I am working on a project where we have a very slim server (Linux, Nginx, Sqlite), but our web application shall not show any signs of shortcomings (should contain charts, dashboards, nice looking controls) – so I need the client to do all the heavy work.
I assume that BreezeJS would be good in this case, because it manages data on the client, in a way that reduces workload on the server. The server only sends the data to the client and at some point gets data back that has to be saved to the database. All caching and other stuff is managed on the client.
I assume AngularJS would also be good in this case, because it is a client-side MVC-framework, again reducing workload on the server. It also works seamlessly together with BreezeJS.
I assume Wijmo would also be good in this case, because it provides nice looking controls and also works seamlessly together with BreezeJS and AngularJS.
Are my assumptions right? Any comments?
My only concerns are how I get BreezeJS to “talk” with the Linux-server (Nginx, Sqlite). Are there any samples regarding this? Is anyone working on something similar?
We will be releasing a NodeJS/Express/Mongo example within the next few weeks that should show how to communicate with an arbitrary non-.NET backend. (also see the current 'Edmunds' example in the Breeze zip). But we don't have anything yet that explicity shows Breeze working with a Linux backend. Please vote for this here: Breeze User Voice
Related
We have a Rails app that acts HTTP API only. On the client side, Ember.js is currently used. We are not overly impressed by Ember and really like the approach Meteor.js takes. So we'd like to exchange the client side with Meteor.js and communicate with the Rails server via websockets that speak the Data Distribution Protocol (DDP), so we can keep using the models, mailers and controllers in Rails. Implementing server side of DDP should be easy.
However, we're unsure how to make Rails talk websockets. We found Reel, which seems to make it easy to accept websocket requests in a standalone environment. Reel seems great as we'd like to implement the DDP on top of the Celluloid stack anyway. But what about running Reel in the Rails environment? Would we need "rails runner" for that? And we'd like to keep using the existing controllers to dispatch incoming requests (like, to add/change/remove resources). Is that even possible without having the request coming through Rack?
Any input is appreciated.
It's a bit late, but I've implemented DDP in Ruby, you can check it out here:
https://github.com/d-snp/ruby-ddp-server
It includes an implementation of EJSON as well. It's built on top of celluloid-websocket, and can be ran simply as a rack app.
I've made an integration with RethinkDB that can be used as a reference to build your own collections implementation.
https://github.com/d-snp/ruby-ddp-server-rethinkdb
I've also made a sample chat application that can be found here:
https://github.com/d-snp/celluloid-rethinkdb-chat
It's something that I have been longing to do as well, to integrate old "legacy" Rails code. Here is the best way I have found:
Since you would not be using any of Rails router/controller/views, but just the ability to read data and push it to the client, I recommend you use Rails to create JSON apis to the database, and deploy the code, then in Meteor you can consume the data via the http package, this would happen on the server at a regular interval and populate the MongoDB with the normalized data you need, then it would serve the browser client.
I am working on such an application that will keep a normalized version of the data in Mongo, and a relational version of the data in mySql (through Rails) this way I can preserve the legacy Rails functionality that I dont want to rewrite in JS, and get the benefit of Meteor for the one page that I need it most.
I a thinking of creating an iPhone/iOS app that would include a feature where one user could create a list of words and then save them to their account on a server. Also (and this is very important), the user could share their list with other users by giving them permission.
So my question is, how can I go about creating such a server? For right now, I have a home computer (running Windows XP that just stores data for my music system) which I can use to host the server. I am also open to the use of other online storage services like Google Drive or Dropbox (I can't remember if Amazon does anything like that). However (and I know this may complicate things a bit), but at least for now, I want/need to stick with free services/options.
Just to recap, the key features that I am looking for are:
create users/accounts (on the server)
eventually I may [try] to incorporate the use of other services to log users in like with their email account, OpenId, etc.
the ability to access (log in to) the server (with credentials) from my app
the ability to send/receive data between the server and my app
the ability to share data between users
I know this is a lot to ask for, but if anyone has any suggestions or can get me going in the right direction, it would be much appreciated.
