I'm working on implementing boards.
Now I have BoardsController and PostsController.
By default, posts are nested by boards.
I want all board's post list have their special route using same PostsController
so I did this in route.rb
resources :notice, :controller => "posts", :board_id => 1
resources :faq, :controller => "posts", :board_id => 2
resources :qna, :controller => "posts", :board_id => 3
At first, it seems to work. But I realized a problem.
because i used same 'PostsController' in these resources.
Codes related to path are same when doing controller's action
like,
posts_controller
def create
#post = Board.find(params[:board_id]).posts.build(params[:post])
if #post.save
redirect_to board_posts_path(#post.board_id)
else
render 'new'
end
end
when I go to localhost:3000/notice/new, it works fine
but when I submitted the new post, controller redirects to localhost:3000/boards/1/posts/
because of redirect_to board_posts_path(#post.board_id)
and that's not what I want.
I could handle this using if statements, but it seems messy.
Is there any proper solution to this?
You can use the self.send on the controller to dynamically resolve the path by the post type. Assuming you have the type of the created post in a string ( I didn't understand from your question if Notice < Post and if you use Single Table Inheritance):
post_type = # Get the specific post type ( "notice, faq ...")
redirect_to self.send("#{post_type}_path", #post.board_id)
Related
I'm trying to add an action called rollback to controller.
As I've seen, the only things I should do is writting the new action:
def rollback
puts "ROLLBACK!"
respond_to do |format|
format.html # index.html.erb
format.json { render json: #components }
end
Modify the routes.rb file:
resources :components do
collection do
post :rollback, :as => 'rollback'
end
end
And calling the action from some view:
<%= link_to 'Rollback', rollback_components_path %>
But I get the following error:
Couldn't find Component with id=rollback
app/controllers/components_controller.rb:18:in `show'
That's because instead of going to rollback action, the controller thinks that we are trying to 'show' to component with id 'rollback'.
Something that it seems weird for me is that calling 'new' action rails uses new_component_path (without s, in singular), but if I write rollback_component_path it throws me an error and I cant see the view.
In your routes you require a POST, just clicking a link is by default a GET, so either write
resources :components do
collection do
get :rollback
end
end
and then the link_to will work as expected.
I am assuming the rollback operation is not idempotent, so a POST is semantically better in that case.
If you write your link as follows, then rails will create an inline form for you:
link_to 'Rollback', rollback_components_path, :method => 'post'
Hope this helps.
This will work
routes.rb
resources :components
match "components/rollback" => "components#rollback", :as => :rollback
In views
<%=link_to 'Rollback', rollback_path%>
I am making a login route and added this to the routes.rb resources :sign_in
I made a controller like this:
class Mobile::Sign_inController < ApplicationController
layout "mobile/application"
def get
respond_to do |format|
format.html
end
end
def index
respond_to do |format|
format.html
end
end
end
and it seems to get routed correctly, but my view file which is located here:
/app/views/mobile/sign_in.html.haml
which just has 1 line for test purposes:
%strong{:class => "code", :id => "message"} Hello Signin!
But when I go to the url: http://m.cmply.local:8800/signin in the browser, the screen is totally white with nothing rendered in the browser.
Any idea why this happens and how to fix it?
Thanks!
A few problems here:
Your controller name should be SignInsController, not Sign_inController. Consider changing your name to UserSessionsController or similar, since that better reflects the resource it represents. You can still specify an alternate name for the URL (such as sign_in).
Why is your controller namespaced under Mobile? Your routes given don't reflect that, but you don't seem to have provided them all. The route should probably be under a scope:
scope :module => "mobile" do
resource :sign_in
end
Since there is only "one" sign in, it should have its route declared resource :sign_in, and probably even resource :sign_in, :only => [:new, :create, :destroy], depending on what you want. This means that the index action no longer exists, and you probably want to replace it with the new action`.
There is no get action by default for RESTful resources, I'm not sure what you meant it to be, but it should be something else.
I'm working on implementing a SEO-hiarchy, which means that I need to prepend parameters for a show action.
The use-case is a search site where the URL-structure is:
/cars/(:brand)/ => a list page
/cars/(:brand)/(:model_name)?s=query_params => a search action
/cars/:brand/:model_name/:variant/:id => a car show action
My problem is to make the show action URLs work without having to provide :brand, :model_name and :variant as individual arguments. They are always available from as values on the resource.
What I have:
/cars/19330-Audi-A4-3.0-TDI
What I want
/cars/Audi/A4/3.0-TDI/19330
Previously, this was how the routes.rb looked like:
# Before
resources :cars. only: [:show] do
member do
get 'favourize'
get 'unfavourize'
end
Following was my first attempt:
# First attempt
scope '/cars/:brand/:model_name/:variant' do
match ":id" => 'cars_controller#show'
match ":car_id/favourize" => 'cars_controller#favourize', as: :favourize_car
match ":car_id/unfavourize" => 'cars_controller#unfavourize', as: :unfavourize_car
end
This makes it possible to do:
cars_path(car, brand: car.brand, model_name: car.model_name, variant: car.variant)
But that is obviously not really ideal.
