I'm trying to use RestSharp with MonoDroid and I'm running into some problems. A MethodMissingException is thrown with the message "Default constructor not found for type EmPubLite.Android.Tweet[]." I can only see the exception when I inspect the Task in the VS debugger, it doesn't show up in LogCat. I know that the exception is related to the JSON deserialization in RestSharp.
The linker is set to 'None' in MonoDroid options, and I also tried adding the [Preserve] attribute to my DTOs.
Beyond getting this to work, why doesn't this crash and show up in LogCat? I'd like any Tasks that fail with exceptions to rethrow the exception when I access the result.
[Activity(Label = "EmPubLite", MainLauncher = true, Icon = "#drawable/icon")]
public class EmPubLiteActivity : Activity
{
protected override void OnCreate(Bundle bundle)
{
base.OnCreate(bundle);
SetContentView(Resource.Layout.EmPubLight);
var client = new TwitterClient();
client.Search("bielema").ContinueWith(tweets =>
{
Debug.WriteLine("back");
Debug.WriteLine(tweets.Result[0].Text); // Exception not showing up in LogCat
});
}
}
public class TwitterClient
{
private RestClient client = new RestClient();
public Task<Tweet[]> Search(string query)
{
var request = new RestRequest("http://search.twitter.com/search.json?rpp=5&include_entities=true&result_type=mixed&q={q}", Method.GET);
request.AddUrlSegment("q", query);
var taskCompletionSource = new TaskCompletionSource<Tweet[]>();
client.ExecuteAsync<SearchResult>(request, response =>
{
if (response.ErrorException != null) taskCompletionSource.TrySetException(response.ErrorException);
else taskCompletionSource.TrySetResult(response.Data.Results);
// taskCompletionSource.TrySetResult(response.Data.Results);
});
return taskCompletionSource.Task;
}
}
public class SearchResult
{
public Tweet[] Results { get; set; }
}
public class Tweet
{
public string Text { get; set; }
}
I fixed this by using the ServiceStack JSON parser instead of the default RestSharp JSON parser.
Related
I'm using my own middleware to capture exceptions thrown in my API to format the response to the client. This includes things like checking for the dev env to send additional information and logging. This all works great but the built-in validation middleware responds with a different response format. I want to keep the functionality and just change what data is sent to the client and how it's formatted.
Currently it returns the default
{
"message": "Validation error(s)",
"details": [
"The value '35353535353535353535353535353535353535353535' is not valid."
]
}
You can customize the default response by using a BadResultObject in the InvalidaModelStateResponseFactory of the ApiBehaviorOptions class. As an example:
apiBehaviorOptions.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = actionContext => {
return new BadRequestObjectResult(new {
Code = 400,
Request_Id = "Someuniqueid",
Messages = actionContext.ModelState.Values.SelectMany(x => x.Errors)
.Select(x => x.ErrorMessage)
});
Configured:
serviceCollection.PostConfigure<ApiBehaviorOptions>(apiBehaviorOptions =>
apiBehaviorOptions.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = ...
);
Or you can send the response directly from the action you are using as well with your own custom validation error result class. For example:
public class ValidationError
{
[JsonProperty(NullValueHandling=NullValueHandling.Ignore)]
public string Field { get; }
public string Message { get; }
public ValidationError(string field, string message)
{
Field = field != string.Empty ? field : null;
Message = message;
}
}
public class ValidationResultModel
{
public string Message { get; }
public List<ValidationError> Errors { get; }
public ValidationResultModel(ModelStateDictionary modelState)
{
Message = "Validation Failed";
Errors = modelState.Keys
.SelectMany(key => modelState[key].Errors.Select(x => new
ValidationError(key, x.ErrorMessage)))
.ToList();
}
}
Then we can create our own IActionResult. Here:
public class ValidationFailedResult : ObjectResult
{
public ValidationFailedResult(ModelStateDictionary modelState)
: base(new ValidationResultModel(modelState))
{
StatusCode = StatusCodes.Status404...;
}
}
And update our ValidateModelAttribute by overriding the OnActionExecuting to perform actions before they are taken.
public class ValidateModelAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
if (!context.ModelState.IsValid)
{
context.Result = new ValidationFailedResult(context.ModelState);
}
}
}
Sources:
Customize automatic response on validation error
https://www.jerriepelser.com/blog/validation-response-aspnet-core-webapi/
I'd like to wrap IHttpActionResult because I need some extra data to be consumed by the client app.
