I'm new to RoR.
I was able to install Rails and host it in Webrick (Sample App with "Welcome" controller) in my windows.
Now i have a Unix Weblogic Server along with a dedicated domian.
After exporting the .WAR file using Warbler, i accessed the Oracle Admin Console from where i deployed the .WAR file in the dedicated domain. I did all this for the Sample app with only the Welcome controller in it.
But even after deploying the WAR file, on accessing the Domain along with the Port Number (:9002) i ended up with 404 file not found error On looking at the server logs,there wasn't any records relating to any error. The Application must have been deployed properly. I assume that i must have missed out on some basic configurations in the routes.rb or similar files before deploying. Can anyone Guess what are all the possibilities and if possible can anyone help me by pointing to any tuts that cover the Steps to be carried out for configuration before deployment. do i need to install both JRuby and Rails inside the server before depolyment?
I can't really guess with Eror 404 only.
You can try mapping your rails app rack config to a different base_uri.
All you need to do is wrap the existing 'run' command in a map block
try doing this in your rails 'config.ru' file:
map '/mydepartment' do
run Myapp::Application
end
Now when you 'rails server' the app should be at localhost:3000/mydepartment .
Not sure if this will give you the desired outcome, but worth a try.
One more thing you also add this to your config/environments/production.rb and config/environments/development.rb (if on production mode):
config.action_controller.asset_path = proc { |path| "/abc#{path}" }
otherwise when you call your helpers such as stylesheet_link_tag in your views, they will generate links without the "/abc".
Also, find some guides you may refer for good support.
JRubyOnRailsOnBEAWeblogic.
Use JRuby with JMX for Oracle WebLogic Server 11g
Let me know if it is not resolved.
Related
I am currently using a platform where multiple web applications must interact with each other in a frameset. This set of web applications and the frameset is hosted on Tomcat.
Now the application we're working on is developed with jRuby and Rails. Is there anyway I can run my development environment inside of Tomcat similar to just running the jRuby -S Rails Server command so I can effectively debug?
The only way I've found is to generate a war using warble and then modifying the exploded war which seems really hacky. Any thoughts?
EDIT: I think my best bet is to generate a war, gut it, use symbolic links and figure out what gems / libs I need to copy from the war generation process. It's the best way I can think of.
one option to explore: deploy a little servlet to Tomcat which returns
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http://localhost:3000
So far the best solution I have found is to setup a reverse proxy with Tomcat and point it to the Rails development server. This allows it to run, as expected on the client side, while still giving me debug control.
When I get a chance to do some more testing I'll edit my answer to include additional information.
go to the webapps folder in tomcat where you have deployed the war file, then find the web.xml file inside the expanded war file
The path to this file is generally /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/your-project-here/WEB-INF/web.xml and inside this file you should find the
Changing this is one way to go about.
<context-param>
<param-name>rails.env</param-name>
<param-value>production</param-value>
</context-param>
I'm looking for a good deployment tutorial for a Rails 3.1.1 application on a server. And by good I actually mean complete. The reason I'm posting this question is that although there are tons of tutorials out there on the web (google, blogs, books, other stackoverflow questions etc...) all of them seem to focus either on a problem with the deployment process or make some assumptions about the deployment environment that do not match with what I need.
I realize that deploying a Rails app on a server requieres a variety of different programs and tools that need to be configured and somehow I always get stuck on apparently "little" things that make me very frustrated.
So, let's begin from the start. What I have now is a server that I can access through SSH and a domain name, let's call it www.example.com. The server runs a fresh Ubuntu 10.04 x64 and has just a user installed, namely root (through root I access the server with SSH).
Note! There is no Apache, Ruby, PHP, MySQL, cPanel or any other panel installed, just the bare minimum that comes with a fresh installation.
Also the web server will host a single application and the database will run on the same machine.
From my knowledge the process of deploying a Rails application follows the following scenarios:
Installing Ruby
I already did this by using RVM using the Multi-User install process (simply because I have just the root user and it does it automatically). This seems to work fine aftewards but I do have some questions:
Would it make more sense to install Ruby directly and not through RVM (I'm thinking maybe in terms of efficiency - also RVM does a little bit of magic behind the scences modifying some bash_profile files in ways that I don't understand and this somehow seems invasive...)?
Would it make more sense to install as a separate user through RVM (can there any safety problems arise)?
Necessary gems
Now that Ruby is installed what would be the best initial set of gems to install along side it?
I installed just bundler, so that once I upload my application on the server I can run a bundle install command which will install in turn the required app gems.
Question - Should I install the rails gem before hand? Are there any other gems that need to be installed?
Web server
This is where it gets tricky for me. I'm trying to use apache and mod-passenger for deployment (they seem to be the most popular). So I installed the apache web server and the passenger gem and all the related dependencies (libraries mentioned by passenger).
