[CustomViewController respondsToSelector:]: message sent to deallocated instance - ios

This is used to work fine for my pre-ARC code, but since refactoring all the project to be ARC compatible, I start getting this crash:
[CustomViewController respondsToSelector:]: message sent to deallocated instance
My project is an iPad app with a split view, but contrary to apple documentation, previous developer has put another view controller to be visible on app launch before split view. So I know this is not the right way to do, but as I said it used to work before ARC integration so I need to get a workaround with this.
The root view controller which contain a menu of items, each item display a detail form to be filled, then a click on next button move to the next detail screen, etc.
The issue starts when I click on home button put on root view to get back to the home view, here is the relevant code that move the user to the home screen:
//this method is in the appdelegate, and it gets called when clikc on home button located on the root view
- (void) showHome
{
homeController.delegate = self;
self.window.rootViewController = homeController;
[self.window makeKeyAndVisible];
}
Then when I click on a button to get back to the split view (where are the root/details view), the app crashes with the above description. I profiled the app with instruments and the line of code responsible of that is located in the RootViewController, in the didSelectRowAtIndexPath method, here is the relevant code:
if(indexPath.row == MenuCustomViewController){
self.customVC=[[CustomViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"CustomVC"
bundle:nil];
[viewControllerArray addObject:self.customVC];
self.appDelegate.splitViewController.delegate = self.customVC;
}
customVC is a strong property, I tried to allocate directly and assign to the instance variable but that didn't help to fix the crash. Any thoughts ?
EDIT:
Here is the stack trace given by instruments:
[self.appDelegate.splitViewController setViewControllers:viewControllerArray];//this line caused the crash
[viewControllerArray addObject:self.appDescVC];//this statement is called before the above one
self.custinfoVC=[[CustInfoViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"CustInfo" bundle:nil];//this statement is called before the above one
self.appDelegate.splitViewController.delegate = self.appDescVC;//this statement is called before the above one
custinfoVC and appDescVC are strong properties.

I solved this problem by setting my delegates and datasources to nil in the dealloc method. Not sure if it'll help you but its worth a try.
- (void)dealloc
{
homeController.delegate = nil;
//if you have any table views these would also need to be set to nil
self.tableView.delegate = nil;
self.tableView.dataSource = nil;
}

You may want to setup the CustomViewController during app launch, and display the other views modally on top if necessary. The error message you're getting is because something is getting released by ARC prematurely. It might have not manifested before because pre-arc stuff wasn't always deallocated immediately. ARC is pretty serious about releasing stuff when it leaves scope
Hard to tell without seeing a lot more of the code involved, and what line it breaks on, etc.
This:
- (void) showHome {
//THIS: where is homeController allocated?
homeController.delegate = self;
self.window.rootViewController = homeController;
[self.window makeKeyAndVisible];
}
EDIT:
Add this line right above the line that causes your crash
for (id object in viewControllerArray) {
NSLog(#"Object: %#",object);
}

I had the same Problem.If you are not using "dealloc" method then use "viewWillDisappear" to set nil.
It was difficult to find which delegate cause issue, because it does not indicate any line or code statement for my App So I have try some way to identify delegate, Maybe it becomes helpful to you.
1.Open xib file and from file's owner, Select "show the connections inspector" right hand side menu. Delegates are listed, set them to nil which are suspected.
(Same as my case)Property Object like Textfield can create issue, So set its delegate to nil.
-(void) viewWillDisappear:(BOOL) animated{
[super viewWillDisappear:animated];
if ([self isMovingFromParentViewController]){
self.countryTextField.delegate = nil;
self.stateTextField.delegate = nil;
}
}

Related

Memory not being released right even dealloc method is called after dismissing view controller