My first approach was to create and return simple DTO, wrapping result object if succeeded:
Response DTO:
public class Response<T>
{
public string ErrorMessage { get; set; }
public bool Success { get; set; }
public string CodeStatus { get; set; }
public T Result { get; set; }
public Response(bool isSuccess, [Optional] T result, [Optional] string codeStatus, [Optional] string errorMessage)
{
Success = isSuccess;
Result = result;
CodeStatus = codeStatus;
ErrorMessage = errorMessage;
}
}
Controller:
public IHttpActionResult Get(int id)
{
return BadRequest(new Response<MyObjectClass>(false, null,"Invalid Id",400));
...
return Ok(new Response<MyObjectClass>(true, result);
}
I've found it very ineffective way to deal with wrapping. I dont find it very elegant way. I've tried to figured out some generic solution and ended up with the following:
Example Controller Action:
public IHttpActionResult GetById(int id)
{
var result = _someService.Get(id);
if (result == null)
return NotFound().WithError("Invalid Id");
return Ok().WithSuccess(result);
}
This still returns Response DTO.
I've wrapped IHttpActionResult to deal with creating Response DTO:
public class HttpActionResult : IHttpActionResult
{
private readonly string _errorMessage;
private readonly IHttpActionResult _innerResult;
private readonly object _result;
private readonly bool _isSuccess;
public HttpActionResult(IHttpActionResult inner, bool isSuccess, object result,string errorMessage)
{
_errorMessage = errorMessage;
_innerResult = inner;
_result = result;
_isSuccess = isSuccess;
}
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
HttpResponseMessage response = await _innerResult.ExecuteAsync(cancellationToken);
response.Content = new ObjectContent(typeof(Response), new Response(_isSuccess, _result, ((int)response.StatusCode).ToString(), _errorMessage), new JsonMediaTypeFormatter());
return response;
}
}
Finally I've added extension methods to IHttpActionResult to easier use in controller:
public static class IHttpActionResultExtensions
{
public static IHttpActionResult WithSuccess(this IHttpActionResult inner, object result = null, string message = null)
{
return new HttpActionResult(inner, true, result, message);
}
public static IHttpActionResult WithError(this IHttpActionResult inner, string message = null)
{
return new HttpActionResult(inner, false,null, message);
}
}
What are the alternatives to deal with wrapping http messages in API Controller?
What weak points do you see in my solution?
BTW, I see some weak points on your approach:
WebAPI is meant to be used to create RESTful Web services. Why are you trying to provide another layer of status and other details? HTTP is rich enough to cover these requirements. For example, you can use standard status codes and a subcode as follows: 500.1, 500.2.
Success or failure is easier to express with HTTP status codes. 2XX range for successful operations, and for an unsuccessful one you can use, for example, 400 (Bad Request). 401 for an unauthorized access... 500 for a server failure...
WebAPI already provides ModelState to let the framework build a response object. Use it and try to don't re-invent the wheel.
Again, keep it simple. Response entity goes on the response body. Success or failure is expressed by status codes. Details about a bad request are added to the ModelState dictionary. An error message should be set to the response's ReasonPhrase.
IHttpActionResult implementations are meant to transform your domain result into an HTTP response. That is, you're in the right track excepting when you try to return your response object as is. My advise is you should use your IHttpActionResult to set every detail on your own response object to standard HTTP semantics, and notify errors using ModelState out-of-the-box approach which works well.
Avoid IHttpActionResult and use HttpResponseException with Business Entity as result type. As in your solution, you cannot write statically typed test cases.
For example,
protected void ThrowHttpError(HttpStatusCode statusCode, string message)
{
throw new HttpResponseException(
new HttpResponseMessage(statusCode) {
ReasonPhrase = message,
// HTTP 2.0 ignores ReasonPhrase
// so we send ReasonPhrase again in the Content
Content = new StringContent(message)
});
}
// some generic option...
protected void ThrowHttpError<T>(HttpStatusCode statusCode, T content)
where T:class
{
throw new HttpResponseException(
new HttpResponseMessage(statusCode) {
ReasonPhrase = "Error",
Content = JsonConvert.Serialize(content)
});
}
Your methods,
public async Task<Product> Get(long id){
var product = await context.Products
.FirstOrDefaultAsync( x=> x.ProductID == id);
if(product==null){
ThrowHttpError(HttpStatusCode.NotFound,
$"Product not found for {id}");
}
if(product.RequiresValidation){
// generic version....
