Is there a way to get the image dimension of an image that was just resized? What I'm foing is taking a file and fitting it to a 48x48 area (note, I said FIT, not scale.) Once that's done, I need to get the new image's dimension but I don't want to have to write it out to disk, then reading it back in to use. Is there a way to do it without that step?
$img = new Imagick('file.jpg');
$img->resizeImage(48,48,Imagick::FILTER_LANCZOS,1,TRUE);
// this is where I need to get the dimensions of the new image created above, unless it's a perfect square, only one side will be 48 pixels, the other could be less.
Thanks.
Related
I'm trying to use a two step process of employing Gimp to delete sections of images and then using Inkscape for the remainder of the image work.
Unfortunately, I'm seeing a resolution change when doing the export to PNG from Gimp.
The exported image is around 50% larger than the original, which impacts the quality.
Is there a way to keep the resolution constant when exporting the file?
Hopefully I'm just forgetting something, since I've spent some time away from image work.
Please let me know if any additional info is required.
In the interim, I'll try another tool to do the Gimp step.
THANKS!
Edit: Updated size to resolution.
For a bitmap/raster image, resolution (for Gimp: "Image print resolution", see Image>Print size) is indicative. The only thing that counts is the size in pixels.
If you have image window set to "Dot for Dot" (Edit>Preferences>Image Windows->General>"Use dot for dot" or View>Dot for dot) the image is displayed with the definition of your screen (around 100PPI fore regular screens, 20OPPI for high def ones (Retina, etc...).
When you create the image (File>New...), you can specify a print definition and a print size, and Gimp will compute the required size in pixels.
I have users uploading images using filepicker, but I want them to have to upload an image of a certain size (and crop if the image is too big). I could cut it myself, but then it won't look good. Ideally, the user would crop it themselves.
I've tried this page: https://www.filepicker.com/documentation/file-ingestion/widgets/pick?v=v2 and I've tried various options but nothing seems to work quite well.
data-fp-image-min doesn't prevent users from uploading smaller images. data-fp-crop-force along with data-fp-crop-max and data-fp-crop-min doesn't do the trick either.
I'm open to using other image uploading libraries, but I like using filepicker. Seems like this is something other people would have run into.
I'm using rails btw.
From the docs:
data-fp-image-min - Images smaller than the specified dimensions will be upscaled to the minimum size.
So it doesn't really prevent users from uploading smaller images.
data-fp-crop-max and data-fp-crop-min specifies the maximum and minimum dimensions of the crop area so it won't give you specific dimensions.
I would recommend you to:
Set data-fp-crop-ratio - Specify the crop area height to width ratio. User will be able to adjust the crop area for each photo with desired ratio.
Set data-fp-crop-force="true" - User could not skip cropping image.
Then resize image to specific height or width.
This will result, you will always get the image with the desired dimensions.
Example for 150 x 200 image output:
Html widget:
<input type="filepicker"
data-fp-crop-ratio="3/4"
data-fp-crop-force="true"
mimetype="image/*"
onchange="window.upload(event)"
data-fp-apikey="APUGwDkkSvqNr9Y3KD4tAz" />
Javascript:
window.upload = function(event){
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.fpfile));
var listElem = document.createElement("li");
var image = document.createElement("img");
/*
set w=150 (width) conversion option
so all images would be 150x200
and crop_first option to make sure the image is cropped
before any other conversion parameters are executed.
*/
image.setAttribute('src', event.fpfile.url + '&w=150&crop_first=true');
listElem.appendChild(image);
document.getElementById('results').appendChild(listElem);
};
Here is working solution: http://jsfiddle.net/krystiangw/9o9ebddL/
I am displaying a grid of images (3rows x 3 columns) in collection view. Each image is a square and its width is determined to be 1/3 of collectionView's width. Collection view is pinned to left and right margin of the mainView.
