I am trying to do the following:
#foreach(var p in #Model.line_products){
<img class="small_img_#Model.line_products[i].short_name" src="/Content/images/#Model.line_products[i].image_name" />
}
Which isn't working, it renders the text just the way it is, not recognizing the '#'. I found this other post in Stackoverflow, which suggests adding parenthesis in the following way:
#foreach(var p in #Model.line_products){
<img class="small_img_(#Model.line_products[i].short_name)" src="/Content/images/#Model.line_products[i].image_name" />
}
Using this workaround, I get that my id is rendered as small_img_(MODEL ATTRIBUTE). Isn't there a workaround which doesn't require adding specific characters? (such as the parenthesis).
You have more errors than a simple undercore problem here. You cannot use #Model inside your if. You are already in a # block. Simply use #foreach(var p in Model.line_products).
Plus, the way you wrote the parenthesis, they will get rendered. What you want is
small_img_#(Model.line_products[i].short_name)
Put the parenthesis after the # instead of before:
class="small_img_#(Model.line_products[i].short_name)"
I sometimes put a couple of Guids in the id of an element and an underscore separator doesn't work.
There are two ways around this. First use the entity code _ instead and secondly just use a hyphen.
<input id="chk_#classLeader.ClassLeader_#ing.Ingredient.Guid" type="checkbox" class="chk_Done form-check">
<input id="chk-#classLeader.ClassLeader-#ing.Ingredient.Guid" type="checkbox" class="chk_Done form-check">
This is because I want to grab out the Guid's when the check box is clicked with some JQuery like this:
$(".chk_Done").click(function () {
var obj =[];
const itemId = ($(this).attr("id"));
const myArray = itemId.split("_");
var ClassLeaderGuid = myArray[1], IngredientGuid = myArray[2];
Related
(I'm new to Svelte so it is quite likely that I'm doing something wrong here)
UPDATE: I've added a second, slightly different REPL which may demonstrate the problem better. Try this one: https://svelte.dev/repl/ad7a65894f8440ad9081102946472544?version=3.20.1
I've encountered a problem attempting to bind a text input to a reactive value.
I'm struggling to describe the problem in words, so hopefully a reduced demo of the issue in the attached REPL will make more sense.
https://svelte.dev/repl/6c8068ed4cc048919f71d87f9d020696?version=3.20.1
The demo contains two custom <Selector> components on a page.
The first component is passed two string values ("one" and "two"):
<Selector valueOne="one" valueTwo="two"/>
Clicking the buttons next to the input field sets selectedValue to one of these values.
This, in turn, triggers the following reactive declaration to update:
$: value = selectedValue
The input field is bound to this reactive value:
<input type="text" bind:value>
So clicking the "One" button sets the input text to "one", and clicking the "Two" button sets the input field to "two".
Importantly though, you can still type anything into the input field.
The second component is passed two array values:
<Selector valueOne={[1, "one"]} valueTwo={[2, "two"]}/>
Again, clicking the buttons sets selectedValue to one of these.
However this time the reactive declaration depends on an array element:
$: value = selectedValue[1]
Everything works as before, except now you can no longer type into the input field at all.
So the question is - why does <input bind:value> behave differently for these two:
$: value = aString
vs
$: value = anArray[x]
It seems that this is only an issue when using two-way bindings.
By switching to a one-way and an on:input handler, the problem goes away:
i.e. instead of this:
<input type="text" bind:value={valX}/>
use this:
<input type="text" value={valX} on:input={e => valX = e.target.value}/>
I'm pretty sure your reactive declaration is overwriting your bound value as soon as it changes, which is with every key stroke on the input and every button press. Meaning it technically is working, you're just reverting it each time it changes. Check out this version of it that uses a watcher.
Also binding to a reactive declaration means you're never actually changing the variables with the input (which you can see in your JSON result on the first selector when you type in the input the value doesn't update only on button click).
Why not lose the reactive declaration and bind directly to the variable you want. Then use an {#if} block to switch between which version of the input you're showing based on the truthiness of index?
<script>
export let valueOne;
export let valueTwo;
export let index;
let selectedValue = index? [] : '';
let selectValue = (val) => selectedValue = val;
</script>
{#if index}
<input type="text" bind:value={selectedValue[index]} placeholder="Type anything...">
{:else}
<input type="text" bind:value={selectedValue} placeholder="Type anything...">
{/if}
<button on:click={() => selectValue(valueOne)}>One</button>
<button on:click={() => selectValue(valueTwo)}>Two</button>
<p>
<strong>Selected value:</strong> {JSON.stringify(selectedValue)}
</p>
By binding directly to the selectedValue or an index of it you have the added benefit of changing the value with the input. Here's a working example in the REPL
I'm creating a website with ASP.NET MVC5 and I'm using MaterializeCSS for the first time, which looks like a very exciting framework.
