I got dbset for table Functions in database and FunctionsContext: dbContext. I am implementing repository. In my interface I have only one function at the movement "GetFunctions". I got stuck in implementing class; method "GetFunctions" where I need to call FunctionsContext to get all list of available functions title from database and then send to controller class
I am using mvc5 asp.net and entity framework
dbContext
public class FunctionsContext : dbContext
{
public DbSet<App_Functions> Functions { get; set; }
}
model
[Table("Functions")]
public class App_Functions
{
[Key]
public int Function_ID { get; set; }
[StringLength(50)]
[Required]
public string Title { get; set; }
public int Hierarchy_level { get; set; }
}
Domain Class
public class Functions
{
public Functions()
{
}
public int Function_ID { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public int Hierarchy_level { get; set; }
}
IRepository
interface IFunctionRepository: IDisposable
{
IQueryable<Functions> GetFunctions { get; }
}
IRepository Implementation class
public class FunctionRepository : IFunctionRepository
{
private FunctionsContext fun_Context = new FunctionsContext();
public IQueryable<Functions>GetFunctions
{
?????????
}
}
what I want to implement in IQueryableGetFunctions
using (var db = new FunctionsContext())
{
var query = from b in db.Functions
orderby b.Function_ID
select b;
foreach (var item in query)
{
var a2 = item.Title;
}
}
I think the easiest way will be the following:
public IQueryable<Functions> GetFunctions()
{
return fun_Context.Functions.Select(x=>new Functions {
Function_ID = x.Function_ID,
Title = x.Title,
Hierarchy_level = x.Hierarchy_level
});
}
You have to add () after the method name, this declaration does not work 'public IQueryable GetFunctions'
IRepository Implementation class
public class FunctionRepository : IFunctionRepository
{
private FunctionsContext fun_Context = new FunctionsContext();
// For method declaration add the () after the method name
public IQueryable<Functions> GetFunctions()
{
return fun_Context.Functions;
}
}
Related
i am using Database first method. EDMX file generated default Dbset(TableName) for me.
myDbContext.Table1.ToList();
myDbContext.Table2.ToList();
Can we have a ModelView Class which pull both table out with single line?
Instead of
Table1=myDbContext.Table1.ToList();
Table2=myDbContext.Table2.ToList();
can we have like
ModelView=myDbContext.ModelView;
Updated
public partial class ProductTb
{
public string ProductID { get; set; }
public string ProductArticleNumber { get; set; }
public string ProductName { get; set; }
}
public partial class ProductTbTWO
{
public string ProductID { get; set; }
public string ProductArticleNumber { get; set; }
public string ProductName { get; set; }
}
public class ProductModelView
{
public ProductTb{get;set;}
public ProductTbTWO{get;set}
}
Create a Partial Class of your DbContext and add your custom Code.
public partial class MyDbContext
{
private MyDbContext(string contextName) : base(contextName) { }
public static MyDbContextCreate() {
return new MyDbContext(ContextName);
}
public ProductModelView ModelView {// Get ProductTb and ProductTbTWO}
}
and use it var myDbContext= MyDbContext.Create() and myDbContext.ModelView
But I don't recommend to do something like that, Add a Service class to with public method to get your code, Data Layer shouldn't deal with View Models
i prefer using static class:
public static class Utilities
{
public static ProductModelView getProductViewModel()
{
using (var db = new myDbContext()
{
var vm = new ProductModelView();
vm.ProductTb = db.ProductTb.ToList();
vm.ProductTbTWO = db.ProductTbTWO.ToList();
return vm;
}
}
}
you can call it like:
var vm = Utilities.getProductViewModel();
Domain Model
public abstract class BaseClass
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Something1 { get; set; }
public int Something2 { get; set; }
public string Something3 { get; set; }
}
public class PQR1 : BaseClass
{
public int value1 { get; set; }
}
public class PQR2 : BaseClass
{
public int value2 { get; set; }
}
public class PQR3 : BaseClass
{
public int value2 { get; set; }
}
Context Class
public class PQRContext : DbContext
{
public PQRContext() : base ("PQR")
{
}
public DbSet<BaseClass> Baseclass { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<BaseClass>().
