As someone that experienced the pain of iCloud while trying to prototype iCloud enabling one of our CoreData apps, Simperium looks very promising, but I'm interested in seeing how it handles some of the sharp edges.
One issue I came across was how to gracefully handle bootstrapping data when the application starts up. The first time a user launches our app, we will load some default data into our CoreData database. If a user launches the app first on the iPhone and then later on the iPad, they will end up getting the bootstrap data duplicated on both devices because of syncing. With iCloud, the solution was to hook into the iCloud merge process.
How would I handle this with Simperium?
There are at least a couple ways to do this.
You can hardcode the simperiumKey for each seeded object. For example, in a notes app, if every new user gets a welcome note, you can locally create that note with the simperiumKey of welcomeNote. This will ensure that only one welcome note will ever exist in that user's account (on any device). With this approach, there can be some redundant data transfer, so it's best if there's not a large amount of seeded data. On the other hand, this approach is good if you want data to be immediately available to new users even if they're offline when they first launch your app.
With Simperium, you also have the option to use a server process. You can seed new user accounts with data by using a Python or Ruby listener that runs some code when accounts are created. This is a good approach if there's a large amount of data, but has the disadvantage that users need to be online before the seeded data will transfer (and of course the transfer itself will take some time).
There are subtleties with these approaches. With the first approach, using the welcomeNote example, if your user deletes the welcomeNote and subsequently reinstalls your app in the future, the welcomeNote will get resurrected (but never duplicated) because it's being created locally. This is often acceptable. With the second approach, the welcomeNote would be seeded once and only once, so it will never get resurrected even if your app is reinstalled.
Related
I implemented real time sync following Realm's tasks demo app.
There a dummy container is used, to hold a List with the models.
The demo app doesn't seem to support offline usage.
I wondered what happens when, given this setup, I start the app on an online as well as an offline device and then go online with the offline device.
My initial expectation was that I'd end with 2 containers (which would be an invalid state), but when I tested surprisingly there was only 1 container at the end.
But sometimes I get 2 containers and haven't been able to identify what causes this.
The question then is, how does this exactly work? I assume the reason that the container is normally not duplicated when I sync the offline device for the first time is that it's handled as the same object, maybe because it doesn't have a primary key or something? But then why is it sometimes duplicated? And what would be the best practice here? Do I maybe have to use a primary key or check after connecting if there's duplication and if yes do a manual merge of the containers?
At the moment, Realm Tasks merely checks if the default Realm is empty before it tries to add a new base list container object. If the synchronization process hasn't completed by the time this check occurs, it's reasonable that a second container would be created. When testing the app on a local network, this usually isn't a problem since the download speeds are so fast, but we definitely should test this a bit more thoroughly.
Adding a primary key will definitely help since it means that if a second list is created locally, it will get merged with the version that comes down from the server.
We've recently been focusing on the 'on-boarding' process when a second device connects to a user's Realm Mobile Platform account via the new progress notification system. A more logical approach would be to wait for the synchronization to complete the initial download after logging in, and then checking for the presence of the objects. Once the documentation is complete, we'll most likely be revamping how Realm Tasks handles this.
The demo app (as well as the Realm Mobile Platform) does support offline, but only after the user has logged in for the first time (which is when these container objects are initially generated). After that time, the apps can be used offline, and any changes done in that interim are synchronized the next time it comes online.
We're planning on building 'anonymous user' feature where a user can start using the app straight away (even offline) and then any changes they made before they log in (due to them being offline) are then transferred to the user account after they do so.
If my objective is to create a cloud backup that a user can restore if they accidentally delete my app or a bug causes data loss (no need to share data across devices), what's the simplest option to backup user CoreData daily?
(Note: The occasional full iPhone backup isn't sufficient)
When I read about CloudKit I see things like:
You might wonder why you should choose CloudKit over Core Data, other commercial BaaS (Back end as a Service) offerings, or even rolling your own server...
But that's a problem because I would like to continue using CoreData! I do not want the user to depend on the cloud for data. I don't want syncing problems, online/offline issues, etc.
I would also like to avoid having the user login or create an account. According to Ray Wenderlich:
Since CloudKit uses the iCloud credentials entered when the device is set up (or entered after set up via the Settings app), there’s no need to build complicated login screens.
I see some apps use Facebook login but I'd even like to avoid that! So can I use CloudKit to avoid login screens but also still use CoreData?