Now, the problems arise. First thing is user related. How does Apache run? I mean under each user? If I installed it and (re)started it using the root user, will it permanently run under the root user? Is this a bad thing? If yes, should I create another user? If yes, how? In what groups should I put the new user in, what rights should he have (namely what folders should he have access to). How to start the apache in this case (under root, under that user, add a line somewhere in the configuration file, etc.)
Website configuration
Where to put the website configuration stuff? Is it OK to put it into apache.conf, or should I create a new file in sites-available? Or should I simply reuse the default file that is already present there? If a new user has been created at the previous step, what rights should he have in relation to the config files?
Also... where to eventually put the rails application? In what folder would it be best? Somewhere under home? Maybe under /var/www? I want to know how would this affect the rights of the apache process serving the app? (Generally I have problems while serving an app, it complains that it doesn't have rights on a specific folder. Also, using the new asset pipelines - which I don't fully understand - asset files are being created and they seem not to inherit the parent folder rights...)
Database
As database I'm using MySQL and installing it is pretty straightforward. The question that I have here is again user related. Should I use a special user for the database? How does MySQL actually manage users (are they internal, or are they the Linux users or ...?). Should the database user be the same as the "web user" from above? Or should it be a different one?
Assets
Here I get really lost. I really have troubles making the assets pipeline works. I've checked the railscasts episode and also the rails website tutorial and I do seem to theoretically understand the thing, yet I have problems in practice.
So the questions here would be - what commands should I run to precompile the assets? (Trying to run rake assets:precompile). Is it ok? What should I change in the production.rb file? How do the assets generated work in relation with the webuser or database users created above? I am personally getting a problem in this step namely the log files say that some css files are not accessible (for example I have jqplot library installed under the vendor/assets folder and its files cannot be accessed - should I add a manifest file here somehow?).
It would be really great if someone could point me towards a nice article, or resource that explains all this stuff. The main area which I'm having problems in is how does Apache, Passenger, Ruby, Rails and MySQL interact with a Linux user. How to properly set up the permissions for the Rails app folder? How does the assets pipeline affect this user permission stuff?
Thank you
Here's my way of deploying Rails:
Installing Ruby
I would not use RVM because it's very tricky to get it running properly in combination with stuff like cron jobs. Doable (with wrappers for example), but a bit of a hassle. If you don't need other Ruby versions on that machine, just install it from source yourself.
Gems
Just let Bundler work its magic. Remember to install with the flags --without test development --deployment. I wouldn't do that up front though. Just make sure you have bundler.
Web server
Using Passenger (with either Apache or Nginx) is a fine and easy choice. When you install Apache from apt, it will run in a special user.
Apache is configured correctly automatically on Ubuntu. It will start on reboot.
Website configuration
All configuration be in /etc/apache2. Place your virtual host configuration in /etc/apache2/sites-available and use a2ensite to enable it.
Put your app in /var/www, since that is the default location in Ubuntu. I usually make a deploy user.
Make sure that user can access your application by assigning your app to the www-data group.
Database
MySQL has its own user system. Log in as root user and create a new user with SQL: GRANT ALL ON 'application_production'.* TO 'deploy' IDENTIFIED BY 'some password';
Assets
Assets should be generated as the user owning the application. You should add any css and javascript files to production.rb. For example:
config.assets.precompile += %w(backend.css)
Conclusion
It helps to use a deploy tool like Capistrano. When you run capify, uncomment the appropriate line in the Capfile to get assets compilation. Here's mine:
ENV['RAILS_ENV'] = 'production'
load 'deploy' if respond_to?(:namespace) # cap2 differentiator
load 'deploy/assets'
load 'config/deploy'
require 'capistrano/ext/multistage'
require "bundler/capistrano"
require 'capistrano_colors'
This is just how I normally install my rails apps. I hope this will get you going. Recently I've written a gem for integrating Chef-solo with Capistrano, called capistrano-chef-solo. It's very alpha and might be a bit too complicated if you're just starting with deployment, but it might help you.
I'm been working on a rails 3.1 app with one other dev.
I've just pulled some of his recent changes, using git. And am now getting a 403 on any page I try to visit.
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
I'm running the site locally through passenger.
Oddly, when I start the app using rails' internal server. I can visit the site at http://0.0.0.0:3000
Looking at the changes in this recent pull, the only files have changed are some javascripts, some html the application.rb, routes.rb and a rake file.
How do I debug this, I'm a bit lost on where to start?
EDIT:
If I roll back to an earlier version the site works, through passenger. Which leads me to believe the problem is within the rails app, rather than an Apache error. Or it could be a permissions thing, can git change file permissions in this way?
IMHO this is a configuration error in Apache or wrong directory layouts. Make sure that the passenger_base_uri still points to the public folder inside your rails project and that there are no hidden .htaccess files which block access. Also verify that your sym-links are correct (if there are any). Also check your Apache error log.
