See the following link: http://www.howru.nl/preken/new/test3.html
For some reason I keep getting space at the right of the three main buttons.
To better identity this on this forum, I've enabled the border of the relevant table temporary.
The issue is inside the following class I reckon:
.button
{
display: block;
width: 350px;
height: 135px;
margin-left: 7px;
margin-right: 7px;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
text-decoration: none;
background-position: top;
color: #FFFFFF;
}
The specified width is the actual width of the background image.
The full CSS sheet can be found at http://www.howru.nl/preken/new/styles.css
Right column (text) should float at the right, as is the case currently. Left column (buttons) should float at the left (as is currently the case), and the center picture should float in the center. Strange thing is the left column takes more space in the table, while none have a fixed width.
Ideally I don't want to specify a width of a column twice (for the TD and for the content, in case of a BG image on the display-block'd content); in the proposed solutions below the display-block'd has a width specified (width of the background image) and the parent TD element as well... That is what I don't like and for which I started this post. Because I still don't understand why the TD's aren't equally sharing the available table space:
Now column 1 (left) seems to take the most, while it doesn't need so much, the second takes a little less, and the right column takes only what was specified for the inner width, whilst the left (1st) column has the same (width specified for the content instead of the TD) and does not stick to that width apparantly, while the right TD does...)
Both in IE as Opera I get this; any idea what I am missing??!
Goal is to understand what is happening, and why. So I'm not looking for a cheap fix - as one can thing of 100 'ugly' ways to do this.
here are the changes i have made. Try this. Btw you should use % instead of px
.top {
vertical-align: top;
width: 350px;
}
removed float from .blkright
.blkright {
}
.title {
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
letter-spacing: -1px;
padding-bottom: 5px;
text-align: center;
}
.column {
margin-left: 12px;
overflow: hidden;
width: 325px;
}
Change right table .top .column width in the to change this space to right of buttons
.column {
overflow: hidden;
padding: 5px 5px 25px;
width: 290px;
(originally width was 250px) because it is trying to fit the width: 100% you have set
you can also remove the 250px , since the right column is the only column you've set a width on
I am not ultimately sure how you want the rest (e.g. the text paragraph) aligned then, but here is my approach.
First, give each body-column a class or an id. You assign these classes to the three <td>s respectively.
.content-left {
float: left;
}
.content-mid {
float: left;
}
.content-right {
display: table-row;
}
Although this solution takes a bit more effort than IanO.S.'s, this solution is also more dynamic. If your button or image sizes change someday you don't have to hack into your code, find and edit your pixel-widths.
Add declaration of width on the first table cell
.top:first{
width: 364px;
}
and you wont see any spaces anymore
Related
Anyone know, how can I remove Left-Right-Bottom-Up padding from the Blogger Post.
See the IMAGE:
Look for the piece of code below and play with the values I commented until you're happy with it.
#page_body .FeaturedPost, .Blog .blog-posts .post-outer-container {
background: #ffffff;
min-height: 40px;
padding: 30px 40px; /*Play with this numbers */
width: auto;
}
also about padding values:
padding: top right bottom left;
with just 2 values as it is present in your code:
padding: top/bottom right/left;
Got an issue on pages like this where the left border of my checkboxes appear cut off. Looks really unprofessional. Only seems to happen on iOS. I thought I could just add some padding to the div (or margin) but not the case. Is this common?
Try this.
input[type="checkbox"], input[type="radio"] {
-webkit-transform: translate(0px); /*Earlier than iOS 9.0*/
transform: translate(0px);
}
I think the problem is your framework (WooCommerce?) or plugin/theme for it. It has strange CSS code like this:
.single-product div.product .images {
width: 41.1764705882%;
float: left;
margin-right: 5.8823529412%;
margin-bottom: 3.631em
}
.single-product div.product .summary {
width: 52.9411764706%;
float: right;
margin-right: 0;
margin-bottom: 3.631em
}
I don't know why these numbers so fractional, but in this case your checkbox looks OK:
.single-product div.product .summary {
width: 52%;
...
}
I advice you to figure out why your framework/plugin/theme has so fractional numbers, but if you don't want/can't, you could use workaround with margin-left: 1px for your checkbox.
