Is there a way to make a sprite rotate after contact with other sprites but without having frictional forces applied to it?
If i set
sprite.physicsBody.friction = 0.0;
sprite.physicsBody.allowsRotation = YES;
no rotation occurs.
If you want a body to rotate upon sliding contact with other bodies, some friction is necessary. (Just like in real-world physics!) Do you want friction to cause rotation, but exhibit frictionless behavior once it's rotating? If so, rereading the previous sentence should give a clue to the answer: you need to change the friction coefficient after the body starts rotating. Setting a contact delegate gives you an opportunity to make this change. It's also good for just about any other case where you want to "fudge" the results of a collision after it occurs, such as re-setting the body's velocity to a predetermined value.
If you want to manage the rotation by yourself, you can detect the collision with the delegate and the apply angular impulse like this
[sprite.physicsBody applyAngularImpulse:0.05];
Maybe I'm not getting the point but what you seem to want to do is really just:
sprite.zRotation = 1.0; // Note: zRotation is in radians
Or use SKAction rotateToAngle:duration: if you want the rotation to occur over a period of time.
Related
Does anyone have any idea how I can make my SKSpriteNode defy gravity? I thought of inverting the default gravity but realise I also need things to fall too!
It seems like it should be easy but reading through the documentation I can’t see how I would do it!
Thanks
Update: In iOS 8 / OS X Yosemite (10.10), physics fields provide an elegant solution to these sorts of problems. Here's a quick take on using them to add buoyancy (for a specific set of nodes) to your scene.
Create an SKFieldNode with the linearGravityFieldWithVector constructor, providing a vector that's the opposite of gravity, and add the field node to your scene.
Set the fieldBitMask on your balloons to something unique.
Set the categoryBitMask on the field to something that overlaps with the balloons' fieldBitMask, but that does not overlap with the fieldBitMask of any other bodies.
Now, the balloons will rise or hold steady, but other objects will fall. Tweaking the field's strength will let you tune whether the balloons' buoyancy is perfectly balancing gravity (so that they float in place, but are disturbed when touched), or slightly more or less than gravity (so that they slowly rise or fall).
By default, a field is infinite, covering the whole scene, but you can change that with the field's region property to limit it to a portion of the scene. (This is useful if you want to simulate buoyancy in water — once an object rises past the top of the field at the water's surface, it falls back in.)
Also, if you want variable buoyancy as per #TheisEgeberg's answer, you can control its variation over distance with the falloff property.
In iOS 7 / OS X Mavericks (10.9), or if you want more precise control over which forces apply where and when, you can use the approach from my original answer below.
If you want an object to really float like a balloon — that is, to be buoyant, affected by gravity but also counteracting it — you'll need to apply a force to it on every frame (i.e. in your update: method).
Beware scaling: gravity is a constant acceleration, but if you're applying a force to counteract gravity, a force is proportional to mass. To make a vector that perfectly balances gravity for use in applyForce:, you'll need to:
scale the gravity vector by {-1,-1,-1} to point in the opposite direction
scale by the mass of the body you're applying the force to (F = ma, where gravity or anti-gravity is a).
scale by 150 — there's a bug where the SKPhysicsWorld.gravity property isn't in the same units as applyForce:. (If you turn SKPhysicsWorld gravity off and use SKFieldNode gravity instead, you don't need to do this.)
Unlike turning off affectedByGravity and applying an action to make the balloon rise, this approach works well with the rest of the physics sim. With a balancing force exactly equal to gravity, the balloon will float in place — after colliding with other things it'll return to equilibrium. If the balancing force is greater than gravity, the balloon will rise, but its rise will be hindered by other bodies in its way.
First off, an SKSpriteNode isn't affected by gravity at all. It is the SKPhysicsBody that belongs to the node that is affected by gravity.
Second...
myNode.physicsBody.afectedByGravity = NO;
:D
If you want it to rise upwards then you can add an action to it...
SKAction *moveAction = [SKAction moveByX:0 y:-10 duration:1];
SKAction *repeatingAction = [SKAction repeatActionForever:moveAction];
[myNode runAction:repeatingAction];
As many have said it's about counterforce.