ThrowHttpError(HttpStatusCode.Conflict,
new Product{
ProductID = product.ProductID,
ValidationRequestCode = product.ValidationRequestCode
});
}
return product;
}
For further more, you can customise method ThrowHttpError to suite your needs. Best part is, it is still testable.
I have an intranet application that uses the Windows username and passes that to a procedure to return data.
I'm using dependency injection, but I don't believe I have the method to get the username separated properly.
I'm trying to keep this secure by not passing in the username as a parameter, but I also want to be able to impersonate (or bypass my GetWindowsUser() method) and send in another username so I can test results for other users.
One idea I had for this was to set a session variable in another page with another (impersonated) username, then check if that session variable exists first before grabbing the actual user name, but I couldn't figure out how to access the session variable in the repository.
WEB API CONTROLLER
public class DropDownDataController : ApiController
{
private IDropDownDataRepository _dropDownDataRepository;
//Dependency Injection using Unity.WebAPI NuGet Package
public DropDownDataController(IDropDownDataRepository dropDownDataRepository)
{
_dropDownDataRepository = dropDownDataRepository;
}
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage MyList()
{
try
{
return _dropDownDataRepository.MyList();
}
catch
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.NotFound));
}
}
}
REPOSITORY
public class DropDownDataRepository : IDropDownDataRepository, IDisposable
{
private DatabaseEntities db = new DatabaseEntities();
public HttpResponseMessage MyList()
{
//(This should be separated somehow, right?)
//Create a new instance of the Utility class
Utility utility = new Utility();
//Grab the windowsUser from the method
var windowsUser = utility.GetWindowsUser();
//Pass windowsUser parameter to the procedure
var sourceQuery = (from p in db.myProcedure(windowsUser)
select p).ToList();
string result = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(sourceQuery);
var response = new HttpResponseMessage();
response.Content = new StringContent(result, System.Text.Encoding.Unicode, "application/json");
return response;
}
}
INTERFACE
public interface IDropDownDataRepository : IDisposable
{
HttpResponseMessage MyList();
}
UTILITY CLASS
public class Utility
{
public string GetWindowsUser()
{
//Get the current windows user
string windowsUser = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name;
return windowsUser;
}
}
UPDATE 1
In addition to what Nikolai and Brendt posted below, the following is also needed to allow Web Api controllers work with the session state.
Accessing Session Using ASP.NET Web API
Abstract the Utility class and inject it into the repository.
Then you can stub or mock for testing.
public interface IUtility
{
string GetWindowsUser();
}
public class TestUtility : IUtility
{
public string GetWindowsUser()
{
return "TestUser";
}
}
public class DropDownDataRepository : IDropDownDataRepository, IDisposable
{
private IUtility _utility;
public DropDownDataRepository(IUtility utility)
{
_utility = utility;
}
}
EDIT
Also the repository should not return an HTTPResponseMessage type it should just return a List<T> of the domain model you're accessing.
i.e.
public List<Model> MyList()
{
//Grab the windowsUser from the method
var windowsUser = _utility.GetWindowsUser();
//Pass windowsUser parameter to the procedure
var sourceQuery = (from p in db.myProcedure(windowsUser)
select p).ToList();
return sourceQuery
}
Then move the JSON portion to the controller.
One idea I had for this was to set a session variable in another page
with another (impersonated) username, then check if that session
variable exists first before grabbing the actual user name, but I
couldn't figure out how to access the session variable in the
repository.
Potentially, if you add in a dependency to session, you need to isolate it, e.g.
public class DropDownDataRepository : IDropDownDataRepository, IDisposable
{
// ... other fields
private ISession session;
public DropDownDataRepository(ISession session)
{
this.session = session;
}
public HttpResponseMessage MyList()
{
var myUserName = this.session.UserName;
// ... etc
With ISession being something like:
public interface ISession
{
string UserName { get; }
}
Implemented as:
public class MySession : ISession
{
public string UserName
{
get
{
// potentially do some validation and return a sensible default if not present in session
return HttpContext.Current.Session["UserName"].ToString();
}
}
}
Of course there is the potential to decouple this MySession class from HttpContext if desired.