Can anyone tell me how to make ng-input-tag(Angular) scrollable in X-direction.
Currently if I insert the tags then the height of the div increases.
What I want is that If I go on inserting the tags then it should scroll in X-direction
I have tried:
width: auto;height: 34px;overflow-x: auto;overflow-y: hidden;white-space: nowrap;
But it didn't work as expected
So let me know where I am wrong.
I know this is late, but I have seen similar questions go unanswered recently and this one is at the top of a google search for this problem. This can be done using only CSS. If you would like an added visual effect, try customizing the scrollbar.
For the X direction:
This can get a bit ugly if you decide to set a min-width or width on your tags.
The only way I've found to do it in the X direction is using flexbox:
tags-input .tags .tag-list {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
overflow-x: auto;
}
tags-input .tags .tag-item {
/* Applying this display class */
display: inline-table;
/* OR set the tag width to ensure that the text is visible */
min-width: 150px; /* Could also use width: 123px */
}
This Github issue is also directly related to the problem.
For the Y direction:
Applying a fixed height to the .tags class and setting the overflow-y to scroll will give you the desired result:
.tags {
height: 34px;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
Try This
simple css to add on tags-input class for scroll on x and y axis
.tags-input {
max-width: 100%;
line-height: 22px;
overflow-y: scroll;
overflow-x: scroll;
height: 65px;
cursor: text;
}
I have a button image I'm using as a background image for some links.
The background image has rounded corners.
I want to use a css drop shadow instead of putting the drop shadow in the image
The problem is, the drop shadow appears to be drawn around the element. Although I kind of expected to see the drop shadow color through the transparent parts of the background image, I'm seeing the background color instead (see this jsfiddle).
My actual goal is a little more complex, but if I can satify my first three bullet points then I can nail this task. Specifically, what I want to do is use two nested elements with background images of the right and left parts of a button image (rounded corners) so that I can use the same css to wrap a 'button' around text of any length. Since the backgrounds overlap in a css 'sliding doors' style, a png alpha drop shadow shows a 2x dark section where the images overlap. Soo.. I thought I'd use a css shadow, but as you can see in the jsFiddle, there are problems with that too.
Any ideas?
Box-shadows don't show through transparent backgrounds. A more simple test case would be:
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: transparent;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000;
}
The output expected would be a nice blurred black square right? Well... no, it's a white square with a dropshadow. http://jsfiddle.net/UjhrW/
To achieve what you want to do you will need separate markup for the dropshadow, fill it with white, and then set the spill of the shadow so it looks like a blurry square...
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: #000;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px 6px #000;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/Etmty/
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: #000;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px 6px #000;
}
<div class="box"></div>
I'm trying to come up with my own star image that's slightly smaller and different style than the one provided in the gem/plugin, but Ajaxful_rating doesn't have an easy way to do this. Here's what I've figured out so far:
The stars.png in the public folder is three 25x25 pixel tiles stacked vertically, ordered empty star, normal star, and hover star.
I'm assuming as long as you keep the above constraints, you should be fine without modifying any other files.
But what if you want to change the image size of the stars to larger or smaller?
I've found where you can change the height in the stylesheets/ajaxful_rating.css
.ajaxful-rating{
position: relative;
/*width: 125px; this is setted dynamically */
height: 25px;
overflow: hidden;
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-position: left top;
}
.ajaxful-rating li{ display: inline; }
.ajaxful-rating a,
.ajaxful-rating span,
.ajaxful-rating .show-value{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
text-indent: -1000em;
height: 25px;
line-height: 25px;
outline: none;
overflow: hidden;
border: none;
}
You just need to change every place that says "25px" above to whatever height your new star image is. This works fine but doesn't display the horizontal part correctly. Anyone know where I would look to set the horizontal part as well? (I'm assuming it's in an .rb file somewhere based upon how many stars you specified in your ajaxful_rating setup)
Nevermind, I'm stupid.
In the lib/axr/stars_builder.rb, find the following:
def ratings_tag
......
#css_builder.rule('.ajaxful-rating', :width => (rateable.class.max_stars * 25))
....
end
Change the 25 to your new width.