I have Visutal Studio 2012, MVC 4 & Razor. I am having trouble getting a website up and running with this technology.
The Web Server is a Windows Server 2008 server. I tried deploying using the Web Deploy method but am consistently getting something like 'set ACL" error.
I tried deploying using the File System. All files got deployed, but when I try and run the website, it fails because of missing ASP.NET MVC infrastruccture files.
Two things:
•If I use Web-Deploy, how do I solve the ACL error, because I assume with this method, everything needed will get deployed.
Note that the Web Deploy 3.0 service is on the server and started.
•If I use File System, where can I find the downloads needed to deploy on the server where MVC WILL work.
◦Note that I downloaded the 4.5 Framework and was successfully installed.
You need to be a bit more precise with what you need help with.
What's the exact error.
Often times you need to give the IIS users group access to at least read from the directory where you've deployed. Did you do this already?
Do you have .NET 4.5 and MVC4 installed on the server? If not, are you expecting those DLLs to be "packaged" with your deployment? They generally are not since they are "standard" assemblies. But if you want them to be included in your deployment you can do that by selecting the references in VS and saying "copy." This is not recommended because when you install patches to .NET and MVC on the server, those updates will not carry through to your app, since it'll use the local (old) copies of your assemblies.
This may be more of an IIS issue, but not sure based on the details in your question.
Check that the application pool that the site is running under is using .net 4.0.
Just a thought I would check.
Related
I'm thoroughly confused about how to properly deploy ASP.NET MVC with my application. As far as I understand, there are the following ways you can get it on a machine:
You can download a separate installer and install it on a machine that has the approprite .NET framework (although which MVC version requires which .NET framework?)
Some versions come along with .NET framework itself (though I can't find which version of MVC is shipped with which version of .NET);
Some versions are installed with Visual Studio (though again, no idea which versions are installed with which versions of VS). In this case, you can set Copy Locally to true for these references and perform a "bin deploy". You might need to add some extra references though (not sure which though).
You can also download MVC as a NuGet package, in which case it also downloads some other unrelated packages like WebPages, Infrastructure and Razor (which is my personal WTF - wasn't Razor a core part of MVC?). In this case the build process will automatically do a "bin deploy" by default (I think...)
So... WTF? What is the proper way to add MVC to your development workstation, what is the proper way to add the references to your project (NuGet? GAC?), and what is the proper way to deploy it to the target server (separate installer? .NET installer? bin deploy?)
"Proper" Development:
The "proper way" (by which I mean standard/redistributable way) would be using Nuget for your references. This means you can easily manage different versions and anybody else working on your project has a standard repository from which to pull the external requirements.
The NuGet documentation has a decent explanation of how to add references.
To install the appropriate version of MVC for developing through Visual Studio, just download and install it from the ASP.NET MVC website. This will install the necessary templates for you to create a new MVC project in Visual Studio. This will also include the necessary binaries, etc.
"Proper" Deployment:
Use bin deploy to deploy to your webserver. This means you don't need full admin priviledges to install the MVC requirements.
Phil Haack's guide will walk you through the process of bin deploying MVC3+
Keep in mind, the web server does need the appropriate .NET platform installed. You should install this via the appropriate redistributable installer if it is not already installed on the server.
Referring to the deployment i publish my asp.net app (i usually make web applications) to the file system in a directory (you can set also a server there, but i don't like it) and make an upload to the server with an FTP client of all the deployed folders. All the changes that i make to the app after (like bug correction) i deploy all the app again and upload single parts.
I hope i get your question in part, this is my first answer in SO.
is there anything special I need to do to get ASP.NET MVC3 enabled on my Windows 8 Release Preview install? Creating even a blank ASP.Net MVC3 Razor application in VS2010, deploying to the local IIS instance as a new application, and loading the page in the browser doesn't work. I'm met with the following error:
HTTP Error 403.14 - Forbidden
The Web server is configured to not list the contents of this directory.
So I've then gone in to the new VS2010 project, right click, select "Add Deployable Dependencies" and selected "ASP.NET MVC" along with "ASP.NET Web Page with Razor syntax"
Then I re-deploy the project to local IIS application. No change. Still "web server not configured to list contents of the directory".
It's worth noting the VS 2010 Development Web Server works fine.
Any ideas?
Found it. Turns out even though I'm using ASP.NET MVC3 and had the .Net 4.0 framework installed, the Windows 8 "feature" for ASP.NET 4.5 needed to be installed for all this to wire up. Seems a bit counter-intuitive, but changing that did it.
You may want to consider running the MVC3 installer on your host machine so that all dependencies for MVC3 projects are stored in the GAC. If you need the install package you can download it from:
http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/install.aspx?appid=MVC3
I can't verify that this works on the Windows 8 preview, but it would be my first instinct upon running into your problem.
