I am new to TFSBuild but I have been able to create a build definition for my solution. I have a couple questions that help would be great with.
I have created 3 definitions - I wonder if this is the correct way to this.
A definition that fires for every check in, builds the code and runs unit tests only
A definition runs every night, builds everything, runs all unit and integration tests
A definition that I specifically use for deployments - so I specify the environment via a parameter and it builds the code, runs unit and integration tests and ms deploys it to specified environment, again via parameter
When I branch my code etc, I will have to create 3 definitions for each and this could become unmanageable. Feedback on this please?
Is it true that each definition has its own set of build numbers? Can they be shared?
My application is an MVC4 app with VS2012 IDE.
Sadly TFS Build doesn't have very good support for branches, yes this typically means you duplicate your build definitions for each branch. There are a few custom build process template that I've seen in the past which try to get around this, but nothing built in.
You could replace #2 with a windows scheduler task to run #1 with custom parameters, not the nicest solution, but could be extended to queue every build definition at midnight with the integration test flag.
For #3 instead of using a build definition to deploy I use an external tool called TFS Deployer, this allows me to use any build to deploy simply by changing the build quality of the build. Reducing the number of builds that need to be setup by 1 for each branch.
Each build definition has its own build numbers, there's no built in way to share however I believe this is set by the build definition, so you may be able to hack around it somehow.
Related
I have a "SOA" styled application, with a single solution containing almost 100 individual projects (which are a solution within them, i.e. they can be run independently). I have created a build and release definition in TFS 2018 and everything works perfectly.
The issue is if I make changes to a single service (out of 100), and check-in my code, the build definition is triggered which builds the entire application and then the release definition deploys the entire thing(100+) each time.
I don't want it. I need it to be specific to the service in which changes are made. Is there any way to do it?
Creating multiple build/release definition which is tied to the specific path of each service should solve it but I don't want to go down that road, because I will end up creating 100's of definitions.
Is there any other way to do it?
This is for a .Net application, hosted in TFS 2018 (On-premise).
The solution structure is as below:
AllWCFService.sln
|_Service1.csproj
|_Service2.csproj
|..
|..
|_Service100.csproj
Each Service can also be run and hosted independently.
This is my first question here. I apologize for any confusion.
As you have mentioned, by using Path filters on the Build definition should be the easiest solution.
With the proper path to the project in the Path filter only the proper Builds spin up, and any projects untouched do not trigger a build. Each build has it's own release which then deploys the specified app to it's own destination. As a ugly workaround, you could set up a group each with 5 services which will reduce 100's of definitions to 20's.
Otherwise, you have to customize your build definition/pipeline. Use some scripts to determine or judge which part of your Servicex.csproj changed base on your name.
Then call msbuild with /t option to build a single or multiple projects.
msbuild test.sln /t:project;project2 /p:Configuration="Release" /p:Platform="x86" /p:BuildProjectReferences=false
specify project file of a solution using msbuild
It will only build specified changed project and generated corresponding artifacts. Then add scripts in release to specify path according build generated artifacts to deploy each service.
Hope this helps.
We are migrating 50+ .net project from TFS to GitHub, at the same, we want to use Jenkins to automate the build. Currently all the builds are done inside the Visual Studio manually. I know how to automate this build using MSBuild and we already have a lot of these projects building inside Jenkins.
My question: is there a way to set up these 50+ project quickly w/o creating them one by one manually? Anyway to script them? e.g. a Jenkins project has everything inside a folder, I can copy a sample project/folder to create a new one and modify something. Or create a Jenkins project using a script reading a config file? Any idea can save some time is appreciated.
Not a direct answer but too long for a comment so here it goes anyway. Following the Joel test (which in no way is dogmatic for me but does make a lot of good points), and in my experience, you should already have an msbuild file now to build all those projects 'in one click'. Then, setting up a build server, in fact any build server, is just a matter of making it build that single parent project. This might not work for everyone, but for several projects I've worked on this had the following advantages:
the entire build process gets defined by developpers, working locally on their machine, using 'standard' tools
as such they don't need to spend hours in a web interface figuring out the appropriate build steps, dependencies and whatnot (also those hours would have been worthless in the end if switching to a different build server)
since a complete build is now just a matter of msbuild master.proj, possibly along with some options to define configuration/platform/output directories getting this running on any build server should be painless and quick
in the same manner this makes it easy to test different build servers with a minimum of time and migrate between them (also no need to ask SO questions on how to set everything up :)
this also makes it easy for other developpers to get complete builds as well without having to go round via a build server
Anecdote: we once had Jenkins running on multiple different projects as well. It took us days to get everything running, with the templates etc, and we found the web intercae slow and cumbersome (and getting to know the API would have taken even more days). Then one day I got sick of this and made a bunch of msbuild scripts which could build everything from one msbuild command. That took much less time than setting up Jenkins, a couple of hours or so. Then I took a TeamCity installation we already had and made it build the new master project. Took like an hour and everything worked. Just recently I took the same project and got it working on Visual Studio Online, again in no time.