So yes, you can apply a counterforce to the balloon to make it go upwards.
But to make it look like a balloon you need to understand what makes a balloon go up: Air pressure. Since the helium or whatever light gas you are using is lighter than air it will start to go up, or in other words the heavier air will go under the balloon. It's like a piece of wood in water, the heavier water will go under the wood, till the wood is soaked and gets even heavier than the water.
So what you should do is to make the counterforce adapt to the height of the balloon, the higher it gets the less pressure you apply upwards. This is a way to simulate buoyancy.
Here’s my answer:
- (MyClass *)newRisingObject
{
MyClass *risingObject = [MyClass spriteNodeWithImageNamed:#"image"];
[risingObject setPosition:CGPointMake(CGRectGetMidX(self.frame), CGRectGetMinY(self.frame))];
[risingObject setName:#"name"];
[risingObject setUserInteractionEnabled:YES];
// Physics
//
[risingObject setPhysicsBody:[SKPhysicsBody bodyWithCircleOfRadius:risingObject.size.width / 2.0f]];
[risingObject.physicsBody setRestitution:1.0f];
[risingObject.physicsBody setFriction:0.0f];
[risingObject.physicsBody setLinearDamping:0.0f];
[risingObject.physicsBody setAngularDamping:0.0f];
[risingObject.physicsBody setMass:1.3e-6f];
return risingObject;
}
.
- (void)didMoveToView:(SKView *)view
{
/* Setup your scene here */
MyClass *risingObject = [self newRisingObject];
[self addChild:risingObject];
}
.
- (void)update:(CFTimeInterval)currentTime
{
/* Called before each frame is rendered */
[self enumerateChildNodesWithName:#"name"
usingBlock:^(SKNode *node, BOOL *stop)
{
// Push object up
//
[node.physicsBody applyImpulse:CGVectorMake(0.0f, node.physicsBody.mass * OBJECT_ACCELERATION)];
}];
}
I can't change the position of a SKSpriteNode by changing
self.position = newPosition;
It doesn't work anymore if it has a physicsBody.
A workaround I got is:
self.myStar.physicsBody = nil;
[self.myStar changePosition];
self.myStar.physicsBody = [SKPhysicsBody bodyWithCircleOfRadius:self.myStar.size.width/2];
Or
[self runAction:[SKAction moveTo:newPosiion duration:0.0]];
But #2 isn't smooth. It needs to pop up on another position without a moving action.
I had the same problem. Apparently you cannot explicitly set the position of a Sprite node once it has a PhysicsBody. I solved it by temporarily removing the sprite node's PhysicsBody.
CGFloat yPosition = 400.f;
SKPhysicsBody* goldfishPhysicsBody = _goldfish.physicsBody;
_goldfish.physicsBody = nil;
_goldfish.position = CGPointMake(_goldfish.position.x, yPosition);
_goldfish.physicsBody = goldfishPhysicsBody;
Yes, you can!
I'm not sure what exactly you're doing and where exactly you run this code and what the observed effect is that you meant by "can't change position" but changing a node's position always works, whether the node has a physicsBody or not, and whether the physicsBody is dynamic or static. I verified this in a simple test project with dynamic set to both YES and NO, with both circle and edge loop body types, using both position property and move actions.
You can change the node's position either by setting the position property directly or by using a move action - both variants work. If you use a 0 duration for the move action, it effectively becomes the same as setting the position property.
So whatever problem you're observing, it's not because you can't generally change a node's position once it has a physicsBody. That's absolutely not the case.
I'm guessing you may have run into one of the following problems:
node is already running a different move action, overriding your position changes
you were looking at the wrong node (use logs to verify actual position of the node in question)
you change position elsewhere, for example setting the node's position every frame thus invalidating any other position change
if it's not one of the above, then possibly something else I couldn't think of ...
I had a problem like this where I tried to update position inside didBeginContact:, but it was not having any effect, I think because the physics simulation immediately clobbers the value.
My solution was to cache the new position in a property on my scene and then update the position of the node next time update: was called on my scene.
[SKAction moveTo:newPosition duration:0.0] worked for me, too, and there was no popping. I haven't decided yet which is more elegant.