The basic setup would be as follows:
Backend: Database (MySQL), Web server (Apache), with server side scripting (PHP).
Client: iOS device with developed app.
Communication: use HTTP client/server model, communicating with something like JSON.
This is much the same setup as a web server, but instead of serving html/css/javascript etc the results will be JSON.
As far as implementing specifics such as login in, and sharing data between users, this is purely dependent on your implementation. This is not trivial, and not something that can be easily stated in a single post.
Hope this helps.
You could build your own webservice in PHP, Ruby or Python. If you do so I would recommend building a RESTful webservice (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_state_transfer) and then use RestKit (http://restkit.org/) to handle the data in the iOS app. Especially RestKit's CoreData integration is nice in my opinion.
Another solution would be using a service like Parse (https://parse.com/products/data). The first million or so requests per month are free but after that it could get pricy. I personally have not tried it so I couldn't tell you if it is any good.
I have built two rails apps that need to communicate and send files between each other. For example one rails app would send a request to view a table in the other apps' database. The other app would then render json of that table and send it back. I would also like one app to send a text file stored in its public directory to the other app's public directory.
I have never done anything like this so I don't even know where to begin. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
You requirement is common for almost all the web apps irrespective of rails, Communicating with each other is required by most modern web apps. But there is a small understanding that you need to get hold on,
Web sites should not directly access each others internal data (such as tables), (even if they are build by the same language (in this case Rails) by the same developer),
That is where the web-services comes in to play, So you should expose your data through web services so that not only rails application can consume that, but also any app that knows how to consume a web service will get benefit.
Coming back to your question with Rails, rails supports REST web services out of the box, So do some googling about web services, REST web services with rails
HTH
As a starting point, look at ActiveResource.
Railscast
docs
Message queuing systems such as RabbitMQ may be used to communicate things internally between different apps such as a "mailer" app and a main "hub" application.
Alternatively, you can use a shared connection to something like redis stick things onto a "queue" in one app and read them for processing from the other.
In recent Rails versions, it is rather easy to develop API only applications. In the Rails core master, there was even a special application type for these apps briefly (until it got yanked again). But it is still available as a plugin and probably one day becomes actually part of Rails core again. See http://blog.wyeworks.com/2012/4/20/rails-for-api-applications-rails-api-released for more information.
To actually develop and maintain the API of the backend service and make sure both backend and frontend have the same understanding of the resources, you can use ROAR which is great way to build great APIs.
Generally, you should fully define your backend application with an API. Trying to be clever and to skip some of the design steps will only bring you headaches in the long run...
Check out Morpheus. It lets you create RESTful services and use familiar ActiveRecord syntax in the client.
I have an existing complex website built using ASP.NET MVC, including a database backend, data layer, as well as the Web UI layer. Rebuilding this website in another language is not a feasible option.
There are some UI elements on some views (client side) which would benefit from live interactivity, involving both push and pull, so rather than implement some kind of custom long polling or websocket server in asp.net, I am looking to leverage node.js for Windows, and Socket.io.
My problem is that I need two way communication between both applications. Each user should only be able to receive data once they are authorised on the ASP.NET website, so I first need communication for this. Secondly, once certain events occur on the ASP.NET website I want to immediately push this data to the Node server, to be broadcast to specific users or groups of users. Thirdly, I would like any data sent to the node.js server to be pushed to the ASP.NET website for processing, as this is where all our business logic lies. The sole reason for adding Node.js is to have the possibility to push data directly to the client, I do not want to build any business logic into it (or as little as possible).
I would like to know what the fastest method of two-way push communication is between Node.Js and ASP.NET. The only good option I'm aware of so far is to create a special listener on a specific port on the node.js server and connect to that, but I was wondering if there's a more elegant or more efficient method? I also know that you could use a database inbetween but surely this would need to be polled and would be less efficient? Both servers will be running on the same server under a Visual Studio project.
