Let me know the reason for the below question.
I have written NUnit test and is going through all lines of that method in debug mode, but those lines are not shown as covered in NCover report.
Note: I am getting the data for that method from DB.
I am using completev.3.4.18.6937 version ncover and executing nunits using command line \ using ncover UI.
Related
I am using Appium for automation test cases in iOS project. I would like to create a report of code coverage. I have gone through appium documentation as well as on internet forums, but didnt find any way.
Is there any way to get it for iOS (Appium)?
It is not possible to do a code coverage because appium doesn't test the actual source code. Appium tests only from the UI level. You might have to manually map the functional test cases and see which all functions it get called when the test is done. But certainly there is no way to figure out like UnitTests with a report to see percent wise code covered report.
I have gone through the Opencover wiki documentation and tried a lot to figure out what would be the filter criteria for not to include test assembly as part of code coverage. Here is the problem
for eg I have many assemblies starts with sample name like sample.submodule.assembly1.dll, sample.submodule.assembly2.dll, my tests assembly also starts with sample like sample.submodule.tests.dll, here I applied the filter criteria for openCover
1.-filter: "+[sample*]* -[*tests]*"
it didn't work, not generating report file.
-filter: "+[sample*]* -[sample.submodule.tests]*" didn't work, not generating report file,
-filter: "+[sample*]* -[*]*tests*" didn't work, not generating report file too,
can somebody please advise what can be the filter criteria here to exclude all the test files from code coverage
First run OpenCover without any filters.
Now you can look at the XML report produced (or you can use ReportGenerator to turn it into HTML) and identify assemblies/modules that you wish to exclude.
now you can apply filters using the filter switch e.g.
-filter:"+[*]* -[*.tests]* -[*.Tests]*"
NOTE: no space between : and first "
or
"-filter:+[*]* -[*.tests]* -[*.Tests]*"
if you are talking about writing unit test using visual studio nunit adaptor then you have open cover UI visual studio extension available for all such purpose. it is wonderful.
Step 1) Install open cover from latest relese build https://github.com/opencover/opencover/releases
Step 2) Usuall it will install C:\Users\goma1940\AppData\Local\Apps\OpenCover (%localappdata%\Apps\OpenCover)
Steo 3) Install VS Extn from gallery https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/6950a046-8919-4935-8542-c6f37956f688
Step 4) you have open cover test explorer and open cover coverage result pane as below…
My tests are XCTests and I'm using Objective-C instead of Swift.
I've seen some articles that tackle the topic, but the seem focused on older versions of Xcode, for example:
Visualizing Code Coverage with Xcode
Code Coverage Fixed for Xcode 5.1
What would be the recommended approach to get code coverage on Xcode 6? Does Apple have something built in for code coverage, maybe via Xcode CI via OSX Server?
Take a look at frankencover.it
Simple script that can be run from dev's cmd-line or CI build server.
Produces console output as well as a detailed report in HTML format. This can be viewed locally or published as an artifact by the build server.
Optionally includes a checker that will 'fail' the build if required coverage is not met. (Feedback only. This is a prompt to review coverage and look for useful tests that can be added or reduce the required amount. Either option may be correct. )
Free for both commercial and open-source projects. No hosting, sponsorship or subscription required.
Usage:
FTW, it has an easy-to-remember dogue-speak-esque command line interface:
groovy http://appsquickly.github.io/frankencover.it/with --source-dir MyProject/Source
Terminal Output:
HTML Report:
We use Xcoverage for this..Check on link below, if this helps..
Xcoverage
This is an update, From Xcode 6 Apple having in-build code coverage tool, But Have a look at coverStory it is easy to configure test locally before push.
And providing a line by line coverage.
I am using theIntern for unit testing my javascript framework. My test is running fine using node.
However, I am not able to generate code coverage report properly. I tried the options provided in the documentation. I was successful to print code coverage information on to the console while testing through selenium web driver. That gives only a summary.
How can I generate extensive code coverage report using reporters other than console?
I provided the "reporters" option but doesn't print the report. Any help would be appreciated.
The lcov reporter generates an lcov.info file that can then be passed to the lcov genhtml utility to output a complete set of HTML coverage reports (the simplest invocation is just genhtml lcov.info).
In Intern 1.2, however, there is a bug with the generated lcov.info files (fixed for Intern 1.3) that may cause genhtml to fail to find any coverage data inside a generated lcov.info file. The patch for this issue is very simple and you should be able to cleanly it to Intern 1.2 until the new version is released in the next couple of weeks.
Recently I started using BullseyeCoverage.
I'm going through the steps: compiling with BullseyeCoverage, running some test cases on the binaries created, generating a coverage report.
In the coverage report there are: function coverage, and condition/decision coverage. However, there is no line coverage. I tried to find a way of generating line coverage statistics, unsuccessfully. I thought of using covbr to this end, but, I need something that will cover all of my sources altogether.
Thanks for your help!
Bullseye does not support line coverage (which is also called statement coverage).For reasons, see http://www.bullseye.com/statementCoverage.html