Performance Enhancement in Orbeon Forms - orbeon

I have a set of 10 controls in a single page.
When i am entering one field, a 'Loading.....' symbol occurs on the top of the page.
But still i am able to edit the other fields in the same page.
Is there any methods (or) functions in Orbeon which will blur all other fields when one field is entered with the values?
So that no field will be editable.
For Eg:when some pop-windows opens all other fields at the back will be made blurred and non-editable.
Similarly it must be for fields in the same page

There is no way, out-of-the-box, to "blur" all the other fields while a user is entering data in one field.
The Loading indicator tells users that information is being exchanged between the browser and the server in the background, just as if you had an indication "Autosaving…", but I don't really see why or in which situation preventing the user from filling out another field while this is happening would be useful. (This is somewhat off-topic, purely based on your question, but if you have feedback on this, feel free to leave a comment below.)

Related

Validation error messages disappear when Trinidad component panelAccordion is minimized or maximized

I have a form that is very long but is submitted and validated all together. I need to break it up into sections.
I have tried using the Trinidad component panelAccordion to break the form into sections.
However if I then submit and validate the form, clicking one of the panels open or closed causes the validation messages to disappear.
Is there any way to avoid this?
Or is there a better way to achieve the same result of breaking up the form?
I am using Trinidad 1.2.6 and MyFaces 2.0.
Due to corporate standards I cannot use anything else.
One way you can achieve the desired effect is by submitting the form when a user clicks on each <tr:accordionPanel>. It supports many other client side events so pick one that best suits your needs.If you submit the entire form, this will force validation to kick in for all components however, whether the user entered a value or not. This might be the quickest and simplest way but some people might be picky and not like this solution.
You can also make use of partial updates and partial triggers and submit only the components that are part of the current accordion panel based on the event you choose.

How does Rails persist text in input field?

I have a regular text input field, whose value is submitted via AJAX. After I migrate away from this page, and hit Back button, I can still see the value of the field there.
My questions are:
Does most of modern browsers support this user-entered values?
How can I remove the persisted value using Rails?
Thank you.
Your browser is remembering the form input values and displaying them when you go back. This likely doesn't have anything to do with Rails*.
You can't really do anything via Ruby/Rails code to change this behavior, but you can do it with JavaScript. Here's a random SO question that covers it: Reset form on Back button.
I'm not sure if there's a perfect way to handle this in every browser. Also note that many users would prefer that the browser keep the form values they've entered.
Note: I only qualify with "likely" because it is possible to write an app that explicitly remembers form values and restores them when the page is visited again, but by default, Rails isn't going to do that. It'd involve a fair bit of Rails and JavaScript code.
Does most of modern browsers support this user-entered values?
Yes, I believe they all support it to various degrees
How can I remove the persisted value using Rails?
This is a client side issue, not a Rails issue. You could use javascript to clear the input fields
A similar question and answer: Clear all fields in a form upon going back with browser back button
BFCache? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Working_with_BFCache

Are manual activation and password reset pages still necessary?

I'm currently coding all of the account management functionality for my site, and have already implemented the account activation and password reset systems by e-mail. The e-mails each contain a link to a servlet (with the appropriate parameters attached to the end), which does all the processing. Tests for the systems have gone well, however I have one question.
If the link's text is the same as its address, is there any reason to include traditional manual activation/password reset page (a page with a form where the request parameters in the activation or reset link would be entered in to the appropriate fields)? If the link doesn't work in the e-mail, the user can always copy and paste it. Is there any particular reason why sites still have seperate pages dedicated to these actions? And should I allow it?
You never know for certain the kind of transformations your email will undergo before being displayed to the person that will eventually use your reset facility. Combined with clueless users this may pose a problem.
An example: Since reset/activation links can be quite long they may be partially wrapped onto a new line after a transformation from HTML to plain text. Inevitably this will someday happen to a user that does not know how to deal with that situation.
Therefore it might prudent to provide the backup method of just entering the code in a text field which on submit performs the GET that was intended in the first place.
You are of course free to decide that your site does not need the business of said type of user and skip implementation of the manual method!

View terms and conditions without losing form inputs?

I have a form that allows users to view some terms and conditions, which causes them to leave the current page. When they come back, the form is blank.
How can I store their inputs so they don't lose what they've already entered?
I would rather avoid popups if possible.
You could make the link to the Terms and Conditions open in a new tab/window (target="_blank"), or you could use a modal dialog to overlay the Terms and Conditions info in the same page.
I don't know Ruby/RoR though.
If the term and condition is mandatory, why don't you load it in the first place and then you can easily manipulate it using lightbox/fancybox or simple javascript.

