I've started using travis-ci to automate my builds. I have several open source projects and they all deploy to nexus sonatype from where they go to maven central. They're all Java projects that use Maven to build and github as a repo.
I've been doing this manually for years and I have appropriate keys and logins and my pom is compatible etc.
Implementing the first one was easy enough, it is a single module project and it builds and deploys just fine. Then I did a second one, a multi module project and got that working in much the same way. My third, however, is baffling me.
The maven build on this thing is a bit tricky but it does run fine locally and I even have it running the actual build on travis successfully. But the deploy doesn't work.
The problem is that when it tries to connect to nexus sonatype I get an authorisation error:
Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy (default-deploy) on project madura-bundles:
Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer artifact nz.co.senanque:madura-bundles:pom:4.5.6 from/to sonatype-nexus-staging (https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/):
Failed to transfer file: https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/nz/co/senanque/madura-bundles/4.5.6/madura-bundles-4.5.6.pom.
Return code is: 401, ReasonPhrase: Unauthorized.
It looks like I have not set up my sonatype credentials correctly. But I have set it up the same way as I did for the other two projects. Specifically I go into Nexus Sonatype and get my Access User Token and add those to my environment (SONATYPE_USERNAME and SONATYPE_PASSWORD, I deleted both of these and re-entered them in case it was a typo). I also add references to those in my local maven settings file:
...
<server>
<id>ossrh</id>
<username>${env.SONATYPE_USERNAME}</username>
<password>${env.SONATYPE_PASSWORD}</password>
</server>
...
The local maven settings file is a file in my project and the .travis.yml maven commands refer to it. The travis.yml file has a deploy section identical to the other two (working) projects, except I have been adding extra bits to try and make it work. But none of the differences there look relevant. The working deploys look like this:
deploy:
provider: script
script: "mvn versions:set -DnewVersion=${TRAVIS_TAG} && mvn clean deploy -B -U -P release --settings travis/settings.xml"
on:
tags: true
so this is only going to kick off if the repo has been tagged and it uses the tag as the version number. In the other projects this works fine, but not in the one I'm trying to get working. The tag does trigger the deploy as it should, but the deploy fails.
Does anyone know why I get the deploy on one project but not another? Thanks for any help.
Okay, I figured it out. The problem is that the parent pom of the failing project does not have a release profile, the parent pom of the working project does have one. The release profile in both cases looks like this:
<profile>
<id>release</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-gpg-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>sign-artifacts</id>
<phase>verify</phase>
<goals>
<goal>sign</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.sonatype.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>nexus-staging-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.6.3</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
<configuration>
<serverId>ossrh</serverId>
<nexusUrl>https://oss.sonatype.org/</nexusUrl>
<autoReleaseAfterClose>true</autoReleaseAfterClose>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
It is needed to sign the generated artifacts (jar files, javadoc files etc) with the gpg plugin and to deploy them to nexus. The deploy to nexus is attempted without this but because it didn't have the reference to serverId:ossrh it doesn't pick up credentials from the maven settings file and therefore I get an authorization error.
The release profile needs to be on the parent project and all the module projects. I had added it to the modules but forgot the parent.
I have a WAR project that also produces some extra artefacts that I want to deploy to my artifact repo. So I have configured executions under the deploy plugin to deploy each of the extra artefacts
<execution>
<id>deploy-exe</id>
<phase>deploy</phase>
<goals>
<goal>deploy-file</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<file>target/${project.build.finalName}.exe</file>
<packaging>exe</packaging>
<!-- pom, sources and javadoc already deployed by project. Release repo will fail redeployment -->
<generatePom>false</generatePom>
<sources/>
<javadoc/>
</configuration>
</execution>
But each execution will try and deploy the javadoc and sources for the project, even though I have tried to explicitly switch them off for the execution. NB I want javadoc and sources for the project, but I only want them deployed once (by deploy mojo).
This isn't a big deal until it comes to release time at which point my build breaks because it tries to deploy the javadoc and source for the deploy mojo as well as each of the deploy-file mojo executions to a release repo that doesn't allow redeploy of artifacts.
Is it possible to configure the maven-deploy-plugin to not deploy source & javadoc for the deploy-file mojo?
In order to work with a legacy app framework I need to split a webapp project into 2. 1 jar needs to have the java class files, the other will have all the web stuff like jsps, css, et. al.. How can I do this with on maven-3 pom?
For this purpose you can use the configuration of the maven-war-plugin. This will create a separate jar file which contains the .class files...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<attachClasses>true</attachClasses>
</configuration>
</plugin>
like xyz-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-classes.jar which can be used as a separated dependency (you have to use the supplemental classifier).
If the war artifact should not contain any classes, you can achieve this by adding the packagingExcludes configuration.
<packagingExcludes>WEB-INF/classes/**</packagingExcludes>
I have grails app whose build runs under maven. When running the build, the grails' integration test phase fails, which fails the build. Since I don't have any integration tests, but do have unit tests, I'd like to skip just the grails integration test part of the build, while still running my unit tests. Is there a way to do this?
I've looked at the following links, but they don't help in my case. Ideally, I want to be able to just run mvn package without any additional command-line parameters.
http://grails.1312388.n4.nabble.com/skipping-integration-testing-td1377155.html
http://jira.grails.org/browse/MAVEN-94
I've thought about breaking things up into multiple executions and using grails:exec (as mentioned in the nabble post) to execute the test phase, but I'm not sure how I'd set "args" in that case.
