SPSS' default settings for graphs are pretty rudimentary and, generally, ugly.
I have just upgraded from v.12 to v.21 and am very surprised, and extremely disappointed, to see that there is practically no change.
I had high hopes for GPL, but it does not seem to offer anything more than basic settings.
For instance, I want to create a sequence of scatterplots.
The dimension should be 375 points square.
Both axes should go to 1,000.
The points should be size 1, colour dark red.
The chart background should be white.
I also want to create a sequence of scatterplots.
The dimension should be 375 points square.
X axis should go to 1,000,
Y axis to 160.
There should be 50 bins - (x-axis, number of intervals).
Display digit grouping should be on.
Histogram bar fill and border should be colour a and colour b (these will vary, but should be scripted).
Finally, a set of box plots which also need customisation away from the default settings.
So, is it possible to script customisations like this, or do I have to go through the VERY SLOW and TEDIOUS point and click process for every one?
I HAVE 105 GRAPHS!
Thanks for your advice.
GPL provides syntax control for all of these things. The graphics engine in V21 is entirely different and much more flexible than the ancient on in V12.
The Chart Builder UI offers only basic, general controls. There is a huge amount of functionality in GPL that is not exposed in the CB. Paste the syntax from that as a starting point, and look at the GPL documentation in the help. You may also want to create a template with your specifications and use that from the CB as a shortcut.
The GraphBoard editor provides another interface ultimately to the same graphics engine. It offers more aesthetic control but is harder to customize.
Related
I've been trying different tiling WM's to see which one best fits my needs. Every time I try a new one, it looks good but I find other things that don't quite work the way I like. My requirements have evolved as I go. Initially, I didn't want to get into Awesome because having to learn Lua is not on my wish list but maybe I should give it a try IF it can do what I want better than the other tiling WM's out there.
I'm going to as specific as I can about what I want. I am running a 3440x1440 monitor. I want to use as much vertical space as possible (meaning, a full width, persistent but mostly empty status bar is not an option, but I do like the notification area and a date/time).
I understand it may not do everything exactly the way I want, which is oke. If it does more or less most of what I want I can weigh my options between Awesome and other tiling WM's (actually, only i3 which is what I'm using now but I'm open to better suggestions). I would very much appreciate it if people don't just say no to something it can't do, but say "no, but it can do ...". In other words, feel free to suggest alternatives that might be helpful as well.
Divide the screen in 3 columns, initially 30/45/25, with the right column split horizontally; Fully adjustable and resizable as needed during my work session;
Persistent layout; when closing the last application in a tile, I don't want that tile to disappear and the remaining tiles to resize. Just show an empty space and leave all tiles as they are.
tabbed tiles, so I see which applications are running in a tile (similar to i3).
Resizable tiles with the keyboard into 1 direction; When making the middle column/tile wider, I want that into a specific direction into another tile and leave the other side alone.
Certain applications I want to always launch into a specific tile. For instance, terminals always go into the right-most column top/bottom, browser/spotify always into the middle, atom/IDE always into the left. Some applications should always be floating. Obviously I want to be able to send them to a different tile after launch.
I don't want a 100% width status bar. It will be mostly empty which is a waste of screen estate. Preferably, I'd like a statusbar part of a tile, for example in the right-most tile, resizing with it. Otherwise I'd like it to be fixed to 30% and allow tiles which are not beneath it to use the full height of the screen. My reason for a statusbar is mute; I actually only want a notification area and a date time permanently visible. I don't need a "start menu", dmenu or similar is perfect, which I believe it has integrated.
Many thanks in advance!
The general answer is "Awesome configuration is code and it can do whatever you want". But there is a catch. Can Awesome be configured like you describe? Yes, totally. There is at least 2 distributions coming close enough (mine[1] and worron[2]) (at least for the tiling workflow, not the look).
The "catch" is that the workflow you describe isn't really the "Awesome way". Awesome is usually used as an automatic tiler. You have layouts that describe a workflow (code, web, internet) and manage the clients according to their programming. Manual tile management is rarely necessary once you have proper layouts. That doesn't mean you can't, I did, but it might be worth thinking outside the box and see if you can automate your workflow a bit further.
Also, the default layout system isn't very modern and makes it hard to implement the features you requested. My layout system (see link below) can be used as a module or as a branch and supports all features described above. Awesome is extremely configurable and it's components can be replaced by modules.
