I want to match strings of the forms:
123
.123
1.123
and I am using the following string for my regex
#"^\\d*(?:\\.\\d+)?$"
However, it matches strings of the following forms as well
1.2.3
1..2..3
123...
What's wrong with my regex? I used the ^ and $ because I don't want the string to contain anything other than the number forms mentioned.
EDIT:
I logged what is matched in the string like 78..7 and found that the match location is 0 and length is 0 with a result of "" being matched. Any ideas? Shouldn't the range location be NSNotFound if the length is 0? I suppose the regex expression is fine then and I can just check for !length but that seems like an unnecessary work around.
Try this regex:
^(?<!\.)\d*(\.\d+)?$
I added a negative look-behind assertion that means that no dot is allowed before that numbers. That should fix your problem.
Description
This regex will find valid positive real numbers with or without a decimal point. like 123, .123, 1.123. The expression can be applied against a string where each value tested is on it's own line or find numbers in the middle of a block of text. It will also allow punctuation like periods and commas directly after the number but won't capture them.
(?<=^|\s)\d*\.?\d+(?=[,.;]?(?:\s|$))
Given Input String:
1.2.3
1..2..3
128...
1234
.123
1.123
1...23
1.2.3
123...
I like kittens 345.23, and version 2.3.4 dogs
Matches are:
1234
.123
1.123
345.23
Does this work for you?
#"^\\d*\\.?\\d+$"
Here it is without escaped backslashes:
^\d*\.?\d+$
My best guess is that rekire is right about the $ symbol not working. If that's the case, then the regex does actually match the empty substring at the start of the string, which explains why it says it's found a match of length 0 at location 0, instead of NSNotFound.
This is REGEX match your strings:
[0-9]*(.){0,1}[0-9]+
Related
I've been looking for a good way to see if a string of items are all numbers, and thought there might be a way of specifying a range from 0 to 9 and seeing if they're included in the string, but all that I've looked up online has really confused me.
def validate_pin(pin)
(pin.length == 4 || pin.length == 6) && pin.count("0-9") == pin.length
end
The code above is someone else's work and I've been trying to identify how it works. It's a pin checker - takes in a set of characters and ensures the string is either 4 or 6 digits and all numbers - but how does the range work?
When I did this problem I tried to use to_a? Integer and a bunch of other things including ranges such as (0..9) and ("0..9) and ("0".."9") to validate a character is an integer. When I saw ("0-9) it confused the heck out of me, and half an hour of googling and youtube has only left me with regex tutorials (which I'm interested in, but currently just trying to get the basics down)
So to sum this up, my goal is to understand a more semantic/concise way to identify if a character is an integer. Whatever is the simplest way. All and any feedback is welcome. I am a new rubyist and trying to get down my fundamentals. Thank You.
Regex really is the right way to do this. It's specifically for testing patterns in strings. This is how you'd test "do all characters in this string fall in the range of characters 0-9?":
pin.match(/\A[0-9]+\z/)
This regex says "Does this string start and end with at least one of the characters 0-9, with nothing else in between?" - the \A and \z are start-of-string and end-of-string matchers, and the [0-9]+ matches any one or more of any character in that range.
You could even do your entire check in one line of regex:
pin.match(/\A([0-9]{4}|[0-9]{6})\z/)
Which says "Does this string consist of the characters 0-9 repeated exactly 4 times, or the characters 0-9, repeated exactly 6 times?"
Ruby's String#count method does something similar to this, though it just counts the number of occurrences of the characters passed, and it uses something similar to regex ranges to allow you to specify character ranges.
The sequence c1-c2 means all characters between c1 and c2.
Thus, it expands the parameter "0-9" into the list of characters "0123456789", and then it tests how many of the characters in the string match that list of characters.
This will work to verify that a certain number of numbers exist in the string, and the length checks let you implicitly test that no other characters exist in the string. However, regexes let you assert that directly, by ensuring that the whole string matches a given pattern, including length constraints.
Count everything non-digit in pin and check if this count is zero:
pin.count("^0-9").zero?
Since you seem to be looking for answers outside regex and since Chris already spelled out how the count method was being implemented in the example above, I'll try to add one more idea for testing whether a string is an Integer or not:
pin.to_i.to_s == pin
What we're doing is converting the string to an integer, converting that result back to a string, and then testing to see if anything changed during the process. If the result is =>true, then you know nothing changed during the conversion to an integer and therefore the string is only an Integer.
