Show a refresh page IOS-Xamarin - ios

For my ios application I need to handle those cases where the server returns an error, there are a couple of errors I am interested in handle, such as Not Found and Timed Out.
I'm developing with Xamarin and Windows Azure Mobile Services. So far, I know how to catch these exceptions, however, in case of an exception I would like to show a view that contains a refresh button, which the user can press in order to refresh (go to the server and see if there is new data, remove the refresh view, and display the new info).
this is how I'm capturing the exceptions thrown by the server:
public async RefreshAsync(){
try
{
var results = await DailyWorkoutTable.ToListAsync();
wod = results.FirstOrDefault();
SetupUI();
}
catch(Exception e)
{
var ex = e.GetBaseException() as MobileServiceInvalidOperationException;
if(ex.Response.StatusCode == 404)
{
//this is where I need to set up the refresh view and
//and add a UIButton to it
Console.WriteLine("Daily workout not found");
}
}
}
I don't know what's the right way to accomplish this. If I create a UIView and add a UIButton to it, with an event which calls RefreshAsync again, it will not work and is not the most elegant way to do it.
Is there another approach on this?? please help.

Here is an example you can use as a starting point:
/// <summary>
/// A class for performing Tasks and prompting the user to retry on failure
/// </summary>
public class RetryDialog
{
/// <summary>
/// Performs a task, then prompts the user to retry if it fails
/// </summary>
public void Perform(Func<Task> func)
{
func().ContinueWith(t =>
{
if (t.IsFaulted)
{
//TODO: you might want to log the error
ShowPopup().ContinueWith(task =>
{
if (task.IsCompleted)
Perform(func);
}, TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext());
}
}, TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext());
}
/// <summary>
/// Wraps a retry/cancel popup in a Task
/// </summary>
private Task ShowPopup()
{
var taskCompletionSource = new TaskCompletionSource<bool>();
var alertView = new UIAlertView("", "Something went wrong, retry?", null, "Ok", "Cancel");
alertView.Dismissed += (sender, e) => {
if (e.ButtonIndex == 0)
taskCompletionSource.SetResult(true);
else
taskCompletionSource.SetCanceled();
};
alertView.Show();
return taskCompletionSource.Task;
}
}
To use it:
var retryDialog = new RetryDialog();
retryDialog.Perform(() => DoSomethingThatReturnsTask());
This example is prior to async/await support, but you can refactor it if desired.
You might also consider making Perform() return a Task and become async -- depending on your use case.

Related

Asp.Net MVC How to send Updated model to view?

I am making an app that will trigger timers on my webpage whenever certain voice commands are spoken with the help of
using System.Speech.Recognition;
My voice recognition works. Goal: Every time a phrase is recognized, to send that phrase to the view, where I can start and stop timers based on the recognized phrase.
I know how to simply send a model to my view:
return View(SpeechRecognition.RecognizedPhrase);
But how can I accomplish sending a new phrase to my view everytime one is recognized? I dont want to return a new View every time, I just want to update the current model already inside my view every time a new phrase is recognized. How can I accomplish this?
My Controller
public class MapsController : Controller
{
// GET: Maps
public async Task<ActionResult> CursedHollow()
{
try
{
SpeechRecognition.GrammarRecognized += OnGrammarRecognized;
var t = Task.Run(() => SpeechRecognition.Init());
t.Wait();
if(!SpeechRecognition.isCurrentlyListening)
{
SpeechRecognition.StartListening();
}
}
catch(Exception e)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(e.Message);
}
//****I WANT TO SEND THE UPDATED RECOGNIZED PHRASE HERE, BUT NOT RETURN A WHOLE VIEW
return View(SpeechRecognition.RecognizedPhrase);
}
public static void OnGrammarRecognized(SpeechRecognizedEventArgs e)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Recognized grammar from controller: " + SpeechRecognition.RecognizedPhrase);
}
}
Use PartialView and Update the Partial View using Ajax.