If those projects are more or less similar to build, you will probably be interested in using the template plug-in for jenkins. There you configure a dummy project such that it does what is common to (most of) the 50+ projects.
Afterwards you create a separate project for each: Create the first project and make it use the template project for each of the steps which can be shared with the template project (use build step from other project). All subsequent projects can be created as slightly adopted copy of this first 'real' project.
I use it such that the variable $JOB_NAME (the actual project name in jenkins that is) is part of the repository path and I can thus clone from http://example.org/$JOB_NAME/
Configured that way, I can include the source code management step in the templating job and use it unmodified. Similar with the build step and post-build step: they are run by a script which is somewhat universal accross all my projects (mostly calling make and guessing deployment / publication paths upon $JOB_NAME again).
We have MTM tests running on Release build of our product (Desktop Application).
Now we want the same tests to run on two product builds: Beta and Release.
When a test run is initiated from MTM (or tcm), we need a way to pass a 'value' to the test run telling it which version/build of the product it needs to test. This 'value' will then be read in the test method and correct decision will be taken while the tests are executing (like installation path, test results file updates etc).
Is there any way to achieve this? in TFS or MTM?
Consider using Test Settings.
If you start an automated tests from MTM you can specify Test Settings to use when running this tests.
In "Advanced" part of Test Settings you can specify scripts to run on your environment before running the tests.
Create two scripts, one for Release and one for Beta version. These scripts could create a file with particular content, set an environment variable or do something else that can then be checked by your test, when it’s running.
Create two Test Settings, one for Release and one for Beta version and
set up appropriate script to run for each Test Settings.
Use one of these Test Settings when starting tests.
This way you could pass information to your test.
We also faced similar problem in our project. We decided to modify the build definition template to take product build type (Beta or RTM or Release) as an input parameter. Using this value during TFS build, we can either update the TFS build name to reflect the product build type or create a file (xml) as part of TFS build process to contain this type detail.
See here for more detail on how to add Arguments and Parameters to build definition: http://www.ewaldhofman.nl/post/2010/04/27/Customize-Team-Build-2010-e28093-Part-2-Add-arguments-and-variables.aspx
Pls take a look at the below link, if it can be used to suit your needs.
http://blogs.infosupport.com/switching-browser-in-codedui-or-selenium-tests-based-on-mtm-configuration/
one question: Are you using Build-Deploy-Test flow to install the product on the environment or doing it any other way?
So, when you select to run a set of automated tests and pick the build from the drop down list this tells MTM which drop folder to go look in. So if your configuration is code, as it should be, then you can set this up to be automatic.
It is not possible to pass additional variables when you start a test run in MTM.
You could setup your tests to run from the Release Management tool instead. You would then be able to configure the environment however you like based on passed in veriables.
http://nakedalm.com/execute-tests-release-management-visual-studio-2013/
In TeamCity, you can create build dependencies where one build will not start until another finishes successfully. Is that possible with TFS 2012? Where can I find more information about how to set that up?
The short answer is that TFS doesn't have equivalent functionality, but you can achieve the same goals with a little work.
A common scenario I encounter is a team wants to do a build when they check-in that does some quick stuff (compile, fast unit tests), then immediately after wants to do another build that runs some slower stuff (integration tests, test deployments, etc). I do this often with my teams, and I'll setup a Gated Build that runs in say 5 mins, then have a CI build that is kicked off as soon as the Gated Build checks-in, which may take an hour to run. I like this approach as it gets the developers some feedback quickly, then more detailed feedback shortly thereafter.
Another supported scenario is having a build explicitly kickoff it's dependencies. If you look a the Lab Build Template it does exactly this, it will first kickoff the application TFS Build, and the Lab Build will sit and wait for it to finish, then the Lab Build will continue. In theory you could have Build A kickoff build B which kicks off C & D, etc.
If your needs are more complex than that (e.g. you have multiple applications that you have a build for each, then a Product that includes some applications that needs to be built after each application changes, then maybe a Product Suite build that needs to kickoff whenever a Product changes - this is the scenario I dealt with). I basically implemented a custom build dependency system to handle this. We made an XML file that described the build dependencies, then wrote a simple ISubscriber plug-in that we would deploy to TFS, and it would listen for Build Completed events then consult the dependency config and kickoff the appropriate build(s).
I'm using TFS2008 - soon to move to TFS2010
I want run code coverage for as part of my nightly builds. Since it adds some overhead I don't want it to run on my dev machine or as part of the CI build.
Is there a way to run code coverage only on my nightly builds?
The only way I'm aware is having two .testconfig files one for each build - and I'm wondering if anyone has tried doing that. If I choose this path how do I define while testconfig file to use locally?
Absolutely. You can have different Build Definitions (one for CI & one for Nightly), and then simply set Code Coverage to the latter.Separating the builds with different Definitions is in any case a good idea. Each build has different targets/requirements anyway (what they do with WorkItems, what Tests they do, what DBs-WebApps they deploy, what they email to whom etc).