I asks these questions because I assume that the main page www.dartlang.org is similar to "download page" because possible direct DOWNLOAD DART (without redirect to download page) from this page without requirement to read additional information.
When I want download Java I can read similar information on the download page.
Version 7 Update 45
This means that this is a version 7 with the 45 update. I assume it last stable.
When I want download Dart I can read similar information on the download page (www.dartlang.org).
CURRENT STABLE VERSION OF DART: 30188
How I can get information how many updates released after major version?
Is this means that Dart has 1.0 rev 30188?
In my Editor (that I use) version is version 1.0.1_r30657 (DEV). It downloaded automatically.
Which version I use?
I think it is not stable because CURRENT STABLE VERSION OF DART is 30188.
How to avoid in Editor to download unstable versions?
How to allow the Editor to download latest stable versions?
Or I must use two systems (possible virtual) separately. One for the production and another for the development?
How I can get information how many updates released after major version?
You'll have to ask Google, they're not really doing comprehensive release notes right now because it just went to version 1. In the future, major version changes might be tracked on the language spec page.
I think it is not stable because CURRENT STABLE VERSION OF DART is 30188
Well, your version isn't considered stable because it's a dev release. A release can be stable even if it's not the most current.
How to avoid in Editor to download unstable versions? How to allow the Editor to download latest stable versions?
Only download the current stable version provided by Google. Not sure how your editor is downloading something automatically, the Dart Editor downloads directly from dartlang.org are packaged with the specified version of the language.
For older builds, check this out - http://gsdview.appspot.com/dart-editor-archive-integration/ .
Updates are not counted in Dart the way they are counted in Java
30188 is a continuous build number. Not every increment is a release. In fact between two updates differ usually by more than one build number.
A stable version is never the most current. The most current are builds from source (bleeding edge) from the development branch.
If you download the development version it updates itself with updates from the development channel. If you download a stable version it updates itself only with stable updates.
You can change the configuration so that the editor doesn't download updates automatically.
Hope this helps
Additionally to the other answers: If you want to use the stable build, you have to download it from dartlang.org. You probably have the DEV version because you used the Editor before Dart went to 1.0:
All existing users that has been with us from pre 1.0 days have been automatically updated to the dev channel.
https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/d/msg/misc/UXRMVmX_6EQ/CSEHZ5c_HBYJ
I guess you have downloaded Dart Editor before the release of the first stable and you are updating it right from the Dart Editor environment. The version 1.0.1_r30657 (DEV) you wrote is the unstable dev release (as it was before the release of the first stable) and it automatically updates only to the dev releases.
For the latest stable release, you should download the current stable version of Dart 1.0.0_r30188 (STABLE) on the Dart Editor website https://www.dartlang.org/tools/editor/. It automatically updates only to the stable releases.
P.S.: If you want to get back the dev version, the link is right under the stable download link on the Dart Editor website
Related
Let’s imagine I have an iOS app. In version 2.0, I added a bunch of new features, but to implement them, I had to drop support for an older iOS version which is still in heavy use (remember, it’s a hypothetical scenario).
Later, I discovered a super critical bug in version 1.0 of my app that needs to be patched.
What are my options in terms of distribution?
It seems that it’s not possible to release version 1.0.1 if version 2.0 is already on the App Store. Adding back support for the older iOS version and fixing the bug in 2.0.1 is not feasible because that would require removal of the new features.
The problem here is that I can’t think of a way you could submit a version that updates version 1 without letting your version 2 users download it. So if you want to update version 1 you will just have to bite the bullet and meld your versions together. Use availability so that the new features are not present for your version 1 users.
I am running gitlab-ce in docker containers. I am currently using version 10.5.4. I want to update because of a few bugs with kubernetes in this old version.
Reading the documentation Here the advice is to "first upgrade to the latest available minor version within your major version."
But reading other docs Here says I should update through each minor version. Is that just to avoid downtime?
What is the simplest Upgrade path for me to 11.8, if we're not too worried about downtime?
For anyone else reading it, the quote from the first link is:
We recommend that you first upgrade to the latest available minor version within your major version. By doing this, you can address any deprecation messages that could change behavior in the next major release.
Based on the table below that, the GitLab upgrade path would be 10.5.4 -> 10.8.(latest), fix the deprecations, then 10.8 -> 11.8. The page makes clear that one can (probably) jump between any patch/minor versions without going through the intermediate steps:
It is considered safe to jump between patch versions and minor versions within one major version.
The second source is presumably the Upgrading without Downtime section immediately below the one linked in the question.
Starting with GitLab 9.1.0 it’s possible to upgrade to a newer major, minor, or patch version of GitLab without having to take your GitLab instance offline. However, for this to work there are the following requirements:
You can only upgrade 1 minor release at a time. So from 9.1 to 9.2, not to 9.3.
