I have a question about RequestScoped ManagedBean :
It seems like the RequestScoped ManagedBean is created every time we change something in the view, indeed, if we change value of <p:selectOneMenu>, for example, method declared as #PostConstruct is called.
I think this will slow the application.
Can some explain more this issue ?
It seems like the RequestScoped ManagedBean is created every time we change something in the view
RequestScoped ManagedBean will be created for every request made. If changing something in the view is going to make a new request, e.g. ajax request, then the bean will be created and its method annotated with #PostConstruct will get every time bean is created
I think this will slow the application
What kind of operation are you performing in that PostConstruct annotated method? What is it that you need everytime a request is created? If you could avoid that, then there is no need to write a PostConstruct
Related
I am running Mojarra 2.2.0.
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
</context-param>
The managed bean action method is-
public void action() {
HttpSession session = (HttpSession) FacesContext.getCurrentInstance()
.getExternalContext().getSession(false);
System.out.println(session.getId()); // not null for stateful views
}
For stateless views session.getId() throws NPE
For views which are not stateless-
Firing a GET request, there is JSESSIONID=340041C96D5AA446D761C3602F54A76D
I read it here that-
For client side state saving mechanism, JSF won't create the session
and will store the view state in a hidden input field with the name
javax.faces.ViewState in the form whenever necessary.
Further, it's mentioned here that
JSF will indeed autocreate the session because the JSF view state has
to be stored over there. If you set the JSF state saving method to
client instead of server, then it won't be stored in session and hence
no session needs to be created
I think the above line is a source for trouble for me.
If you set the JSF state saving method to client instead of server,
then it won't be stored in session // FULLY AGREED
and
hence no session needs to be created. // This confuses because for
client side saving mechanism, a session id gets generated by the
servlet container & hence there is a session associated with the
request.
In reference to the discussion which I had with BalusC in this question,
I created a HttpSessionListener-
#WebListener
public class MyHttpSessionListener implements HttpSessionListener {
public void sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent event) {
Thread.dumpStack();
}
public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent event) {
}
}
See below attached screenshots(these 2 screenshots are for version 2.0.3, there must have been an old bug due to which the session was getting created)-
Libraby (Mojarra 2.2.0)-
When does JSF creates a session
Eaiest way to naildown this is creating a HttpSessionListener, putting a debug breakpoint on sessionCreated() method and inspecting the call stack who needed to get the session for the first time (and thus implicitly needs to create it).
In below example you will see a chain of getSession() calls in the call stack. You will see that FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.renderView() method is the one calling it for the first time.
After you click on FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.renderView() line in debugger's call stack, you will get into its source code (Maven will load source code automatically, otherwise you need to manually attach it).
You see, when server side state saving is enabled and the view to render is not transient (stateless), then JSF will implicitly create the session, just to ensure it's created on time in order to save the view (if the session was created later, e.g. during render response phase, you would otherwise risk exceptions like this Adding <h:form> causes java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed).
You'll in the source code also immediately see that when the state saving method is set to client, or when the view is stateless as in <f:view transient="true">, then JSF won't anymore implicitly create the session. Older JSF versions may do that as you figured, but this is to be accounted as a bug and ought to be fixed in a newer version.
If you would like to ensure statelessness and avoid accidental/unforeseen session creation, then you could just throw new IllegalStateException() inside sessionCreated() method. When that happens, you just have to look in call stack who's responsible for creating the session and then fix/change the code to not do that anymore.
what does it puts in a session map?
Under the covers, ExternalContext#getSessionMap() delegates to HttpSession#setAttribute()/getAttribute()/removeAttribute(). You can listen on those methods using a HttpSessionAttributeListener.
In below example you will see that ViewScopeContextManager.getContextMap() line calls SessionMap#put() method in order to put something in the session map. When you unfold the event argument, you will see the session attribute name and value, which is com.sun.faces.application.view.activeViewContexts and an empty ConcurrentHashMap respectively.
Indeed, I was using a #Named #ViewScoped which was referenced by an value expression on the particular page (you see EL resolver and Weld resolver further down in call stack). When you click ViewScopeContextManager.getContextMap() line in call stack, you'll see that it was just preparing a map in session scope in order to store view scoped beans.
That's just one example. There are more things which could be stored in the session. Using a debugger this way and inspecting the associated source code will tell a lot about the Why.
I want to create a JSF-2 Portlet with multiple SessionScoped Backing Beans. I'd also like them all to share some POJOs with a common SessionScoped Bean that will serve as an Object Pool.
I have two issues troubling me:
I'd like to have this bean Initialized before any of the Backing Beans. Note that no xhtml page will call an object directly to the Object Pool Bean, so at least one Backing Bean will be init before the ObjectPool. Is there some way to make sure it will be init first, except that calling in in PostConstruct of every other Backing Bean ?