Map<PQR1>(m => m.Requires("Type").HasValue("Value1"))
.Map<PQR2>(m => m.Requires("Type").HasValue("Value2"))
.Map<PQR3>(m => m.Requires("Type").HasValue("Value3"));
}
}
It'll create table like this:
But I don't know how to use this table while coding, I get stuck like this
So I can't access to another classes like PQR1, PQR2,PQR3 where as I have no reason to insert data into base class which is already abstract.
First option :
You are not restricted on DbSet creations. You can create many DbSet as much as you need for your derived classes like the code below and access them like you will do with other DbSet :
public DbSet<BaseClass> Baseclass { get; set; }
public DbSet<PQR1> PQR1s { get; set; }
public DbSet<PQR2> PQR2s { get; set; }
public DbSet<PQR3> PQR3s { get; set; }
You use the DbSet related to the derived you want for inserting into or requesting your context.
Second option :
For querying your context and get only the desired subclass entities you can use the generic method OfType<T> which act as a filter like this:
var myBaseClassList = myContext.BaseClass; // Retrieve all PQR1, PQR2 and PQR3 entities
var myPQR1List = myContext.BaseClass.OfType<PQR1>(); // Retrieve all PQR1
var myPQR2List = myContext.BaseClass.OfType<PQR2>(); // Retrieve all PQR2
var myPQR3List = myContext.BaseClass.OfType<PQR3>(); // Retrieve all PQR3
For inserting you can create an instance of your derived class and add it directly to your base class DbSet :
var pqr1 = new PQR1() { /* set my properties */ };
myCOntext.BaseClass.Add(pqr1); // EF knows how to insert data for classes that use TPH.
In my mvc application i have a base model as below
namespace ModulericaV1.Models
{
public class BaseModel
{
private ApplicationDbContext db = new ApplicationDbContext();
public DateTime? CrDate { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("CrUser")]
public ApplicationUser UserCr { get; set; }
public string CrUser { get; set; }
public DateTime? MdDate { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("MdUser")]
public ApplicationUser UserMd { get; set; }
public string MdUser { get; set; }
public bool IsDeleted { get; set; }
public ApplicationUser GetUserObject(string id)
{
var UserObject = db.Users.Find(id);
return UserObject;
}
public void LogBasic()
{
if (this.CrDate == null)
{
this.CrDate = System.DateTime.Now;
this.CrUser = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.GetUserId();
}
else
{
this.MdDate = System.DateTime.Now;
this.MdUser = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.GetUserId();
}
}
}
}
All my models inherits the :BaseModel. What i am trying to do, calling LogBasic() method for all Create and Update DB queries so i can log which user create new row or made changes.
Where is the place should i need to call LogBasic() method .
Probably something like this should work:
public class ApplicationDbContext : DbContext {
// ...
public override int SaveChanges () {
if(HasChanges()){
foreach(var entry in Entries<BaseModel>()){
((BaseModel)entry.Entity).LogBasic();
}
}
}
// ...
}
The best place to do this is in the ApplicationDbContext on the SaveChanges() method. You can iterate through all of the items that are pending updates and then if they are of a BaseModel, log them.
I don't have the exact syntax to hand, but this is the idea:
public class ApplicationDbContext : DbContext
{
//.....
public override int SaveChanges()
{
foreach(var entity in this.ChangeTracker.Entries)
{
var baseModel = entity as BaseModel;
if(baseModel!=null)
{
switch(entity.State)
{
case State.Modified;
// Do things with an updated version
case State.Deleted:
// Do things with the deleted version
case State.Added:
{
// Do things with the Added entity
baseModel.LogBasic();
break;
}
}
}
base.SaveChanges();
}
}
I have an ASP.NET MVC application which uses Entity Framework to get data.
I need to transform Entites to Models before passing them to View. Projections can be very complex, but to keep it simple:
public static IQueryable<UserModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<User> users)
{
return from user in users
select new UserModel
{
Name = user.Name,
Email = user.Email,
};
}
This can be used in a controller like this:
return View(Repository.Users.ToModel().ToList());
Very good. But what if I want to use this projection inside another one? Example:
public static IQueryable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<BlogPost> blogs)
{
return from blogs in blogs
select new BlogPostModel
{
Title = blog.Title,
Authors = blog.Authors.AsQueryable().ToModel(), // (entities are POCOs)
// This does not work, because EF does not understand method ToModel().
