I'm new to OpenGL and I can't find info about which way to choose if I want to move object.
I've created a simple triangle using only vertices array (no shaders) and display it on the screen. Next I want to move my triangle (to the right/left sides). As I see it there is two ways:
use GLKBaseEffect and play with GLKMatrix4MakeTranslation and GLKBaseEffect.transform.projectionMatrix property
change coordinates in vertices array
which way is more correct?
Thank you.
Translation. You never want to change coordinates in array.
Related
Morning all (if its morning where you are)
I have been looking around and have not seen a satisfactory method for doing this so thought I would ask around...
Ideal world I would like to be able to generate a transparent Texture2D object. Drawing this to the screen I would like to be able to "paint" to it, i.e. when the left mouse button is down whatever pixel the cursor is over should be set to black. Following this I would then need to be able to use this texture.
Using the texture is the easy part, we can simply make a new Texture2D attribute for a "painting" object and use that in the SpriteBatch.Draw method. The two tricky parts are
Generating a texture2D object of a specified size, filled with transparency in code.
Editing that texture2D on the fly (i.e. being able to alter pixel colours)
If anyone has any experience of these you input would be very much appreciated.
You can either use a RenderTarget2D (MSDN), which is itself a Texture2D (so you can use it in SpriteBatch.Draw). This allows you to render onto a texture in the same way you render onto the screen. You need to use GraphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget (MSDN) to set this up.
Or you can use Texture2D.SetData (MSDN) to manipulate pixels directly. You can construct a transparent Texture2D directly (MSDN). Don't forget to Dispose of any textures or other resources you create yourself!
Okay im working on making a tic tac toe game for one of my game development courses using XNA 4.0 I need to place sprites or some other objects so the game can check if the mouse is being clicked in the correct spots. I am going to use transparent sprites as a kind of button. How do I code them to go to these specific x,y coordinates. The game board is drawn on the background, I have all the coordinates to where to place these sprites. I am just stuck on putting the sprites in the correct positions.
SpriteBatch.Draw has a position parameter. Pass in an appropriately-valued Vector2.
Well if you check the Draw method you will find a parameter for the position.
Check this code sample
spriteBatch.Begin();
Vector2 pos = new Vector2(10, 10);
spriteBatch.Draw(SpriteTexture, pos, Color.White);
spriteBatch.End();
This is how you draw a sprite, with SpriteTexture as the image, on the position x10, y10 with the color White to modulate the texture.
You can also find more informations here.
Keep in mind that there are many overloaded methods to the Draw method. One you can even pass in rotation information and the like. So .Draw(...) has a lot of functionality you can use beyond just placing a sprite.
I have written a 2D Jump&Run Engine resulting in a 320x224 (320x240) image. To maintain the old school "pixely"-feel to it, I would like to scale the resulting image by 2 or 3 or 4, according to the resolution of the user.
I don't want to scale each and every sprite, but the resulting image!
Thanks in advance :)
Bob's answer is correct about changing the filtering mode to TextureFilter.Point to keep things nice and pixelated.
But possibly a better method than scaling each sprite (as you'd also have to scale the position of each sprite) is to just pass a matrix to SpriteBatch.Begin, like so:
sb.Begin(/* first three parameters */, Matrix.CreateScale(4f));
That will give you the scaling you want without having to modify all your draw calls.
However it is worth noting that, if you use floating-point offsets in your game, you will end up with things not aligned to pixel boundaries after you scale up (with either method).
There are two solutions to this. The first is to have a function like this:
public static Vector2 Floor(Vector2 v)
{
return new Vector2((float)Math.Floor(v.X), (float)Math.Floor(v.Y));
}
And then pass your position through that function every time you draw a sprite. Although this might not work if your sprites use any rotation or offsets. And again you'll be back to modifying every single draw call.
The "correct" way to do this, if you want a plain point-wise scale-up of your whole scene, is to draw your scene to a render target at the original size. And then draw your render target to screen, scaled up (with TextureFilter.Point).
The function you want to look at is GraphicsDevice.SetRenderTarget. This MSDN article might be worth reading. If you're on or moving to XNA 4.0, this might be worth reading.
I couldn't find a simpler XNA sample for this quickly, but the Bloom Postprocess sample uses a render target that it then applies a blur shader to. You could simply ignore the shader entirely and just do the scale-up.
You could use a pixelation effect. Draw to a RenderTarget2D, then draw the result to the screen using a Pixel Shader. There's a tool called Shazzam Shader Editor that let's you try out pixel shaders and it includes one that does pixelation:
http://shazzam-tool.com/
This may not be what you wanted, but it could be good for allowing a high-resolution mode and for having the same effect no matter what resolution was used...
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "resulting in ... an image" but if you mean your end result is a texture then you can draw that to the screen and set a scale:
spriteBatch.Draw(texture, position, source, color, rotation, origin, scale, effects, depth);
Just replace the scale with whatever number you want (2, 3, or 4). I do something similar but scale per sprite and not the resulting image. If you mean something else let me know and I'll try to help.
XNA defaults to anti-aliasing the scaled image. If you want to retain the pixelated goodness you'll need to draw in immediate sort mode and set some additional parameters:
spriteBatch.Begin(SpriteBlendMode.AlphaBlend, SpriteSortMode.Immediate, SaveStateMode.None);
GraphicsDevice.SamplerStates[0].MagFilter = TextureFilter.Point;
GraphicsDevice.SamplerStates[0].MinFilter = TextureFilter.Point;
GraphicsDevice.SamplerStates[0].MipFilter = TextureFilter.Point;
It's either the Point or the None TextureFilter. I'm at work so I'm trying to remember off the top of my head. I'll confirm one way or the other later today.