I think the problem you are having is that in order for you to control a phsyics body, you need to set it to dynamic.
self.myStar.physicsBody.dynamic = NO;
If the dynamic property is set to YES, then the physics engine is in control of it's movement.
As noted in the comments, setting dynamic to NO shouldn't restrict movement via SKAction or position property. However, if it is set to YES, it's possible that something in the physics engine is affecting your attempt to move the node.
If you want the movement to not pop, then you need to set a duration higher than zero to your SKAction or it will pop as you have described. Setting duration to 0.0 is the same as just changing the position.
For example :
[self runAction:[SKAction moveTo:newPosition duration:1.0]];
will move the node to the new position over 1 second.
I ran into a similar problem. When using SKAction, even with duration set to 0.0 I got strange behaviours especially when two SKActions had been triggered at the same time.
I tried setting position directly but as mentioned by others this doesn't work when using the SKPhysicsContactDelegate.
However for me it worked to remove the node from its parent, I then set the new position, and other things I want to change, and then I add the node again to its former parent.
It's not ideal but in some cases it might help.
As an example with the SKPhysicsContactDelegate method didBegin:
func didBegin(_ contact: SKPhysicsContact) {
guard let node = contact.bodyB.node else { return }
node.removeFromParent()
node.position = CGPoint(x: 10, y: 10)
addChild(node)
}
Seems similar to SKSPriteNode position changes to 0,0 for no reason
As stated in answer and comments of this question, it seems you must either set the position before setting the physicsBody and/or set the physicsBody after adding the node to your scene.
I've had this problem in several scenarios and I haven't found out what exactly causes it to fail sometimes.
Yes you can, but it has its price.
I think you have to make a decision: Either let the position being calculated by the PhysicsEngine OR set the position on your behalf.
Look, for an object in a physics world, there is no magical movement from 'outside', there is only forces, collisions, drifts, ... and that will lead to any position. You can not manipulate the position without putting forces on some related nodes.
And in the moment you try BOTH, having a physicsBody (e.g. on your player), but also try to move them around by setting position manually or running actions for moving, YOU LEAVE the world of physics. Your player will be MOVED through walls and so on, against all physics rules.
So, to want an object being manipulated by the physics engine on the one hand and also to want "positioning" by code is kind a contradiction.
There are - of course ways - to combine both ways (e.g. the mentioned 'workaround' by temporarily removing the physicsBody), but this has also its price and has to be sequentially. You can not have both ways at the very same time.
I have working implementation of drag and drop feature written in Cocos2d + Box2d for iOS. I need to port it to Sprite Kit. The logic is pretty basic:
when user touching the screen, find sprite under the finger
create mouse joint between found sprite and the scene's physics body, set joint's target to position of touch
when touches moved, update joint's target to new position
when touches ended, remove the joint
Everything is working quite well. I like the way physics is simulated when touches ends - the dragged shape has velocity dependent on dragging speed and direction, so when I left my finger from the screen while moving the sprite, it will continue moving in the same direction, but now affected by gravity and damping.
Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce the same effect using Sprite Kit. There is no such joint like mouse joint, but I have tried using other joint types. I almost succeeded with SKPhysicsJointFixed - I'm creating new sprite and joint between it and dragged sprite, when touches moving I'm moving the newly created sprite. Unfortunately it doesn't work like mouse joint in Cocos2d + Box2d - while dragging the sprite, its velocity always equals zero. So, every time I left my finger from the screen, the dragged sprite stops immediately and start falling affected by gravity. No matter how fast I move the finger when dragging, after releasing dragged shape, it behaves exactly the same way.
My question is how to implement mouse joint in Sprite Kit, or how to implement drag and drop feature that works like described above?
Update:
This is a box2d mouse joint example that could give you more clear view on what I am trying to implement using Sprite Kit:
http://blog.allanbishop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Box2DJointTutorial1.swf
I'm pretty new to iOS development so I guess this might not be the best way, but this is how I solved it and it seems to work pretty smooth actually.