What am I doing is I am creating lots of UIView in the background and keep them in a NSMutableArray to use later. But when I dismiss the view controller I check the memory in Xcode and it seems some of memory not being released. I checked; view controller is being deallocated.
Check please:
This happend after several showing and dismissing the view controller. Some of them is being released but not all.
Thanks.
Uncheck Enable Zombie Objects option under Edit Scheme. And try again.
A zombie is an object that has been deallocated, but references to it still exist and messages are still being sent to it
I think this link has more info for you
What is NSZombie?
I suppose you use arc, so it might be useful to explicitly release this in dealloc.
-(void)dealloc {
for(UIView *vw in self.arrayOfViews) {
vw = nil;
}
self.arrayOfViews = nil;
}
Using dealloc is a bit like the old days (pre-arc), but it will help you manage memory better.
!important! --> NEVER call [super dealloc]; when using arc!
In dealloc method release all views that you have in the array.
called the below method in your controller dealloc method
- (void)releaseViewArray
{
// Releasing views in the array
for (UIView *view in _viewArray) {
[view release];
}
// Releasing the array that holding the views
[_viewArray release];
}

iOS - viewController dealloc method not called after popping to previous viewController

In iOS, I pop from current viewController into previous one, but it doesn't go into dealloc.
Is this because there is another pointer pointing towards the current viewController, either in a different viewController or in the current one?
This is where I pop to previous view:
- (IBAction)fileUploadCancelTouched:(UIButton *)sender {
[self.fileToUpload cancel];
[self.view hideToastActivity];
[self.greenprogressBar removeFromSuperview];
[self.subView removeFromSuperview];
self.fileUploadCancelButton.hidden = YES;
if (self.commandComeBackToFinalScreen == 1) {
[self.navigationController popViewControllerAnimated:YES];
}
}
This is my dealloc function:
- (void)dealloc {
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] removeObserver:self];
self.greenprogressBar = nil;
self.fileUploadCancelButton = nil;
self.fileToUpload = nil;
[buttonHome_ release];
[buttonTestMeAgain_ release];
[buttonMarkMyTest_ release];
[examId_ release];
[sender_ release];
self.ob = nil;
[_fileUploadCancelButton release];
[super dealloc];
}
Check to make sure that ARC is not enabled in your project. If it is not ARC enabled then dealloc should be called unless your code is retaining your view controller. You should check through the Instruments tool if your pop commands reduces memory or not.
There may be some other reasons as mentioned in another answer that I am posting below:
The obvious reason is that something is retaining your viewController. You will have to look closely at your code. Do you do anything that in your class that uses delegates, since they sometimes retain the delegate. NSURLConnection will retain your class, and so does NSTimer. You can scatter code in you class and log your class's retain count, and try to find out where. In the code you showed so far the retain could should just be 1, since the class is only retained by the navigation controller.
Also, before you pop your view, get a reference to it, pop it with NO animation, and then send it some message that has it report the retain count (this would be some new method you write). That new method could also log other things, like whether it has any timers going, NSURLConnections, etc.
First of all, get rid of [super dealloc]. I know that's intuitive, but the documentation says don't do it.
In my own case, I had an observer & timer in my dealloc method, but that wouldn't run since the timer had a strong pointer to the controller.
Created a dedicated clean up method which removed the observer & invalidated the timer. Once that ran, the controller was correctly deallocated.