Using events to trigger ActionResult in ASP.NET MVC

I am working on an ASP.NET MVC web service. In a web page, when a user clicks on a button, this triggers a complex method that takes a bit of time to finish. I want to redirect the user to a waiting page and then, when the process is finished, to redirect the user to a new page.
When the process is done it raises an event, which I can listen to from the controller. But I cannot make the last step to work (the controller redirecting to the new page upon receiving the event).
Here is my very naïve attempt at doing it (with simpler names):
public MyController()
{
EventsControllerClass.ProcessComplete += new EventHandler<MyArgsClass>(OnEventReceived);
}
private void OnEventReceived(object sender, MyArgsClass eventArguments)
{
RedirectToPage();
}
private ActionResult RedirectToPage()
{
return RedirectToAction("PageName");
}
After many days working on this, I have a viable solution. It may not be pretty, but it works, and maybe some ideas can be useful for other people, so here it goes:
I will explain the solution to my particular problem: I need a button to redirect to a "waiting" page while a longer process runs in the background and raises an event when it is finished. When this event is received, we want to redirect the user (automatically) to a final page.
First, I created a class to listen to the event. I tried doing this directly in the controller, but you need to be careful about signing and unsigning, because apparently controllers get created and destroyed at each request. In this "listener class" I have a bool property that is set to "true" when the event is received.
When the first action is triggered, the controller normally redirects to the "wait" page, where I have this simple java script redirecting to the new action:
<script type="text/javascript">
window.location = "#Url.Action("WaitThenRedirect", "AuxiliaryControllerName")";
</script>
This sets in motion the long process (through another event). The key is that I do this with an asynchronous action (this controller inherits from AsyncController). (Note I used an auxiliary controller. This is to keep all asynchronous stuff apart.) This is how this looks (more info here):
public static event EventHandler<AuxiliaryEventsArgs> ProcessReady;
public void WaitThenRedirectAsync()
{
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment();
ProcessReady += (sender, e) =>
{
AsyncManager.Parameters["success"] = e.success;
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement();
};
WaitForEvent();
}
public ActionResult WaitThenRedirectCompleted(bool success)
{
if (success)
{
return RedirectToAction("RedirectToView", "ControllerName");
}
else
{
return RedirectToAction("UnexpectedError", "ControllerName");
}
}
private void WaitForEvent()
{
bool isWaitSuccessful = true;
int waitingLoops = 0;
int waitingThreshold = 200;
int sleepPeriod = 100; // (milliseconds)
while (!EventsListener.IsTheThingReady())
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(sleepPeriod);
++waitingLoops;
if (waitingLoops > waitingThreshold)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Waiting timed out!");
isWaitSuccessful = false;
break;
}
}
isWaitSuccessful = true;
if (null != ProcessReady)
{
AuxiliaryEventsArgs arguments = new AuxiliaryEventsArgs();
arguments.success = isWaitSuccessful;
try
{
ProcessReady(null, arguments);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Error in event ProcessReady" + ex);
}
}
}
I believe it is possible to use ajax syntax for alternative solutions, but this is what I have and it works nicely. I believe this is not a very common need, but hopefully someone will benefit!

How do I get the current attempt number on a background job in Hangfire?

