I started with a functioning bindings project, but I needed to add a global int for a status flag and I can't get it to bind without error. I started with the sample code and can't get this to work.
The code I add to my bindings file is:
[Static]
interface CameraEffects {
[Field ("kCameraEffectsZoomFactorKey", "CameraLibrary")]
NSString ZoomFactorKey { get; }
}
I get three errors:
obj/Debug/ios/PDFExpert/CameraEffects.g.cs(34,94): error CS0117: `MonoTouch.Constants' does not contain a definition for `CameraLibraryLibrary'
obj/Debug/ios/PDFExpert/CameraEffects.g.cs(34,76): error CS1502: The best overloaded method match for `MonoTouch.ObjCRuntime.Dlfcn.dlopen(string, int)' has some invalid arguments
obj/Debug/ios/PDFExpert/CameraEffects.g.cs(34,76): error CS1503: Argument `#1' cannot convert `object' expression to type `string'
If I leave the library off it tried to assign it to another unknown constant. This seems really screwed up as it is strait from the documentation.
I guess this should be bound like this
[Static]
interface CameraEffects {
[Field ("kCameraEffectsZoomFactorKey", "__Internal")]
NSString ZoomFactorKey { get; }
}
This is due to on the final app, the executable and the libxxx.a will be linked and merged together so it should work.
Alex
Another option that allows both assignment and retrieval of the value is to use the internal marshalling that MonoTouch uses. I got this from a Xamarin support person, notice that this is for manipulating an int, but should be a pattern you can use if you get the right marshalling code.
public unsafe static partial class RDPDFGlobal
{
static readonly IntPtr __Internal_libraryHandle = Dlfcn.dlopen (null, 0);
public static int RDPDFFeatures {
get {
return Dlfcn.GetInt32 (__Internal_libraryHandle, "RDPDFKitEnabledFeatures");
}
set {
var indirect = Dlfcn.dlsym (__Internal_libraryHandle, "RDPDFKitEnabledFeatures");
if (indirect == IntPtr.Zero)
throw new Exception ("Field 'RDPDFKitEnabledFeatures' not found.");
Marshal.WriteInt32 (indirect, value);
}
}
Related
I'm trying to understand the Java compiler's thinking (I know, bad idea)...
Consider this program:
import java.util.Optional;
public class xx {
public static class Foo<T> {
public interface Bar<T> {
int getX();
}
public Optional<Bar<T>> getBar() {
return Optional.empty();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Foo foo = new Foo(); // note raw type
foo.getBar().get().getX();
}
}
The java 1.8.0_112 compiler gives:
xx.java:15: error: cannot find symbol
foo.getBar().get().getX();
^
symbol: method getX()
location: class Object
1 error
The question is: why doesn't the compiler, given the raw type Foo for foo, realize that the return type of foo.getBar() is Optional<? extends Bar> instead of what it apparently thinks, which is Optional<?> ?
Note: I know how to change this program to make it compile, that's not the question.
Once you use raw types in conjunction with type inference, the following from JLS 18.5.2 will apply
If unchecked conversion was necessary for the method to be applicable during constraint set reduction in ยง18.5.1, then [...] the return type and thrown types of the invocation type of m are given by the erasure of the return type and thrown types of m's type.
From this follows, that the return type of foo.getBar() is indeed just Optional with all type arguments erased.
Solution: avoid raw types, always.
I have the following code. "Protectable" is an interface. My compiler gives the following error: "Incompatible types: Object cannot be converted to Collection"
When I remove the .filter line, everything works. Why does the compiler loose my type here?
Thanks,
Hannes
Collection<Protectable> requiredItems prefs.getConnectedProtectables(fuzDoc)
.stream()
.filter(protectable -> !protectable.itemVisibleForCurrentUser(fuzDoc))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
The variable prefs implements HasConnectedRights which is implemented as follows:
public interface HasConnectedRights {
public Collection<Protectable> getConnectedProtectables(FuzDocument doc);
}
The interface Protectable declares the method itemVisibleForCurrentUser like this:
default public boolean itemVisibleForCurrentUser(Docker<FuzDocument> doc) {
User user = UserCtrl.getCurrentUser(doc.getDoc());
return user == null || itemVisibleFor(user);
}
I want to add a custom xpath extension function to the Saxon-HE transformer. This custom function should accept one or more arguments. Let's use the string concatenation analogy for concatenating one or more string arguments. Following the sample on the saxon page, i wrote the following code:
ExtensionFunction myconcat = new ExtensionFunction() {
public QName getName() {
return new QName("http://mycompany.com/", "myconcat");
}
public SequenceType getResultType() {
return SequenceType.makeSequenceType(
ItemType.STRING, OccurrenceIndicator.ONE
);
}
public net.sf.saxon.s9api.SequenceType[] getArgumentTypes() {
return new SequenceType[]{
SequenceType.makeSequenceType(
ItemType.STRING, OccurrenceIndicator.ONE_OR_MORE)};
}
public XdmValue call(XdmValue[] arguments) throws SaxonApiException {
//concatenate the strings here....
String result = "concatenated string";
return new XdmAtomicValue(result);
}
};
i have expected that the following xpath expression would work in an xsl file
<xsl:value-of select="myconcat('a','b','c','...')">
Unfortunately i got the following exception:
XPST0017: Function myconcat must have 1 argument
What is the right way of creating a custom function for this use case?
Thanks.
The standard mechanisms for creating extension functions don't allow a variable number of arguments (it's not really pukka to have such functions in the XPath view of the world - concat() is very much an exception).