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/644
The layout "serialization" documentation is here:
https://elv13.github.io/libraries/awful.layout.html#awful.layout.suit.dynamic.manual
It is similar to i3 but has more layouts and containers. As for the "leaving blank space" part, it is configured using the fill_strategy:
https://awesomewm.org/doc/api/classes/wibox.layout.ratio.html#wibox.layout.ratio.inner_fill_strategy
As a word of conclusion, I would note that what you ask is "work exactly like i3". If you want such thing, well, use i3. Awesome is a window manager framework. Its goal and purpose is to create a customized desktop shell / WM. If it's what you want, then go ahead and learn it, nothing else can come close to the possibility and the level of control you can get out of it. However it takes time and effort to get to the point where you have "your own perfect desktop". Our users perfect desktops:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1395
[1] https://gfycat.com/SmallTerribleAdamsstaghornedbeetle
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yNALqST1-Y
The WM your are looking for is herbstluftwm (hlwm). Its a manual tiling window manager. The tiles which you are talking about are called frames in hlwm. Each frame can contain multiple windows. A frame can also be empty. Only if you kill a frame the other frames will automatically resize. You can add new frames vertically and horizontally and resize them. Each frame can also have a different layout to organize the windows inside. The layout you are looking for is max. This will stack the windows inside a frame on each other. It doesn't show you tabs like i3 however. hlwm allows you to create rules to open certain applications always in certain frames and workspaces. hlwm doesn't have a statusbar buildin. I personally like to use tint2. It can be used as a replacement for your requirement to see running applications as tabs.
I'm experiencing painting issues when combining TScaledLayout and custom styles created from the bitmap style designer in fmx.
To demonstrate, I loaded the default custom style created by chosing "New style for VCL / FMX" -> "save as .style" in the bitmap style designer. I dropped several standard controls on some colored rectangles: The red & green ones on a TScaledLayout, the blue one directly on the form. As I stretch the form, colored lines appear on the controls on the ScaledLayout; the background is partially visible:
If I size the form to exactly match the design-time dimensions, the lines disappear. That seems like a pretty significant issue, I certainly can't use those two together like that. Does anybody have an idea for a possible fix or workaround?
Looks like this is a known issue with scaling and bitmaps. See the Google+ discussion here - https://plus.google.com/+PaulThornton/posts/ACAHkJD3a84. I'll quote Marco Cantu's thoughts:
I've found an internally reported issue of a similar case, but haven't
found one that matches this scenario. Certainly worth adding to quality
portal. Having said this, I fear that bitmap-based operations and
scaling don't really fit together very well, and it might be difficult
to have an all encompassing solution.
Let me explain with an example. Take a button. This is painted by FMX
with 9 sections (borders, corners, central part) so that regardless of
the size the bitmap elements are stretched in one direction at most,
often just draw. Stretching a single bitmap for the button to the
target size would break anti-aliasing and create a blurred image when
using colors.
This is example what happens with a ScaledLayout, given it takes the
complete final image and transforms it. ScaledLayout was originally
introduced with vector styles, and worked very well in that scenario.
With todays's bitmap styles things get a bit more complex.
Regardless of this explanation of there the issue lies, I'd recommend
reporting it on QC, and I'll make sure it doesn't get closed as design
(it could naturally happen, this is how the system works) but that we
do some investigation to address the issue -- turning this into a
feature request.
I'm coding iOS app that will explain complex numbers to the user. Complex numbers can be displayed in Cartesian coordinates and that's what I want to do; print one or more vectors on the screen.
I am looking for the easiest way to print 3 vectors into a coordinate system that will adjust itself to the vector-size (if x-coord is > y-coord adjust both axis to x-coord and vice versa).
I tried using Core Plot, which I think is way too multifunctional for my purpose.
Right now I am working with PowerPlot and my coordinate system looks okay already, but I still encounter some problems (x- and y-axis are set to the x and y values which results in a 45 degree angled line, no matter the user input).
The functionality of the examples in CorePlot and PowerPlot don't seem to meet my needs.
My last two approaches were using HTML and a web view, and doing it all myself with Quartz (not the simple way...)
Do you have any advice how to do this the simple way, as it is a simple problem, I guess?
If you're not wanting to do much actual graphing and plotting, then using Core Plot or similar sounds like overkill to me. The extra bloat of adding coreplot to your project, not to mention the time taken for you to understand how to use it, might not be worth it for some simple graphics.
Quartz is well equipped for the job of showing a few vectors on the screen, assuming you're not interested in fancy 3D graphics. There are plenty of tutorials and examples of using Core Graphics (AKA Quartz) to draw lines etc. If you're going the Quartz route, perhaps get some simple line drawing going in Quartz, then ask more questions if you need help with the maths aspect of it.
