At minimal I want to achieve some indentation in index table. Like this:
+Parent
+--Child
+--Child of Child
+--Child
So I create the following:
ActiveAdmin.register Section do
config.filters = false
index do
column :name do |s|
" #{ "――" * s.depth } #{s.name}"
end
default_actions
end
controller do
def collection
Section.some_method_to_get_things_in_right_order
end
end
end
It's need to some_method return active record relation, but I haven't succeed. And ended up with this hacky way.
The sortable_tree activeadmin plugin works for me well with closure tree.
https://github.com/zorab47/active_admin-sortable_tree
It creates a simple hierarchical and sortable view.
Just put the following in your tree model resource (app/admin/TreeModel):
(assuming Rails >4, replace <..> with your values)
ActiveAdmin.register TreeModel do
config.filters = false # the default filters don't work unfortunately
permit_params <YOUR_TREE_MODEL_ATTRIBUTES>
sortable tree: true,
sorting_attribute: :<YOUR_SORT_ATTRIBUTE>,
parent_method: :parent,
children_method: :children,
roots_method: :roots
index :as => :sortable do
label :name # item content
actions
end
end
Related
I added the following filter in ActiveAdmin.
filter :roles, as: :select, collection Model::ROLES, multiple: true
but when i choose the filter value to search the roles. it gives me following error
PG::InvalidTextRepresentation: ERROR: malformed array literal: "teacher"LINE 1: ...ted" = $1 AND roles" IN('teacher
DETAIL: Array value must start with "{" or dimension information. ^
Any idea ? How we can search/Filter ARRAY field using AA filters? I'm using Rails 4.2.4,
ruby 2.2.2p95
I came up to a solution slightly different (and inspired by) this one over here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/45728004/1170086
Mine involves some changes (and prevent breaking contains operator in other cases). So, you're going to basically create two initializer files:
This one is for Arel, in order to support #> operator (array's contain operator in PG) for a given table column.
# config/initializers/arel.rb
module Arel
class Nodes::ContainsArray < Arel::Nodes::Binary
def operator
:"#>"
end
end
class Visitors::PostgreSQL
private
def visit_Arel_Nodes_ContainsArray(o, collector)
infix_value o, collector, ' #> '
end
end
module Predications
def contains(other)
Nodes::ContainsArray.new self, Nodes.build_quoted(other, self)
end
end
end
The other file aims to create a new Ransack predicate but I also decided to support the :array type (that's not natively supported in Ransack in terms of predicates).
# config/initializers/ransack.rb
module Ransack
module Nodes
class Value < Node
alias_method :original_cast, :cast
def cast(type)
return Array(value) if type == :array
original_cast(type)
end
end
end
end
Ransack.configure do |config|
config.add_predicate 'contains_array',
arel_predicate: 'contains',
formatter: proc { |v| "{#{v.join(',')}}" },
validator: proc { |v| v.present? },
type: :array
end
And in other to use it. All you need to do is:
User.ransack(roles_contains_array: %i[admin manager])
Or as a filter in ActiveAdmin (which is my case):
ActiveAdmin.register User do
# ...
filter :roles_contains_array, as: :select, collection: User.roles_for_select
# ...
end
I hope it works for you as it worked for me. ;)
You can set up a custom ransacker method to first collect the ids you want returned using a regular postgres search, and then return the results based on those ids:
class User < ApplicationRecord
ransacker :roles,
formatter: proc { |str|
data = where("? = ANY (roles)", str).map(&:id)
data.present? ? data : nil
} do |parent|
parent.table[:id]
end
end
If your filter is a select drop-down, then this should work fine. If you have a free-form text box, then make sure to use the "in" predicate:
filter :roles_in, as: :string
leandroico solutions works well.
But if you add the predicate with this formatter
formatter: proc { |v| "{#{v.join(', ')}}" }, (note the space after the comma)
Then you could use the multiple: true keyword in the filter input and filter by more than one value:
filter :roles_contains_array, as: :select, multiple: true, collection: User.roles_for_select
I used the answer from #leandroico to come up with the below wiki-type approach to doing this.
How to Create Custom SQL Searches for ActiveAdmin (using Arel and Ransack)
In ActiveAdmin, filters are declared in app/admin/model.rb like:
ActiveAdmin.register Model do
filter 'column_name', label: 'column_name', as: :string
end
That will make a searchbox available on the front-end with options to choose between
contains
equals
starts with
ends with
You can even do something like...
filter 'column_name_contains', label: 'column_name', as: :string
...to only have a contains type search available on the front-end.
