What is the difference between the fetch command and the search command in IMAP?
I am trying to get the messages in my inbox, I use the following command to retrieve the UID:
sb = receiveResponse("$ UID SEARCH ALL\r\n");
then I use this command to fetch a particular message header:
sb = receiveResponse("$ FETCH " + number+ " BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From Subject Date)]\r\n");
Does the fetch command use the UID to get the message header or does it use the message number?
If it uses the message number, how do I retrieve the message numbers?
Use UID FETCH to fetch by uid. Use just FETCH to fetch by message sequence number.
If you want to just download all messages in the INBOX folder, all you need to do is
FETCH 1:* BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (From Subject Date)]
Related
We have a published app in the Teams App Store.
Now we are implementing expiration date for all messages in database to wipe them after some period of time.
If we need to restore some messages we're using protected api.
/* Get Direct Messages */
messages = graphClient.chats(chatId).messages().buildRequest().get();
But there's a problem with direct chats we can't find the ChatID anywhere, we only have ConversationId.
If we look closer to ChatID we can see that we can actually generate it:
/* Example Chat ID: */
String chatId =
"19:f9b63c6a-c731-4a52-8203-60d886978f9a_5a287066-43c0-40b0-8e39-d8779e37ae38#unq.gbl.spaces"
We can generate it using User AADID and Bot AADID like this:
String chatId = "19:" + UserAADID + "_" + BotAADID + "#unq.gbl.spaces"
Is this a good way to generate ChatIDs and can we just hardcode these parameters: "19:", "#unq.gbl.spaces" ?
And if not then how can we get a ChatID of a direct conversation?
We are using Java Bot Framework and Java Graph SDK (com.microsoft.graph:microsoft-graph:3.7.0)
I am writing an Office Outlook add-in that has a React frontend and a dotnet core backend. I have set up a subscription using the Graph API to receive notifications when a new email appears on the SentItems folder. I want to correlate the email from the notification with information I have stored in a database.
Unfortunately the item id changes when the email is sent and moves from the Drafts folder into SentItems so it isn't useful for matching.
There is a new ImmutableId that doesn't change when the email is moved between folders. I've been unable to get the Office.js lib to generate an ImmutableId but there is a translateExchangeIds method that when given an email item id will return an immutable id.
// convert to immutable
var translateRequest = new {
inputIds = new string [] { mailMessage.ItemId },
targetIdType = "restImmutableEntryId",
sourceIdType = "restId"
};
var immutableResponse = await graphClient.PostAsJsonAsync("me/translateExchangeIds", translateRequest);
var immutableId = await immutableResponse.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
I can use that immutable id to retrieve the email message using the Graph request:
await graphClient.GetAsync($"Users/cccccccc-dddd-eeee-ffff-ba0c52e56d99/Messages/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC-EWg0AQ-irLc2NFESKcGAhz1k_GBBDB5JMOwAA/
But the immutable id that is returned with the subscription notification is a different immutable id for the same message. So it's not possible to match the notification mail message with the message info stored in my database. So I still have to attach a custom property to the message for the sole purpose of matching the database entry with the SentItems notification.
Is there a better way to deal with this issue?
Update: my theory is the difference occurs because the immutable id is derived when the item is in different folders? When translating the item id to an immutable id, the item is still in the Drafts folder. When the subscription notification occurs, the item is in the Sent Items folder. The following responses were from queries using the different immutable id's but identify the same message - the myId GUID is a custom property attached to the message and used to correlate the notification with the message info stored in a local database.
