I have a edmx model done by Database First and generating the DBSet with the VS tools. I extended with partials the classes to add dataannotation validation to it.
I am receiving on my controller the view model which I am manually controlling the validation of fields. So eventhough I have a required field on my partial class, I am removing it once in my controller ModelState.Remove("pasajeros[" + count + "].numResidencia"); because of some conditions.
Before, I was using LINQTOSQL and I had no problems. But now Entity framework is not honoring my customization of ModelState.
How do i propagate or GO about this issue with EntityFramework?
thanks
Keep your view models and Entity models separate. Put your validation annotations on your view models. Then use a tool like Automapper to map the Entity to ViewModel fields for you.
On edit you validate your view model then update your Entity fields which you then save.
Related
I have a model containing a property of HttpPostedFileBase type, and I have created a custom validation attribute which implements RequiredAttribute to make some validations. It works perfectly when you create the model. However I don't want to make any validation when you edit the model (optional HttpPostedFileBase property when you edit the model). How do I make it?
Your attribute is simple metadata added to a property of a class. This attribute has no information about what you do with the class, i.e. if you're using this class to edit or to create a new entity.
So, the answer is that you cannot do that directly in the attribute. So the only solution is to "bypass" the attribute where you're using it, if you're editing the value. There are several alternatives:
use two different models, one for editing, the other for creating. And decorate the property only in the model for creating
remove the validation, or the error, using some code to do it: for example, you can remove the property error from the ModelState in a post action for the Edit action.
Obviously the easiest is 1. You can use a base class with all the fields, but those which have different treatement, and then inherit it for creation or edition. It's not strange to represent the same data with different models when you use MVC: a model for viewing, a model for showing the editor, a model for receiving the result of an edition... so, using several different models is not a problem at all. You can use AutoMapper or ValueInjecter to simplify moving data between entities and models.
I did MVC 2 two years ago. I am now using MVC 4 and would like to confirm a few things.
1) In MVC 4, we do not need to create a ModelMetadata class to annotate with data annotations for data validation. We may simply annotate the model classes themselves.
In other words, if we are using the EDM generator to generate a model and corresponding classes for us, then we may create a new set of partial classes with the same names and use data annotation attributes on those partial classes themselves.
We do not need to create a new type of model metadata class and decorate that class with data annotation/attributes, like here: http://www.asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/models-%28data%29/validation-with-the-data-annotation-validators-cs
2) For data annotations to work, we need a reference only to System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations and not to Microsoft.Web.Mvc.DataAnnotations.
3) We do not need to instantiate the default model binder in the Application_Start event in the Global.asax file.
Could you please confirm if my understanding is correct?
As I remember, there's no difference between MVC 2 and MVC 4 when it comes to this. You didn't have to use MetadataType in MVC 2, you could have used partial classes for generated models.
I'm not able to find any MSDN doc on Microsoft.Web.Mvc.DataAnnotations, but for data annotations to work with MVC you'd need System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations and System.Web.Mvc (it contains some additional attributes like HiddenInputAttribute).
No, you don't, it's instantiated by framework.
Actually, for question 1, you need to use Metadata classes to annotate the properties of of model-first EF classes in the same way as previously with MVC2. When you use code-first EF classes, you can annotate them directly - the annotations will be used for generating the database as well as for scaffolding the Views.
We have an MVC3 project that uses nHibernate; there is a separate model project that contains all the model classes which is used by the repository and service layers. The models make use of data annotations like DisplayAttribute and RequiredAttribute from System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.
There are also attributes such as RemoteAttribute that are contained in System.Web.Mvc.
This of course means that the model project now has a dependency to a particular front end technology.
Assuming the solution could have other front ends what would be the best way to handle this dependency link?
RemoteAttribute does not belong in the model, since it specifies a controller/action to validate the property on the server, and the model shouldn't have knowledge of concepts like controller, action or route. The presentation layer depends on the model, not the other way around.
I would create a view model that inherits the model, overrides the property (must be virtual) and adds the RemoteAttribute. This way you can avoid duplication and mapping, although that's also an alternative.
To reduce dependency between database model and frontend technology, you can use special view model for validation qnd other front end actions in controller and put data from viewmodel to database entity after it.
I was reading this tutorial for MVC3 with Linq to Entities using Model First.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/gg685489.aspx
A quote from the article states
Our controllers will use the BlogDataEntities to retrieve data for us.
In a more advanced application, you should separate logic further and
would not be working with the BlogDataEntities directly from the
controller.
What is the general structure of this other layer between the entities and Controller in an MVC application? What is the purpose?
I usually have a bastardized ViewModel (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_View_ViewModel) which contains the business logic, can fetch/save from EF and is what the view is bound to. The controller doesn't do much but instantiate the viewmodel and depending on the controller action, call a method within the view model.
Some people might break that up even further and have a full blown ViewModel which has no logic in it,just data. A business layer with all of the logic and the ability to move data from EF to the ViewModel and vice-versa.
In the article "BlogDataEntities" is not the name for some specific entity classes (what the name suggests) but the name of the DbContext.
I guess it means that you would try to hide that you work with EF by not instantiating the DbContext, but by using a repository-implementation like this
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/ff707264#_Toc261428890
At the start of the development I faced with problem called "an impedance mismatch between domain model and the view". To solve this problem I decide to use ViewModel pattern - for every view (that is strongly typed) we create viewmodel class. But where is the validation logic is locate - in viewmodel classes or in our domain model objects? And where we need to perform operations to query database - in controller action, and then populate viewmodel or straight in viewmodel?
Thank you.
You should have validation logic for the viewmodel. This is what the view sends and what should be validated. As far as populating the viewmodel is concerned here's how to proceed: write a repository which queries the database and returns models. Then map those models to viewmodels (AutoMapper can help you here). Finally return viewmodels to the view. This also works the other way around: the users POSTs some data to a controller action as the form of a viewmodel which once validated is mapped back to a model and passed to the repository for update.
As an alternative to Data Annotations you may take a look at FluentValidation for validating your view models. It integrates nicely with ASP.NET MVC.