However, the checkboxes generated by CheckBoxFor helper become hidden !
When I write :
#Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.IsAgreeTerms)
The generated HTML is :
<input name="IsAgreeTerms" type="hidden" value="false">
Why does Materialize change my type=checkbox into type=hidden ?
I tried to add type="checkbox" in the CheckboxFor helper, but it doesnt change anything. The only way is to modify in in my browser's console.
The only solution I found is this SO thread.
However, the accepted answer doesn't change anything for me.
The other answer works, but I think it's ugly to add some JS script to modify what Materialize modifies without my consent.
Is there any way to say "Hey, I ask for a type=checkbox, so just let my type=checkbox in the generated HTML" ?
Thank you
UPDATE :
My full ASP.NET MVC code is :
#Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.IsAgreeTerms, new { #type = "checkbox" })
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.IsAgreeTerms, new { #class = "login-label" })
The full generated HTML is
<input data-val="true" data-val-required="Le champ IsAgreeTerms est requis." id="IsAgreeTerms" name="IsAgreeTerms" type="checkbox" value="true"
<input name="IsAgreeTerms" type="hidden" value="false">
<label class="login-label" for="IsAgreeTerms">IsAgreeTerms</label>
Here's a solution in the form of a html helper. It constructs a checkbox and label in the correct order:
public static IHtmlString CheckBoxWithLabelFor<TModel>(
this HtmlHelper<TModel> htmlHelper,
Expression<Func<TModel, bool>> expression,
string labelText,
object htmlAttributes = null
)
{
if (expression == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(expression));
}
var checkBoxWithHidden = htmlHelper.CheckBoxFor(expression, htmlAttributes).ToHtmlString().Trim();
var pureCheckBox = checkBoxWithHidden.Substring(0, checkBoxWithHidden.IndexOf("<input", 1, StringComparison.Ordinal));
var labelHtml = htmlHelper.LabelFor(expression, labelText).ToHtmlString().Trim();
var result = pureCheckBox + Environment.NewLine + labelHtml + Environment.NewLine + $"<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"{ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression)}\" value=\"false\" />";
return new MvcHtmlString(result);
}
Is there other html generated by materialize.css? I think this happens because it is not possible apply a custom CSS to element input of type checkbox.
So, the checkbox becomes hidden and other html component represents visually the checkbox. Many components work like that.
UPDATE:
Why is Html checkbox generating an additional hidden input
OP here. Problem looks like more complex.
Actually, when using #Html.CheckBoxFor, MVC5 generates 3 fields, in that order :
Your input, with type="checkbox", binded to your model property
An hidden field (see the Claudio's link for an explaination)
Your label, generated by #Html.LabelFor
Problem is Materialize expects that in another order to work.
In your browser's console, just move the <label> element between the input and the hidden field, and everything works fine !
I found this very useful link, where, basically, it is said that the order of the generated fields by #Html.checkBoxFor will change ... In MVC6 !
As I'm working with MVC5, I use this very ugly solution in my _Layout:
$(":checkbox").each(function () {
$(this).nextAll("label").before($(this))
})
If anyone has a better idea, please feel free to post an elegant solution.
This is probably a simple question, but to which I havent found an answer yet.
How to escape the ' _ ' when creating an HtmlElement in razor?
To render a '-' in the final Html we put an ' _ ', but to render an '_' (underscore), How do we escape it? I tryed '#:', but it didn't work, and didn't find any other options...
Example:
#Html.CheckBox("Access_Groups", false, new
{
#class = "input-control checkbox",
#data_group = "I', looking for data-group",
#Description_pt = "<----- I'm looking for Description_pt"
})
#data_group will render as data-group as expected, but...
#Description_pt will render as Description-pt, and that is not what is expected (don't know how to escape the _ for this)
thank you
If you look at the signature of Html.Checkbox, we can see that it takes an object for the htmlAttributes. Further, looking at the syntax, its actually a key based collection of objects. A Dictionary<string,object> fits that bill and allows you to absolutely specify the name of the html attributes that you want to add (note each key is typed exactly how we want it to display).
#Html.CheckBox("Access_Groups", false, new Dictionary<string,object>
{{"class", "input-control checkbox"},
{"data-group", "I', looking for data-group"},
{"Description_pt", "SomeValue"}})
This renders the following HTML
<input Description_pt="SomeValue" class="input-control checkbox"
data-group="I', looking for data-group" id="Access_Groups"
name="Access_Groups" type="checkbox" value="true" />
Have you tried the HTML character code for underscore, i.e., _?