You can also (after defining some custom methods elsewhere) specify other, non-built-in search methods, like:
filter 'column_name_custom_contains', label: 'column_name', as: :string
The rest of this doc will be about how to define this custom search method, custom_contains
Within config/initializers/arel.rb, define the following:
module Arel
# this example of custom_contains will cast the SQL column as ::text and then do a wildcard-wrapped ILIKE
class Nodes::CustomContains < Arel::Nodes::Binary
def operator
'::text ILIKE'.to_sym
end
end
class Visitors::PostgreSQL
private
def visit_Arel_Nodes_CustomContains(o, collector)
infix_value o, collector, '::text ILIKE '
end
end
module Predications
def custom_contains(column_value)
column_value = self.relation.engine.column_types[self.name.to_s].type_cast_for_database(column_value)
column_value = "%#{self.relation.engine.send(:sanitize_sql_like, column_value)}%" # wrap escaped value with % wildcard
column_value = Nodes.build_quoted(column_value, self)
Nodes::CustomContains.new(self, column_value)
end
end
end
module ActiveRecord::QueryMethods
def custom_contains(predicates)
return none if predicates.length == 0
predicates.map{ |column_name, column_value|
column_value = table.engine.column_types[column_name.to_s].type_cast_for_database(column_value)
column_value = "%#{table.engine.send(:sanitize_sql_like, column_value)}%" # wrap escaped value with % wildcard
column_value = Arel::Nodes.build_quoted(column_value)
where Arel::Nodes::CustomContains.new(table[column_name], column_value)
}.inject(:merge)
end
end
module ActiveRecord::Querying
delegate :custom_contains, :to => :all
end
Within config/initializers/ransack.rb, define the following:
Ransack.configure do |config|
config.add_predicate(
'custom_contains',
arel_predicate: 'custom_contains',
formatter: proc { |v| v.to_s },
validator: proc { |v| v.present? },
type: :string
)
end
The above has accomplished a couple of things:
1) You can use the custom_contains method that was delegate'd to all ActiveRecord models:
puts Model.custom_contains(column_name: 'search for me').to_sql
2) You can use Ransack to search against the Arel predicates that were defined:
puts Model.ransack(column_name_custom_contains: 'search for me').result.to_sql
However, in order to do the below in ActiveAdmin...
filter 'column_name_custom_contains', label: 'column_name', as: :string
...we must add a scope to Model so that there is a method, column_name_custom_contains, on Model
scope_name = "#{column_name}_custom_contains".to_sym
unless Model.methods.include?(scope_name)
Model.scope(
scope_name,
->(value) {
Model.custom_contains({column_name.to_sym => value})
}
)
end
Voila!
here is my code:
Perk not save on multiple select,when multiple true/false. perk save and habtm working.
class Perk < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :companies
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :perks
end
view perk/new.html.erb
<%= select_tag "company_id", options_from_collection_for_select(Company.all, 'id', 'name',#perk.companies.map{ |j| j.id }), :multiple => true %>
<%= f.text_field :name %>
Controller's code:
def new
#perk = Perk.new
respond_with(#perk)
end
def create
#perk = Perk.new(perk_params)
#companies = Company.where(:id => params[:company_id])
#perk << #companies
respond_with(#perk)
end
Your select_tag should return an array of company_ids:
<%= select_tag "company_ids[]", options_from_collection_for_select(Company.all, 'id', 'name',#perk.companies.map{ |j| j.id }), :multiple => true %>
http://apidock.com/rails/ActionView/Helpers/FormTagHelper/select_tag#691-sending-an-array-of-multiple-options
Then, in your controller, reference the company_ids param:
#companies = Company.where(:id => params[:company_ids])
(I assume that you've intentionally left out the #perk.save call in your create action... Otherwise, that should be included as well. Model.new doesn't store the record.)
It sounds like you may not have included company_id in the perk_params method in your controller. Rails four uses strong pramas this means you need to state the params you are allowing to be set.However it is difficult to say for sure without seeing more of the code.
In your controller you should see a method like this (there may be more options that just :name):
def perk_params
params.require(:perk).permit(:name)
end
You should try adding :company_id to it so it looks something like this:
def perk_params
params.require(:perk).permit(:name, :company_id)
end
if there are other params int your method leave them in and just added :company_id
EDIT to original answer
The above will only work on a one-to-many or one-to-one because you are using has_and_belongs_to_many you will need to add companies: [] to the end of your params list like this
def perk_params
params.require(:perk).permit(:name, companies: [] )
end
or like this
def perk_params
params.require(:perk).permit(:name, companies_ids: [] )
end
See these links for more details:
http://edgeapi.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/StrongParameters.html
http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/action_controller_overview.html#strong-parameters
I'm using activeadmin with Ruby 2.2.1 and Rails 4.2.0 for a trouble ticketing system. I need to hide/archive the closed tickets, but I don't know how...
index do
selectable_column
column :ticket
column :in_carico
column :inoltrato
column :categoria
column :oggetto do |n|
truncate(n.oggetto, omision: "...", length: 50)
end
column :note do |n|
truncate(n.note, omision: "...", length: 30)
end
column :created_at
column :stato
actions defaults: true do |a|
link_to 'Infoweb', "http://XXX/main/ticket_dettagli.asp?TT="+a.ticket , :target => "_blank"
end
end
In :stato I can choose 3 voices: working, suspended and closed.