EDIT:
The example above only works if the entire string is an Integer and won’t properly deal with leading zeros. If you want to check to make sure each and every character is an Integer then do something like this instead:
pin.prepend(“1”).to_i.to_s(1..-1) == pin
Part of the question seems to be exactly HOW the following portion of code is doing its job:
pin.count("0-9")
This piece of the code is simply returning a count of how many instances of the numbers 0 through 9 exist in the string. That's only one piece of the relevant section of code though. You need to look at the rest of the line to make sense of it:
pin.count("0-9") == pin.length
The first part counts how many instances then the second part compares that to the length of the string. If they are equal (==) then that means every character in the string is an Integer.
Sometimes negation can be used to advantage:
!pin.match?(/\D/) && [4,6].include?(pin.length)
pin.match?(/\D/) returns true if the string contains a character other than a digit (matching /\D/), in which case it it would be negated to false.
One advantage of using negation here is that if the string contains a character other than a digit pin.match?(/\D/) would return true as soon as a non-digit is found, as opposed to methods that examine all the characters in the string.
please i want to validate the inputs from a user, the format for the inputs would be: 3 uppercase characters, 3 integer numbers, an optional space, a -, an optional space, either a 'LAB or ((EN or ENLH) with 1 interger number ranging from a [1-9]).
The regex i wrote is
/\D{3}\d{3}\s?-\s?(LAB|(EN(LH)?\d{1}))/
am finding it difficult to stop inputs after the LAB so that when EEE333 - LAB1 is inputed it becomes invalid.
If you are asking how to prevent LAB1 at the end, use an end of line anchor $ in your regex test:
/\D{3}\d{3}\s?-\s?(LAB|(EN(LH)?\d{1}))$/
If you are trying to require exactly one digit at the end of the acceptable strings, move the single digit match outside of the optional groups:
/\D{3}\d{3}\s?-\s?(LAB|(EN(LH)?))\d{1}$/
I have wrote for you the following regular expression:
[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{3}\s?-\s?(?:LAB|(?:EN|LH))[1-9]{1}
The regex works a follows:
[A-Z]{3}
MATCH EXACTLY THREE UPPERCASE CHARACTERS RANGING FROM A TO Z
[0-9]{3}
MATCH EXACTLY THREE NUMBERS RANGING FROM 0 TO 9
\s?\-\s?
MATCH a space (optional) or a '-' (required) or a space (optional)
(?:LAB|(?:EN|LH))
MATCH 'LAB' OR ('EN' OR 'LH')?: omits capturing LAB OR EN OR LH
[1-9]{1}
MATCH EXACTLY ONE NUMBERS RANGING FROM 1 TO 9
You could place your regex between word boundaries \b.
You start your regex with \D which is any character that is not a digit. That would for example also match $%^. You could use [A-Z].
You use \d{1} which is a shorhand for [0-9], but you want to match a digit between 1 and 9 [1-9]. You could also omit the {1}.
Maybe this updated will work for you?
\b[A-Z]{3}\d{3} ?- ?(?:LAB|(?:EN(?:LH)?[1-9]))\b
Explanation
A word boundary \b
Match 3 uppercase characters [A-Z]{3}
Match 3 digits \d{3}
Match an optional whitespace, a hyphen and another optional whitespace ?- ?
A non capturing group which for example matches LAB or EN EN1 or ENLH or ENLH9 (?:EN(?:LH)?[1-9]))
A word boundary \b
I can't figure out what does this regex match:
A: "\\/\\/c\\/(\\d*)"
B: "\\/\\/(\\d*)"
I suppose they are matching some kind of number sequence since \d matches any digit but I'd like to know an example of a string that would be a match for this regex.
The pattern syntax is that specified by ICU. Expressions are created with NSRegularExpression in an iOS app and are correct.
The first matches //c/ + 0 or more digits. The second matches // + 0 or more digits. In both the digits are captured.
An example of a match for A) is //c/123
An example of a match for B) is //12345
When I use Cygwin which emulates Bash on Windows, I sometimes run into situations where I have to escape my escape characters which is what I think is making this expression look so weird. For instance, when I use sed to look for a single '\' I sometimes have to write it as '\\\\'. (Funny, StackOverflow proved my point. If you write 4 backslashes in the comment, it only shows two. So if you process it again, they might all disappear depending on your situation).