};
}
(let's suppose blog can have more then one author and it is of type User).
Can I somehow separate the projections and reuse them inside another ones?
Here's something that actually works (in a simple test application) to only select the requested fields:
namespace Entities
{
public class BlogPost
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime Created { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<User> Authors { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
public virtual string Email { get; set; }
public virtual byte[] Password { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<BlogPost> BlogPosts { get; set; }
}
}
namespace Models
{
public class BlogPostModel
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<UserModel> Authors { get; set; }
}
public class UserModel
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
}
public static class BlogPostModelExtensions
{
public static readonly Expression<Func<BlogPost, BlogPostModel>> ToModelConverterExpression =
p =>
new BlogPostModel
{
Title = p.Title,
Authors = p.Authors.AsQueryable().Select(UserModelExtensions.ToModelConverterExpression),
};
public static readonly Func<BlogPost, BlogPostModel> ToModelConverterFunction = ToModelConverterExpression.Compile();
public static IQueryable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<BlogPost> blogPosts)
{
return blogPosts.Select(ToModelConverterExpression);
}
public static IEnumerable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IEnumerable<BlogPost> blogPosts)
{
return blogPosts.Select(ToModelConverterFunction);
}
}
public static class UserModelExtensions
{
public static readonly Expression<Func<User, UserModel>> ToModelConverterExpression =
u =>
new UserModel
{
Name = u.Name,
Email = u.Email,
};
public static readonly Func<User, UserModel> ToModelConverterFunction = ToModelConverterExpression.Compile();
public static IQueryable<UserModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<User> users)
{
return users.Select(ToModelConverterExpression);
}
public static IEnumerable<UserModel> ToModel(this IEnumerable<User> users)
{
return users.Select(ToModelConverterFunction);
}
}
}
To test it without actually creating a database:
var blogPostsQuery = (
from p in context.BlogPosts
where p.Title.StartsWith("a")
select p).ToModel();
Console.WriteLine(((ObjectQuery)blogPostQuery).ToTraceString());
I'm trying out Entity Framework Code first CTP4. Suppose I have:
public class Parent
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class Child
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public Parent Mother { get; set; }
}
public class TestContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Parent> Parents { get; set; }
public DbSet<Child> Children { get; set; }
}
public class ChildEdit
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int MotherId { get; set; }
}
Mapper.CreateMap<Child, ChildEdit>();
Mapping to the Edit model is not a problem. On my screen I select the mother through some control (dropdownlist, autocompleter, etc) and the Id of the mother gets posted in back:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(ChildEdit posted)
{
var repo = new TestContext();
var mapped = Mapper.Map<ChildEdit, Child>(posted); // <------- ???????
}
How should I solve the last mapping? I don't want to put Mother_Id in the Child object. For now I use this solution, but I hope it can be solved in Automapper.
Mapper.CreateMap<ChildEdit, Child>()
.ForMember(i => i.Mother, opt => opt.Ignore());
var mapped = Mapper.Map<ChildEdit, Child>(posted);
mapped.Mother = repo.Parents.Find(posted.MotherId);
EDIT
This works, but now I have to do that for each foreign key (BTW: context would be injected in final solution):
Mapper.CreateMap<ChildEdit, Child>();
.ForMember(i => i.Mother,
opt => opt.MapFrom(o =>
new TestContext().Parents.Find(o.MotherId)
)
);
What I'd really like would be:
Mapper.CreateMap<int, Parent>()
.ForMember(i => i,
opt => opt.MapFrom(o => new TestContext().Parents.Find(o))
);
Mapper.CreateMap<ChildEdit, Child>();
Is that possible with Automapper?
First, I'll assume that you have a repository interface like IRepository<T>
Afterwards create the following class:
public class EntityConverter<T> : ITypeConverter<int, T>
{
private readonly IRepository<T> _repository;
public EntityConverter(IRepository<T> repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
public T Convert(ResolutionContext context)
{
return _repository.Find(System.Convert.ToInt32(context.SourceValue));
}
}
Basically this class will be used to do all the conversion between an int and a domain entity. It uses the "Id" of the entity to load it from the Repository. The IRepository will be injected into the converter using an IoC container, but more and that later.