It then provides details on background processes required for migrations. These are substantial, so it makes sense that jumping multiple minor versions could be a bit much is not recommended. One minor version at a time for upgrading without downtime. Useful once you are up-to-date, but may be worth skipping with so many minor versions to get through.
So I upgraded to 1.4 for a project I am contributing to (in development/testing branch of course) and ran into some problems and thus we want to use Dart 1.3.6 again. However, I cannot find this.
Does anyone know where I could download it?
I have seen and starred https://code.google.com/p/dart/issues/detail?id=18323
as I was putting this question together, but of course seems like there is no more movement there just yet.
I think I pretty much ran into similar issues to what corgath described in comments on this question... looking for the right version in those "archives" where the "latest" is not really the latest anymore.
Update
There is now a nice page to select and download specific Dart versions https://www.dartlang.org/tools/download-archive/
Since a while there are also deb packages available which can be installed using
sudo apt-get install dart=1.7.0-dev.0.1.*
see https://www.dartlang.org/tools/debian.html for more details.
Original
You can download from
http://gsdview.appspot.com/dart-archive/channels/stable/release/
The list only contains the build number but each folder contains a file VERSION that contains detailed version information for this build.
dev channel releases can be found here
http://gsdview.appspot.com/dart-archive/channels/dev/release/
there are also unsigned raw builds (bleeding edge) but it is not recommended to use them.
http://gsdview.appspot.com/dart-archive/channels/be/raw/release/
I have installed the Zeos 7 Beta on my own machine but it fails on my client's laptop. We're both running Delphi xe2, his is Entreprise, mine is Pro. His machine is running 64-bit windows 7, mine is running Window 7 32-bit.
When I do Compile all on ZeosDbo or ProjectGoup16 it seems to get through ZCore.dpk but then shows 2 fatal errors:
ZCore.dpk(1) E2225 Never-build package 'ZCore' must be recompiled
ZParseSQL.dpk(33) E2202 Required package 'ZCore' not found
This is production code we are working on, so I hope we can find a solution and get back to working on this
Zeos forum thread: http://zeos.firmos.at/viewtopic.php?t=3633
That is one error, the 1st one. The second is merely post-effect.
Perhaps you can do better than downloading beta ZIPs: until they have mature release you just can download each day "nightly" changes by version-control tools, like Git or SVN or whatever Zeos team is using.
Such errors are usually quickly fixed (they are simple) but long released(they are so moot that no one would bother making release for them).
Just open http://zeos.firmos.at/portal.php and read where to get most instant updates and how to report problems.
Actually - there it is, http://svn.code.sf.net/p/zeoslib/code-0/trunk/
Install TortoiseSVN and be on the edge until 7.0.1 or 7.0.2 final release
The page also says: Please report bugs for this version to our brand new bugtracker on sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/p/zeoslib/tickets/
Please do. Open Source is about participating. At least participate by registering bugs.
About the essence of problem read official documentation and "See Also" section.
Someone should decide about package binary update strategy. And the decision should be kept for all packages (okay, you can mix it in some conditions, but that is not to be suggested). So basically you have three choices:
Make your own decision and put all Zeos packages into the strategy of your choice. That puts the responsibility upon yourself to maintain this fork for a while until you come back to vanilla ZeosDB.
Report the bug to ZeosDB team and ask their suggestion, then change those settings for all the packages as suggested by them.
Report the bug to ZeosDB team and wait until they'd fix it in their SVN and then do SVN Update.
Personally i'd go with 1 option, but i am ready to be FLOSS libraries co-developer.
Option 3 would be the most slow yet the most easy for you.
Option 2... well... i can not see why you should choose that, except for trying to avoid version controls at any cost, which is bad idea per se.
I also suggest you to read http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
That would help you effectively communicate at ZeosDB forums - and you'd have to if you want to be "on the edge" (and if you do not - then wait for public release like 7.0.2).
There seems to be a great deal of enthusiasm about OmniXML, but omnixml.com is offline and the Google Code project is empty. What happened to this library and where can I find the code (since it's open source)?
The OmniXML Google Code project does have source available if you click on the "Source" link, but you'll need a Subversion client to get the source.
I made a local Mercurial repository with the releases I could easily collect and a few modifications. I'll archive the entire repo and throw it online for anyone to download...
It's available at http://www.traumazone.com/OmniXML.7z
Changes from the official source:
Support for xml:space attribute as created by Ondřej Pokorný
Shuffled source around and created Delphi 2007 and XE packages
Updated 3rd party units with latest versions from upstream sources (e.g. jedi.inc, GpDelphiUnits)
Add optional useBoolStrs parameter to SetNodeTextBool
The Mercurial history is available in the archive, so you can always roll back to a different release (what few I bothered to collect).