Considering this, it might be helpful to think of pairs of backslashes as representing only one if you're coming from a similar situation. My guess would be you are. Because of this I would say Erik Duymelinck is probably spot on. This will capture a sequence of digits that may or may not follow a couple slashes and a c:
//c/000
//00000
This regex matches an odd sequence of characters, which, at first glance, almost seem like a regex, since \d is a digit, and followed by an asterisk (\d*) would mean zero-or-more digits. But it's not a digit, because the escape-slash is escaped.
\\/\\/c\\/(\\d*)
So, for instance, this one matches the following text:
\/\/c\/\
\/\/c\/\d
\/\/c\/\dd
\/\/c\/\ddd
\/\/c\/\dddd
\/\/c\/\ddddd
\/\/c\/\dddddd
...
This one is almost the same
\\/\\/(\\d*)
except you just delete the c\/ from the above results:
\/\/\
\/\/\d
\/\/\dd
\/\/\ddd
\/\/\dddd
\/\/\ddddd
\/\/\dddddd
...
In both cases, the final \ and optional d is [capture group][1] one.
My first impression was that these regexes were intended for escaping in Java strings, meaning they would be completely invalid. If the were escaped for Java strings, such as
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("\\/\\/c\\/(\\d*)");
It would be invalid, because after un-escaping, it would result in this invalid regex:
\/\/c\/(\d*)
The single escape-slashes (\) are invalid. But the \d is valid, as it would mean any digit.
But again, I don't think they're invalid, and they're not escaped for a Java string. They're just odd.
I have a string from which I want to extract a certain part:
Original String: /abc/d7_t/g-12/jkl/m-n3/pqr/stu/vwx
Result Desired: /abc/d7_t/g-12/jkl/
The number of characters can vary in the entire string. It has alphabets, numbers, underscore and hyphen. I want to basically cut the string after the 5th "/"
I tried a few regex, but it seems there is some mistake with the format.
If a non-regexp approach is acceptable, how about this:
s.split('/').take(n).join('/')+'/'
Where s if your string (in your case: /abc/d7_t/g-12/jkl/m-n3/pqr/stu/vwx).
def cut_after(s, n)
s.split('/').take(n).join('/')+'/'
end
Then
cut_after("/abc/d7_t/g-12/jkl/m-n3/pqr/stu/vwx", 5)
should work. Not as compact as a regexp, but some people may find it clearer.
The regexp would be: %r(/(?:[^/]+/){4}). Note that it is a good idea in this case to use the %r literal version to avoid escaping slashes. Unescaped slashes are likely the cause of your format errors.
Match any sequence of chars except '/' 4 times :-
(\/[^\/]+){4}\/
I would like to use regular expression to check if my string have the format like following:
mc_834faisd88979asdfas8897asff8790ds_oa_ids
mc_834fappsd58979asdfas8897asdf879ds_oa_ids
mc_834faispd8fs9asaas4897asdsaf879ds_oa_ids
mc_834faisd8dfa979asdfaspo97asf879ds_dv_ids
mc_834faisd111979asdfas88mp7asf879ds_dv_ids
mc_834fais00979asdfas8897asf87ggg9ds_dv_ids
The format is like mc_<random string>_oa_ids or mc_<random string>_dv_ids . How can I check if my string is in either of these two formats? And please explain the regular expression. thank you.
That's a string start with mc_, while end with _oa_ids or dv_ids, and have some random string in the middle.
P.S. the random string consists of alpha-beta letters and numbers.
What I tried(I have no clue how to check the random string):
/^mc_834faisd88979asdfas8897asff8790ds$_os_ids/
Try this.
^mc_[0-9a-z]+_(dv|oa)_ids$
^ matches at the start of the line the regex pattern is applied to.
[0-9a-z] matces alphabetic and numeric chars.
+ means that there should be one or more chars in this set
(dv|oa) matches dv or oa
$ matches at the end of the string the regex pattern is applied to.
also matches before the very last line break if the string ends with a line break.
Give /\Amc_\w*_(oa|dv)_ids\z/ a try. \A is the beginning of the string, \z the end. \w* are one or more of letters, numbers and underscores and (oa|dv) is either oa or dv.
A nice and simple way to test Ruby Regexps is Rubular, might have a look at it.
This should work
/mc_834([a-z,0-9]*)_(oa|dv)_ids/g
Example: http://regexr.com?2v9q7