I am trying to write a query in Grails to return a set of results from a domain class, but within those return the relevant results of a separate class whom have the parentId of the main class.
def query = Cars.where {
(colour == 'red')
}
And then within each list item include the set of parts relating to that CAR ID (as an example of what I'm trying to achieve, I know the code is incorrect though....
query.each{
this car. add(Parts.whereCarID{it.id})
}
If you define your domain model properly, you should get it without a criteria involved.
As far as I understand you need to add static hasMany = [parts: Parts] in your Cars domain class, and static belongsTo = [car:Cars] in your Parts class.
So for example, here how it might look:
class Cars {
string colour
static hasMany = [parts:Parts]
// ... rest of your properties
}
class Parts {
static belongsTo = [car:Cars]
// ... rest of your properties
}
And to get your result just do this:
def cars = Cars.findAllByColour('red')
Then you can do:
cars.each { car->
println car.parts // <-- all the parts for each car is here
}
Related
I needed to create a custom join table to re-model a many-to-many mapping and following some great posts on here came up with the model below.
Now my question is, if I have either a Course or Journey object in a GSP, how do I access the extra column data belonging to the join table.
In this example, I want to access the field named extraColumn1 in the CourseJourneyDetail within my GSP if I have either a journey or course instance
I've tried the following :
${course.courseJourneyDetail.extraColumn1}
but it didn't work.
Here are (relevant parts of) my domain classes :
class Course {
static hasMany = [journies: CourseJourneyDetail]
String courseName
String organisersDescription
Set<Journey> getJournies() {
return CourseJourneyDetail.findAllByCourse(this)*.journey
}
}
class Journey {
static hasMany = [courses: CourseJourneyDetail]
java.util.Date dateCreated
java.util.Date lastUpdated
boolean enabled = true
User user
Set<Course> getCourses() {
return CourseJourneyDetail.findAllByJourney(this)*.course
}
}
class CourseJourneyDetail implements Serializable {
String extraColumn1
static belongsTo = [course: Course, journey: Journey]
boolean equals(other) {
if (!(other instanceof CourseJourneyDetail)) {
return false
}
other.journey?.id == journey?.id &&
other.course?.id == course?.id
}
int hashCode() {
def builder = new HashCodeBuilder()
if (course) builder.append(course.id)
if (journey) builder.append(journey.id)
builder.toHashCode()
}
static constraints = {
}
static mapping = {
version false
id composite: ['course', 'journey']
}
}
Since you've established that each Course/Journey has a collection of CourseJourneyDetail's rather than a single instance, ${course.courseJourneyDetail.extraColumn1} won't work (as you've discovered).
If you break down your groovy expression into this: course.courseJourneyDetail, it doesn't really make sense based on the relationships you have created. The reason being, Course doesn't have a single CourseJourneyDetail but rather a collection.
If your desire is to have Course and Journey in a one-to-one relationship, but with a join table with additional columns, then your domain structure needs to change to reflect this: rather than using static hasHany in each class, you would switch to a single instance.
If your desire is to keep the many-to-many relationship, then you need to think about how to fetch the appropriate join object that represents the association. One example:
CourseJourneyDetail.findAllByCourseAndJourney(<courseInstance>, <journeyInstance>)
If you want the additional columns collected for all of the many-to-many associations, you can use a syntax that you are already using in your convience methods (getJournies and getCourses):
course.journies*.extraColumn1
This would output an array of Strings, so its usage makes less sense within a ${} expression; and more sense within a g:each. It entirely depends on how you plan on using this data.
I have the following domain classes (Only trying to show what is needed to get the idea) :
class Scholarship {
static hasMany = [grades:Grade]
}
and
class Grade {
String id
String description
}
In words I would like to, "Get all scholarships where the associated grade_id = myId". I would like to accomplish this using grails domain classes and not using sql. Any help appreciated
Are you looking for something like this?...
def results = Scholarship.withCriteria {
grades {
// myId must be defined somewhere above...
idEq myId
}
}
EDIT
A comment below adds to the original question and asks what if another relationship was expressed like this...
class Scholarship {
static hasMany = [grades:Grade,majors:Major]
}
The query I show above would still be exactly the same. The fact that there is a majors collection would not be relevant unless you wanted to include some attribute of Major to also be part of the criteria, which could look something like this...
def results = Scholarship.withCriteria {
grades {
// myId must be defined somewhere above...
idEq myId
}
majors {
// only return Scholarship instances which
// contain a Major with the name 'Mechanical Engineering'
eq 'name', 'Mechanical Engineering'
}
}
I hope that helps.