How is it possible to setup the routes (and perhaps the .to_param method?) in a way that doesn't make it a tedious task to change all link_to calls?
Thanks in advance!
-- UPDATE --
With #tharrisson's suggestion, this is what I tried:
# routes.rb
match '/:brand/:model_name/:variant/:id' => 'cars#show', as: :car
# car.rb
def to_param
# Replace all non-alphanumeric chars with - , then merge adjacent dashes into one
"#{brand}/#{model_name}/#{variant.downcase.gsub(/[^[:alnum:]]/,'-').gsub(/-{2,}/,'-')}/#{id}"
end
The route works fine, e.g. /cars/Audi/A4/3.0-TDI/19930 displays the correct page. Generating the link with to_param, however, doesn't work. Example:
link_to "car link", car_path(#car)
#=> ActionView::Template::Error (No route matches {:controller=>"cars", :action=>"show", :locale=>"da", :brand=>#<Car id: 487143, (...)>})
link_to "car link 2", car_path(#car, brand: "Audi")
#=> ActionView::Template::Error (No route matches {:controller=>"cars", :action=>"show", :locale=>"da", :brand=>"Audi", :model_name=>#<Car id: 487143, (...)>})
Rails doesn't seem to know how to translate the to_param into a valid link.
I do not see any way to do this with Rails without tweaking either the URL recognition or the URL generation.
With your first attempt, you got the URL recognition working but not the generation. The solution I can see to make the generation working would be to override the car_path helper method.
Another solution could be, like you did in the UPDATE, to override the to_param method of Car. Notice that your problem is not in the to_param method but in the route definition : you need to give :brand,:model_name and :variant parameters when you want to generate the route. To deal with that, you may want to use a Wildcard segment in your route.
Finally you can also use the routing-filter gem which make you able to add logic before and after the url recognition / generation.
For me, it looks like all theses solutions are a bit heavy and not as easy as it should be but I believe this came from your need as you want to add some levels in the URL without strictly following the rails behavior which will give you URL like /brands/audi/models/A3/variants/19930
OK, so here's what I've got. This works in my little test case. Obviously some fixups needed, and I am sure could be more concise and elegant, but my motto is: "make it work, make it pretty, make it fast" :-)
In routes.rb
controller :cars do
match 'cars', :to => "cars#index"
match 'cars/:brand', :to => "cars#list_brand", :as => :brand
match 'cars/:brand/:model', :to => "cars#list_model_name", :as => :model_name
match 'cars/:brand/:model/:variant', :to => "cars#list_variant", :as => :variant
end
In the Car model
def to_param
"#{brand}/#{model_name}/#{variant}"
end
And obviously fragile and non-DRY, in cars_controller.rb
def index
#cars = Car.all
respond_to do |format|
format.html # index.html.erb
format.json { render json: #cars }
end
end
def list_brand
#cars = Car.where("brand = ?", params[:brand])
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :index }
end
end
def list_model_name
#cars = Car.where("brand = ? and model_name = ?", params[:brand], params[:model])
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :index }
end
end
def list_variant
#cars = Car.where("brand = ? and model_name = ? and variant = ?", params[:brand], params[:model], params[:variant])
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :index }
end
end
You just need to create two routes, one for recognition, one for generation.
Updated: use the routes in question.
# config/routes.rb
# this one is used for path generation
resources :cars, :only => [:index, :show] do
member do
get 'favourize'
get 'unfavourize'
end
end
# this one is used for path recognition
scope '/cars/:brand/:model_name/:variant' do
match ':id(/:action)' => 'cars#show', :via => :get
end
And customize to_param
# app/models/car.rb
require 'cgi'
class Car < ActiveRecord::Base
def to_param
parts = [brand,
model_name,
variant.downcase.gsub(/[^[:alnum:]]/,'-').gsub(/-{2,}/,'-'),
id]
parts.collect {|p| p.present? ? CGI.escape(p.to_s) : '-'}.join('/')
end
end
Sample of path helpers:
link_to 'Show', car_path(#car)
link_to 'Edit', edit_car_path(#car)
link_to 'Favourize', favourize_car_path(#car)
link_to 'Unfavourize', unfavourize_car_path(#car)
link_to 'Cars', cars_path
form_for(#car) # if resources :cars is not
# restricted to :index and :show
You want bounded parameters to be passed to url of which some parameters are optional and some of them strictly needs to be present.
Rails guides shows you can have strict as well as optional parameters and also you can give name to particular route in-order to simplify its usage.