There are some database operations I need to execute before the end of the final attempt of my Hangfire background job (I need to delete the database record related to the job)
My current job is set with the following attribute:
[AutomaticRetry(Attempts = 5, OnAttemptsExceeded = AttemptsExceededAction.Delete)]
With that in mind, I need to determine what the current attempt number is, but am struggling to find any documentation in that regard from a Google search or Hangfire.io documentation.
Simply add PerformContext to your job method; you'll also be able to access your JobId from this object. For attempt number, this still relies on magic strings, but it's a little less flaky than the current/only answer:
public void SendEmail(PerformContext context, string emailAddress)
{
string jobId = context.BackgroundJob.Id;
int retryCount = context.GetJobParameter<int>("RetryCount");
// send an email
}
(NB! This is a solution to the OP's problem. It does not answer the question "How to get the current attempt number". If that is what you want, see the accepted answer for instance)
Use a job filter and the OnStateApplied callback:
public class CleanupAfterFailureFilter : JobFilterAttribute, IServerFilter, IApplyStateFilter
{
public void OnStateApplied(ApplyStateContext context, IWriteOnlyTransaction transaction)
{
try
{
var failedState = context.NewState as FailedState;
if (failedState != null)
{
// Job has finally failed (retry attempts exceeded)
// *** DO YOUR CLEANUP HERE ***
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
// Unhandled exceptions can cause an endless loop.
// Therefore, catch and ignore them all.
// See notes below.
}
}
public void OnStateUnapplied(ApplyStateContext context, IWriteOnlyTransaction transaction)
{
// Must be implemented, but can be empty.
}
}
Add the filter directly to the job function:
[CleanupAfterFailureFilter]
public static void MyJob()
or add it globally:
GlobalJobFilters.Filters.Add(new CleanupAfterFailureFilter ());
or like this:
var options = new BackgroundJobServerOptions
{
FilterProvider = new JobFilterCollection { new CleanupAfterFailureFilter () };
};
app.UseHangfireServer(options, storage);
Or see http://docs.hangfire.io/en/latest/extensibility/using-job-filters.html for more information about job filters.
NOTE: This is based on the accepted answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38387512/2279059
The difference is that OnStateApplied is used instead of OnStateElection, so the filter callback is invoked only after the maximum number of retries. A downside to this method is that the state transition to "failed" cannot be interrupted, but this is not needed in this case and in most scenarios where you just want to do some cleanup after a job has failed.
NOTE: Empty catch handlers are bad, because they can hide bugs and make them hard to debug in production. It is necessary here, so the callback doesn't get called repeatedly forever. You may want to log exceptions for debugging purposes. It is also advisable to reduce the risk of exceptions in a job filter. One possibility is, instead of doing the cleanup work in-place, to schedule a new background job which runs if the original job failed. Be careful to not apply the filter CleanupAfterFailureFilter to it, though. Don't register it globally, or add some extra logic to it...
You can use OnPerforming or OnPerformed method of IServerFilter if you want to check the attempts or if you want you can just wait on OnStateElection of IElectStateFilter. I don't know exactly what requirement you have so it's up to you. Here's the code you want :)
public class JobStateFilter : JobFilterAttribute, IElectStateFilter, IServerFilter
{
public void OnStateElection(ElectStateContext context)
{
// all failed job after retry attempts comes here
var failedState = context.CandidateState as FailedState;
if (failedState == null) return;
}
public void OnPerforming(PerformingContext filterContext)
{
// do nothing
}
public void OnPerformed(PerformedContext filterContext)
{
// you have an option to move all code here on OnPerforming if you want.
var api = JobStorage.Current.GetMonitoringApi();
var job = api.JobDetails(filterContext.BackgroundJob.Id);
foreach(var history in job.History)
{
// check reason property and you will find a string with
// Retry attempt 3 of 3: The method or operation is not implemented.
}
}
}
How to add your filter
GlobalJobFilters.Filters.Add(new JobStateFilter());
----- or
var options = new BackgroundJobServerOptions
{
FilterProvider = new JobFilterCollection { new JobStateFilter() };
};
app.UseHangfireServer(options, storage);
Sample output :

DevExpress MVC PivotGrid Custom Actions Keep Firing

I am using a DevExpress MVC Pivot Grid and trying to work out some problems with the loading and saving of layouts. So far I have the following:
I have set my CustomActionRouteValues in the PivotGridSettings as follows:
CustomActionRouteValues = new { Controller = "Home", Action = "PivotGridCustomCallback" },
Which points to the following:
public ActionResult PivotGridCustomCallback(string action, string reportName)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(reportName))
{
reportName = "Report 1";
}
var settings = PivotGridLayoutHelper.DefaultPivotGridSettings;
if (action == "Save")
{
// TODO: Find a better solution than this. At the moment, if Save is called once, it is then called again every time the user changes the layout.. which is why we have the 'saved' variable here.
bool saved = false;
settings.AfterPerformCallback = (sender, e) =>
{
if (saved)
{
return;
}
SaveLayout(((MVCxPivotGrid)sender).SaveLayoutToString(), reportName);
saved = true;
};
}
else if (action == "Load")
{
// TODO: Find a better solution than this. At the moment, if Load is called once, it is then called again every time the user changes the layout.. which is why we have the 'loaded' variable here.
bool loaded = false;
string layoutString = LoadLayout(reportName);
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(layoutString))
{
settings.BeforeGetCallbackResult = (sender, e) =>
{
if (loaded)
{
return;
}
((MVCxPivotGrid)sender).LoadLayoutFromString(layoutString, PivotGridWebOptionsLayout.DefaultLayout);
loaded = true;
};
}
}
ViewBag.PivotSettings = settings;
return PartialView("PivotPartial");
}
The problem, as you can see in the code comments, is that after performing an action just one time, it then gets called EVERY time I make any sort of change. So, for example... say I load a report.. that's fine.. but then when I try expand something or add a field.. or do ANYTHING, nothing seems to happen on the UI.. and I figured out that's because immediately, this code gets called again:
settings.BeforeGetCallbackResult = (sender, e) =>
{
((MVCxPivotGrid)sender).LoadLayoutFromString(layoutString, PivotGridWebOptionsLayout.DefaultLayout);
};
That just keeps resetting the values to the saved layout, which means the UI looks like it's unresponsive when trying to change anything.
This is why I now have the boolean variable called loaded to check if it's already loaded. That works.. but it's an ugly hack.. because it's making unnecessary trips to the server each and every time the user does anything on the pivot grid.
Surely there must be a way to prevent these actions from firing all the time?

is an async controller apropos here?

