process.start from a variable location %temp% - environment-variables

I have the program unzipping the file to %temp%\myfolder\
I need to run a file from within that location.
I have tried both shell and process.start but ultimately I'm looking for:
Process.start("%temp%\myfolder\start.cmd")
Also I looked on msdn on the getenvironmentvariable but nothing has worked. :(
Update: This is what I have in a nutshell
Imports system.diagnostics
Imports system.IO
System.Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("TEMP")
Dim temp As String = System.IO.Path.GetTempPath
Things I have tried
process.start("%temp%\myfolder\start.cmd")
process.start("temp" & "myfolder\start.cmd")
I get an error code saying "file not found". But if I copy %temp%\myfolder\start.cmd into run or cmd.exe the program runs.

First set the
Environment.CurrentDirectory = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("temp")
' Possible variables include temp, tmp, and windir for examples.
This command will place the current directory as C:\Users\ (currentuser)\appdata\local\temp or which ever the variable is set for. Then run process start. It should look like this:
Environment.CurrentDirectory = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("temp")
Process.start("myfolder\start.cmd")

Related

Lua require does not work but file is in the trace

I'm trying to require files in Lua, in one case it is working, but when I want to simplify the requirements in updating the LUA PATH the file is not found, but it is in the trace!
To reproduce my require problem I did the test with the package.searchpath function, which takes the required key and the Lua path in arguments.
So the code :
print('MY LUA PATH')
local myLuaPath = "?;?.lua;D:\\Projets\\wow-addon\\HeyThere\\?;D:\\Projets\\wow-addon\\HeyThere\\src\\HeyThere\\?;D:\\Projets\\wow-addon\\HeyThere\\test\\HeyThere\\?"
print(myLuaPath)
print('package search core.add-test')
print(package.searchpath('core.add-test', myLuaPath))
print('package search test.HeyThere.core.add-test')
print(package.searchpath('test.HeyThere.core.add-test', myLuaPath))
The result :
MY LUA PATH
?;?.lua;D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\?;D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\src\HeyThere\?;D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\test\HeyThere\?
package search core.add-test
nil no file 'core\add-test'
no file 'core\add-test.lua'
no file 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\core\add-test'
no file 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\src\HeyThere\core\add-test'
no file 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\test\HeyThere\core\add-test'
package search test.HeyThere.core.add-test
test\HeyThere\core\add-test.lua
So the first try with 'core.add-test' should work with the 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\test\HeyThere\?' value in the path but fails...
In the trace, there is the file I want!
no file 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\test\HeyThere\core\add-test'
But with the same LUA PATH but starting in a parent folder the file is found... Second test with 'test.HeyThere.core.add-test' found from the 'D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\?'
-> test\HeyThere\core\add-test.lua
Can someone explains to me why it doesn't work the first time?
EDIT :
My current directory is D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere
My lua.exe is in D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\bin\lua but is added to my PATH variable (I'm on Windows)
I set the LUA_PATH environment variable and execute
lua "test\test-suite.lua" -v
The code inside test-suite.lua is the test code described above
As #EgorSkriptunoff suggested, adding file extansion in the path resolve the problem...
Ex:
Wrong path D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\?
Good path D:\Projets\wow-addon\HeyThere\?.lua
The extension should be in the path variable because in the require the dot is replace and used as a folder separator.

Lua io.write() not working

I am using a luvit Lua environment to run my lua code through my control panel. I am looking to write to a .txt file, but with the simple code that i am running, its not working.
The reason I wish to write to a .txt file is to log notices from my Discord Bot I am working on in the Discordia library.
I have a folder called MezzaBOT. In this file i have a write.lua file and also a log.txt file. I have this simple code in my write.lua file:
io.output('log.txt')
io.write('hello\n')
io.close()
I then run in my command promt with Luvit environment:
>luvit Desktop\mezzabot\write.lua
I don't get any errors but the log.txt file continues to stay empty. Am I missing a line in my code, or do i need to access log.txt differently?
edit: my new code is the following
file = io.open('log.txt')
file:write('hello', '\n')
file:close()
and it is not making a new line for each time with \n
edit B:
Ok, i found my problem, its creating a log.txt in my C:\Users\PC.
One other problem is when writing, its not making a new line with the \n. Can someone please help me?
Lua, by default, opens files in read mode. You need to explicitly open a file in write mode if you want to write to it (see manual)
file = io.open('log.txt', 'w')
file:write('hello', '\n')
file:close()
Should work :)

Using the FSharp.Configuration type provider

I'd like to the use app.config file of my F# to store versioning information. I discovered the FSharp.Configuration type provider which seemed like it'd be simple enough. However, I'm running in to an error I can't diagnose.
Below is a screen shot of a version.config file (identical to the one in the link above) and a scratch pad.
As you can see, calling Settings auto populates a drop-down of everything in the <appSettings> chunk of the config but when I try to run something,
I get an error saying that the thing I'm looking for can't be found in the <appSettings> section of the config file.
What's causing this error, especially considering that it clearly is finding it in the config file, given it's auto-populating? What can I do to prevent this from happening again?
You have bumped into this issue.
When you run the Configuration provider in FSI it will look not for the app's config file but FSI's config file. One way to get around this is by specifying the exe's config file explicitly. Here's an example:
open FSharp.Configuration
open System
type Settings = AppSettings<"app.config">
[<EntryPoint>]
let main argv =
let path = System.IO.Path.Combine [|__SOURCE_DIRECTORY__ ;"bin";"release";"ConfigApplication.exe" |]
Settings.SelectExecutableFile path
Settings.TestBool <- false // change a setting
printfn "%A" Settings.Test2 // read another setting
Console.ReadLine() |> ignore
0 // return an integer exit code
This will take the App.config file in the source directory, but use the ConfigApplication.exe.config file in the binaries directory.
If you just need to set the DB's connection string, it's actually easier, if the SQL type provider has a config setting parameter, just specify the config file there (and set it to Always copy in VS), if you add that to .gitignore you can have many different app.config files with different connection strings.
You could also use the YAML provider, it has two advantages, it's not XML and it's not an erasing type provider.

