This is the error messsage I get.
I know it's kind of an eye roller, that it's difficult nigh impossible to tell what I may need without the source, but it seems like a deployment problem as people that installed the Qt SDK can run it. Plus, I figured I'd have better luck asking here than with a chinese developer that speaks google-english.
So here's what I've done:
I installed the MSVC2012.
I used a program called cffexplorer to see what the exe was looking for. I have the 7 or so .dlls that are at the top of the tree.
I found a recent (jun 2013) qwindows.dll from elsewhere on my system and put it in ./plugins (I've tried this file in ./, ./plugins, and ./plugins/platforms
I created a qt.conf with the following data (I determined the format from an existing Qt based app that works)
[Paths]
Plugins = plugins
Yet, I continue to get this message. Any suggestions on what I might look for to clear this up?
Ask the developer what compiler was used to build the application. Then you will need the right dll (that was built with the same compiler as the application). Also notice that (by default) the documentation says that qwindows.dll should be in the platforms folder in the same path as your executable, read more here. Depending on whether the developer used a Qt built with angle, you may also need: libEGL.dll and libGLESv2.dll. Dependency walker might help you find dependencies that are not there.
Related
When I use the installer from the author's website, I end up with a program that seems to have no support for autohotkey editing, no syntax hiliting, (not even a language to deal with .ahk files), no ahk specific tools in the toolbar, debuger support, help file, and so on. In fact, the only thing I see is a changed 'About...' in the Help menu.
Is there some setup I'm missing, or is the current version broken?
This is an old question but after a longer period there has been an update.
The latest version can be found here.
The list of current NaCl ports is here: https://code.google.com/p/naclports/wiki/PortList
I'm curious if there is (or will be) a repository for PNaCl executables (.pexe files) since they only need a .nmf manifest wrapper to run?
Please list any PNaCl resources here, I'm looking for ImageMagick specifically.
I know I could probably build the .pexe myself but I don't have the time to learn Native Client.
The short answer is: this isn't available yet, but we are working on it.
The long answer:
There isn't currently a binary repository for naclports. We are planning to add that soon (likely this quarter).
I took a quick look at the ImageMagick port, and it looks like it currently only generates libraries, not an application binary (i.e. nexe/pexe). My guess is that it wouldn't be too hard to add this, however.
Even with a pexe, you'll need to have a way to launch the application, give it commandline options, and a set of files to process. I've discussed a way to do this with my team, but we haven't started work on it yet (though again, we'll likely work on this in Q1 2014).
I have successfully registered an IDE notifier (IOTAIDENotifier80) so I get AfterCompile notifications.
Is it possible to find out whether the project was built versus just being compiled/made?
I've found this answer about implementing a IOTAProjectCompileNotifier but this is not available in D2007.
Any other way? I'd be fine with an undocumented way as this is for an inhouse expert only.
Update: I need this to replicate the "AutoInc build number" feature with an external .rc file containing the version info resource. Maybe this can be done via BuildEvents? Although I like the ability to log a message in the IDE showing the updated version number...
I have no idea about writing experts or hooking into the IDE, and I'm scared of trampolines. Having said that, I've noticed that you can tell the difference between a compile and build by monitoring the timestamps of the files in your project output folder, but this difference is only evident if no code (*.pas or *.dfm) has changed since last compile or build. In other words, when there is a code change, you can NOT tell the difference by monitoring the timestamps. However, when there is no code change since last compile or build, a compile will only change the timestamp of the exe (the dcu timestamps are not changed).
Therefore, in the absence of other more elegant solutions, and only if you are really desperate for this information (ie, was it compiled or was it built?) then I can suggest a 2-part solution for you.
Part 1. Write a process to monitor changes in timestamps in your output folder, and
Part 2. Tell your fellow developers there is a bug in D2007 which complicates your build process, but that this bug is easily overcome by simply compiling twice or building twice (or if you know how to automate this then go for your life). If you can get your developers to compile twice or build twice then upon the second compile or build you will be able to deduce whether it was a compile or build by testing if the timestamp of the dcu changed upon the second compile or build.