UITableView calling wrong DataSource

I created a Master-Detail-Application, which uses one DetailViewController and multiple TableViewDataSources. Every time the user touches an item, i check the items class and choose the right TableSource for it.
Just like this:
if ([_detailItem isKindOfClass: [cAdress class]]) {
self.dataSource = [[AddressDetailTableSource alloc] init];
((AddressDetailTableSource *) dataSource).current = _detailItem;
} else if ([_detailItem isKindOfClass: [cActivities class]]) {
self.dataSource = [[ActivityDetailTableSource alloc] init];
((ActivityDetailTableSource *) dataSource).current = _detailItem;
}...
Sometimes i go more into Detail and push a new DetailView above the current DetailView. I do this a lot with some different views. Choosing an item in the MasterView causes, that the application goes back to the first DetailView (popToRootViewController).
I now have a problem with one view in particular. When this view is on Top and i choose an item in the MasterView, my App crashes. With NSZombies i found out, that it still tries to build the table with the wrong DataSource. Or at least it tries to call "titleForHeaderInSection" on the wrong DataSource. The error message is:
[ItemDetailTableSource tableView:titleForHeaderInSection:]:message sent to deallocated instance...
The error only occurs with this specific TableSource, also i treat same all the same.
Can anyone help me to get rid of this problem?
Any help is appreciated!
I think your app is trying to access datasource using deallocated instance, you better have individual classes for each tableView, it will simplify your work, always try to modulize the classes instead of trying to put everything in just one class.

UIActivity activityViewController not dismissing on iPad

I have a UIActivity subclass that creates its own activityViewController:
- (UIViewController *)activityViewController {
WSLInProgressViewController* progressView = [[[WSLInProgressViewController alloc] init] autorelease];
progressView.message = [NSString stringWithFormat:NSLocalizedString(#"Posting to %#...",#"Posting to..."),
self.activityType];
return progressView;
}
I've add a full repro on GitHub.
According to the documentation, you aren't supposed to dismiss this manually. Instead, the OS does that when you call activityDidFinish:. This works fine when ran on an iPhone.
When I say "works," this is the sequence of events that I'm expecting (and see on the iPhone):
Display the UIActivityViewController
User presses my custom activity
My view controller appears
I call activityDidFinish:
My custom view controller is dismissed
The UIActivityViewController is also dismissed
However, when I run this same code on the iPad Simulator -- the only difference being that I put the UIActivityViewController in a popup, as the documentation says you should -- the activityViewController never dismisses.
As I say, this is code wo/the popUP works on the iPhone and I have stepped through the code so I know that activityDidFinish: is getting called.
I found this Radar talking about the same problem in iOS6 beta 3, but it seems such fundamental functionality that I suspect a bug in my code rather than OS (also note that it works correctly with the Twitter and Facebook functionality!).
Am I missing something? Do I need to do something special in the activityViewController when it's run in a UIPopoverViewController? Is the "flow" supposed to be different on the iPad?
The automatic dismissal only appears to happen when your 'activity' controller is directly presented, not wrapped in anything. So just before showing the popup it's wrapped in, add a completion handler
activity.completionHandler = ^(NSString *activityType, BOOL completed){
[self.popup dismissPopoverAnimated:YES];
};
and you'll be good.
I see the question is quite old, but we've been debugging the same view-controller-not-dismissing issue here and I hope my answer will provide some additional details and a better solution than calling up -dismissPopoverAnimated: manually.
The documentation on the UIActivity is quite sparse and while it hints on the way an implementation should be structured, the question shows it's not so obvious as it could be.
The first thing you should notice is the documentation states you should not be dismissing the view controller manually in anyway. This actually holds true.
What the documentation doesn't say, and what comes as an observable thing when you come across debugging the non-dissmissing-view-controller issue, is iOS will call your -activityViewController method when it needs a reference to the subject view controller. As it turns out, probably only on iPad, iOS doesn't actually store the returned view controller instance anywhere in it's structures and then, when it wants to dismiss the view controller, it merely asks your -activityViewController for the object and then dismisses it. The view controller instantiated in the first call to the method (when it was shown) is thus never dismissed. Ouch. This is the cause of the issue.
How do we properly fix this?