I'm using a UIPanGestureRecognizer to handle the touch event. I set this one up in my didMoveToView: with this code:
UIPanGestureRecognizer *gestureRecognizer = [[UIPanGestureRecognizer alloc] initWithTarget:self action:#selector(handlePan:)];
An UIPanGestureRecognizer is passed to handlePan: and I check with recognizer.state == UIGestureRecognizerStateEnded if the touched stopped. This is where I want to "release" the object and "let it fly away". For doing so I needed to calculate a few things, first of all I get the velocity of the finger/touch with this code:
CGPoint velocity = [recognizer velocityInView:recognizer.view];
(I use the same method (handlePan:) with other statements for getting the right object when touch starts, and letting the object be under the finger all the time by setting the position of the object to the location of the touch when moving)
Now I know the velocity, but I still don't know how much force I need to apply to the object. You should be able to calculate the force by this formula: Force = mass * acceleration. We know the mass (object.physicsBody.mass) and we know the velocity. To get the acceleration we need the time as well because acceleration = velocity / time.
In my update: method that is called every time a new frame is to be rendered I calculate the difference between the last time a frame was about to be rendered by doing something like this:
self.delta = currentTime - self.lastTime;
self.lastTime = currentTime;
I now can calculate which force that is needed to get the object moving in the velocity I'm "dragging it in". To do this I do the following:
[self.currentNode.physicsBody applyForce:CGVectorMake(velocity.x/self.delta * self.currentNode.physicsBody.mass, -velocity.y/self.delta * self.currentNode.physicsBody.mass)];
I take velocity divided with the difference in time since last frame (self.delta) to get the acceleration, and then multiply it with the mass of the object to get the force needed to keep (or actually getting) the object moving in the same direction and in the same velocity as it was moved by my finger.
This is working for me at the moment and I hope it helps other people too, and please tell me if I got something wrong or if there is a better solution. So far I have not found any "native solution".
If the only issue is velocity, then that is simple to fix.
Subtract the current touch position from the previous touch position to get the velocity between the last and current touch. Use applyForce: to apply this velocity to the body.
In order to prevent the body from moving on its own while dragging, read out the new velocity from the body after calling applyForce: and keep it in an ivar and set the body's velocity to zero.
When the touch ends, set the body's velocity to the one you keep as an ivar.
If this doesn't work, try using applyImpulse: and/or setting the velocity before calling any of the two methods, ie:
sprite.physicsBody.velocity = bodyVelocity;
[sprite.physicsBody applyForce:touchVelocity];
bodyVelocity = sprite.physicsBody.velocity;
sprite.physicsBody.velocity = CGVectorMake(0, 0);
That way you can keep the body's velocity without losing control over it while dragging.
I'm pretty new to Box2D and cocos2d. I'm trying to do something which I thought would be pretty simple, but it is turning out to be more difficult than I had expected and I cannot find a working answer anywhere.
Basically, I want to move a b2body and rotate it to a certain point with animation.
I can get it to the correct position and rotation with:
targetBody->SetTransform(b2Vec2(10.0f,1.0f),10);
But I have no idea how to animate it there over time. I tried using cocos2d animation on the sprite used for the body, but that doesn't do anything. Any ideas?
There are a couple of ways you could do this.
You could use SetTransform every time step to update the position of the body gradually over time, in effect performing the animation yourself. The drawback with this method is that the body is 'teleporting' to the new position rather than moving, so it has no momentum, which means you can get odd results if it hits anything along the way. Still, if you know it will not hit anything or does not need to react to a collision this would be ok.
The other way is to SetLinearVelocity and SetAngularVelocity to give the body proper movement. This will keep the results of a collision realistic, and you don't need to keep updating anything every timestep. On the other hand, you will need to detect when the body has arrived at the desired position and then set the velocities back to zero, otherwise it will just keep moving. For dynamic bodies you will also need to counter gravity somehow, either by setting the gravity scale of the body to zero, or by applying an upwards force to balance gravity, or by changing the body type to kinematic during the move.
In general, you use Box2D to simulate the physical behavior of objects in relation to each other. The rules of mechanics implemented by Box2D dictate how your cocos2d CCSprites move if you continuously update the translation and rotation of your sprites according to their corresponding Box2d b2Body. You will have some kind of repeatedly invoked tick: method in which you step your Box2d world along in time, and in which you update your sprite positions according to simulation results of Box2d.