With regards to this:
//(This should be separated somehow, right?)
//Create a new instance of the Utility class
Utility utility = new Utility();
Yes, anytime you create a new object you are tightly coupling them together, which will give you issues, for example, if you try to unit test it in isolation.
In this instance you could extract an IUtility interface from Utility:
public class Utility : IUtility
{
string GetWindowsUser();
}
Then:
public class DropDownDataRepository : IDropDownDataRepository, IDisposable
{
// ... other fields
private IUtility utility;
public DropDownDataRepository(IUtility utility)
{
this.utility = utility;
// .... etc
Then you have removed the depenedency between Utility and DropDownDataRepository, and can substitute in another type or mock with ease.
I got a lot of help from Nikolai and Brent and got most of the way there with their posted answers, but ended up figuring out the complete answer on my own. The problems I was having were related to not being able to access session variables in a WebAPI. So, I'm sure there are cleaner solutions to this, but I definitely improved what I had and came up with the following code, which works.
This answer was needed to allow access to the session variable in Web Api - Accessing Session Using ASP.NET Web API
GLOBAL.asax.cs
public class MvcApplication : System.Web.HttpApplication
{
protected void Application_Start()
{
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
UnityConfig.RegisterComponents();
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
FilterConfig.RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
BundleConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles);
}
//Added to allow use of session state in Web API
protected void Application_PostAuthorizeRequest()
{
if (IsWebApiRequest())
{
HttpContext.Current.SetSessionStateBehavior(SessionStateBehavior.Required);
}
}
//Added to allow use of session state in Web API
private bool IsWebApiRequest()
{
return HttpContext.Current.Request.AppRelativeCurrentExecutionFilePath.StartsWith(WebApiConfig.UrlPrefixRelative);
}
protected void Session_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//Default set the session variable to none
Session["_impersonatedUser"] = "none";
}
protected void Session_End(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//Reset the session variable to blank
Session["_impersonatedUser"] = "";
}
}
UNITY.config
public static class UnityConfig
{
public static void RegisterComponents()
{
var container = new UnityContainer();
// register all your components with the container here
// it is NOT necessary to register your controllers
// e.g. container.RegisterType<ITestService, TestService>();
container.RegisterType<IDropDownDataRepository, DropDownDataRepository>();
container.RegisterType<IUtilityRepository, UtilityRepository>();
container.RegisterType<ISessionRepository, SessionRepository>();
//MVC5
//Unity.MVC5 NuGet Package
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new Unity.Mvc5.UnityDependencyResolver(container));
//WEB API
//Unity.WebApi NuGet Package
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver = new Unity.WebApi.UnityDependencyResolver(container);
}
}
WEB API CONTROLLER
public class DropDownDataController : ApiController
{
private IDropDownDataRepository _dropDownDataRepository;
//Dependency Injection using Unity.WebAPI NuGet Package
public DropDownDataController(IDropDownDataRepository dropDownDataRepository)
{
_dropDownDataRepository = dropDownDataRepository;
}
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage MyList()
{
try
{
var sourceQuery = _dropDownDataRepository.MyList();
//JSON stuff moved to controller
string result = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(sourceQuery);
var response = new HttpResponseMessage();
response.Content = new StringContent(result, System.Text.Encoding.Unicode, "application/json");
return response;
}
catch
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.NotFound));
}
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
_dropDownDataRepository.Dispose();
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
}
DROPDOWNDATA REPOSITORY
public class DropDownDataRepository : IDropDownDataRepository, IDisposable
{
private DatabaseEntities db = new DatabaseEntities();
private IUtilityRepository _utilityRepository;
private ISessionRepository _sessionRepository;
//Dependency Injection of Utility and Session
public DropDownDataRepository(IUtilityRepository utilityRepository, ISessionRepository sessionRepository)
{
_utilityRepository = utilityRepository;
_sessionRepository = sessionRepository;
}
//Changed to a list here
public List<MyProcedure> MyList()
{
string windowsUser;
//Check the session variable to see if a user is being impersonated