I have a system whereby users can upload sometimes large(100-200 MB) files from within an MVC3 application. I would like to not block the UI while the file is uploading, and after some research, it looked like the new AsyncController might let me do what I'm trying to do. Problem is - every example I have seen isn't really doing the same thing, so I seem to be missing one crucial piece. After much futzing and fiddling, here's my current code:
public void CreateAsync(int CompanyId, FormCollection fc)
{
UserProfile up = new UserRepository().GetUserProfile(User.Identity.Name);
int companyId = CompanyId;
// make sure we got a file..
if (Request.Files.Count < 1)
{
RedirectToAction("Create");
}
HttpPostedFileBase hpf = Request.Files[0] as HttpPostedFileBase;
if (hpf.ContentLength > 0)
{
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment();
BackgroundWorker worker = new BackgroundWorker();
worker.DoWork += (o, e) =>
{
string fileName = hpf.FileName;
AsyncManager.Parameters["recipientId"] = up.id;
AsyncManager.Parameters["fileName"] = fileName;
};
worker.RunWorkerCompleted += (o, e) => { AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement(); };
worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
RedirectToAction("Uploading");
}
public void CreateCompleted(int recipientId, string fileName)
{
SystemMessage msg = new SystemMessage();
msg.IsRead = false;
msg.Message = "Your file " + fileName + " has finished uploading.";
msg.MessageTypeId = 1;
msg.RecipientId = recipientId;
msg.SendDate = DateTime.Now;
SystemMessageRepository.AddMessage(msg);
}
public ActionResult Uploading()
{
return View();
}
Now the idea here is to have the user submit the file, call the background process which will do a bunch of things (for testing purposes is just pulling the filename for now), while directing them to the Uploading view which simply says "your file is uploading...carry on and we'll notify you when it's ready". The CreateCompleted method is handling that notification by inserting a message into the users's message queue.
So the problem is, I never get the Uploading view. Instead I get a blank Create view. I can't figure out why. Is it because the CreateCompleted method is getting called which shows the Create view? Why would it do that if it's returning void? I just want it to execute silently in the background, insert a message and stop.
So is this the right approach to take at ALL? my whole reason for doing it is with some network speeds, it can take 30 minutes to upload a file and in its current version, it blocks the entire application until it's complete. I'd rather not use something like a popup window if I can avoid it, since that gets into a bunch of support issues with popup-blocking scripts, etc.
Anyway - I am out of ideas. Suggestions? Help? Alternate methods I might consider?
Thanks in advance.
You are doing it all wrong here. Assume that your action name is Create.
CreateAsync will catch the request and should be a void method and returns nothing. If you have attributes, you should apply them to this method.
CreateCompleted is your method which you should treat as a standard controller action method and you should return your ActionResult inside this method.
Here is a simple example for you:
[HttpPost]
public void CreateAsync(int id) {
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment();
var task = Task<double>.Factory.StartNew(() => {
double foo = 0;
for(var i = 0;i < 1000; i++) {
foo += Math.Sqrt(i);
}
return foo;
}).ContinueWith(t => {
if (!t.IsFaulted) {
AsyncManager.Parameters["headers1"] = t.Result;
}
else if (t.IsFaulted && t.Exception != null) {
AsyncManager.Parameters["error"] = t.Exception;
}
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement();
});
}
public ActionResult CreateCompleted(double headers1, Exception error) {
if(error != null)
throw error;
//Do what you need to do here
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
Also keep in mind that this method will still block the till the operation is completed. This is not a "fire and forget" type async operation.
For more info, have a look:
Using an Asynchronous Controller in ASP.NET MVC
Edit
What you want here is something like the below code. Forget about all the AsyncController stuff and this is your create action post method:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult About() {
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => {
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000);
if (!System.IO.Directory.Exists(Server.MapPath("~/FooBar")))
System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(Server.MapPath("~/FooBar"));
System.IO.File.Create(Server.MapPath("~/FooBar/foo.txt"));
});
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
Notice that I waited 10 seconds there in order to make it real. After you make the post, you will see the it will return immediately without waiting. Then, open up the root folder of you app and watch. You will notice that a folder and file will be created after 10 seconds.
But (a big one), here, there is no exception handling, a logic how to notify user, etc.
If I were you, I would look at a different approach here or make the user suffer and wait.

Resources