I have a Product model which has name and description columns in the database.
I also have a Product.search_results_for(query), where query is a string like "Green Apple".
I need to return an ActiveRecord::Relation of the results ordered by which is the best hit. Currently, I'm setting a search_result_value to each product. search_result_value IS NOT a column in the database, and I don't want it to be.
So in essence, I have an ActiveRecord::Relation of Products that I need to order by search_result_value without changing it to an array, which is an instance variable that isn't stored in the database. How can I do this?
Something like this:
Product.order(:search_result_value)
If you do not put the value in a column or express the logic in search_result_value in pure SQL, then you’ll have to load all Products into memory and then sort them in Ruby using sort_by:
Product.all.to_a.sort_by(&:search_result_value)
Related
How do I get records from a table with a specific ID and store these records in an Array?
For better understanding I try to explain it to you more clear:
Imagine a table with the following columns: (ID,FIX_ID,AMOUNT)
where ID is an unique ID which always will auto_incremented by 1.
FIX_ID is an ID which can appear multiple times in the table.
And AMOUNT is just a simple type which represents the amount of some "things".
So all I want to get now is every record from the table which have the FIX_ID that I am looking for.
Remember: The FIX_ID is not unique => it can appear multiple times.
And that's it. So imagine that I want to get all records with the FIX_ID of 10. All these records which I will get should be stored in an Array.
My question to you: Is it possible to realize this "request" to the database with ActiveRecord?
If so, then how?
You can get an ActiveRecord::Relation object like this:
ModelName.where('FIX_ID = ?', 10)
Relation object will perform a database query as soon as you call methods like all, each or any? on it. If you really need an array, call to_a on that Relation:
ModelName.where('FIX_ID = ?', 10).to_a
I have a model to which I need to create a default scope. I am unsure of the best way to write this scope but I will explain how it needs to work.
Basically I need to get all items of the model and if two items have the same "order" value then it should look to the "version" field (which will contain, 1, 2, 3 etc) and pick the one with the highest value.
Is there a way of achieving this with just a scope?
Try this code:
scope :group_by_order, -> { order('order ASC').group('order') }
default_scope, { (group_by_order.map{ |key,values| values.order('version DESC') }.map{|key, values| values - values[1..-1]}).values.flatten }
Explanation Code:
order by "order" field.
group by "order" field.
map on the result hash, and order each values by "version" field
map again on values, and remove from index "1" to the end.
get all values, and flatten them
A word of caution using default scopes with order. When you performs updated on the collection such as update_all it will use the default scope to fetch the records, and what you think would be a quick operation will bring your database to its knees as it copies the rows to a temporary table before updating.
I would recommend just using a normal scope instead of a default scope.
Have a look at Select the 3 most recent records where the values of one column are distinct on how to construct the sql query you want and then put that into a find_by_sql statemate mentioned in How to chain or combine scopes with subqueries or find_by_sql
The ActiveRecord order method simply uses the SQL ORDER function which can have several arguments. Let's say you have some model with the attributes order and version then the correct way order the records as you describe it, is order(:order, :version). If you want this as the default scope would you end up with:
default_scope { order(:order, :version) }
First, default_scopes are dangerous. They get used whenever you use the model, unless you specifically force 'unscoped'. IME, it is rare to need a scope to every usage of a model. Not impossible, but rare. And rarer yet when you have such a big computation.
Instead of making a complex query, can you simplify the problem? Here's one approach:
In order to make the version field work, you probably have some code that is already comparing the order fields (otherwise you would not have unique rows with the two order fields the same, but the version field differing). So you can create a new field, that is higher in value than the last field that indicated the right entity to return. That is, in order to create a new unique version, you know that you last had a most-important-row. Take the most-important-rows' sort order, and increment by one. That's your new most-important-rows' sort order.
Now you can query for qualifying data with the highest sort order (order_by(sort_order, 'DESC').first).
Rather than focus on the query, focus on whether you are storing the right data, that can the query you want to achieve, easier. In this case, it appears that you're already doing an operation that would help identify a winning case. So use that code and the existing database operation, to reduce future database operations.
In sql you can easily order on two things, which will first order on the first and then order on the second if the first thing is equal. So in your case that would be something like
select * from posts order by order_field_1, version desc
You cannot name a column order since it is a sql reserved word, and since you did not give the real column-name, I just named it order_field_1.
This is easily translated to rails:
Post.order(:order_field_1, version: :desc)
I would generally advice against using default_scope since once set it is really hard to avoid (it is prepended always), but if you really need it and know the risks, it is really to apply as well:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
default_scope { order(:order_field_1, version: :desc) }
end
This is all actually documented very well in the rails guides.
I'm trying to create a reporting app with Rails 4.
As a reporting system, it has a lot of SQL queries where the result is not like any table schema. I mean, a select query where I have some joins, unions and etc and the result will be something like a row with it's columns being result of subqueries, sums and etc.
