I am trying to use a combination of Domain Driven Design with Test Driven Development for this application I am building in ASP.NET MVC 3. My archictecture is set up with Repositories, Domain Models, View Models, Controllers and Views. All validation will be handled in the view model. I set up my view model to inherit from "IValidatableObject" so that my validation attributes and my custom validation that i set up in the "Validate" method are both executed when my controller method calls "ModelState.IsValid". The problem I am running into is accessing my repository in the Validate method of my view model. I need to access the repository to check for duplicate records in the database. It seems like the best idea would be to create a property of IRepository type and set that property by passing injecting my repository into the constructor of the view model. For example:
public class UserViewModel : IValidatableObject
{
public UserViewModel(User user, IUserRepository userRepository)
{
FirstName = user.FirstName;
LastName = user.LastName;
UserRepository = userRepository;
UserName = user.UserName;
}
public string UserName { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public IUserRepository UserRepository { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate()
{
UserCriteria criteria = new UserCriteria { UserName = this.UserName };
IList<User> users = UserRepository.SearchUsers(criteria);
if (users != null && users.count() > 0)
{
yield return new ValidationResult("User with username " + this.UserName + " already exists."
}
}
}
Do you guys think this is a good idea?
It is good enough but if I were you, I would use
...
private readonly Func<IUserRepository> userRepositoryFactory;
...
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate()
{
UserCriteria criteria = new UserCriteria { UserName = this.UserName };
using(var UserRepository = userRepositoryFactory())
{
IList<User> users = UserRepository.SearchUsers(criteria);
if (users != null && users.count() > 0)
{
yield return new ValidationResult("User with username " + this.UserName + " already exists."
}
}
}
You can add Domain Service class to get object match with your criteria and validated at domain service level
public class PurchaseOrder
{
public string Id { get; private set; }
public string PONumber { get; private set; }
public string Description { get; private set; }
public decimal Total { get; private set; }
public DateTime SubmissionDate { get; private set; }
public ICollection<Invoice> Invoices { get; private set; }
public decimal InvoiceTotal
{
get { return this.Invoices.Select(x => x.Amount).Sum(); }
}
}
public class PurchaseOrderService
{
public PurchaseOrderService(IPurchaseOrderRepository repository)
{
this.repository = repository;
}
readonly IPurchaseOrderRepository repository;
public void CheckPurchasedOrderExsist(string purchaseOrderId)
{
var purchaseOrder = this.repository.Get(purchaseOrderId);
if (purchaseOrder != null)
throw new Exception("PO already exist!");
}
}
Related
Again...
I am doing a MVC with EF5 App. I have a Users Entity, that EF bind with Users table in Database... Looks like this.
public partial class Users
{
public long User_id { get; set; }
[Required]
[StringLength(30, ErrorMessage = "LastName cannot be longer than 30 characters.")]
public string LastName { get; set; }
[Required]
[StringLength(30, ErrorMessage = "Name cannot be longer than 30 characters.")]
public string Name { get; set; }
public int ProcessState_id { get; set; }
public string Sex { get; set; }
[Required,Range(1, int.MaxValue, ErrorMessage = "El País es Obligatorio")]
public int Country_id { get; set; }
[Required]
[EmailAddress(ErrorMessage = "Invalid Email Address")]
public string Email { get; set; }
public System.DateTime CreationDate { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> UpDateTime { get; set; }
[RegularExpression(#"^.{5,}$", ErrorMessage = "Minimum 3 characters required")]
[Required]
[StringLength(9, MinimumLength = 3, ErrorMessage = "Password cannot be longer than 9 characters.")]
public string Password { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public byte[] Picture { get; set; }
public string CodArea { get; set; }
public string PhoneNumber { get; set; }
public virtual Countries Countries { get; set; }
public virtual ProcessStates ProcessStates { get; set; }
public virtual States States { get; set; }
[NotMapped] // Does not effect with your database
[RegularExpression(#"^.{5,}$", ErrorMessage = "Minimum 3 characters required")]
[StringLength(9, MinimumLength = 3, ErrorMessage = "Confirm Password cannot be longer than 9 characters.")]
[Compare("Password")]
public virtual string ConfirmPassword { get; set; }
}
I have a Model Class that i use it in my Create View....
public class UserViewModel
{
public Users user { get; set; }
public IList<SelectListItem> AvailableCountries { get; set; }
}
My Create Method in the Controller gets a UserViewModel instance...