You can do it by creating your own implementation of the class FunctionLibrary and adding your FunctionLibrary to the static context of the XSLT engine - but you're deep into Saxon internals if you attempt that, so be prepared for a rough ride.
public class StaticDataContainer<T> where T : IStaticData {
protected static Dictionary<int, T> data;
public static void init(string jsonString){
//It work fine in Unity,But in Xcode iOS,it will show an error below:
//ExecutionEngineException: Attempting to JIT compile method
//'System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2<int, AD>:.ctor ()'
//while running with --aot-only.
data = new Dictionary<int, T> ();
I refer to:http://answers.unity3d.com/questions/250803/executionengineexception-attempting-to-jit-compile.html
Your application makes use of some generic type that was missed during AOT compile.
And solution is:The problem can usually be fixed by including a "dummy" class that references the missing types.
But I dont' know what dummy class is.
How can I solve it?
Here's how I do it. I create a file with name AOTDummy.cs in a project with following structure (adapted for your problem):
public static class AOTDummy
{
public static void Dummy()
{
System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<int, AD> dummy01;
}
}
I am building a framework that I don't want to couple to a particular IOC container so have created a layer on top of Ninject / structuremap etc.
I have a binding class that accepts a Func to allow binding to a method.
For example
public class Binding
{
public Type Source { get; set; }
public Func<object> Method {get; set; }
public Scope { get; set; }
}
If I have a binding like...
var binding = new Binding() {
Source = typeof(IRepository),
Method = () => new Repository(new LinqToSqlRepository(connectionString)),
Scope = Scope.HttpRequest
};
The framework wrapping Ninject creates Ninject bindings for my generic binding like this
Module :NinjectModule
{
IList<Binding> _Bindings;
public Module(IList<Binding> bindings)
{
_Bindings = bindings;
}
public override void Load() {
foreach (var binding in _Bindings) {
switch(binding.Scope) {
case IocScope.HttpRequest:
Bind(binding.Source).ToMethod(c => binding.Method()).InRequestScope();
break;
// ... omitted for brevity
}
}
}
}
This works fine when there is only one binding being bound to a method. When there are multiple bindings being bound within the same module to methods however the incorrect type is returned. From debugging, it looks as if the last binding is always used.
Thus the problem with an example;
var binding1 = new Binding() {
Source = typeof(IRepository),
Method = () => new Repository(new LinqToSqlRepository(connectionString)),
Scope = Scope.HttpRequest
};
var binding2 = new Binding() {
Source = typeof(ICalendar),
Method = () => new MvcCalendar( ..... )
Scope = Scope.HttpRequest
};
At runtime when Ninject is requested to new up an MVC Controller which takes in an IRepository and an ICalendar, I receive a type conversion error saying that a MvcCalendar cannot be converted to an IRepository. I have discovered that for some reason the last binding is always being returned for the first requested type.
This is a highly simplified version of what is really going on to try and highlight the actual issue, the wrong method being bound to a requested type when there are multiple method bindings. I hope this still explains the issue though.
This appears to be related to some sort of closure scoping issue. I also wonder whether Ninject is getting is getting confused by the Func instead of Func usage.
Unit Test Example
Here is a test module I load into my custom IOC container. This does not depend on any particular IOC framework. When I instantiate a NinjectIocContainer to handle the DI, the internal binding of this in Ninject occurs as example further up (see NinjectModule)
public class MultipleMethodBoundTypesModule : IocModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<IPerson>().To(() => new Person()).In(IocScope.Transient);
Bind<IRobot>().To(() => new Robot(new Person())).In(IocScope.Transient);
}
}
Here is a simple test that tries to retrieve each of the types.
[Test]
public void Expect_That_Multiple_Method_Bound_Types_Can_Exist_Within_The_Same_Module()
{
// arrange
var container = Get_Container_With_Module(new MultipleMethodBoundTypesModule());
// act
var person = container.Get<IPerson>();
var robot = container.Get<IRobot>();
// assert
Assert.IsNotNull(person);
Assert.IsNotNull(robot);
}
As explained eariler, this throws a type conversion where the last closure (for the robot) is being bound to a person.
TestCase 'Ioc.Test.NinjectContainerTest.Expect_That_Multiple_Method_Bound_Types_Can_Exist_Within_The_Same_Module'
failed: System.InvalidCastException : Unable to cast object of type 'Ioc.Test.Robot' to type 'Ioc.Test.IPerson'.
at System.Linq.Enumerable.d__b11.MoveNext()
at System.Linq.Enumerable.Single[TSource](IEnumerable1 source)
at Ninject.ResolutionExtensions.Get[T](IResolutionRoot root, IParameter[] parameters)
NinjectIocContainer.cs(40,0): at Ioc.Ninject.NinjectIocContainer.GetTInstance
IocTestBase.cs(149,0): at Ioc.Test.IocTestBase.Expect_That_Multiple_Method_Bound_Types_Can_Exist_Within_The_Same_Module()
In the snippet:
Bind(binding.Source).ToMethod(binding.Method()).InRequestScope();
You're dereferencing the Method bit. You want to be doing that as either binding.Method or ()=>binding.Method() (the former may not unambiguously be inferrable based on the C# type inference rules).
You mentioned this is heavily stripped down from your real code. As a result, this may not be the actual issue. I'd still be betting on some form of closure confusion though (see the section Comparing capture strategies: complexity vs power in this CSID excerpt for a nice walkthrough).
You also probably meant to use .InScope(binding.Scope) rather than .InRequestScope() too,.