The typical technique used when rendering with Quartz is to override drawRect in a subclass of UIView and place calls to Core Graphics drawing functions in there.
A decent question and example of Quartz line drawing is here:
How do I draw a line on the iPhone?
If you aren't adverse to using Google Chart Image you can load reasonably complex data sets in a simple manner by calling the appropriate URL and then putting the image in a UIImageView. It takes very little code: here is a blog post explanation with sample code.
The limitations are
length of the data set is restricted by the max URL length you can request from Google (2048 characters, with encoding is large), though I've plotted with 120 data points in 4 series.
a net connection is required (at least to get the initial chart)
and perhaps the biggest problem, API is deprecated and will be discontinued in 2015 at some point. You would then have to switch to the UIWebView/Javascript Google Chart API implementation...
Sample image:
I've never done OpenGL, but I'm looking for some pointers on this particular question on an AR app I'm practicing with.
I'd like to make an app with a "flat rectangle" along with text written on the surface of the rectangle. Visually, I'm imagining something along the lines of a piece of paper with text written on it. Each time the app starts, the text would be something different (the text is pulled from a plist file).
The user would be able to view the paper from all sides, much as if there was a piece of paper hanging in front of him.
Is this trivial to do in OpenGL? How could I get started?
Sorry for the really open-ended question, but I wanted to get a feel for how this kind of thing is done.
Looking at the OpenGL template source code in the Xcode sample projects, I see that there is a big array of vertices. I presume that to create a "flat" rectangle, I'd essentally just have to remove or make the z-axis zero. And then the dynamic text that will attach to the surface of the flat rectangle...I dont have any idea how to do that......
This question is hard to answer unambiguously. In general, this is trivial, but then again it is not.
Drawing a "flat rectangle with something on it" is a couple of API calls, as simple as it can get. Drawing text in OpenGL in an efficient way, and high quality, and without big preprocessing is an entirely different story.
What I would do is render text using whatever the "normal system-supported" way is under iOS (just like you would draw in any window, I wouldn't know this specific detail), but draw into a bitmap rather than on the screen. This should be supported, pretty much every OS has supported this for at least 10-15 years. Then turn this bitmap into a texture, bind it, and draw your trivial flat quad with OpenGL (set up a vertex buffer with 4 vertices, each vertex a texture coordinate, and draw two triangles - as easy as it gets).
The huge advantage of that is that you get to use the installed system fonts (or any fonts available), you don't need to generate a bitmap font and don't need to think about really ugly things such as hinting and proper spacing, and it's much easier to mix different text styles, etc. OpenGL has built-in support for text too, of course, but it is not terribly efficient or nice either. If the text does not change every millisecond, it's really best to render it using the standard renderer that the operating system provides (yes, that probably won't be hardware accelerated, but so what... since the user must read the text, it likely won't change every millisecond).
Now it gets more complicated if your "piece of paper" should bend and twist too, or do a page peel effect rather than being just a flat rectangle. In that case you need to tesselate it, which can be harder than it sounds, too. Not all tesselations look optimal for all bends/twists, or they do but do not have the optimal (read as minimum) number of vertices.
There is an article on "page peel" and such tesselation in one of the GPU Gems or GPU Pro books, let me search...
There: Andreas Bizzotto: "A Shader-Based eBook Reader - Page peeling effect", GPU Pro2 pp. 278-299
Maybe you can get hold of a copy or are lucky enough to find it on Google Books or something.
I need to find graphic editor, which can create simple swimming pools drawing like this: http://k.min.us/iiPZI.png
It must be able to draw pool outline (including curves, not only lines), split pool into several parts (the darker color is - the deaper poll is in this area), also user should be able to provide depth for each area.
Also will be nice, if this editor can calculate pool square (S), perimeter (P), it's scope (V) and square of all walls and bottom (to know how much tile we`ll need).
Please, give me links to any editors, which contain even several of these functionalities, so I can try and upgrade editor for my needs.
You can give links on editors, written on any language/platform (Javascript, standalone programm, etc.). I will need to calculate all this staff (V, P, S, etc.) and then just send this data to PHP (and make calculations on server side).
I found only this editor, but it doesn't have a lot of functionality I need: http://svg-edit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.5.1/editor/svg-editor.html
I guess any good vector editor might do but not sure about the calculations. This might be more a job for an architecture program. You might want to take a look at Inkscape