My Create Method looks like this.
public async Task<ActionResult> Create(UserViewModel model, System.Web.HttpPostedFileBase image = null)
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
model.user.ProcessState_id = Security.WAITING;
model.user.Rol_id = Security.ROL_PUBLIC;
model.user.CreationDate = DateTime.Now;
model.user.IP = Request.UserHostAddress;
model.user.Url = UserValidation.EncriptacionURL(model.user.Email);
if (image != null)
{
// product.ImageMimeType = image.ContentType;
model.user.Picture= new byte[image.ContentLength];
image.InputStream.Read(model.user.Picture, 0, image.ContentLength);
}
_db.Users.Add(model.user);
_db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Create");
}
model.AvailableCountries = GetCountries();
return View(model);
}
catch (RetryLimitExceededException /* dex */)
{
}
return View(model);
}
So far so good.
For my Edit View, i need less properties from User class, so I have a new class with the properties I need. This class is called UserEditView.
public class UserEditView
{
public long User_id { get; set; }
[Required]
[StringLength(30, ErrorMessage = "LastName cannot be longer than 30 characters.")]
public string LastName { get; set; }
[Required]
[StringLength(30, ErrorMessage = "Name cannot be longer than 30 characters.")]
public string Name { get; set; }
[Required, Range(1, int.MaxValue, ErrorMessage = "El País es Obligatorio")]
public int Country_id { get; set; }
[Required]
[EmailAddress(ErrorMessage = "Invalid Email Address")]
public string Email { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> UpDateTime { get; set; }
public byte[] Picture { get; set; }
public string CodArea { get; set; }
public string PhoneNumber { get; set; }
public virtual Countries Countries { get; set; }
}
I also create a new Model for Edit View, called UserEditViewModel and looks like this.
public class UserEditViewModel
{
public UserEditView user { get; set; }
public IList<SelectListItem> AvailableCountries { get; set; }
}
On my Edit method, I use Mapper to bind User entity with UserEditView
public ViewResult Edit(int User_id=3)
{
Users users = _db.Users
.FirstOrDefault(p => p.User_id == User_id);
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Users, UserEditView>();
});
IMapper mapper = config.CreateMapper();
UserEditView userEditView = mapper.Map<Users, UserEditView>(users);
var model = new UserEditViewModel
{
user = userEditView,
AvailableCountries = GetCountries(),
};
return View(model);
}
My problem arise when I want to Update the User table.
The Edit method gets UserEditViewModel instance.
public async Task<ActionResult> Edit(UserEditViewModel model, System.Web.HttpPostedFileBase image = null)
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{}
}
}
UserEditViewModel has an instance of UserEditView but I need an instance of Users in order to EF updates Users Table.
I need to Map again?
How can I get a Users Instance?
I add the following Class
public static class AutoMapperBootStrapper
{
public static void BootStrap()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Users, UserEditView>();
cfg.CreateMap<UserEditView, Users>();
});
IMapper mapper = config.CreateMapper();
}
And I add in my Global.asax
public class MvcApplication : System.Web.HttpApplication
{
protected void Application_Start()
{
AutoMapperBootStrapper.BootStrap();
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
BundleConfig.RegisterBundles(BundleTable.Bundles);
}
}
then in the controller... i do
public ViewResult Edit(int User_id=3)
{
Users users = _db.Users.FirstOrDefault(p => p.User_id == User_id);
UserEditView userEditView = Mapper.Map<Users, UserEditView>(users);
}
But Mapper.Map have an error... it says Mapper is not instantiated.
the problem is because I defined more than one Mapper. If i define just one, it Works fine...
I need to Map again? How can I get a Users Instance?