Guide on rails routing
bound parameters
Example usage -
In below route,
brand is optional parameter as its surrounded by circular bracket
Also please note there can be optional parameters inside route but they needs to added at last /cars(/:brand)(/:make)(/:model)
match '/cars/(:brand)', :to => 'cars#index', :as => cars
here cars_url will map to index action of cars controller..
again cars_url("Totoya") will route index action of cars controller along-with params[:brand] as Toyota
Show url route can be as below where id is mandatory and others can be optional
match '/cars/:id(/:brand(/:model_name/)(/:variant)', :to => "cars#show", :as => car
In above case, id is mandatory field. Other parameters are optional.
so you can access it like car_url(car.id) or car_url(12, 'toyota') or car_url(12, 'toyota', 'fortuner') or car_url(12, 'toyota', 'fortuner', 'something else)
I am a beginner when it comes to Ruby on Rails, so I need a little bit of help. I started reading a basic tutorial recently, which was taught using Scaffolding. I made a "Clients" model: script/generate scaffold clients name:string ip_address:string speed:integer ... Inside the clients_controller.rb file, there is a method called show:
# GET /clients/1
# GET /clients/1.xml
def show
#client = Client.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html # show.html.erb
format.xml { render :xml => #client }
end
end
For queries, I'd go to localhost:3000/clients/{Enter the ID here}. Instead of searching with the ID are the argument, I'd like to search with another value, like ip_address or speed, so I thought all I would have to do is change :id to :ip_address in "#client = Client.find(params[:id])". However, that does not work, so would someone please tell me how I can achieve a search with another parameter. Thanks!
This doesn't work because of the way things are routed
When you do something like
map.resources :client (See config/routes.rb)
This happens automatically when you use scaffold.
It sets up routes based on the assumption you're using an id.
One of these routes is something like
map.connect 'clients/:id', :controller => 'client', :action => 'show'
So :id is passed as a parameter as part of the URL.
You shouldn't have the IP be the primary identifier unless they're distinct - and even then it kind of messes with the RESTful routing.
If you want to have the ability to search by IP, modify your index action for the clients
def index
if params[:ip].present?
#clients = Client.find_by_ip_address(params[:ip]);
else
#clients = Client.all
end
end
Then you can search by ip by going to clients?ip=###.###.###
This line in your routes.rb file
map.connect 'clients/:id', :controller => 'client', :action => 'show'
implies that when the dispatcher receives an URI in the format "clients/abcdxyz' with GET Method, it will redirect it to show method with the value "abcdxyz" available in params hash with key :id.
EDIT
Since you have used scaffold, the clients resource will be RESTful. That means that when you send a GET request to "/clients/:id' URI, you will be redirected to show page of that particular client.
In your controller code you can access it as
params[:id] # which will be "abcdxyz"
The find method that is generated by scaffold searches on the primary key i.e 'id' column. You need to change that statement to either
#client = Client.find_by_ip_address(params[:id]) #find_by_column_name
OR
#client = Client.find(:first, :conditions => [":ip_address = ?", params[:id]])
:-)
I have a Rails model named Xpmodule with a corresponding controller XpmoduleController.
class XpmoduleController < ApplicationController
def index
#xpmodule = Xpmodule.find(params[:module_id])
end
def subscribe
flash[:notice] = "You are now subscribed to #{params[:subscription][:title]}"
redirect_to :action => :index
end
end
The original intent was to name the model Module which for obvious reasons doesn't work. However I still want to have the URLs look like /module/4711/ therefore I added this to my routes.rb:
map.connect '/module/:module_id', :controller => 'xpmodule', :action => 'index'
map.connect '/module/:module_id/subscribe', :controller => 'xpmodule',
:action => 'subscribe'
Now I want to test this controller with Rspec:
describe XpmoduleController do
fixtures :xpmodules
context "index" do
it "should assign the current xpmodule" do
xpm = mock_model(Xpmodule)
Xpmodule.should_receive(:find).and_return(xpm)
get "index"
assigns[:xpmodule].should be_an_instance_of(Xpmodule)
end
end
end
for which I get No route matches {:action=>"index", :controller=>"xpmodule"}. Which of course is sort-of right, but I don't want to add this route just for testing purposes. Is there a way to tell Rspec to call a different URL in get?
As far as I can tell you're testing controller action and not routing to that action. These are two different things!
Try this for starters:
it "should map xpmodules controller to /modules url" do
route_for(:controller => "xpmodule", :action => "index").should == "/modules"
end
Apply for other actions as well. If you want to do a reverse routing (from url to controller/action) then do this:
it "should route /modules url to xpmodules controller and index action" do
params_from(:get, "/modules").should == {:controller => "xpmodules", :action => "index"}
end
Head, meet wall, Wall, meet head. bang.
Not getting an answer on SO is a sure sign that I should try harder. Therefore I added the /xpmodule route explicitly to the routes.rb. Just to notice that the tests are still failing. To cut a long story short:
it "should assign the current xpmodule" do
xpm = mock_model(Xpmodule)
Xpmodule.should_receive(:find).and_return(xpm)
get "index", :module_id => 1
assigns[:xpmodule].should be_an_instance_of(Xpmodule)
end
is the solution.