Given that I have a string being displayed on the page in AngularDart.
... <strong>Notes: </strong> {{cmp.selectedStudent.notes}} ...
How can I make it display multi-line? In the string I have newline characters, I want them to be encoded as <br /> characters in the html output.
You can replace the '\n' in your string with <br/> and use something like the proposed my-bind-html directive shown in my answer here How to add a component programatically in Angular.Dart? (the code might be a bit outdated due to a lot of recent changes in Angular)
You could use ng-repeat and repeat over your notes lines but first you need to split them by '\n' so you get an array of lines.
List<String> _notesList = null;
List<String> get notesList {
if (_notesList==null) _notesList = notes.split("\n").toList(); return _notesList;
}
.
<span ng-repeat="note in cmp.selectedStudent.notesList">{{note}}<br /></span>
By default, angular doesn't interpret HTML balise to avoid some unpredictible behavior or others bad thing, but you can disable this verification with
ng-bind-html
link to the official doc : NgHtmlBind
So you can replace directly the '\n' character by the 'br' html node.
So you can do :
// ...
String getHtmlBrNote() {
return this.notes.replaceAll("\n", "<br />");
}
// ...
and after in angular
... <strong>Notes: </strong> <span ng-bind-html="cmp.selectedStudent.getHtmlBrNote()"></span> ...
And it will be ok
been having toruble with the button that has action. I have several btns which I want to know its paramaeter. In grails tutorial it says it should be like this:
<g:actionSubmit action="action" value="${message(code: 'default.button.edit.label', default: 'Edit')}" params="['actionTaken':editPhone]"/>
I tried using remotelink, submitButton, submitToRemote tags but none works. I always get null when I try parsing it in my controller:
def action=
{
def actionTaken = params.actionTaken
def employeeId= params.employeeId
MySession session = MySession.getMySession(request, params.employeeId)
profileInstance = session.profileInstance
switch(actionTaken)
{
case "editPhone" :
isEditPhone=true
break
case "editEmail" :
isEditEmail=true
break
}
render(view:"profile", model:[profileInstance:session.profileInstance, isEditPhone:isEditPhone, isEditEmail:isEditEmail])
}
What am I missing? is my params code wrong? Is my code in parsing params wrong? this just gets me in circles with no progress. help. thanks.
The Grails documentation doesn't list params as one of the attributes accepted by actionSubmit.
It is possible to inject the value you want in your params list in the controller by exploiting what that tag actually does:
def editPhone = { forward(action:'action', params:[actionTaken: 'editPhone'])}
def editEmail = { forward(action:'action', params:[actionTaken: 'editEmail'])}
You may also just want to just code completely separate logic into the editPhone and editEmail actions if that makes your code cleaner.
Updated View Code:
<g:actionSubmit action="editPhone" value="${message(code: 'default.button.edit.label', default: 'Edit')}" />
The params attribute is parsed as a map, where the keys are treated a strings but the values are treated as expressions. Therefore
params="['actionTaken':editPhone]"
is trying to define the key named actionTaken to have the value from the variable named editPhone in the GSP model. Since there is no such variable you're getting null. So the fix is to move the quotes:
params="[actionTaken:'editPhone']"
which will set the value to the string "editPhone".
You could also pass the parameter inside the POST-data using
<input type="hidden" name="actionTaken" value="editPhone" />
inside the form. Then it is also accessible through the params variable.
It works for me.
I just had a similar problem (I needed to submit a delete together with an id) and found a solution using HTML5's "formaction" attribute for submit-inputs.
They can be given a value that can include a controller, action, additional parameters, etc.
In General, to add a parameter to a submit button such as a edit of a specific sub-object on a form would looks like this:
<input type="submit" formaction="/<controller>/<action>/<id>?additionalParam1=...&additionalParam2=..." value="Action" >
and in your example:
<input type="submit" formaction="action?actionTaken=editPhone" value="${message(code: 'default.button.edit.label', default: 'Edit')}" >
In my situation, I had a single form element with multiple actions on each row of a table (i.e. data table edit buttons). It was important to send the entire form data so I couldn't just use links. The quickest way I found to inject a parameter was with javascript. Not ideal, but it works:
function injectHiddenField(name, value) {
var control = $("input[type=hidden][name='" + name + "']");
if (control.size() == 0) {
console.log(name + " not found; adding...");
control = $("<input type=\"hidden\" id=\"" + name + "\" name=\"" + name + "\">");
$("form").append(control);
}
control.val(value);
}
Your button can look like this:
<g:each in="${objects}" var="object">
...
<g:actionSubmit value="edit" action="anotherAction"
onclick="injectHiddenField('myfield', ${object.id})"/>
</g:each>