You could get the User model from your database using the id and then map the properties that you need to be updated from the view model:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Edit(UserEditViewModel model, HttpPostedFileBase image = null)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
// Validation failed => redisplay the Edit form so that the
// user can correct the errors
return View(model);
}
var user = _db.Users.FirstOrDefault(p => p.User_id == model.user.User_id);
if (user == null)
{
// no user with the specified id has been found in the database =>
// there's nothing to update
return NotFound();
}
// This will map only the properties of the user object that
// are part of the view model
Mapper.Map<Users, UserEditView>(model.user, user);
// at this stage you could manually update some properties that
// have not been mapped such as the uploaded image
// finally persist the changes to the database
_db.SaveChanges();
// redirect to some other action to show the updated users
return RedirectToAction("users");
}
Also the code you have shown in your question:
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Users, UserEditView>();
});
IMapper mapper = config.CreateMapper();
This is absolutely NOT something that you should be doing inside a controller action. AutoMapper mappings should be configured only once per application lifetime, ideally when your application starts, i.e. for a web application that would be Application_Start in Global.asax. In a controller action you should only use the already configured mappings. I strongly recommend you going through the AutoMapper's documentation for getting better understanding of how to use this framework.
Quote from the documentation:
Where do I configure AutoMapper?
If you're using the static Mapper method, configuration should only
happen once per AppDomain. That means the best place to put the
configuration code is in application startup, such as the Global.asax
file for ASP.NET applications. Typically, the configuration
bootstrapper class is in its own class, and this bootstrapper class is
called from the startup method. The bootstrapper class should call
Mapper.Initialize to configure the type maps.
Summary:
I want a data annotation validator to reference another property in the same class (TitleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration).
However, DB.SaveChanges() is not being called on this class directly. Rather it is being called on the parent of this class (WebsiteConfiguration).
Therefore validationContext.ObjectType is returning WebsiteConfiguration and I am unable to refer to properties of TitleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration within the data annotation validator.
WebsiteConfiguration.cs
public class WebsiteConfiguration
{
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public int ID { get; set; }
public TitleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration TitleAuthorAndPublishing { get; set; }
public BookChaptersAndSectionsConfiguration BookChaptersAndSections { get; set; }
public SocialMediaLoginsConfiguration SocialMediaLogins { get; set; }
public TagGroupsConfiguration TagGroups { get; set; }
}
public class TitleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration
{
public string BookTitle { get; set; }
public bool IsPublished { get; set; }
// how do I access a property of current model when calling DB.SaveChanges() on parent?
[RequiredIfOtherFieldIsEnabled("IsPublished")]
public string Publisher { get; set; }
}
// ... and other sub models...
ApplicationDbContext.cs
DbSet<WebsiteConfiguration> WebsiteConfiguration {get;set;}
Example Update Code
public void SeedWebsiteConfiguration()
{
var titleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration = new TitleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration()
{
// seed values
};
var bookChaptersAndSectionsConfiguration = new BookChaptersAndSectionsConfiguration()
{
// seed values
};
var socialMediaLoginConfiguration = new SocialMediaLoginsConfiguration()
{
// seed values
};
var tagGroupsConfiguration = new TagGroupsConfiguration()
{
// seed values
};
var websiteConfiguration = new WebsiteConfiguration()
{
TitleAuthorAndPublishing = titleAuthorAndPublishingConfiguration,
BookChaptersAndSections = bookChaptersAndSectionsConfiguration,
SocialMediaLogins = socialMediaLoginConfiguration,
TagGroups = tagGroupsConfiguration
};
DB.WebsiteConfiguration.Add(websiteConfiguration);
DB.SaveChanges();
}
Validator Code
public class RequiredIfOtherFieldIsEnabledAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
private string _ifWhatIsEnabled { get; set; }
public RequiredIfOtherFieldIsEnabledAttribute(string IfWhatIsEnabled)
{
_ifWhatIsEnabled = IfWhatIsEnabled;
}
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object currentPropertyValue, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
var isEnabledProperty = validationContext.ObjectType.GetProperty(_ifWhatIsEnabled);
if (isEnabledProperty == null)
{
return new ValidationResult(
string.Format("Unknown property: {0}", _ifWhatIsEnabled)
);
}
var isEnabledPropertyValue = (bool)isEnabledProperty.GetValue(validationContext.ObjectInstance, null);
if (isEnabledPropertyValue == true)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(currentPropertyValue.ToString()))
{
return new ValidationResult(String.Format("This field is required if {0} is enabled", isEnabledProperty));
}
}
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
}
Questions
Is there a way for me to access child model properties from validationContext?
Am I misguided in my approach? Is there a better way to store multiple models as part of a larger model in a single DB table?
I was hoping not to have multiple config tables and calls to the DB. (There are 4 child models in this example, but there may be 10+ in the next app.)
The setup above meets my needs in so many ways. But I don't want to give up the functionality of DataAnnotations on the sub models!