Fsx execution path

I have a c# .net library I am looking to use within FSI/FSX. As part of the initialization of the .net lib, by default it expects and references a custom config file (MyAppConfig.xml) which loads various things before it can be used. When using it in c# it gets copied to the bin folder and the app by default expects it to be there and references it there unless there is a specific entry in the app.config to tell it otherwise. (I should add that it does it all by convention rather than injecting a path + filename, as per NLog, say)
I have an f# source file in a console app which will execute this initialization find, but I can't quite work out how to achieve this with FSI/FSX.
So my program.fs looks simply like
open System
open myApp
module Program =
[<EntryPoint>]
let Main(args) =
myApp.Initialization.Load() // references MyAppConfig.xml
Console.WriteLine("do my stuff!")
Console.ReadLine() |> ignore
0
If I try and do the same in FSI or using FSX, I have
#r #"E:\...path to MyApp...\MyApp.dll"
#I #"E:\...path to MyAppConfig.xml ..."
Environment.CurrentDirectory <- #"E:\...path to MyAppConfig.xml ..."
myApp.Initialization.Load() |> ignore // fails ... can't find MyAppConfig.xml
//do my stuff
I suspect that I've not got the paths quite right.
I'd be grateful of a steer
EDIT:
So I've managed to attach a debugger to the c# lib and see where it is looking for the config file - turns out it is "c:\Program Files\Microsoft F#\v4.0\" ( System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory) which again shows I've not quite understood how to tell FSI/FSX to use a particular path. If I copy the config file (MyAppConfig.xml) to that location it works fine.
Many thx
S
I'm not sure of the implications, but one possiblity might be temporarily changing the app base:
let origAppBase = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("APPBASE", "path_to_MyAppConfig.xml")
myApp.Initialization.Load() |> ignore
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("APPBASE", origAppBase) //restore original app base

how to set the path to where aapt add command adds the file

I'm using aapt tool to remove some files from different folders of my apk. This works fine.
But when I want to add files to the apk, the aapt tool add command doesn't let me specify the path to where I want the file to be added, therefore I can add files only to the root folder of the apk.
This is strange because I don't think that developers would never want to add files to a subfolder of the apk (res folder for example). Is this possible with aapt or any other method? Cause removing files from any folder works fine, and adding file works only for the root folder of the apk. Can't use it for any other folder.
Thanks
The aapt tool retains the directory structure specified in the add command, if you want to add something to an existing folder in an apk you simply must have a similar folder on your system and must specify each file to add fully listing the directory. Example
$ aapt list test.apk
res/drawable-hdpi/pic1.png
res/drawable-hdpi/pic2.png
AndroidManifest.xml
$ aapt remove test.apk res/drawable-hdpi/pic1.png
$ aapt add test.apk res/drawable-hdpi/pic1.png
The pic1.png that will is added resides in a folder in the current working directory of the terminal res/drawable-hdpi/ , hope this answered your question
There is actually a bug in aapt that will make this randomly impossible. The way it is supposed to work is as the other answer claims: paths are kept, unless you pass -k. Let's see how this is implemented:
The flag that controls whether the path is ignored is mJunkPath:
bool mJunkPath;
This variable is in a class called Bundle, and is controlled by two accessors:
bool getJunkPath(void) const { return mJunkPath; }
void setJunkPath(bool val) { mJunkPath = val; }
If the user specified -k at the command line, it is set to true:
case 'k':
bundle.setJunkPath(true);
break;
And, when the data is being added to the file, it is checked:
if (bundle->getJunkPath()) {
String8 storageName = String8(fileName).getPathLeaf();
printf(" '%s' as '%s'...\n", fileName, storageName.string());
result = zip->add(fileName, storageName.string(),
bundle->getCompressionMethod(), NULL);
} else {
printf(" '%s'...\n", fileName);
result = zip->add(fileName, bundle->getCompressionMethod(), NULL);
}
Unfortunately, the one instance of Bundle used by the application is allocated in main on the stack, and there is no initialization of mJunkPath in the constructor, so the value of the variable is random; without a way to explicitly set it to false, on my system I (seemingly deterministically) am unable to add files at specified paths.
However, you can also just use zip, as an APK is simply a Zip file, and the zip tool works fine.
(For the record, I have not submitted the trivial fix for this as a patch to Android yet, if someone else wants to the world would likely be a better place. My experience with the Android code submission process was having to put up with an incredibly complex submission mechanism that in the end took six months for someone to get back to me, in some cases with minor modifications that could have just been made on their end were their submission process not so horribly complex. Given that there is a really easy workaround to this problem, I do not consider it important enough to bother with all of that again.)

Resources