Skimming the UIActivity docs further one may stumble accross the -prepareWithActivityItems: method. The particular hint lies along the following text:
If the implementation of your service requires displaying additional UI to the user, you can use this method to prepare your view controller object and make it available from the activityViewController method.
So, the idea is to instantiate your view controller in the -prepareWithActivityItems: method and tackle it into an instance variable. Then merely return the same instance from your -activityViewController method.
Given this, the view controller will be properly hidden after you call the -activityDidFinish: method w/o any further manual intervention.
Bingo.
NB! Digging this a bit further, the -prepareWithActivityItems: should not instantiate a new view controller each time it's called. If you have previously created one, you should merely re-use it. In our case it happily crashed if we didn't.
I hope this helps someone. :)
I had the same problem. It solved for me saving activityViewController as member and return stored controller. Activity return new object and dismiss invoked on new one.
- (UIViewController *)activityViewController {
if (!self.detaisController) {
// create detailsController
}
return self.detailsController;
}
I pass through the UIActivity to another view then call the following...
[myActivity activityDidFinish:YES];
This works on my device as well as in the simulator. Make sure you're not overriding the activityDidFinish method in your UIActivity .m file as I was doing previously. You can see the code i'm using here.
a workaround is to ask the calling ViewController to perform segue to your destination ViewController via - (void)performActivity although Apple does not recommend to do so.
For example:
- (void)performActivity
{
if (UI_USER_INTERFACE_IDIOM() == UIUserInterfaceIdiomPad)
{
[self.delegate performSomething]; // (delegate is the calling VC)
[self activityDidFinish: YES];
}
}
- (UIViewController *)activityViewController
{
if (UI_USER_INTERFACE_IDIOM() == UIUserInterfaceIdiomPhone)
{
UIViewController* vc=XXX;
return vc;
}
else
{
return nil;
}
}
Do you use storyboards? Maybe in your iPad storyboard, the UIActivityIndicatorView doesn't have a check on "Hides When Stopped"?
Hope it helps!
So I had the same problem, I had a custom UIActivity with a custom activityViewController and when it was presented modally it would not dismiss not matter what I tried. The work around I choose to go with so that the experience remained the same to the user was to still use a custom UIActivity but give that activity a delegate. So in my UIActiviy subclass I have the following:
- (void)performActivity
{
if ([self.delegate respondsToSelector:#selector(showViewController)]) {
[self.delegate showViewController];
}
[self activityDidFinish:YES];
}
- (UIViewController *)activityViewController
{
return nil;
}
Then I make the view controller that shows the UIActivityViewController the delegate and it shows the view controller that you would otherwise show in activityViewController in the delegate method.
what about releasing at the end? Using non-arc project!
[progressView release];
Many Users have the same problem as u do! Another solution is:
UIActivityIndicatorView *progress= [[UIActivityIndicatorView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(125, 50, 30, 30)];
progress.activityIndicatorViewStyle = UIActivityIndicatorViewStyleWhiteLarge;
[alert addSubview:progress];
[progress startAnimating];
If you are using storyboard be sure that when u click on the activityind. "Hides When Stopped" is clicked!
Hope that helped...

Dismissing a modal view causes the app crash

I'm displaying a modal view called "rule" from a round rect button. In that "rule" modal view i'm displaying another modal view called "newRule" when user clicks the Create Rule button.
When i'm quitting from the "newRule" modal view the app crashes. Here's the code i had written for quitting the "newRule" modal view.
[self dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES];
Nothing is displayed in the console. When i tried to debug the code, it displayed a EXC_BAD_ACCESS after the dealloc method. My dealloc method looks like this:
[label release];
label = nil;
[imageArray release];
imageArray = nil;
[languageElementsArray release];
languageElementsArray = nil;
[super dealloc];
Please help me.
Is the label a UILabel object? Also what are in the arrays? Views are automatically released once their superview is released, so releasing a subview after its superview has been released (or releasing the subview then the superview) will cause an crash similar to the one you describe
I'm experiencing something similar. When I comment out the last line ( [super dealloc] ), it then works. Does this make a difference for you?
If you happen to be using Automatic Reference Counting in Xcode 4.2, then you should not have a [super dealloc] at all—which would result in this error.
Of course, in that context you likely should not be releasing these other objects either.

Resources