I do not know what the image height and width will be at runtime, because of different screen sizes of various iPhones. For example each image will be 100x100 display pixels on 5S, but 130x130 on 6+. I was advised to supply images that exactly matches the size on screen. Bigger images often tend to become pixelate and too sharp when downsized. How does one tackle such problem?
The usual solution is to supply three versions, for single-, double-, and triple-resolution screens, and downsize in real time by redrawing with drawInRect into a graphics context when the image is first needed.
I do not know what the image height and width will be at runtime, because of different screen sizes of various iPhones. For example each image will be 100x100 display pixels on 5S, but 130x130 on 6+
Okay, so your first sentence is a lie. The second sentence proves that you do know what the size is to be on the different screen sizes. Clearly, if I tell you the name of a device, you can tell me what you think the image size should be. So, if you don't want to downscale a larger image at runtime because you don't like the resulting quality, simply supply actual images at the correct size and resolution for every device, and use the correct image on the actual device type you find yourself running on.
If your images are photos or raster type images created using a raster drawing tool, then somewhere you will have to scale the original to the sizes you want. You can either do this while running in iOS, or create sets up front using a tool which can give you better scaling results. Unfortunately, the only perfect image will be the original with everything else being a distortion of the truth.
For icons, the only accurate rendering solution is to use vector graphics. Tools like Adobe Illustrator will let you create images which you can scale to different sizes without losing clarity. Unfortunately this still leaves you generating images up front. You can script this generation using most tools and given you said your images were all square, then the total number needed is not huge. At most you need 3 for iPhone (4/5 are same width, 6 and 6+) and 2 for iPad (#1 for mini/ipad1 and #2 for retina).
Although iOS has no direct support I know of for vector image rendering, there are some 3rd party tools. http://www.paintcodeapp.com/ is an example which seems to let you import vector images or draw vector images and then generate image code to run in your app. This kind of tool would give you what you want as the images are now vector drawings drawn at the scale you choose at run time. $99 though.
There is also the SVGKit (https://github.com/SVGKit/SVGKit), but not sure how good/bad this is. It seems to let you simply load and render direct from SVG files. Might be worth trying.
So in summary, I think you either generate the relatively small subset up front using a tool you can control the output from, take the hit in iOS and let it scale the images or use a 3rd party vector to image rendering kit which would give you what you want.
I have 2 relatively small pngs that will be images inside UIButtons.
Once our app is finished, we might want to resize the buttons and make them smaller.
Now, we can easily do this by resizing the button frame; the system automatically re-sizes the images smaller.
Would the system's autoresize cause the image to look ugly after shrinking the image? (i.e., would it clip pixels and make it look less smooth than if I were to shrink it in a photo editor myself?)
Or would it better to make the image the sizes they are intended to be?
It is always best to make the images of correct size from the beginning. All resize-functions will have negative impact on the end result. If you scale it up to a larger image it will be a big different, but even if you scale it down to a smaller it is usually creating visible noise in the image. Let's say that you have a line of one pixel in your image. scale it down to 90% of the original size, this line will just use 90% of a pixel wide and other parts of the images will influence the colors of the same pixels.
I have a series of images that I would look to loop through using iOS's [UIView startAnimating]. My trouble is that, when I exported the images, they all came standard in a 240x160 size, although only 50x50 contains the actual image, the rest being transparent parts that are just taking up space.
When I set the frame of the image automatically using image.size.width and image.size.height, iOS takes into images' original size of 240x160, so I am unable to get a frame that conforms to the actual parts of the image. I was wondering if there is a way using Illustrator or Photoshop, or any other graphics editing software for me to export the images based on their natural dimensions, and not a fixed dimension. Thanks!
I am a fan of vector graphics and thinks everything in the world should be vector ;-) so here is what you do in illustrator: file - document setup - edit artboards. Then click on the image, and the artboard should adjust to the exact size. You can of course have multiple artboards, or simply operate with one artboard and however-many images.