I started out with a simple MVC-site using NancyFx with Razor-views (.cshtml) and Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet, using IIS Express. Now I adapted the project to a self-hosting service using Nancy.Hosting.Self (and TopShelf).
However, to provide the Views, it seems I need to change their properties from None & Do not copy to Content & Copy if newer, so they are copied to .\bin\Debug\.
One consequence is that changes to the Views will not be shown/updated until a restart. Even when working in debug-mode, where caching is disabled by default. I know this is just a minor annoyance, but still an annoyance, and it is nice to be able to try (cs)HTML-changes right away. So I was wondering is there a way to fix this, e.g. to prevent having to set the files to Copy if newer?
You can provide a custom root path that looks directly at the views folder in your project.
You will need to set these values:
#if DEBUG
StaticConfiguration.Caching.EnableRuntimeViewDiscovery = true
EnableRuntimeViewUpdates = true
#endif
Related
This is the new little code on my View.cshtml:
#Html.HiddenFor(i => i.vVendaUnitarioSemImpostoSemFormatacao)
When I'm on debug mode, it works normally, but when I put in release mode and publish on azure, doesn't update what I've codded.
I've already tried:
Click on compiling before publishing in visual studio options.
Tried to set true on .csproj <MvcBuildViews>true</MvcBuildViews>
Publishing from another computer
Change another View from my project and works normally, but that one specifically don't.
Tried to put optimizeCompilations="true on <compilation> in web.config
Tried to copy and paste on ftp project to check if will work.
Someone can help me on that?
I saw this post Certain Razor views not publishing . What I did to resolve the problem was create another view, with another name and change the code where I'm calling the old view.
We have four different environments - dev VMs, dev, QA and prod. All environments have the following setting for the "website" site:
<site name="website" virtualFolder="/" physicalFolder="/"
rootPath="/sitecore/content" startItem="/home" database="master"
domain="extranet" allowDebug="true" cacheHtml="false"
htmlCacheSize="10MB" registryCacheSize="0" viewStateCacheSize="0"
xslCacheSize="5MB" filteredItemsCacheSize="2MB" enablePreview="true"
enableWebEdit="true" enableDebugger="true"
disableClientData="false" loginPage="/" hostName="www.site.com"
enableFallback="true" enforceVersionPresence="true"/>.
So on VM and prod, www.site.com/en/home/press and www.site.com/en/press work.
But on dev and QA, www.site.com/en/home/press works but www.site.com/en/press doesn't work. (Works with startItem but gets a 404 without it).
This is happening with ISAPI enabled and disabled both (no exceptions).
I am not sure what is going on here or where else to look except to make sure that my start item is in good shape which it seems to be.
What can I do to resolve this? If you need more information please let me know.
Thanks
Try looking at the:
"linkManager" tag in the web.config, there is a property called:
languageEmbedding: asNeeded | always | never
which could be set differently on those solutiuons.
If you have Multi-Language website it is recommended to go with
languageEmbedding: always
Advantages :
Some time in IE8 the Language cookie is destroyed, because of that
the language displayed is change randomly.(We have faced this issue
in our environment) LanguageEmbadding : Always will keep the Information and will work without any Issue.
If you have set asNeeded then First time the Language will be displayed and next time onward it will be hidden. But this will create issue with Google Analytics. In GA you will have 2 diff URL with same page content so your analysis will be unnecessarily divided in to 2 pages.
And Yes you can check if there is any difference is Config files. As Mentioned by Martijn you can use the www.site.com/sitecore/admin/showconfig.aspx Copy the Config, compare it using any file compare tool like WinMerge etc.
What is the Hierarchy in your project?
Sitecore-Content-home-Press or
Sitecore-Content-home-Home-Press?
In my project the setting you have mentioned has database = web.
