Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to enable monetization during a YouTube API upload. I have set my default preferences to always set the monetization flag which it does when uploading through the Youtube.com website, but it is ignored when uploading via the API.
We're expecting thousands of videos to be uploaded by our user community in a short amount of time, and it will be impractical to manually switch every video via the Youtube.com website.
If this isn't supported with the default YouTube API, is there a business development person we can talk to in order to see if there is a different partner level that would give us access to this feature?
Your API uploads should act the same. Please reach me with your info, so I can verify.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an application where i need to take the mobile number of users upon registration, and then verify the phone number by sending a pin code to his number.
Is this against apple's policies?
No that is not against Apple's Policies, apps such as WhatsApp do this.
However, according to Apple's Human Interface Guidelines you should delay sign up as long as possible and also explain why such information is necessary for your app.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I've read on different analytics website but couldn't understand the difference. Companies charge for non-organic installs so I'm worried about that before using those.
An organic install is when the user finds the app interesting or useful and downloads or buys it. A non-organic install is when the company rewards the user for installing the app.
An organic install is when a user downloads a mobile application but didn’t tap any advertising or tracked campaign link. Basically, organic installs are those generated via app store search, top charts and featured slots (App Store Optimization).
On the opposite side, non-organic installs are those generated via tracked links (owned media or not) or advertising.
Hope this helps!
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Apple says they may reject apps that are "...are simply web sites bundled as Apps..." I am wondering why does it provide UIWebView then? If there is a mobile friendly website and UIWebView can be used to view the website within an app then why would they reject it? Does anyone have any experience with this kind of app?
The UIWebview and WKWebView classes are available for us to show SOME web content within our apps.
Take Facebook or Twitter for example. Tapping a link in either of those apps will present a webpage. This is so that users aren't thrown out of the app and sent to Safari.
Web views are also great for presenting remote or locally stored PDFs to the user.
What Apple DOESN'T want is people to come along and just wrap up their entire website and put it on the store as an app.
Many reasons include:
Bad user experience. (e.g. Mouse hover doesn't work, its slower)
No control over content. (whats to stop people from going to a completly different website within your app?)
Review Process (Since web content can change anytime, apple can't really ensure your app is appropriate for the store)
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any program available to developers/website owners for a share in ad revenue for embedded videos, similar to how site owners can make money by showing google adwords?
The ads are linked directly with the account holder of the video so I believe this would not be possible. You would be displaying that video's ads and therefor generating revenue for the owner of the video and never see a cent yourself.
I have videos that have ads. I can control where the ads are shown, and also where the video is shown, but unless you come to a private agreement with the content producer for traffic driven to the video you wouldn't be able to receive any ad revenue.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an iOS app that will only work with a UK IP address - therefore apple will not be able to review it correctly. How do people handle this type of problem when it comes to the review process?
Thanks
If it's possible, remove the limitation until it's approved. You can do it if you control the server or in the app itself downloading a small configuration file with restrictions, etc. before the actual connection stuff starts.
If not, provide them with a proxy with a UK IP address. You can set it up yourself or just get a 1 month (or so) service in a VPN provider. And add the corresponding instructions in iTunes Connect to configure the iPhone proxy (just in case).