\"id\":\"AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC-EWg0AQ-irLc2NFESKcGAhz1k_GAADB4INPAAA\",...,\"myId\":\"8baa904f-cf64-437c-878c-be4f71714aee\"
\"id\":\"AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC-EWg0AQ-irLc2NFESKcGAhz1k_GAADB4INLwAA\",...,\"myId\":\"8baa904f-cf64-437c-878c-be4f71714aee\"
We fixed this and now you should see the same ImmutableId for draft and sent messages. Can you try and let us know if this is working as expected?
i have a problem to get label email from Gmail. i was tried using Gmail API. that totally works fine. but that has a problem. gmail API does not have a listener (email idle). so now we using IMAP for getting the email. but i have no idea how to get id email by the label (update,promotions,social etc) with IMAP.
its possible to get id email by label using IMAP?
thanks
Labels are generally mapped to folder names, fairly directly. Each message appears in any IMAP Folder that it is labelled with.
However, GMail has a set of extensions to IMAP documented where you can fetch the labels for a message more directly. They have added a X-GM-LABELS item for FETCH and STORE.
Here's there an example there:
a010 FETCH 1:4 (X-GM-LABELS)
* 1 FETCH (X-GM-LABELS (\Inbox \Sent Important "Muy Importante"))
* 2 FETCH (X-GM-LABELS (foo))
* 3 FETCH (X-GM-LABELS ())
* 4 FETCH (X-GM-LABELS (\Drafts))
a010 OK FETCH (Success)
Note special/system labels are prefixed with a \.
I store sent messages in a log table with their unique SIDs. With a periodic console task I iterate over the records having status = undelivered and request the status of it and if it's still undelivered, I'd like to re-send that very message. I don't want a new one as the message contains a verification code and we store only hash of it. Is it possible to re-send the old message having its SID?
Twilio Developer Evangelist here,
There is not a way to automatically resend an undelivered message using the API. You can work around this by grabbing the messages by SID and sending the undelivered ones again to the same number with the same body. When you use the REST API to get a message by SID, you have access to all of the data from that message, including the exact message body.
A quick example using the Twilio PHP Library would look like this:
<?php
$client = new Services_Twilio($AccountSid, $AuthToken);
$messageSIDs = array("Insert", "Array of", "Message SIDs", "here");
foreach ($messageSIDs as $sid) {
$msg = $client->account->messages->get($sid);
if ($msg->status == "undelivered") {
echo "Resending undelivered message for SID: $sid\n";
$sms = $client->account->messages->sendMessage(
// The number we are sending from.
$msg->from,
// The number we are sending to.
$msg->to,
// The sms body.
$msg->body
);
}
}
You can see all of the data that the REST API gives you about messages here
I am building an application where I need the option to share via email and SMS.
I have done the share via Email, where when the user selects the image, the url is passed as the content of the email. But while sharing via SMS, I can't do something like setContent as I did for email and fetch the url in the SMS directly, instead of user typing the address manually.
I am using Message class in email and MessageConnection class for SMS, as shown in the blackberry community example.
The Message object you receive when calling MessageConnection.newMessage(TEXT_MESSAGE) is actually a TextMessage object (or a BinaryMessage object with BINARY_MESSAGE).
If you cast the received object to the proper class (TextMessage or BinaryMessage), you should be able to use its setPayloadText(String data) (or setPayloadData(byte[] data) for a BinaryMessage) to enter a value in the message before sending it.
Your code should look like this:
Message msg = myMessageConnection.newMessage(TEXT_MESSAGE, /* address */);
TextMessage txtMsg = (TextMessage)msg;
txtMsg.setPayloadText(/* Text to send */);
myMessageConnection.send(msg);
When you send an email, you can set the body of it and send it to the user from the Email native application. You cant do taht for SMSs. I worked on that issue and for BB Torch I was able to set the text of the SMS message but for other devices that was impossible. I always obtain an empty text message!!
So y suggestion to you is using the following code wich will send the SMS to a number without the interference of the user
MessageConnection conn = (MessageConnection) Connector.open("sms://" + userNumber);
TextMessage txtmessage = (TextMessage) conn.newMessage(MessageConnection.TEXT_MESSAGE);
txtmessage.setPayloadText(text);
conn.send(txtmessage);