Example using Post model.
You can register a model in AA for archived posts (/admin/archived_posts.rb):
ActiveAdmin.register Post, as: "Archived Posts" do
end
Then in Post model define a scope, returning only post, where, for example, status attribute is archived:
scope :archived, -> { where(status: 'archived') }
Then in already registered model in AA you use this scope in scoped_collection method:
ActiveAdmin.register Post, as: "Archived Posts" do
# ...
controller do
def scoped_collection
Post.archived
end
end
# ...
end
This is it, you have all the archived posts in this new tab of AA.
Of course, now, to not have posts, where status is archived in regular Post tab in AA (/admin/posts.rb), add new scope to Post model (/models/post.rb):
scope :not_archived, -> { where.not(status: 'archived') } # or something like this
and use it in scoped_collection method in /admin/posts.rb
So I am trying to implement multiple autocomplete using this gem and simple_form and am getting an error.
I tried this:
<%= f.input_field :neighborhood_id, collection: Neighborhood.order(:name), :url => autocomplete_neighborhood_name_searches_path, :as => :autocomplete, 'data-delimiter' => ',', :multiple => true, :class => "span8" %>
This is the error I get:
undefined method `to_i' for ["Alley Park, Madison"]:Array
In my params, it is sending this in neighborhood_id:
"search"=>{"neighborhood_id"=>["Alley Park, Madison"],
So it isn't even using the IDs for those values.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Edit 1:
In response to #jvnill's question, I am not explicitly doing anything with params[:search] in the controller. A search creates a new record, and is searching listings.
In my Searches Controller, create action, I am simply doing this:
#search = Search.create!(params[:search])
Then my search.rb (i.e. search model) has this:
def listings
#listings ||= find_listings
end
private
def find_listings
key = "%#{keywords}%"
listings = Listing.order(:headline)
listings = listings.includes(:neighborhood).where("listings.headline like ? or neighborhoods.name like ?", key, key) if keywords.present?
listings = listings.where(neighborhood_id: neighborhood_id) if neighborhood_id.present?
#truncated for brevity
listings
end
First of all, this would be easier if the form is returning the ids instead of the name of the neighborhood. I haven't used the gem yet so I'm not familiar how it works. Reading on the readme says that it will return ids but i don't know why you're only getting names. I'm sure once you figure out how to return the ids, you'll be able to change the code below to suit that.
You need to create a join table between a neighborhood and a search. Let's call that search_neighborhoods.
rails g model search_neighborhood neighborhood_id:integer search_id:integer
# dont forget to add indexes in the migration
After that, you'd want to setup your models.
# search.rb
has_many :search_neighborhoods
has_many :neighborhoods, through: :search_neighborhoods
# search_neighborhood.rb
belongs_to :search
belongs_to :neighborhood
# neighborhood.rb
has_many :search_neighborhoods
has_many :searches, through: :search_neighborhoods
Now that we've setup the associations, we need to setup the setters and the attributes
# search.rb
attr_accessible :neighborhood_names
# this will return a list of neighborhood names which is usefull with prepopulating
def neighborhood_names
neighborhoods.map(&:name).join(',')
end
# we will use this to find the ids of the neighborhoods given their names
# this will be called when you call create!
def neighborhood_names=(names)
names.split(',').each do |name|
next if name.blank?
if neighborhood = Neighborhood.find_by_name(name)
search_neighborhoods.build neighborhood_id: neighborhood.id
end
end
end
# view
# you need to change your autocomplete to use the getter method
<%= f.input :neighborhood_names, url: autocomplete_neighborhood_name_searches_path, as: :autocomplete, input_html: { data: { delimiter: ',', multiple: true, class: "span8" } %>
last but not the least is to update find_listings
def find_listings
key = "%#{keywords}%"
listings = Listing.order(:headline).includes(:neighborhood)
if keywords.present?
listings = listings.where("listings.headline LIKE :key OR neighborhoods.name LIKE :key", { key: "#{keywords}")
end
if neighborhoods.exists?
listings = listings.where(neighborhood_id: neighborhood_ids)
end
listings
end
And that's it :)
UPDATE: using f.input_field
# view
<%= f.input_field :neighborhood_names, url: autocomplete_neighborhood_name_searches_path, as: :autocomplete, data: { delimiter: ',' }, multiple: true, class: "span8" %>
# model
# we need to put [0] because it returns an array with a single element containing
# the string of comma separated neighborhoods
def neighborhood_names=(names)
names[0].split(',').each do |name|
next if name.blank?