Now, I will go and stand in the naughty corner and ask myself "why me?". Cheers.
I am trying to use an application called CLUT.exe which is an old application for MS-DOS that can be used to reindex NTX files for DBF databases.
(This is not the main topic, but I am just writing this if someone wants to test the app and don't trust at all about the content).
The problem starts when trying to run the command line version through console (cmd.exe) and this error appears:
C:\>CLUT.exe [arg1] [arg2] [arg3]
run-time error R6009
- not enough space for environment
So, according to what I've searched, this could be a possible solution:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;230205
but it doesn't work and every alternative that I found to solve this over the internet is the same.
Another alternative could be to make right-click in the .exe file, go to Properties then Memory tab and increase the Initial environment memory from Auto to the max value but it doesn't work too.
Well, I am stuck and no "possible" solution is working for me. If someone is interested, knows more about this issue and want to test, you can download the application from here (click "Free Download" green button):
http://www.filebasket.com/free/Development-Clipper-programming-language/clut-exe/13996.html
or directly from my DropBox:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/15208254/stackoverflow/clut_214.rar
Just to know, I am using Windows 7 and the CLUT.exe application is a Clipper based app (old programming language) that may run under windows console (cmd.exe).
Wikipedia does mention other dos emulators but, oddly, doesn't mention BOCHS.
Reindexing NTX files is not a difficult thing to do, and can be done with tools other than CLUT. For example, many of the utilities listed on this part of Download32 could be used. Otherwise, you could write your own using Harbour Project or xHarbour. Or contact me off list and I'll cook up something in Clipper 5.3.
LATER
If I read the README correctly for CLUT, it's a replacement for the DBU utility that comes with Clipper 5.x. I can supply you with a build of that if you're unsuccessful with other approaches.
I have been having this issue with OpenCV 2.4.2 that it doesn't really get installed properly with Microsoft VS 2010 Express; It is always missing a dll file or two doesn't matter what I follow by Googling. Also, Visual Studio 2010 Express is only valid for a few days, so it is acceptable that VS will not behave well with OpenCV at that point. However, when I changed my IDE to CodeBlocks, it is even stranger because now I have missing dll files and also "Missing Entry Point" error because of a duplicate .dll file. I found this guide and followed what it told me to do:
http://conanhung.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/opencv-2-2c-codeblocks-and-mingw-got-it-working-on-windows/
But it still doesn't work!! What I am after is a complete and definitive solution to integrating OpenCV (preferrably 2.4.2 version) on a Windows 7 64-bit machine. I have been turning Stackoverflow inside out but no solution is working for me. The problems are
WHEN USING VISUAL STUDIO:
Missing dll file (e.g. libopencv_core242d.dll, etc.)
WHEN USING CODE BLOCKS:
First it complains that libstdc++-6.dll is missing. When I download it to my C:\MinGW\libexec\gcc\mingw32\4.7.0 folder, it stops complaining about this. But now it complains that there is any entry point problem and some other .dll file is missing!!!
If someone has managed to make it work by hook or crook, I will be more than happy to know what it is, IN DEPTH. I don't believe that such an important library can be so stupidly distributed so that developers have to struggle night and day to make this work.
FYI, I have tried even the OPenCV website and frankly their instructions are a bit useless. Also, all the necessary information e.g. adding PATH, adding includes and libraries, etc. Please someone point me to the right direction as it has been two days and I cannot get anywhere. It is literally stopping my job now :(
As an answer, but probably a very simple one, I did the following and got rid of the problem:
1) Uninstalled code::blocks completely from the PC and downloaded the IDE-only version (i.e. withouth MinGW compiler), then installed it.
2) Downloaded the latest stable version of MinGW, installed, and added C:\MinGW\bin to PATH
3) Followed rest of the instructions from [link] http://conanhung.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/opencv-2-2c-codeblocks-and-mingw-got-it-working-on-windows/
4) Just to be sure, copied the opencv .dll files from the build folder (i.e. the one that you have created "make" and "install" files using CMake) to the debug (i.e. the executables') folder.
This will fix the problems. In case, it doesn't it might be that you need to add some environment variables.