I can't add a comment, but as Martijn says you need to compare the configs. Now this should be very easy since you should be using config include files and so the changes between the environments should be very minimal. If you are not using them then you should start using them, it makes life much easier to figure out the differences from default Sitecore installation and will also make your upgrades much easier in the future. Or maybe you are using them for the other environments and that is what is causing the issue?
All About web.config Include Files with the Sitecore ASP.NET CMS
As for comparing the configs, use a file comparison tool like WinMerge as already metioned, that should weed out the differences much more easily.
Also, as Maulik says, default config has: database="web" content="master"
This seems like config differences. Compare the live configs by using www.site.com/sitecore/admin/showconfig.aspx. This way you can see the actual config which also includes all your /app_config/include/ files
As sf_sandbox has set up the symfony environment, why not develop in the sandbox directly and then upload on to server? What are the disadvantages of sandbox compared with configuring manually?
I think there is no drawback in following this approach. sf_sandbox is a pre-configured symfony project. One of the pluses is that is saves you time in creating your project and initializing an empty application (by default this is called frontend).
It's more a matter of taste rather than a matter of right or wrong. It's up to you!
Note: If you follow this approach you have to make some initial configuration (steps 1,2,3 would be done anyway if you started your project from scratch):
Rename the project
Change the config/properties.ini file
Change the config/databases.yml file (by default sf_sandbox uses sqlite database)
Remove the data/sandbox.db database file
I am creating web application in C# using ASP.NET MVC and I am using MSSQL server installed on my machine.
Also I wanted to publish application as open source project, and run it on production server.
Should I add web.config file to source code repository? If i should, how I should track "open source version" (pointing on MsSQL installed on localhost) and production version (pointing on my hosting of web.config (I am using Mercurial).
The recommended way to do this is as follows:
Create a copy of the public version of the file you'd like people to use as a starting point, and name it something other than the actual usable file. In your case, it could be web.config.template. Make sure the file would be usable if you just renamed it.
Instruct Mercurial to ignore the actual file, ie. web.config
If possible, make the build process figure out if the actual file is present, and if not, make a copy from the template file into the actual file
If step 3 is not possible, a batch file to make the actual file is the next best thing, or simple instructions on how to make it.
This ensures that:
There is a simple way of getting the actual configuration file
You can edit your local actual configuration file without worrying about committing it (it is ignored)
If step 3 was possible, this is largely transparent unless you need to make modifications to the file
Step 3 can be handled with a pre-build event for your project, something like:
if not exist web.config copy web.config.template web.config
You could commit a generic version to your repository, probably on the initial load only (so that the project will build for those who don't know how to create their own), and then add an ignore rule later so that you can add your connection strings and whatnot.
Does anyone have any good techniques for easily switching between development and live builds for asp.net mvc websites? Every time I make some changes I need to change to go through my web.config and comment out all my local stuff and uncomment all my remote settings. I also need to update the linq-to-sql dbml file to point to the right connection string.
This happens every time I make a change in a controller. After I upload the changes I then have to do the same process and get it back to development (local) mode.
Is there an automatic way to handle this, or at least one setting that can flag between the two?
Thanks
a way I've done is to make two groups of configuration settings
<LiveSomeSetting>something</LiveSomeSetting>
<TestSomeSetting>anotherthing</TestSomeSetting>
Then in my class that reads configuration info, I'd check on something like the system environment / computer name and if applicable to the name of your LIVE machine look at the settings... otherwise the development.
if (System.Environment.MachineName.ToLower().StartsWith("devMachineName"))
IsLive = "Test";
else
IsLive = "Live";
Application["IsLive"] = IsLive;
SomeSetting = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[IsLive + "SomeSetting"];
I use a simple technique that Scott Hanselman blogged in '97. It basically involves maintaining separate web.config files for each of you build types. Then there is a pre-build event which copies the correct web.config into place.
It does have the down side of having to maintain 2+ web.config files but once you're up and running it isn't really that big an issue.
Have a look here at the article:
Managing Multiple Configuration File Environments with Pre-Build Events
HTHs,
Charles