Start by launching your console to see if rails and your app can be loaded.
In your application root directory type :
rails console
I have a deployed Rails application that I'd like to use with Hoptoad (an online exception notification service). It comes packaged in a gem that I installed on my deployment server, but I need to run the script/generate hoptoad every time I deploy to configure it because the Hoptoad config files/changes exist only on my production application (and not on my development, so when I deploy, they all get erased).
Is there an easy way to run that script/generate on the production server every time I deploy? I feel like you could do this with Capistrano tasks, but I don't know how to do that.
What do people usually do for this? Sorry if this post is a little hard to understand, I'm not quite sure how to explain the issue.
Thanks!
You can add the Hoptoad configuration file to your source code repository so that it gets deployed as part of the Rails application.
Alternatively, if you don't want that information within your repository, then upload the config file to your production server (outside of Capistrano's normal releases directory structure) and have Capistrano create a symbolic link to it as part of the deployment process. I provided an answer to a similar question here which should give you the idea.
I have a Rails app that is running on a production server with Apache and Phusion Passenger. The app works fine locally when using Mongrel, but whenever I try to load a URL on the production server, it returns HTTP 500. I know the server is working properly, because I can get the static elements of the application (e.g., JavaScript files, stylesheets, images) just fine. I've also checked the Passenger status and it is loading the app (it must be, since the app's 500 Internal Server Error page is returned, not just the default Apache one). Also, when I load the app via script/console production and do something like app.get("/"), 500 is also returned.
The problem is that there is nothing in the log files to indicate the problem. production.log is empty. The Apache error logs show no problems with Apache, either. I'm stumped as to what's going on and I'm not sure how to diagnose the problem.
I know I may have been a bit vague, but can anyone give a suggestion on what the problem may be? Or at least a way I can go about diagnosing it?
The answer for this specific situation was a problem with my app. One of the model classes used a different database connection than the rest of the app. This database connection was not configured properly. I think the reason why nothing was written to the log files is that Rails bailed out without having any idea what to do.
Since it may be helpful for others to see how I diagnosed this problem, here was my thought process:
The issue couldn't be with Apache: no errors were written into the Apache log files.
The issue probably wasn't with Passenger: Passenger wasn't writing any errors to the Apache log file, and it seemed to be loading my app properly, since passenger-status showed it as loaded and it was display my app's 500 Internal Server Error page (not the default Apache one).
From there I surmised that it must be something broken in my app that happened very early on in the initialization phase, but wasn't something that caused the app to completely bail and throw an exception. I poked around in the Phusion Passenger Google Group, and ultimately stumbled upon this helpful post, which suggested that the error may be a database connectivity issue. Sure enough, removing this misconfigured database and all references to it made the app work!
Have you tried running the app locally using Passenger?
Try running the application locally on Mongrel in Production mode, to make sure that there's no weird issues with that particular environment. If that works, then you know that it's not an issue with your codebase. Since your static components are being served properly, that tells me that Apache is working fine. The only gear in the system left is Passenger. At this point, I would say it's an improperly configured Passenger. You should post up your Passenger config file, and ask the question on ServerFault.
A couple of things to try :
Have you gone though the following from the docs:
6.3.7. My Rails application’s log file is not being written to
There are a couple things that you
should be aware of:
By default, Phusion Passenger runs Rails applications in production
mode, so please be sure to check
production.log instead of
development.log. See RailsEnv for
configuration.
*
By default, Phusion Passenger runs Rails applications as the owner
of environment.rb. So the log file can
only be written to if that user has
write permission to the log file.
Please chmod or chown your log file
accordingly.
See User switching (security) for details.
If you’re using a RedHat-derived Linux
distribution (such as Fedora or
CentOS) then it is possible that
SELinux is interfering. RedHat’s
SELinux policy only allows Apache to
read/write directories that have the
httpd_sys_content_t security context.
Please run the following command to
give your Rails application folder
that context:
Have you checked your vhost or httpf.conf file ? Do you have any logging directives ?
Check the top level apache log file
Try setting PassengerLogLevel to 1 or 2 or 3, as shown here http://www.modrails.com/documentation/Users%20guide.html#_passengerloglevel_lt_integer_gt
Do you have any rack apps installed ?
My suggestion would be to go right back to "Hello World" land and create the smallest possible Ruby example application and upload it to see if there is a problem with Passenger or Ruby on the server.
May be a silly suggestion but I suggest you start by increasing the logging levels on production while you are testing. Do this in config/environments/production.rb and use:
config.log_level = :debug
This should at least get you some sort of backtrace so you can start to find the problem.
If you still get nothing - you may find that you have an issue with something as simple as a missing gem/plugin on your production server. That sort of thing may well manifest as a "500" error and just not be very verbose for you.
Can you run the test suite on your production server?