Did you ensure that the worker process for the site is configured for .NET 4?
When you say you "Deployed", how did you do that? It sounds like the folder is not being set to an application.
For me .NET 3.5 was not installed for IIS 8 in Windows features. Although I'm pretty sure my app is .NET 4.0... Worth trying though.
I had problems installing MVC3 MS VS 2010. Windows 8 x64. The platform installer shows no errors.
Root cause : aspnetwebpages.msi breaks updating web.config files. I updated two web.config files which appeared to only contain blanks.
Here are my directions:
Ensure C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Config\web.config is valid. Use web.config.default, copy then rename to web.config to correct if it looks wrong.
Ensure C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\Config\web.config is valid. Use web.config.default, copy then rename to web.config to correct if it looks wrong.
I don't know why the files were bad in the first place.
What do I need to do to my Windows 2008 / IIS 7.5 server to allow me to host my new MVC3 applications. It already has .NET 4.0 Framework installed...
I dont want to use the /Bin deployment that I read of on the Internet.
Thanks Paul
You just need to run the MVC3 installer!
All of the DLLs required by your app that are not part of the framework itself SHOULD be deployed into your applications ~/bin folder. Putting DLLs in the GAC is evil.
Benefits of ~/bin deployment:
Your application is guaranteed to have the correct (which is not always the same as the latest) version of each assembly that it requires
Redploying your application keeps those dependencies in sync with your app's requirements.
If you remove the app from the server, you don't leave shrapnel from the installation laying around that is no longer required.
~/bin installation is much, much cleaner than any alternative. I'd like to hear your reasons for avoiding it.
Requirements for MVC3:
Download and install MVC3.
Update your web application project to reference the MVC3 assemblies. (You might create a new, empty MVC3 app and compare the assembly references it includes)
Rebuild and run your unit tests. (You do have a test project, don't you?)
Have a serious look at Razor - it rocks.
It's refers to MVC2 but should work all the same
http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2010/07/13/server-installation-options-for-asp-net-mvc-2.aspx
If you have access to RDP into your server perhaps the Web Platform installer is the "easiest"
http://www.asp.net/downloads
I am currently building an ASP MVC 2 site and I am looking at hooking ELMAH in for my error logging however I'm not sure how to handle the different build environments.
Both my development machine and current test server are 32-Bit and the production server is 64-bit. I can set the MVC site to deploy in x86 and x64 without any problems but is there any way I can get it to use the 32bit and 64bit ELMAH binaries on their respective servers without needing to change the referenced DLL between builds?
The difference between the two editions is due to SQLite since it uses unmanaged code. If you are not using the SQLite provider, it doesn't matter and you can use the same version in both environments. If you are using SQLite then I am not sure how to do this, but I gather most people will use SQL Server in production so won't really run into this issue.
Hope that helps.
I had the same problem, and not using SQLite was not enough to make it work. I tried removing all configuration for SQLite.
I noticed that the SQLite dll was published with my project, so i removed it from the folder containing the Elmah dll. Now my application works in both 32-bit and 64-bit.
Is there something special you usually have to do? I have a DailyRazor .Net Starter account, but it won't run my MVC app. Any ideas?
I have contacted support but they said it should work, but it's not... Thought maybe someone here could help me faster.
I've been through this with Gearhost.
Your host needs to install the following on your IIS server:
ASP.NET 3.5 SP1
ASP.NET MVC 1.0
They need to enable the following settings:
If it's running IIS 6 on Windows 2003:
Enable Wildcard Mappings: (1), (2)
If it's running IIS 7 on Windows 2008, then you don't need to do anything.
Edit:
Regarding your Linq error; that means they probably don't have the correct version of the .NET Framework installed. I'd open a ticket and ask them. If they seem unwilling to help or to upgrade your server, there are plenty of hosts that will, and I can make recommendations if you'd like.
It sounds like the host does not have the latest version of the .net framework installed (3.5) , or if they do, your web application is perhaps set up to use an older version of asp.net.
Also, if they happen to be running on IIS6, there are a few extra steps they may have to do:
http://haacked.com/archive/2008/11/26/asp.net-mvc-on-iis-6-walkthrough.aspx
Try copying the MVC assemblies (System.Web. Abstractions, MVC, and Routing) to your Bin folder.
In reference to your error, you can try adding the System.Linq dll to your bin folder to see if that gets rid of that error. Does your host have .NET 3.5 installed?
You need to copy System.Core.dll to your Bin folder.
Alternatively, ask DailyRazor to install .Net 3.5. (They might not listen, though)