In our web application we have some pages that may take long time to generate. The reason is that they need information that takes between few seconds and few minutes to calculate. Once the data is calculated it is cached and access is very fast.
During the time the system calculate the information we want to show the user some message and not just leave the browser spinning.
The question is how to architect the URL schema:
Use the same URLs and return a different content that show the "loading" sign and reload every few seconds.
Redirect the client (302 temporary) to another URL which redirect the client back to the real URL once the information is ready.
Please take into account we have several URLs that use that same data:
/index/{id}
/export/{id}
So using option 1 will keep the URL schema simpler but will not be so friendly with output cache and cache in general.
I've decide to use option #1 and use the same URL.
The main reason for doing that is that it's much easier to support url parameters the user enter when the long operation had to be done. If I would have redirect to another URL I had to keep those parameters.
I do ensure to update cache headers to ensure the client will not cache the "loading" screen.
Related
My client redirects to a https://domain.com/Controller/GetInfo?Querystring method. Now my query string is getting dangerously close to the 2K limit, so I need to reproduce this behavior but pack my query string into the content of the messages. Since it would be heresy (etc.) to try a GET with content, I'll use a POST. However, I can't redirect to a POST since a Redirect has no content.
So, what I am looking for is the best MVC 5 pattern to resolve this: I need to provide lots of content, but I want the resulting page hosted on my remote server (i.e. as if I had redirected)
Also, since I use load balanced servers in azure, I'd prefer maintaining my clean stateless server if at all possible (else I'll have to introduce session caching).
#AntP is absolutely right in the comments above. If your query string is approaching 2K, then you're abusing it.
If there's a particular object you're referencing, then you can simply include the id or some other identifying piece of it and use that to look it up again from your data store.
If there's no persistent record of the object, then you can use something like Session or TempData to store it between one request and the next.
Regardless, it's not possible to redirect with a request body, with also means it's not possible to redirect using POST. The reason for this that the a redirect is not something the server does, but rather the client. The server merely suggests that the client go to a different URL. It's then up to the client (web browser) to issue a new request for that URL. Since the client is the one issuing the request, it makes the decision about what data is or isn't included in that request, not the server.
tl;dr - Is there a way to ensure that a given Rails controller action stops executing when another simultaneous request from the same user comes in?
In my Rails/Angular app, I make requests to the Foursquare API from the client-side. Because they need to be authenticated, and my authentication information should remain secure, I pass these requests through a Rails controller in my own app.
For a more in-depth description of the architecture of this, check out this semi-related question.
My concern, as elaborated there, is that each request to this internal controller takes up server time (and on Heroku, ties up a dyno). I'd tried to make the action as fast as possible, but I'd still like to reduce the amount the server is tied up.
The amount the server is tied up is exacerbated by the real-time nature of the search I'm doing. The request is sent out to my server as a user types, not on enter or anything, because I wanted to allow for auto-suggestion.
I'm debouncing the user input (0.4 seconds), so a the request isn't made til a user briefly stops typing. But if a user pauses a few times while typing, and a request goes out each time, this can quickly cause multiple dynos to get used.
More concretely, assuming a roughly ~1.3s API response time from Foursquare, imagine this scenario: A user types "ameri", then waits 0.4 seconds, then types "can", then waits 0.4 seconds, then types " beauty", completing their query. This would send three separate requests, all of which would need to be handled by different dynos, because none of the requests have a chance to return before the next comes in.
This would either cost me a ton of money (if I have a bunch of users, that means a large number of dynos to protect against concurrency timeouts) or cause really annoying waits on the user front.
So my thought would be that it would be awesome if I could essentially do a retroactive debounce on the server side, by terminating any running requests to Foursquare coming from that user before sending a new request out. That would mean that in the above concrete example, while 3 requests started, only the last request would come back, because the first two would be dropped midstream when a new one came in.
I was thinking of storing some variable in session for each that would be true when a request was executing. Then, the next request wouldn't go out if it was triggered. But that's actually sort of the opposite of what I want, because I want the original request to get canceled when the new one comes in. I just don't know how to access that request from within the latter on.
This feels complicated, so I'm guessing it may be impossible (particularly as each controller action is responded to by a new controller instance), but does anyone know a way to cancel controller actions if the same action is hit by the same user again while the first request is getting resolved?
Thanks!