Bonus Question
I have come across a few posts like this one:
How can I tell the Data Annotations validator to also validate complex child properties?
But that is 4 years old, and I'm wondering if anything has changed since then.
Am I trying to do something that is basically impossible (or at least very difficult)?
Am I trying to do something that is basically impossible (or at least
very difficult)?
No, there is a very simple solution that integrates perfectly with the framework and technologies using DataAnnotations.
You can create a custom ValidationAttribute that is called by EF Validation and call Validator.TryValidateObject inside. This way, when CustomValidation.IsValid is called by EF you launch child complex object validation by hand and so on for the whole object graph. As a bonus, you can gather all errors thanks to CompositeValidationResult.
i.e.
using System;
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public class Program
{
public static void Main() {
var person = new Person {
Address = new Address {
City = "SmallVille",
State = "TX",
Zip = new ZipCode()
},
Name = "Kent"
};
var context = new ValidationContext(person, null, null);
var results = new List<ValidationResult>();
Validator.TryValidateObject(person, context, results, true);
PrintResults(results, 0);
Console.ReadKey();
}
private static void PrintResults(IEnumerable<ValidationResult> results, Int32 indentationLevel) {
foreach (var validationResult in results) {
Console.WriteLine(validationResult.ErrorMessage);
Console.WriteLine();
if (validationResult is CompositeValidationResult) {
PrintResults(((CompositeValidationResult)validationResult).Results, indentationLevel + 1);
}
}
}
}
public class ValidateObjectAttribute: ValidationAttribute {
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext) {
var results = new List<ValidationResult>();
var context = new ValidationContext(value, null, null);
Validator.TryValidateObject(value, context, results, true);
if (results.Count != 0) {
var compositeResults = new CompositeValidationResult(String.Format("Validation for {0} failed!", validationContext.DisplayName));
results.ForEach(compositeResults.AddResult);
return compositeResults;
}
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
}
public class CompositeValidationResult: ValidationResult {
private readonly List<ValidationResult> _results = new List<ValidationResult>();
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Results {
get {
return _results;
}
}
public CompositeValidationResult(string errorMessage) : base(errorMessage) {}
public CompositeValidationResult(string errorMessage, IEnumerable<string> memberNames) : base(errorMessage, memberNames) {}
protected CompositeValidationResult(ValidationResult validationResult) : base(validationResult) {}
public void AddResult(ValidationResult validationResult) {
_results.Add(validationResult);
}
}
public class Person {
[Required]
public String Name { get; set; }
[Required, ValidateObject]
public Address Address { get; set; }
}
public class Address {
[Required]
public String Street1 { get; set; }
public String Street2 { get; set; }
[Required]
public String City { get; set; }
[Required]
public String State { get; set; }
[Required, ValidateObject]
public ZipCode Zip { get; set; }
}
public class ZipCode {
[Required]
public String PrimaryCode { get; set; }
public String SubCode { get; set; }
}
public int ID { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Surname{get;set;}
[Required (ErrorMessage="FirstName Required")]
public string Firstname{get;set;}
[Required(ErrorMessage="please enter your OtherNames")]
public string Othername{get;set;}
[Required(ErrorMessage="please enter your sex")]
public string Sex{get;set;}
[Required (ErrorMessage="please enter your DateOfBirth")]
public DateTime DateOfBirth{get;set;}
[Required(ErrorMessage="Address is required")]
public string Address{get;set;}
[Required(ErrorMessage="city is required")]
public string City{get;set;}
[Required(ErrorMessage="State is required")]
public string State{get;set;}
public string Country{get;set;}
}
i have created an interface which acts as the middleman between my Domain Layer and my WEBUI
public interface IStudentRepository
{
IQueryable<Student> Student { get; }
//we using a method to save the record into our database
void Save(Student student);
}
the interface is being implented by my repository class which perfoms all the actions of saving the records into the database and retrieving it..
public class EFRepository:IStudentRepository
{
private EFDBContext context = new EFDBContext();
public IQueryable<Student> Student{ get { return context.Students; } }
public void Save(Student student)
{
if (student.ID == 0)
{
context.Students.Add(student);
}
context.SaveChanges();
}
and then i have a view which creates an instance of the student class and uses the interface to store the records in the database, which works perfectly..