I am trying to cut a mesh in half or at least be able to delete faces from it in real-time.
How to go about doing this i wonder?
Lock the vertex buffers, memset the selected face or vertex to 0, does not work for me.
has anyone a solution or a tutorial on this i really want this feature in my program!
Cheers
Oh - that one is easy. There is no need to modify the mesh. D3D can already do this for you!
Set the clip-plane via IDirect3DDevice9::SetClipPlane, then enable the plane via the D3DRS_CLIPPLANEENABLE renderstate. You can even set multiple clip-planes at the same time if you want to..
Here is a link to the msdn-entry: http://doc.51windows.net/Directx9_SDK/?url=/directx9_sdk/graphics/reference/d3d/interfaces/idirect3ddevice9/setclipplane.htm
And if you do a google search on "D3D SetClipPlane" you will find lots of discussions and example codes how to use it.
If you need to dynamically delete triangles from a mesh the best/fastest way is to use indexed triangles. When you create the index buffer, use the 'D3DUSAGE_DYNAMIC' flag. When you want to delete triangles, lock it with the 'D3DLOCK_DISCARD' flag. Write the entire new list of indices into the buffer, leaving out the triangles you want to delete.
The index buffer will be much smaller than the vertex buffer, so re-uploading only indices won't be as much of a drag on the system as the vertex buffer would be. But if it would be a big problem for you to convert to indexed triangle lists, then doing these stame operations using the vertex buffer instead is probably your next best option.
You say that setting the vertex to 0 doesn't work. In what way doesn't it work?
If you set the position of all the verticies of a triangle to (0.0, 0.0, 0.0) then the resulting triangle will be of zero size and shouldn't be drawn. Just to be sure you could set it to an offscreen position instead of zero.
I am using XNA for a 2D project. I have a problem and I don't know which way to solve it. I have a texture (an image) that is drawn to the screen for example:
|+++|+++|
|---|---|
|+++|+++|
Now I want to be able to destroy part of that structure/image so that it looks like:
|+++|
|---|---|
|+++|+++|
so that collision now will work as well for the new image.
Which way would be better to solve this problem:
Swap the whole texture with another texture, that is transparent in the places where it is destroyed.
Use some trickery with spriteBatch.Draw(sourceRectangle, destinationRectangle) to get the desired rectangles drawn, and also do collision checking with this somehow.
Split the texture into 4 smaller textures each of which will be responsible for it's own drawing/collision detection.
Use some other smart-ass way I don't know about.
Any help would be appreciated. Let me know if you need more clarification/examples.
EDIT: To clarify I'll provide an example of usage for this.
Imagine a 4x4 piece of wall that when shot at, a little 1x1 part of it is destroyed.
I'll take the third option:
3 - Split the texture into 4 smaller
textures each of which will be
responsible for it's own
drawing/collision detection.
It's not hard do to. Basically it's just the same of TileSet struct. However, you'll need to change your code to fit this approach.
Read a little about Tiles on: http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~amitp/gameprog.html#tiles
Many sites and book said about Tiles and how to use it to build game worlds. But you can use this logic to everything which the whole is compost from little parts.
Let me quick note the other options:
1 - Swap the whole texture with
another texture, that is transparent
in the places where it is destroyed.
No.. have a different image to every different position is bad. If you need to change de texture? Will you remake every image again?
2- Use some trickery with
spriteBatch.Draw(sourceRectangle,
destinationRectangle) to get the
desired rectangles drawn, and also do
collision checking with this somehow.
Unfortunately it's don't work because spriteBatch.Draw only works with Rectangles :(
4 Use some other smart-ass way I don't
know about.
I can't imagine any magic to this. Maybe, you can use another image to make masks. But it's extremely processing-expensive.
Check out this article at Ziggyware. It is about Deformable Terrain, and might be what you are looking for. Essentially, the technique involves settings the pixels you want to hide to transparent.
Option #3 will work.
A more robust system (if you don't want to be limited to boxes) would use per-pixel collision detection. The process basically works as follows:
Calculate a bounding box (or circle) for each object
Check to see if two objects overlap
For each overlap, blit the sprites onto a hidden surface, comparing pixel values as you go. If a pixel is already set when you try to draw the pixel from the second sprite, you have a collision.
Here's a good XNA example (another Ziggyware article, actually): 2D Per Pixel Collision Detection
Some more links:
Can someone explain per-pixel collision detection
XNA 2-d per-pixel collision
I ended up choosing option 3.
Basically I have a Tile class that contains a texture and dimention. Dimention n means that there are n*n subtiles within that tile. I also have an array that keeps track of which tiles are destroyed or not. My class looks like this in pseudo code:
class Tile
texture
dimention
int [,] subtiles; //0 or 1 for each subtile
public Tile() // constructor
subtiles = new int[dimention, dimention];
intialize_subtiles_to(1);
public Draw() // this is how we know which one to draw
//iterate over subtiles
for(int i..
for(int j ...)
if(subtiles[i,j] == 1)
Vector2 draw_pos = Vector2(i*tilewidth,
j*tileheight)
spritebatch.Draw(texture, draw_pos)
In a similar fashion I have a collision method that will check for collision:
public bool collides(Rectangle rect)
//iterate over subtiles
for i...
for j..
if(subtiles[i,j]==0) continue;
subtile_rect = //figure out the rect for this subtile
if(subtile_rect.intersects(rect))
return true;
return false;
And so on. You can imagine how to "destroy" certain subtiles by setting their respective value to 0, and how to check if the whole tile is destroyed.
Granted with this technique, the subtiles will all have the same texture. So far I can't think of a simpler solution.