I have an website build in MVC4 .NET. Now I want to tracking the time user had online in my website. Example: User open browser and then login to my website and active on my website about 30 minutes then close the browser. I want to store 30 minutes to database but I don;t know how to implement it. Please help me because I very need to do it now. Thank you so much
Here is a script that track user login/logout times on a website. It's a simple script that It has used on some of the sites. Also with this script you can see how many users are online at your site.
But the problem is when the user close the browser he do not log out. his session goes to expire
one of the other ways is global action filter that intercepts requests to all actions on all controllers, then you can get the time of each action in the database for the current user and page. To save hitting the database too hard, you could cache these values and invalidate them every few minutes, depending on how much traffic you're dealing with.
UPDATE
about Closing the Browser This is not something that's provided for in the normal web http protocol. There's no real way to know for sure when the browser closes; you can only sort of know. You have to throw together an ugly hack to get any level of certainty and even then it's bound to fail in plenty of edge cases or cause nasty side effects.
The normal work-around is to send ajax requests at intervals from the browser to your server to set up a sort of heartbeat. When the heartbeat stops, the browser closed and so you kill the session. But again: this is a horrible hack. In this case, the main problems are that it's easy to get false positives for a failed heartbeat if the server and client to get out of sync or there's a javascript error, and there's a side effect that your session will never expire on it's own.
Does anybody know if it possible to cache the image from the database?
I know that there is an OutputCache attribute for above the Action. You then could set the VaryByParam to the id of the image in the database.
But this would just save the image on the server and not on the client right?
I was hoping that er was something as a expiration header for an image. Can you add that to an image? In that way, the client is responsible for the request to the server. This saves a request to the server...
If i'm wrong, please correct me because i'm new in this kind (OutputCache and Expiration Headers) of caching.
Thanks
Output caching affects the client's caching as well so this will actually work ok for you.
See my note on caching here:
Disable browser cache for entire ASP.NET website
Someone on that thread thought that output caching was only on the server side as well but a quick test can tell you otherwise. This doesn't mean there aren't scenarios where its limited to the server (such as varying by key). I would have one action method responsible for only serving up these files. That method doesn't need to cache by key, just change your Duration to say a minute and watch your headers coming down in Fiddler to verify.
And how can the process be speeded up from a developer point of view?
There are a lot of things going on.
When you first type in an address, the browser will lookup the hostname in DNS, if it is not already in the browser cache.
Then the browser sends a HTTP GET request to the remote server.
What happens on the server is really up to the server; but it should respond back with a HTTP response, that includes headers, which perhaps describe the content to the browser and how long it is allowed to be cached. The response might be a redirect, in which case the browser will send another request to the redirected page.
Obviously, server response time will be one of the critical points for perceived performance, but there are many other things to it.
When a response is returned from the server, the browser will do a few things. First it will parse the HTML returned, and create it's DOM (Document Object Model) from that. Then it will run any startup Javascript on the page; before the page is ready to be displayed in the browser. Remember, that if the page contains any ressources such as external stylesheets, scripts, images and so on, the browser will have to download those, before it can display the page. Each resource is a separate HTTP get, and there are some latency time involved here. Therefore, one thing that in some cases can greatly reduce load times is to use as few external ressources as possible, and make sure they are cached on the client (so the browser don't have to fetch them for each page view).
To summarize, to optimize performance for a web page, you want to look at, as a minimum:
Server response time
Bandwith /content transfer time.
Make sure you have a small and simple DOM (especially if you need to support IE6).
Make sure you understand client side caching and the settings you need to set on the server.
Make sure you make the client download as little data as possible. Consider GZipping resources and perhaps dynamic content also (dependent on your situation).
Make sure you don't have any CPU intensive javascript on Page load.
You might want to read up on the HTTP Protocol, as well as some of the Best Practices. A couple of tools you can use are YSlow and Google Page Speed
What are the steps involved from entering a web site address to the page being displayed on the browser?
The steps are something like:
Get the IP address of the URL
Create a TCP (HTTP) connection to the IP address, and request the specified page
Receive/download the page via TCP/HTTP; the page may consist of several files/downloads: e.g. the HTML document, CSS files, javascript files, image files ...
Render the page
And how can the process be speeded up from a developer point of view?
Measure to discover which of these steps is slow:
It's only worth optimizing whichever step is the slow one (no point in optimizing steps which are already fast)
The answer to your question varies depending on which step it is.