string impersonatedUser = _sessionRepository.ImpersonatedUser;
//Grab the windowsUser from the Utility Repository
windowsUser = _utilityRepository.GetWindowsUser();
if (impersonatedUser != "none")
{
windowsUser = impersonatedUser;
}
//Pass windowsUser parameter to the procedure
var sourceQuery = (from p in db.MyProcedure(windowsUser)
select p).ToList();
return sourceQuery;
}
private bool disposed = false;
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!this.disposed)
{
if (disposing)
{
db.Dispose();
}
}
this.disposed = true;
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
}
DROPDOWNDATA INTERFACE
public interface IDropDownDataRepository : IDisposable
{
//Changed to list here
List<MyProcedure> MyList();
}
UTILITY REPOSITORY
public class UtilityRepository : IUtilityRepository
{
public string GetWindowsUser()
{
//Get the current windows user
string windowsUser = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name;
return windowsUser;
}
}
UTILITY INTERFACE
public interface IUtilityRepository
{
string GetWindowsUser();
}
SESSION REPOSITORY
public class SessionRepository : ISessionRepository
{
public string ImpersonatedUser
{
get
{
return HttpContext.Current.Session["_impersonatedUser"].ToString();
}
}
}
SESSION INTERFACE
public interface ISessionRepository
{
string ImpersonatedUser { get; }
}
I'm trying to post a list of objects from my winforms application to my asp.net mvc 4 website. I've tested posting one object, and it works, but does not work for the list. It returns a 500 (Internal Server Error). Here is my code:
ASP.NET MVC Web API
public class PostTraceController : ApiController
{
public HttpResponseMessage Post(List<WebTrace> list)
{
try
{
// Some code
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Created);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Write("exception", ex.Message);
return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.ServiceUnavailable, ex);
}
}
public HttpResponseMessage Post(WebTrace item)
{
try
{
// Some code
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Created);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
HttpContext.Current.Trace.Write("exception", ex.Message);
return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.ServiceUnavailable, ex);
}
}
}
Win forms application
public class BaseSender
{
public BaseSender()
{
Client = new HttpClient
{
BaseAddress = new Uri(#"http://localhost/mywebsite/")
};
Client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Accept.Add(
new MediaTypeWithQualityHeaderValue("application/json"));
}
public string UserCode { get; set; }
protected readonly HttpClient Client;
public HttpResponseMessage PostAsJsonAsync(string requestUri, object value)
{
var response = Client.PostAsJsonAsync(requestUri, value).Result;
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
return response;
}
}
public class WebTraceSender : BaseSender
{
private const string requestUri = "api/posttrace";
public bool Post(List<ArchiveCptTrace> list)
{
try
{
var listWebTrace = new List<WebTrace>();
foreach (var item in list)
{
listWebTrace.Add(new WebTrace
{
DateStart = item.DatePreparation,
DateEnd = item.DateCloture,
UserStart = item.UserPreparation.UserName,
UserEnd = item.UserCloture.UserName,
AmountStart = item.MontantPreparation,
AmountEnd = item.MontantCloture,
TheoricAmountEnd = item.MontantTheorique,
Difference = item.Ecart,
UserCode = UserCode
});
}
var responce = PostAsJsonAsync(requestUri, listWebTrace);
return responce.IsSuccessStatusCode;
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// TODO : Trace the exception
return false;
}
}
}
EDIT :
I've found out the scenario of the error, which is having two methods in my api controller, even thought they have different signature. If I comment one method, the post work fine (item or a list). Any ideas ?
The methods may have different signatures, but Web API can't tell the difference between them without inspecting the body, which it won't do for performance reasons.
You could do two things - either create a new class which just holds a list of WebTrace objects, and put that in a different API controller, or you could map a custom route to one of your existing methods. You could do that with ActionName attribute, however, I would probably take the first approach.
I am trying to building custom validation with dynamic message in fluent validation library.
For example :
public class CreateProcessValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateProcessVM>
{
public CreateProcessValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.ProcessFile).Must((x,e) => IsProcessFileValid(x.ProcessFile))).WithMessage("Parse failed with error : {0}");
}
public bool IsProcessFileValid(HttpPostedFileBase file)
{
var errorMessage = "..." // pass result to validaton message ?