I've two domain classes
1.CustomerInterest.groovy
static hasMany = [activities:Activity]
static belongsTo=[customer:Customer,projectProperty:ProjectProperty]
static mapping={
activities sort:'dateCreated',order:'desc'
}
2.Activity.groovy
Date dateCreated
static belongsTo = [customerInterest:CustomerInterest, employee:Employee]
In a controller i am doing this..
def customerDetails(Customer customer)
{
def customerInterest=customer.customerInterests
render view:"customerDetails",model:[customerInterest:customerInterest]
}
customerDetails.gsp
<g:each in="${customerInterest}" var="ci">
${ci}
</g:each>
**
Question: I want to sort CustomerInterest on property dateCreated of Activity domain.
**
Any help as soon as possible would be appreciated.
Try this
def customerInterest=customer.customerInterests.sort { it.activities.dateCreated }
Instead of using the sort order in the mappings definition, you can use the old java Comparable-interface:
class Foo implements Comparable {
int compareTo(anotherObject) {
// complex logic returning -1 or 0 or 1
}
}
Then you can call listOfFoos.sort() and it will sort it with the help of the compareTo-method.
Beware that (equals) == will also use this method, so ensure that (only) identical objects will return 0.
I know there are several questions on this subject but none of them seem to work for me. I have a Grails app with the following Domain objects:
class Tag {
String name
}
class SystemTag extends Tag {
// Will have additional properties here...just placeholder for now
}
class Location {
String name
Set<Tag> tags = []
static hasMany = [tags: Tag]
}
I am trying to query for all Location objects that have been tagged by 1 or more tags:
class LocationQueryTests {
#Test
public void testTagsQuery() {
def tag = new SystemTag(name: "My Locations").save(failOnError: true)
def locationNames = ["L1","L2","L3","L4","L5"]
def locations = []
locationNames.each {
locations << new Location(name: it).save(failOnError: true)
}
(2..4).each {
locations[it].tags << tag
locations[it].save(failOnError: true)
}
def results = Location.withCriteria {
tags {
'in'('name', [tag.name])
}
}
assertEquals(3, results.size()) // Returning 0 results
}
}
I have validated that the data is being created/setup correctly...5 Location objects created and the last 3 of them are tagged.
I don't see what's wrong with the above query. I would really like to stay away from HQL and I believe that should be possible here.
Welcome to hibernate.
The save method informs the persistence context that an instance should be saved or updated. The object will not be persisted immediately unless the flush argument is used
if you do not use flush it does the saves in batches so when you setup your query right after the save it appears that the data is not there.
you need to add
locations[it].save(failOnError: true, flush:true)
You should use addTo* for adds a domain class relationship for one-to-many or many-to-many relationship.
(2..4).each {
locations[it].addToTags(tag)
}
I'm a newbie in grails. i'm having a problem right now in my domain classes. I have 3 domain classes, class Patient,class Nurse and class NursePatient, the class NursePatient is a composite key where you can see who is the attending Nurse in a Patient, so if you view its table you can only see the id's of nurses and patients. This is my code for Nurse class:
class Nurse {
String name
Nurse partner
boolean idle = true
static belongsTo = [hospital: Hospital]
static constraints = {
name(blank:false)
partner(nullable:true)
hospital(nullable:false)
}
String toString(){
"Nurse ${name}"
}
}
--> and this is my domain class for NursePatient:
class NursePatient implements Serializable{
Nurse nurse
Patient patient
static mapping = {
version false
id composite:['nurse', 'patient']
}
static constraints = {
patient(nullable:false, validator:{val, obj -> val.hospital == obj.nurse.hospital})
nurse(nullable:false)
}
String toString(){
"Nurse ${nurse.name} - ${patient.name}"
}
void saveIt(Nurse x, Patient y){
def np = new NursePatient(nurse: x, patient: y)
if(np.save()){
def n = nurse.get(nurse.id)
n.idle = false
}
}
}
--> I was asked to print a list of nurses who doesn't have a patient. I was thinking that the moment I save in table using the saveIt() method from class NursePatient, once the save() is successful it changes the value of the property idle of class Nurse from true to false so that querying is much more easier. My problem is I don't if my code in class NursePatient is correct or is it possible to change the value of a property from another class. Please Help me.. thank You!!
Changing properties of domain classes inside different classes is fine.
However, you don't really need a NursePatient class. If you declare the relationship between Nurses and Patients as many-to-many, like this:
class Nurse {
static hasMany = [patients: Patient]
...
}
class Patient {
static hasMany = [nurses: Nurse]
...
}
then Grails will create and update the needed join table automatically. You can then query for all the nurses without patients using Criteria API:
def nursesWithoutPatients = Nurse.withCriteria { isEmpty("patients") }