I'm using maven 2.0.9, grails 1.3.7. I cannot change the version of maven or grails I'm using.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.grails</groupId>
<artifactId>grails-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3.7</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>init</goal>
<goal>maven-clean</goal>
<goal>validate</goal>
<goal>config-directories</goal>
<goal>maven-compile</goal>
<goal>maven-test</goal>
<goal>maven-war</goal>
<goal>maven-functional-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
I have an Ant build that is currently being converted to Maven. However, the Ant build has 2 build targets - one that builds the entire app, and one that builds a JAR from some of those files (only a few). In Ant, it's easy to have multiple build targets to handle this, but I'm trying to determine the best way to handle this in Maven.
I could split the subset of files into a second project and it will have its own POM. Then the first project could depend on this one. However, since the subset of files is so small (less than 10), it seems like it might be overkill to have an entirely new project for that.
Are there other ways to handle this?
You could do this with profiles...
If you really wanted to use two separate profiles and customize the JAR plugin to include and exclude patterns of class and package names, you could easily do this by putting something like this in your POM:
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>everything</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<classifier>everything</classifier>
<includes>
<include>**/*</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>only-library</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<classifier>only-library</classifier>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/Main*</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
Aside: If that seems like a lot of configuration, polyglot Maven's support for Groovy POMs is just about ready. It will cut the line count down considerably.
You would put this at the end of your pom.xml (withing the project element), and it adds two profiles. The first profile "everything" is really just there to demonstrate the configuration. This "everything" profile is unnecesary because it simply duplicates the behavior of the default JAR plugin jar goal execution. The second profile "only-library" excludes any class in any package that starts with the text "Main". To invoke these profiles:
mvn package -Peverything
mvn package -Ponly-library
I tested this against the sample application that ships with Chapter 6 of Maven by Example, and running either of these commands will produce a JAR file in ${basedir}/target that has a classifier. Since the JAR plugin's jar goal is bound to the package phase in the default maven lifecycle, these two profiles are going to modify the configuration for this plugin.
Or, you could do this with two JAR plugin executions...
If you need to create two JARs without using profiles. You can bind the JAR plugin's jar goal to the package lifecycle phase multiple times and use different configuration for each configured execution. If you configure two separate executions, each execution has an execution-specific configuration block so you can supply a unique identifier and include/exclude pattern for each execution.
Here is the build element you would use to add both custom JARs to the lifecycle phase "package". Doing this on a project with packaging "jar" would result in the jar goal being run three times. Once as the default lifecycle binding, and then twice for two custom, classified JARs.
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>only-library</id>
<goals><goal>jar</goal></goals>
<phase>package</phase>
<configuration>
<classifier>only-library</classifier>
<excludes>
<exclude>**/Main*</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>everything</id>
<goals><goal>jar</goal></goals>
<phase>package</phase>
<configuration>
<classifier>everything</classifier>
<includes>
<include>**/*</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
If you are not talking about including a different set of classes in each artifact, you'll want to use Maven Assemblies. If you want to know the details of assemblies, there is a chapter listed at the end of this answer from Maven: The Complete Reference. Frankly, i don't think that this particular chapter is a good introductory reference; in fact, I've had numerous reports that this chapter is nearly unreadable (and we're working to fix that). If you are looking to use assemblies, I'd recommend the Maven Assembly Plugin's documentation. In the left-hand nav menu you'll see a list of sample assembly descriptors.
Disclaimer: (Please) don't do this. If you are creating two difference JARs with two different set of classes I strongly recommend that you split the project up into two interdependent modules.
While you can do this with profiles, it is going to be easier for you to split the project into two (actually three). Longer term there are going to be challenges that you are going to face as your application scales. You will be responsible for figuring out this manual list of classes and packages to be included in each of your classified JARs.
There is minimal overhead to having a simple parent project that references two separate modules. If you look at the free Maven by Example book, we show how to make the transition between a single-module and a multi-module project. Chapters 3-5 focus on single module projects, and Chapter 6 shows you how you would combine these single module components into a larger multi-module project.
For more information:
You question involves the following topics, here are some links that will provide more details for each:
The Maven JAR Plugin: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
Multi-module Maven Projects: Chapter 6 of Maven by Example and Section 3.6.2 of Maven: The Complete Reference.
The Maven Lifecycle (jar is bound to package if your packagin is "jar"): Section 3.5.2 of Maven by Example "Core Concepts" and Chapter 4 of Maven: The Complete Reference
Maven Assemblies: First, the Maven Assembly Plugin site, then Chapter 8 of Maven: The Complete Reference for some heavy (almost too heavy) details.
Your first thought is the correct one. Split the 2 pieces into 2 projects.
The maven philosophy is that each project should build one and only artifact (jar, war, whatever)
You could probably hack something together so that you only have one maven project building 2 atrifacts, but it would be a hack.
You can call ant from maven, so if you really want to do this, then I suggest you start looking at the maven ant plugin. The artifact id is "maven-antrun-plugin"
You've got 2 choices:
Profiles
Assemblies
If the subset is only a collection of resources, then I wouldn't make it a separate module.
If the project is always dependent on the subset which is packaged in a uniform way, then the subset is a good candidate to become a module.
If the subset is repackaged in multiple different "flavours", then I would define assemblies for each "flavour" and qualify the artifact names with a "classifier" see maven coordinates.
Finally, you could use profiles to determine which assemblies get produced, your default profile may only create the initial artifact "flavour" that is required during development.
A "full" profile may produce all "flavour" variants of the artifact for final deployment once development is complete.