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Registration(Student student)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
studentrepository.Save(student);
}
return View(student);
}
this works perfectly for me..
But i want to be able to update this same fields incase the student make changes to the fields and it should overwrite the existing record in the database.
i have seen my tutorials where the student id number is passed as an action link before it overwrites the existing record.
however,what i want is the ability for the student to edit the same form using the same button and the same view being display.any help would be appreciated.
You just need to change you repository method to look something like this:
public class EFRepository:IStudentRepository
{
private EFDBContext context = new EFDBContext();
public IQueryable<Student> Student{ get { return context.Students; } }
public void Save(Student student)
{
if (student.ID == 0)
{
context.Students.Add(student);
}
else
{
Student existingStudent = context.Students.FirstOrDefault(x => x.ID == student.ID);
if(existingStudent != null)
{
context.Entry(existingStudent).CurrentValues.SetValues(student);
context.Entry(existingStudent).State = System.Data.Entity.EntityState.Modified;
}
}
context.SaveChanges();
}
or you can use the Entity Framework Attach method as this will automatically track the object state and update the details
I've built my Domain model layer, my repository layer, and now I'm working on my DTO layer to be used by a webApi project. I'm in the middle of implementing an Update service method, and I'm wondering about partial updates. Here's my DTO class:
public class FullPersonDto
{
public FullPersonDto()
{
Friends = new List<Person>();
}
public FullPersonDto(Person person)
{
PersonId = person.PersonId;
DateCreated = person.DateCreated;
Details = person.Details;
Friends = new List<Person>();
foreach (Person friend in person.Friends)
{
Friends.Add(new PersonDto(friend));
}
}
[Key]
public int PersonId { get; set; }
[Required]
public virtual DateTime DateCreated { get; set; }
public virtual string Details { get; set; }
public List<Person> Friends { get; set; }
public Person ToEntity()
{
var person = new Person
{
PersonId = PersonId,
DateCreated = (DateTime) DateCreated,
Details = Details,
Friends = new List<Person>()
};
foreach (PersonDto friend in Friends)
{
person.Friends.Add(friend.ToEntity());
}
return person;
}
}
Here's my Update method in my Repository:
public Person UpdatePerson(Person person)
{
var entry = _db.Entry(person);
if (entry.State == EntityState.Detached)
{
var dbSet = _db.Set<Person>();
Person attachedPerson = dbSet.Find(person.PersonId);
if (attachedPerson != null)
{
var attachedEntry = _db.Entry(attachedPerson);
attachedEntry.CurrentValues.SetValues(person); // what if values are null, like ID, or DateCreated?
}
else
{
entry.State = EntityState.Modified;
}
}
SaveChanges();
return person;
}
My question is: What if I only need to update the Details of a person via my webAPI? Is the convention to construct an entire PersonDto and Update the entire object using SetValues, or is there any way I can specify that I only want a single field updated so that I don't have to send a ton of data over the wire (that I don't really need)?
If it is possible to do partial updates, when is it ever good to update the entire entity? Even if I have to update 5/7 properties, it requires that I send old data for 2/7 to re-write so that SetValues doesn't write nulls into my fields from my DTO.
Any help here would be awesome... totally new to this stuff and trying to learn everything right. Thank you.
I've taken similar approach to do optimization, and I've faced same issues with null values when attaching (not just null, you'll have issue with boolean as well). This is what I've come up with:
public static void Update<T>(this DbContext context, IDTO dto)
where T : class, IEntity
{
T TEntity = context.Set<T>().Local.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Id == dto.Id);
if (TEntity == null)
{
TEntity = context.Set<T>().Create();
TEntity.Id = dto.Id;
context.Set<T>().Attach(TEntity);
}
context.Entry(TEntity).CurrentValues.SetValues(dto);
var attribute = dto.GetAttribute<EnsureUpdatedAttribute>();
if (attribute != null)
{
foreach (var property in attribute.Properties)
context.Entry(TEntity).Property(property).IsModified = true;
}
}
That is extension method for DbContext. Here are the interfaces IDTO and IEntity:
public interface IDTO
{
int Id { get; set; }
}
public interface IEntity
{
int Id { get; set; }
Nullable<DateTime> Modified { get; set; }
Nullable<DateTime> Created { get; set; }
}
I'm using my custom EnsureUpdatedAttribute to annotate what properties should always be updated (to deal with nulls / default values not being tracked):
public class EnsureUpdatedAttribute : Attribute
{
public IEnumerable<string> Properties { get; private set; }
public EnsureUpdatedAttribute(params string[] properties)
{
Properties = properties.AsEnumerable();
}
}
And this is a sample of usage:
public class Sample : IEntity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public bool Active { get; set; }
public Nullable<DateTime> Modified { get; set; }
public Nullable<DateTime> Created { get; set; }
}
[EnsureUpdated("Active")] /// requirement for entity framework change tracking, read about stub entities
public class SampleDTO : IDTO
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonIgnore] /// How to exclude property from going on the wire / ignored for serialization
public bool Active { get; set; }
}
[HttpPost]
public HttpResponseMessage SaveSample(SampleDTO dto)
{
dto.Active = true;
_ctx.AddModel<Sample>(dto);
_ctx.SaveChanges();
return NoContent();
}
return NoContent() is just extension for returning 204 (NoContent).
