyAllowedValue$"
}
}
}
}
}
}