if neighborhood = Neighborhood.find_by_name(name)
search_neighborhoods.build neighborhood_id: neighborhood.id
end
end
end
Your problem is how you're collecting values from the neighborhood Model
Neighborhood.order(:name)
will return an array of names, you need to also collect the id, but just display the names
use collect and pass a block, I beleive this might owrk for you
Neighborhood.collect {|n| [n.name, n.id]}
Declare a scope on the Neighborhood class to order it by name if you like to get theat functionality back, as that behavior also belongs in the model anyhow.
edit>
To add a scope/class method to neighborhood model, you'd typically do soemthing like this
scope :desc, where("name DESC")
Than you can write something like:
Neighborhood.desc.all
which will return an array, thus allowing the .collect but there are other way to get those name and id attributes recognized by the select option.
Converting a Rails 2 application to Rails 3, I have to replace the gem searchlogic. Now, using Rails 3.2.8 with the gem Ransack I want to build a search form which uses an existing scope. Example:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :year, lambda { |year|
where("posts.date BETWEEN '#{year}-01-01' AND '#{year}-12-31'")
}
end
So far as I know, this can be achieved by defining a custom ransacker. Sadly, I don't find any documentation about this. I tried this in the Postclass:
ransacker :year,
:formatter => proc {|v|
year(v)
}
But this does not work:
Post.ransack(:year_eq => 2012).result.to_sql
=> TypeError: Cannot visit ActiveRecord::Relation
I tried some variations of the ransacker declaration, but none of them work. I Need some help...
UPDATE: The scope above is just on example. I'm looking for a way to use every single existing scope within Ransack. In MetaSearch, the predecessor of Ransack, there is a feature called search_methods for using scopes. Ransack has no support for this out of the box yet.
ransack supports it out of the box after merging https://github.com/activerecord-hackery/ransack/pull/390 . you should declare ransakable_scopes method to add scopes visible for ransack.
From manual
Continuing on from the preceding section, searching by scopes requires defining a whitelist of ransackable_scopes on the model class. The whitelist should be an array of symbols. By default, all class methods (e.g. scopes) are ignored. Scopes will be applied for matching true values, or for given values if the scope accepts a value:
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :activated, ->(boolean = true) { where(active: boolean) }
scope :salary_gt, ->(amount) { where('salary > ?', amount) }
# Scopes are just syntactical sugar for class methods, which may also be used:
def self.hired_since(date)
where('start_date >= ?', date)
end
private
def self.ransackable_scopes(auth_object = nil)
if auth_object.try(:admin?)
# allow admin users access to all three methods
%i(activated hired_since salary_gt)
else
# allow other users to search on `activated` and `hired_since` only
%i(activated hired_since)
end
end
end
Employee.ransack({ activated: true, hired_since: '2013-01-01' })
Employee.ransack({ salary_gt: 100_000 }, { auth_object: current_user })
Ransack let's you create custom predicates for this, unfortunately the documentation leaves room for improvement however checkout: https://github.com/ernie/ransack/wiki/Custom-Predicates
Also I believe the problem you're trying to tackle is up on their issue tracker. There's a good discussion going on there: https://github.com/ernie/ransack/issues/34
I wrote a gem called siphon which helps you translate parameters into activerelation scopes. Combining it with ransack can achieves this.
You can read full explanation here. Meanwhile here's the gist of it
The View
= form_for #product_search, url: "/admin/products", method: 'GET' do |f|
= f.label "has_orders"
= f.select :has_orders, [true, false], include_blank: true
-#
-# And the ransack part is right here...
-#
= f.fields_for #product_search.q, as: :q do |ransack|
= ransack.select :category_id_eq, Category.grouped_options
```
ok so now params[:product_search] holds the scopes and params[:product_search][:q] has the ransack goodness. We need to find a way, now, to distribute that data to the form object. So first let ProductSearch swallow it up in the controller:
The Controller
# products_controller.rb
def index
#product_search = ProductSearch.new(params[:product_search])
#products ||= #product_formobject.result.page(params[:page])
end
The Form Object
# product_search.rb
class ProductSearch
include Virtus.model
include ActiveModel::Model
# These are Product.scopes for the siphon part
attribute :has_orders, Boolean
attribute :sort_by, String
# The q attribute is holding the ransack object
attr_accessor :q
def initialize(params = {})
#params = params || {}
super
#q = Product.search( #params.fetch("q") { Hash.new } )
end
# siphon takes self since its the formobject
def siphoned
Siphon::Base.new(Product.scoped).scope( self )
end
# and here we merge everything
def result
Product.scoped.merge(q.result).merge(siphoned)
end
end