Many thanks for any help you can provide.
I'm not an ASP.NET expert, but I think there are multiple ways you can achieve this:
1) As you said, you could make Node listen on a specific port for data and then react based on the data received (TCP)
2) You can make POST requests to Node.js (HTTP) and also send an auth-key in the process to be extra-secure. Like on 1) Node would react to the data you send.
3) Use something like Redis for pub-sub, send messages from ASP.NET (pub) and get them on the Node.js part (sub). This is even better if you want to scale your app across multiple machines etc.
The only good option I'm aware of so far is to create a special
listener on a specific port on the node.js server and connect to that,
but I was wondering if there's a more elegant or more efficient
method?
You can try to look at redis pub/sub model where ASP.NET MVC application and node.js would communicate through separate channels in order to achieve full-duplex communication. Or you can also try to use CouchDB change nofitications.
I also know that you could use a database inbetween but surely this
would need to be polled and would be less efficient?
Former techniques do not require you to poll for changes, but instead they will notify you when the changes happens or channel message arrives.
I'm trying to create a ruby on rails ecommerce application, where potential customers will be able to place an order and the store owner will be able to receive the order in real-time.
The finalized order will be recorded into the database (at the moment SQLite), and the storeowner will have a browser window open, where the new orders will appear just after the order is finalized.
(Application info: I'm using the HOBO rails framework, and planning to host the app in Heroku)
I'm now considering the best technology to implement this, as the application is expected to have a lot of users sending in a lot of orders:
1) Each browser window refreshes the page every X minutes, polling the server continuously for new records (new orders). Of course, this puts a heavy load on the server.
2) As above, but poll the server with some kind of AJAX framework.
3) Use some kind of server push technology, like 'comet' asynchronous messaging. Found Juggernaut, only problem is that it is using Flash and custom ports, and this could be a problem as my app should be accessible behind corporate firewalls and NAT.
4) I'm also checking node.js framework, seems to be efficient for this kind of asynchronous messaging, though it is not supported in Heroku.
Which is the most efficient way to implement this kind of functionality? Is there perhaps another method that I have not thought of?
Thank you for your time and help!
Node.js would probably be a nice fit - it's fast, loves realtime and has great comet support. Only downside is that you are introducing another technology into your solution. It's pretty fun to program in tho and a lot of the libraries have been inspired by rails and sinatra.
I know heroku has been running a node.js beta for a while and people were using it as part of the recent nodeknockout competition. See this blog post. If that's not an option, you could definitely host it elsewhere. If you host it at heroku, you might be able to proxy requests. Otherwise, you could happily run it off a sub domain so you can share cookies.
Also checkout socket.io. It does a great job of choosing the best way to do comet based on the browser's capabilities.
To share data between node and rails, you could share cookies and then store the session data in your database where both applications can get to it. A more involved architecture might involve using Redis to publish messages between them. Or you might be able to get away with passing everything you need in the http requests.
In HTTP, requests can only come from the client. Thus the best options are what you already mentioned (polling and HTTP streaming).
Polling is the easier to implement option; it will use quite a bit of bandwidth though. That's why you should keep the requests and responses as small as possible, so you should definitely use XHR (Ajax) for this.
Your other option is HTTP streaming (Comet); it will require more work on the set up, but you might find it worth the effort. You can give Realtime on Rails a shot. For more information and tips on how to reduce bandwidth usage, see:
http://ajaxpatterns.org/Periodic_Refresh
http://ajaxpatterns.org/HTTP_Streaming
Actually, if you have your storeowner run Chrome (other browsers will follow soon), you can use WebSockets (just for the storeowner's notification though), which allows you to have a constant connection open, and you can send data to the browser without the browser requesting anything.
There are a few websocket libraries for node.js, but i believe you can do it easily yourself using just a regular tcp connection.