// logic
return false;
}
}
Is here any workaround how to pass validation result ?
Thanks
Have you tried something like this?
public class IsProcessFileValid : PropertyValidator
{
public IsProcessFileValid(): base("{ValidationMessage}") {}
protected override IsValid(PropertyValidatorContext context)
{
if (!IsProcessFileValid1(context))
context.MessageFormatter.AppendArgument("ValidationMessage",
"Custom validation message #1");
if (!IsProcessFileValid2(context))
context.MessageFormatter.AppendArgument("ValidationMessage",
"Custom validation message #2");
// ...etc
return true;
}
private bool IsProcessFileValid1(PropertyValidatorContext context)
{
// logic
return false;
}
private bool IsProcessFileValid2(PropertyValidatorContext context)
{
// logic
return false;
}
// ...etc
}
With extension method:
public static class IsProcessFileValidExtensions
{
public static IRuleBuilderOptions<T, object> MustBeValidProcessFile<T>
(this IRuleBuilder<T, object> ruleBuilder)
{
return ruleBuilder.SetValidator(new IsProcessFileValid());
}
}
... and then use it without a custom WithMessage:
public CreateProcessValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.ProcessFile).MustBeValidProcessFile();
}
By creating a custom PropertyValidator, you can encapsulate the default validation message within that class and make it dynamic. However you must not use the .WithMessage extension when declaring the RuleFor, because that would override the default validation message which you customized directly inside the PropertyValidator.
There's no way to do that. I would split the complex validation method you currently have into smaller methods (IsProcessFileValid1, IsProcessFileValid2, IsProcessFileValid3, ...) so that you could have more fine grained control over the error message. Also each method will be responsible for validating only once concern making them more reusable (single responsibility):
RuleFor(x => x.ProcessFile)
.Must(IsProcessFileValid1)
.WithMessage("Message 1")
.Must(IsProcessFileValid2)
.WithMessage("Message 2")
.Must(IsProcessFileValid3)
.WithMessage("Message 3");
Also notice how I simplified the lambda as the method could directly be passed to Must as argument.
Here is how I solved it. Tested with FluentValidation v8.5.0
class EmptyValidationMessage : IStringSource
{
public string ResourceName => null;
public Type ResourceType => null;
public string GetString(IValidationContext context)
{
return string.Empty;
}
public static readonly EmptyValidationMessage Instance = new EmptyValidationMessage();
}
public class MyPropValidator : PropertyValidator
{
public MyPropValidator() : base(EmptyValidationMessage.Instance)
{
}
protected override bool IsValid(PropertyValidatorContext context)
{
// if not valid
Options.ErrorMessageSource = new StaticStringSource("my message");
// you can do LanguageStringSource, LazyStringSource, LocalizedStringSource, etc
// example with localized string (https://github.com/clearwaterstream/LocalizedString.FluentValidation)
Options.ErrorMessageSource = new LocalizedStringSource("my message").InFrench("moi message");
return false;
}
}
Faced the same issue, while trying to insert exception message into WithMessage().
It worked with the method overload taking Func<T, string> messageProvider as parameter.
Here is the solution presented on the posters example (working code, FluentValidation v 9.1):
public class CreateProcessVM
{
public object ProcessFile { get; set; }
}
public class CreateProcessValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateProcessVM>
{
public CreateProcessValidator()
{
var message = "Something went wrong.";
RuleFor(x => x.ProcessFile)
.Must((x, e) => IsProcessFileValid(x.ProcessFile, out message))
// .WithMessage(message); will NOT work
.WithMessage(x => message); //Func<CreateProcessVM, string> as parameter
}
public bool IsProcessFileValid(object file, out string errorMessage)
{
errorMessage = string.Empty;
try
{
Validate(file);
return true;
}
catch (InvalidOperationException e)
{
errorMessage = e.Message;
return false;
}
}
private void Validate(object file)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("File of type .custom is not allowed.");
}
}
And a test demonstrating that we really get the exception message in the error message:
[Fact]
public void Test()
{
var validator = new CreateProcessValidator();
var result = validator.Validate(new CreateProcessVM());
Assert.False(result.IsValid);
Assert.Equal("File of type .custom is not allowed.", result.Errors[0].ErrorMessage);
}