Would it be possible to have a Model with no table associated, but I can use the "find_by_sql" on it, to instanciate an array of that model with the results of my query?
Something like:
Use "select table1.field1, sum(if(...,table2.field,...) as field2, as field3 from...." as query, and return a array of a model "Result", where I can call a
array_of_result.first.field3?
Sorry if I'm not writing clearly enough.
EDIT: until now, sparky's anwser(http://railscasts.com/episodes/193-tableless-model) was the closest one, beacuse I want to use some of the ActiveRecord features, like specify a connection in the class(or even in a super class).
For pure reporting, especially when the result column names span multiple models, one alternative is to just pass the query directly back and deal with the result set:
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute([raw SQL query])
You'll get back a result set, which is typically an enumerable set of row results, but check the documentation for your DB adapter to find out for sure what it's returning.
For example, if you're using PostgreSQL as your database with the pg gem, you'll get back an instance of PG::Result which you can then operate on in the following way:
> results = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM customers")
=> <PG:Result >
> results.count
=> 63 # the number of customers I have in this contrived example
> results.first
=> { "count": "63" }
> results[0]
=> { "count": "63" }
> results[0]["count"]
=> "63"
You'll need to cast your return values to something other than strings. ActiveRecord will typically do this for you in your models since it knows the column types, but by doing a raw query you'll probably just get back strings that you'll have to cast yourself. If you're just doing a query to display it on a page somewhere maybe the strings will be sufficient.
I'm sure you'll be doing more sophisticated reports, but you'll notice in my simple example that the key count wound up being created as the accessor to the result of the SELECT COUNT... query. If you specify column names, or alias them, the keys in the resulting hash set will match the column names or the aliases you've set.
You can certainly create a Reporting model.
You would want to start off by creating a tableless model. Essentially, this can be as simple as a file in your models directory with
class Reporting
end
in it, and a controller with some appropriate actions and views. However, have a look at
http://railscasts.com/episodes/193-tableless-model
http://railscasts.com/episodes/219-active-model
which cover tableless models and what you can do with active model with respect to validations etc.
In your case, you say that you have some complex joins etc. Sometimes it's easier in the short term to SQLize these, but if you can use activerecord you should. Apart from anything else, this will allow you to define custom methods in your model which you can chain and make your Reporting controller much cleaner
In rails-
I need to execute a sql query against the database; the query is not related to any specific Model it can have mix data from multiple tables or from some other table. I have ways to do this=-
first is by executing query agains Model and capture the result like this-
res=User.find_by_sql("select * from customers joins and conditions")
res=User.find_by_sql("select * from [other table] joins and conditions")
Problem with this approach, I am not feeling comfortable with it because in User class objects I am capturing data of other table. like the first query result has data from customer table so in the user object I got customer's attribute. And more interesting problem is- if the resulting query has id attribute then
res.first.id will be id of customer and
if User model has relation with UserRoles model and if I access this relation with res.first.roles then it will fetch roles from UserRole for customer id, which is completely wrong.
And there might be may problems also.
So I think it has lot of chaos.
And good part is we dont not need to deal with connection and result would be an array of objects. so accessing object attributes with res.first.id is easier the hast like row["id"].
and second approach to use ActiveRecord connection and execute the query like
this res = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.query("sql query")
in place of query we can use select_one, select_all and can also make query parameterized.
The problem it has is it returns array of hash, but I need array of objects for easy accessibility in code. So I wrote a class to convert hash to object (I think rail does same thing in background) and is working fine.
So I need some suggestion on both the approach and need to decide which one is better.
First find_by_sql vs select_all
find_by_sql, This method returns an array of objects by initiating them.
users = User.find_by_sql("SELECT * FROM users"); #=> [#, #, #, # ....]
Accessing properties
users[0].name #Getting property in object oriented fashion
select_all, This method returns an array of objects but does not initiate them, and each object represents a row of database.
users = User.connection.select_all("SELECT * FROM users"); #=> #
Accessing properties
users[0]["name"] #Getting property in non-object oriented fashion
Whether find_by_sql is better, because of it is a simple way of custom querying to the database and returns instantiated objects
How do I query the database to find objects that contain one or more attributes that are stored as serializable?
For example, I have a concert which occurs only in certain cities. I want to make a Concert object with a column called cities and store an array of cities.
If I want to query my database to find all concerts that occur in 1 city (or all concerts that occur in an array of n cities), how do I do this?
The best way to do this isn't to store it in a serialized column, but a separate table called Cities. Then you can do this:
City.find_by_name('Cityname').concerts
One possible way to query would be to use SQL's LIKE condition. This would work for boolean conditions in serialized tables.
For example to find those Users with the 'notification' option on,
users=User.arel_table
User.where(users[:options].matches("%notification: true%"))
As for other type of variables this would not be as feasible.