Let's configure the AutoMapper mapping using:
Mapper.CreateMap<int, Mother>().ConvertUsing<EntityConverter<Mother>>();
I suggest creating this "generic" mapping instead so that if you have other references to "Mother" on other classes they're mapped automatically without extra-effort.
Regarding the Dependency Injection for the IRepository, if you're using Castle Windsor, the AutoMapper configuration should also have:
IWindsorContainer container = CreateContainer();
Mapper.Initialize(map => map.ConstructServicesUsing(container.Resolve));
I've used this approach and it works quite well.
Here's how I did it: (using ValueInjecter)
I made the requirements a little bigger just to show how it works
[TestFixture]
public class JohnLandheer
{
[Test]
public void Test()
{
var child = new Child
{
Id = 1,
Name = "John",
Mother = new Parent { Id = 3 },
Father = new Parent { Id = 9 },
Brother = new Child { Id = 5 },
Sister = new Child { Id = 7 }
};
var childEdit = new ChildEdit();
childEdit.InjectFrom(child)
.InjectFrom<EntityToInt>(child);
Assert.AreEqual(1, childEdit.Id);
Assert.AreEqual("John", childEdit.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(3, childEdit.MotherId);
Assert.AreEqual(9, childEdit.FatherId);
Assert.AreEqual(5, childEdit.BrotherId);
Assert.AreEqual(7, childEdit.SisterId);
Assert.AreEqual(0, childEdit.Sister2Id);
var c = new Child();
c.InjectFrom(childEdit)
.InjectFrom<IntToEntity>(childEdit);
Assert.AreEqual(1, c.Id);
Assert.AreEqual("John", c.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(3, c.Mother.Id);
Assert.AreEqual(9, c.Father.Id);
Assert.AreEqual(5, c.Brother.Id);
Assert.AreEqual(7, c.Sister.Id);
Assert.AreEqual(null, c.Sister2);
}
public class Entity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
public class Parent : Entity
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class Child : Entity
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Parent Mother { get; set; }
public Parent Father { get; set; }
public Child Brother { get; set; }
public Child Sister { get; set; }
public Child Sister2 { get; set; }
}
public class ChildEdit
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int MotherId { get; set; }
public int FatherId { get; set; }
public int BrotherId { get; set; }
public int SisterId { get; set; }
public int Sister2Id { get; set; }
}
public class EntityToInt : LoopValueInjection
{
protected override bool TypesMatch(Type sourceType, Type targetType)
{
return sourceType.IsSubclassOf(typeof(Entity)) && targetType == typeof(int);
}
protected override string TargetPropName(string sourcePropName)
{
return sourcePropName + "Id";
}
protected override bool AllowSetValue(object value)
{
return value != null;
}
protected override object SetValue(object sourcePropertyValue)
{
return (sourcePropertyValue as Entity).Id;
}
}
public class IntToEntity : LoopValueInjection
{
protected override bool TypesMatch(Type sourceType, Type targetType)
{
return sourceType == typeof(int) && targetType.IsSubclassOf(typeof(Entity));
}
protected override string TargetPropName(string sourcePropName)
{
return sourcePropName.RemoveSuffix("Id");
}
protected override bool AllowSetValue(object value)
{
return (int)value > 0;
}
protected override object SetValue(object sourcePropertyValue)
{
// you could as well do repoType = IoC.Resolve(typeof(IRepo<>).MakeGenericType(TargetPropType))
var repoType = typeof (Repo<>).MakeGenericType(TargetPropType);
var repo = Activator.CreateInstance(repoType);
return repoType.GetMethod("Get").Invoke(repo, new[] {sourcePropertyValue});
}
}
class Repo<T> : IRepo<T> where T : Entity, new()
{
public T Get(int id)
{
return new T{Id = id};
}
}
private interface IRepo<T>
{
T Get(int id);
}
}
It's possible to define the foreign key in EF this way as well:
[ForeignKey("MotherId")]
public virtual Parent Mother { get; set; }
public int MotherId { get; set; }
In this case, It's not necessary to do an extra query to find the Mother. Just Assign the ViewModel's MotherId to the Model's MotherId.