Hope this helps.
Theres a few options you have, you can create a stored procedure to update the required parts (I wouldnt do this), or you can manually select the fileds to update on the model before saving the context changes with EF.
Heres an example how to update a specific field:
public void UpdatePerson(int personId, string details)
{
var person = new Person() { Id = personId, Details = details };
db.Persons.Attach(personId);
db.Entry(person).Property(x => x.Details).IsModified = true;
db.SaveChanges();
}
It will depend on your scenario what you want to do, but generally speaking its fine to send your whole entity to be updated, and this is how i would approach your situation potentially changing in the future if needed.
I have an ASP.NET MVC application which uses Entity Framework to get data.
I need to transform Entites to Models before passing them to View. Projections can be very complex, but to keep it simple:
public static IQueryable<UserModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<User> users)
{
return from user in users
select new UserModel
{
Name = user.Name,
Email = user.Email,
};
}
This can be used in a controller like this:
return View(Repository.Users.ToModel().ToList());
Very good. But what if I want to use this projection inside another one? Example:
public static IQueryable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<BlogPost> blogs)
{
return from blogs in blogs
select new BlogPostModel
{
Title = blog.Title,
Authors = blog.Authors.AsQueryable().ToModel(), // (entities are POCOs)
// This does not work, because EF does not understand method ToModel().
};
}
(let's suppose blog can have more then one author and it is of type User).
Can I somehow separate the projections and reuse them inside another ones?
Here's something that actually works (in a simple test application) to only select the requested fields:
namespace Entities
{
public class BlogPost
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime Created { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<User> Authors { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
public virtual string Email { get; set; }
public virtual byte[] Password { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<BlogPost> BlogPosts { get; set; }
}
}
namespace Models
{
public class BlogPostModel
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<UserModel> Authors { get; set; }
}
public class UserModel
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
}
public static class BlogPostModelExtensions
{
public static readonly Expression<Func<BlogPost, BlogPostModel>> ToModelConverterExpression =
p =>
new BlogPostModel
{
Title = p.Title,
Authors = p.Authors.AsQueryable().Select(UserModelExtensions.ToModelConverterExpression),
};
public static readonly Func<BlogPost, BlogPostModel> ToModelConverterFunction = ToModelConverterExpression.Compile();
public static IQueryable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<BlogPost> blogPosts)
{
return blogPosts.Select(ToModelConverterExpression);
}
public static IEnumerable<BlogPostModel> ToModel(this IEnumerable<BlogPost> blogPosts)
{
return blogPosts.Select(ToModelConverterFunction);
}
}
public static class UserModelExtensions
{
public static readonly Expression<Func<User, UserModel>> ToModelConverterExpression =
u =>
new UserModel
{
Name = u.Name,
Email = u.Email,
};
public static readonly Func<User, UserModel> ToModelConverterFunction = ToModelConverterExpression.Compile();
public static IQueryable<UserModel> ToModel(this IQueryable<User> users)
{
return users.Select(ToModelConverterExpression);
}
public static IEnumerable<UserModel> ToModel(this IEnumerable<User> users)
{
return users.Select(ToModelConverterFunction);
}
}
}
To test it without actually creating a database:
var blogPostsQuery = (
from p in context.BlogPosts
where p.Title.StartsWith("a")
select p).ToModel();
Console.WriteLine(((ObjectQuery)blogPostQuery).ToTraceString());