Preventing double HTTP POST

I have made a little app for signing up for an event. User input their data and click "sign me in".
Now sometimes people are double in the database, the exact same data that got inserted 2 times very quickly after each other. This can only mean someone clicked the button twice, which caused two posts to happen.
This is common web problem, as credit card apps and forum apps often say: "Clicking once is enough!".
I guess you could solve it by checking for the exact same data to see if the post is unique, but I wonder if there are other methods.
This ofcourse does not count for ASP.NET webforms, because POST doesn't matter as much.
While JavaScript solutions can disable the submit button after it has been clicked, this will have no effect on those people who have JavaScript disabled. You should always make things work correctly without JavaScript before adding it in, otherwise there's no point as users will still be able to bypass the checks by just disabling JavaScript.
If the page where the form appears is dynamically generated, you can add a hidden field which contains some sort of sequence number, a hash, or anything unique. Then you have some server-side validation that will check if a request with that unique value has already come in. When the user submits the form, the unique value is checked against a list of "used" values. If it exists in the list, it's a dupe request and can be discarded. If it doesn't exist, then add it to the list and process as normal. As long as you make sure the value is unique, this guarantees the same form cannot be submitted twice.
Of course, if the page the form is on is not dynamically generated, then you'll need to do it the hard way on the server-side to check that the same information has not already been submitted.
Most of the answers so far have been client-side. On the server-side, you can generate a hidden field with a GUID when you first produce the form, and then record that GUID as a submitted form when the post is received. Check it before doing any more processing.
Whenever a page is requested from the server , generate a unique requestToken , save it in server side,mark status as NOT Processed and pass it along with the current requested page. Now whenever a page submit happens , get the requestToken from the "POST"ed data and check the status and save the data or take alternate action.
Most of the banking applications use this technique to prevent double "POST"ing.So this is a time proven & reliable way of preventing double submissions.
A user-side solution is to disable the submission button via Javascript after the first click.
It has drawbacks, but I see it often used on e-commerce websites.
But, it won't never replace a real server-side validation.
Client side techniques are useful, but you may want to couple it with some server side techniques.
One way to do this is to include a unique token in the form (e.g. a GUID or similar), so that when you come to process the form you can check to see whether the token has already been used, preventing a double submission.
In your case, if you have a table with event visitors, you might include this token as a column.
A client-only solution won't be enough, as stated in many of the answers here. You need to go with a server-side fail-safe.
An often overlooked reason that disabling the submit button doesn't work is, the user can simply refresh the submit target (and click OK on the "are you sure you want to resubmit the POST data?" dialog). Or even, some browsers may implicitly reload the submitted page when you try to save the page to disk (for example, you're trying to save a hard-copy of an order confirmation).
Almost no one has js disabled.
Think about coding your e-commerce website for the 70 year old woman who double clicks every link and button.
All you want to do is add a javascript to prevent her clicking "Order Now" twice.
Yes - check this at the server side too "be defensive" - but don't code for that case. But for the sake of a better UI do it on the client side too.
Here are some scripts that I found:
//
// prevent double-click on submit
//
jQuery('input[type=submit]').click(function(){
if(jQuery.data(this, 'clicked')){
return false;
}
else{
jQuery.data(this, 'clicked', true);
return true;
}
});
and
// Find ALL <form> tags on your page
$('form').submit(function(){
// On submit disable its submit button
$('input[type=submit]', this).attr('disabled', 'disabled');
});
None of the solutions address a load-balance server.
If you have some load balancer, send a UUID (or any type of unique number) to the server to store and read again will not work well if the server is not aware of other servers, because each request could be processed by a different server in a stateless environment. These servers need to read/write to the same place.
If you have multiple servers you will need to have some shared cache (like a Redis) among the servers to read/write the unique value in the same place (what could be an over-engineering solution, but works).
Client side alteration is a common technique:
Disable submit button
Change the screen to a "please wait" screen
If the form was modal, changing the screen back to their usual process (this has the benefit of making things look really slick)
But it's not perfect. It all relies on JS being available and if that's not the case, without back-end duplication detection, you'll get duplicates still.
So my advice is to develop some sort of detection behind the scenes and then improve your form to stop people with JS being able to double-submit.
You can track the number of times the form's been submitted and compare it to the number of unique visits to the page with the form on it in the session.
Beside the many good techniques already mentioned, another simple server-side method, that has the drawback of requiring a session, is to have a session variable that is switched off on the first submit.

Resources