I am confused on using ManagedProperties, because I need All the Backing beans to call the Object Pool's properties, while I also need the Backing Bean to call some Client / BackingBean functions. How can I do that without creating double references ?
For your first question you can use a f:prerenderView in your
login xhtml page. #SessionScoped beans are not created until you
reference them from the page or create them by yourself and store in
the context. If you link the f:prerenderView to some of your method
of the bean which acts like a pool it will be initialized for the
rest of the HttpSession. You can later inject it in your other
#SessionScoped beans using #ManagedProperty annotation.
About your second question, just remember you're not forced to go
through the view beans in order to obtain session properties. Haven't
you made the Object Pool itself a #ManagedBean? So access it
directly from your page!
Old code creates a #SessionScoped #ManagedBean (namely UserSession) at the first request in a ServletFilter and puts it in the HttpSession (if not already there).
Now what happens when some EL expression tries to access that ManagedBean the first time? I expected a second instance of UserSession (one created manually and one from JSF). So I instrumented the constructor, #PostConstruct and #PreDestroy with a few logging statements. Now it seems JSF never creates the UserSession - only the constructor is called.
Is this possible? Can JSF reuse that bean from HttpSession? Is it legit to put #SessionScoped beans in HttpSession?
Your observation is correct. Under JSF's covers, JSF itself also stores session scoped managed beans as an attribute of the HttpSession. So if it's already present, it will just be reused, regardless of the way how it has ended up in there.
Whether that's good or bad depends on the concrete functional requirement. Given your astonishment, I'd guess that it's bad and that you need to revise either the approach or the functional requirement. Perhaps you need a secondary (session scoped?) managed bean which injects the particular session attribute by #ManagedProperty.
I use a managed bean to generate an HtmlPanelGrid, and then bind it in the xhtml file, like so
<h:panelGrid id ="questions" binding="#{ui.generatedComponents}" />
On this page is a form, with a dropdown, and whenever a value is selected, it shows the page. However, whe something is selected, every other (static i.e in xhtml page) component is shown, but the binded component is never shown.
However, if I re-request the page in the browser, it does show them.
Mucho confusing. Any ideas?
When using binding, you need to make absolutely sure that the property behind this attribute is exclusively been used by this component in the current view. The managed bean should not be in the session scope, because it would then share the same property between multiple views (browser windows/tabs) in the same session. It should of course also not be in the application scope. The managed bean should be at highest in request or view scope. The view scope makes the most sense for this particular purpose.
The getter method of the property behind binding should also contain no business code. It should solely return the property, nothing more. Any initialization needs to be done in the (post)constructor or an (action)listener method of the backing bean class. Any manipulation of this component property needs to be done in an (action)listener method of the backing bean class.
Not doing so may result in awkward behaviour.
I am facing a problem with CDI on JBoss AS 7.1.1
I have two JSF-beas, where one has the CODI ViewAccessScope (Bean A) which shows all entities, and the second is plain RequestScoped (Bean B). Each Bean get a, so called, Presenter injected which takes care of all presentation logic. So far so good.
The Presenter from Bean B is responsible for creating a new entity (calling service...bla...blubb) and when everything is done Bean B is redirecting to another page but since Bean A now has to reload its content I introduced the JEE-6 Observer.
In detail: Both Beans (A & B) get a particular Presenter injected (which has a backrefrence to the jsf-bean via a interface). Bean-B-Presenter fires an event after the entity was successfully created, so that then Bean-A-Presenter (the Observer) can reload the data and notify Bean-A about the changes.
The Problem: I am getting as NullPointerException when the observing Presenter (A) reloads its data because the reference to Bean A is lost. The reason why this happens is because CDI is obviously creating a new Presenter-object (its annotated with #Named) instead of using the one that is coupled with Bean-A.
Workaround: when I use Bean-A as the Observer than everything works.
My code is pretty much the same as seen in the link I added. I don't understand why a new instance is created when firing the event.
UPDATE regarding LightGuards comment:
The presenter beans are just annotated with #Named (which should be Dependent-Scope by default).
I had a look at the Weld-Documentation and it looks like this scope is somehow isolating my beans from each other. I need the presenters to be a new instance, each time a view (jsf-bean) gets initialized (so no Singletons). On the other hand I want to be able to send events between them, meaning that only the already existing instances get notified (not that a new instance is created).
I just did a test with the presenters being RequestScoped. This doesnt work either because now on every HTTP-Request I get a new Presenter even though the view (jsf-bean) to which it belongs is ViewAccessScoped. SessionScope of course works...but this would result in the wrong design.
Sounds like you'll need to create your own scope for this usecase. None of the default scopes sound like they fit your need. Another option would be to look at MyFaces CODI and the conversation scope they're written.
Please ensure that your observers aren't private.
And you have to ensure that you redirect correctly.