This pattern corresponds to b2Bodys of type b2_dynamicBody. Physical laws dictate the motion of the body in this case, and your sprites will follow these simulation results. This is why setting a conflicting position of a sprite by means of a CCAction or even directly will be undone almost instantaneously with the next tick:.
Solution 1: kinematic body type
However, there do exist other modes for a b2Body, and one of these is b2_kinematicBody in which the translation is no longer governed by the world but by the velocities or angular speeds you dictate through setters. So it would be one solution to work with body type b2_kinematicBody as in:
b2BodyDef bdef;
bdef.type = b2_kinematicBody;
With this you would manipulate the velocity and angular speed of a b2Body explicitly. In this case, Box2d is still responsible for moving bodies around, but according the velocities you dictate, and without any force effects of collision or gravity applied to this particular body. Also with this strategy, your CCSprites will follow b2Bodys. Setting conflicting positions for your sprites directly or by applying a CCAction would not make sense for the same reason as described above.
Solution 2: decouple sprites from Box2d
An alternative way to animating sprites would be to fully decouple those sprites from Box2d. In this case, you would simply not have any b2Body that governs the position of the sprite you are going to animate. Now, in this case, only you will dictate the position and rotation of your CCSprite, i.e. directly either through its position property or by applying a CCAction.
I have tried many different techniques of applying a realistic looking gravity feature in my game but have had no luck so far. I plan on offering a 100 point bounty on this for someone who can show me or (share) some code that applies gravity to a CCSprite in Cocos2D.
What I have done so far has just been ugly or unrealistic and I have asked in many different places on what the best approach is but I just have not found any good looking gravity techniques yet.
Anyway, can anyone offer some tips/ideas or their approach only applying gravity to a CCSprite in Cocos2D without using a physics engine?
Thanks!
A effective approach without having to explicitly use any physics engine is to step the velocity and position of your sprite manually in your update loop. This is essentially Euler Integration.
// define your gravity value
#define GRAVITY -0.1
// define a velocity variable in the header of your Game class/CCSprite Subclass (neater)
float velocity_y;
-(void) update: (ccTime) dt
{
// Step the y-velocity by your acceleration value (gravity value in this case)
velocity_y += GRAVITY *dt; // drop the dt if you don't want to use it
// Step the position values and update the sprite position accordingly
sprite.position.y += velocity_y* dt; // same here
}
In the code snippet above, I defined a velocity_y variable to keep track of my sprite's current velocity along the y-direction. Remember to initialize this value to 0 in your init method.
Next comes the crux of Euler. At every time step:
Advance your velocity by your acceleration (which is your gravity) multiplied by dt to find your new velocity.
Advance your position by your newly computed velocity value multiplied by dt to find your new position.
You can experiment whether using delta-time or not (see LearnCocos2D's excellent comment on the cons of using it) works for your game. While multiplying by delta-time allows your object motion to more accurately take into account varying framerates, as LearnCocos2d pointed out, it might be wise to avoid using it in a real-time game where system interrupts (new mail, low battery, ads pop-out) can occur and subsequently cause the game simulation to jump forward in an attempt to make up.
So if you are dropping the dt, remember to tweak (scale down) your GRAVITY value accordingly to retain the right feel, since this value is no longer multiplied by the value of delta-time (which is ~ 1/60).
Aditional Tip: To apply an impulse to move the sprite (say via a swipe), you can affect the velocities directly by changing the values of velocity_x (if you have this) and velocity_y.
I have used this approach in my games, and it works very well. hope it helps.
This isn't trivial matter, you should try to see other posts. I'm sure other poeple already had this issue. Try to look at :
How to simulate a gravity for one sprite in cocos2d without a physics engine?
Cocos2D Gravity?
Or try our good friend google :
http://www.gamedev.net/page/resources/ -> got to Math and Physics and then A Verlet based approach for 2D game physics
http://www.rodedev.com/tutorials/gamephysics/
In any case here are some tips :
Step 1, calculate the effective direction vectors
Step 2, calculate velocity
Step 3, project this velocity onto the two effective directions.
Step 4, generate an equal and opposite force for the two direction and call this the “response force”.