Although code answers are great, just a general answer on what API/design-pattern is used for this type of functionality would suffice.
Yes you can use CloudKit at the same time as CoreData to do this and it does avoid the login and cost overheads of many other cloud alternatives.
However as the two data models are not related, if your data is complex there will be a significant amount of code necessary to covert between them whenever the user selects to backup or restore.
Are you sure relying on the normal iOS backup functionality is not sufficient?
I understand that Core Data is essentially a self-contained local database, but I'm not sure if I should be using it in my app or not. Basically, it would be more for caching purposes if anything, since I retrieve all of my content from a web server database. Regardless, I was wondering if Core Data would be useful is any of these situations:
Scenario #1: I retrieve a list of "items" from the web server and feed them into a table view. This is essentially the first page the user sees. The table can be refreshed to retrieve more results, but existing items likely won't change. Over time this list of items could grow tremendously. Items can be deleted.
Scenario #2: A user has a friends list. This list of friends will stay the same unless he or she adds more friends. I imagine there will be a scenario where a friend deletes their account, in which case the friends list will be altered as well.
Scenario #3: Messages can be attached to items. They can't be edited or deleted, so the only change in state for a list of messages would be if a new message was added. Essentially the same as items, except they can't be deleted.
Actually, for your scenario I would say that you don't need any persistence in your app, but rather fetch your data from the server every time the app starts and just keep it in memory. There are a lot of apps which are doing it this way and this is totally fine behaviour.
However, there are some drawbacks of not using persistence:
worse offline experience for your user since they depend on a network connection, so effectively without a connection they can't do anything within your app
risk of slow loading
On the plus side we have:
using Core Data in your app is a huge implementation overhead (especially if you haven't used it before)
after having integrated Core Data, you still have a lot of issues to tackle, first and foremost: data synching between your app and the backend
If you decide to go for persistence, also take a look at alternatives to Core Data like Realm.
Finally, my advice still is to not use Core Data in your situation. However, keep in mind that you can build a version of your app that doesn't use persistence. And then, once you see that your app is well-received and gets more attention, you can still go and add persistence later on.
When core data syncs with iCloud, occasionally all of my records are doubled. I believe this happens on reinstall, where the app has not yet synced data, creates a new data set, and then iCloud syncs and there are double of each record for each model.
Is there a way to prevent this sort of behavior? Right now I'm checking every model on load and data sync for duplication, but this seems messy and hackish.
iCloud transfers data between devices asynchronously, and there can be quite some time between when you add data to the iCloud container, and when it actually gets transferred. Metadata is transferred between devices faster, but even this can be quite delayed.
The reason this is important is that you can never do a test on one device that will guarantee that data has not already been added to iCloud. One device may have seeded data, but not yet begun to upload its files/metadata. At that point, a second device cannot know about the seeded data from the first device.
Apple's advice is to handle this by de-deplicating your data after each merge. Each device just adds its own seed data, and if you find that it has been added twice, you delete half of it, being careful to ensure corresponding objects are deleted on each device.
This approach works, but feels a bit like a hack. An alternative, used in my Ensembles framework, is to supply global identifiers for your objects so that the sync framework can automatically import and merge seed data. That is the approach taken in Ensembles, and it makes seeding data quite a bit easier and less ad hoc.
Trying to use just an iCloud store is folly. Data must be stored both locally and in iCloud, or you will run into serious problems.
Use MagicalRecord if you want core data.
I have a lot of data present in the database present in my webserver. Each time I starts the ipad application after downloadiding, I want all these data to be copied into the sqlite database present in my application. Then using this data, the application should work.
We are now using xml's and sometimes on 3g it takes about 20minutes which is completely unacceptable. After the 1st time it syncs using time log and all. And it works without any problem.
Is there any other way I could get all the data and make it populated into my sqlite db?
If it is a large database it might be worth doingin the background. And even better if it was just over wifi (otherwise you'll be eating up your users data)
What I usually do is have a local copy of the database shipping with the app, so the user can use that, and update it in the background. It might be worth creating some pages where you just present the updated content, download that, then update your database accordingly. Rather than downloading everything all the time.
This would depend entirely on your implementation however.
On initial app launch you could download just enough data to make the app functional. Then download the rest of the data in the background.
This is a common strategy used by Sync Frameworks and works pretty well. I have personally tried with with synchronizing more than a thousand objects using OpenMobster's sync service.
Now what data to download initially is to be decided by the requirements of the App
Thanks