I would like to know if there is a way in WEKA to output a number of 'best-guesses' for a classification.
My scenario is: I classify the data with cross-validation for instance, then on weka's output I get something like: these are the 3 best-guesses for the classification of this instance. What I want is like, even if an instance isn't correctly classified i get an output of the 3 or 5 best-guesses for that instance.
Example:
Classes: A,B,C,D,E
Instances: 1...10
And output would be:
instance 1 is 90% likely to be class A, 75% likely to be class B, 60% like to be class C..
Thanks.
Weka's API has a method called Classifier.distributionForInstance() tha can be used to get the classification prediction distribution. You can then sort the distribution by decreasing probability to get your top-N predictions.
Below is a function that prints out: (1) the test instance's ground truth label; (2) the predicted label from classifyInstance(); and (3) the prediction distribution from distributionForInstance(). I have used this with J48, but it should work with other classifiers.
The inputs parameters are the serialized model file (which you can create during the model training phase and applying the -d option) and the test file in ARFF format.
public void test(String modelFileSerialized, String testFileARFF)
throws Exception
{
// Deserialize the classifier.
Classifier classifier =
(Classifier) weka.core.SerializationHelper.read(
modelFileSerialized);
// Load the test instances.
Instances testInstances = DataSource.read(testFileARFF);
// Mark the last attribute in each instance as the true class.
testInstances.setClassIndex(testInstances.numAttributes()-1);
int numTestInstances = testInstances.numInstances();
System.out.printf("There are %d test instances\n", numTestInstances);
// Loop over each test instance.
for (int i = 0; i < numTestInstances; i++)
{
// Get the true class label from the instance's own classIndex.
String trueClassLabel =
testInstances.instance(i).toString(testInstances.classIndex());
// Make the prediction here.
double predictionIndex =
classifier.classifyInstance(testInstances.instance(i));
// Get the predicted class label from the predictionIndex.
String predictedClassLabel =
testInstances.classAttribute().value((int) predictionIndex);
// Get the prediction probability distribution.
double[] predictionDistribution =
classifier.distributionForInstance(testInstances.instance(i));
// Print out the true label, predicted label, and the distribution.
System.out.printf("%5d: true=%-10s, predicted=%-10s, distribution=",
i, trueClassLabel, predictedClassLabel);
// Loop over all the prediction labels in the distribution.
for (int predictionDistributionIndex = 0;
predictionDistributionIndex < predictionDistribution.length;
predictionDistributionIndex++)
{
// Get this distribution index's class label.
String predictionDistributionIndexAsClassLabel =
testInstances.classAttribute().value(
predictionDistributionIndex);
// Get the probability.
double predictionProbability =
predictionDistribution[predictionDistributionIndex];
System.out.printf("[%10s : %6.3f]",
predictionDistributionIndexAsClassLabel,
predictionProbability );
}
o.printf("\n");
}
}
I don't know if you can do it natively, but you can just get the probabilities for each class, sorted them and take the first three.
The function you want is distributionForInstance(Instance instance) which returns a double[] giving the probability for each class.
Not in general. The information you want is not available with all classifiers -- in most cases (for example for decision trees), the decision is clear (albeit potentially incorrect) without a confidence value. Your task requires classifiers that can handle uncertainty (such as the naive Bayes classifier).
Technically the easiest thing to do is probably to train the model and then classify an individual instance, for which Weka should give you the desired output. In general you can of course also do it for sets of instances, but I don't think that Weka provides this out of the box. You would probably have to customise the code or use it through an API (for example in R).
when you calculate a probability for the instance, how exactly do you do this?
I have posted my PART rules and data for the new instance here but as far as calculation manually I am not so sure how to do this! Thanks
EDIT: now calculated:
private float[] getProbDist(String split){
// takes in something such as (52/2) meaning 52 instances correctly classified and 2 incorrectly classified.
if(prob_dis.length > 2)
return null;
if(prob_dis.length == 1){
String temp = prob_dis[0];
prob_dis = new String[2];
prob_dis[0] = "1";
prob_dis[1] = temp;
}
float p1 = new Float(prob_dis[0]);
float p2 = new Float(prob_dis[1]);
// assumes two tags
float[] tag_prob = new float[2];
tag_prob[1] = 1 - tag_prob[1];
tag_prob[0] = (float)p2/p1;
// returns double[] as being the probabilities
return tag_prob;
}
Related
I am using the following code to create my machine learning model. The accuracy of the model is 0.76. I am just curious to know which records from my test data failed? Is there a way I can see those data?
// 1. Load the dataset for training and testing
var trainData = ctx.Data.LoadFromTextFile<SentimentData>(trainDataPath, hasHeader: true);
var testData = ctx.Data.LoadFromTextFile<SentimentData>(testDataPath, hasHeader: true);
// 2. Build a tranformer/estimator to transform input data so that Machine Learning algorithm can understand
IEstimator<ITransformer> estimator = ctx.Transforms.Text.FeaturizeText("Features", nameof(SentimentData.Text));
// 3. - set the training algorithm and create the pipeline for model builder
var trainer = ctx.BinaryClassification.Trainers.SdcaLogisticRegression();
var trainingPipeline = estimator.Append(trainer);
// 4. - Train the model
var trainedModel = trainingPipeline.Fit(trainData);
// 5. - Perform the preditions on the test data
var predictions = trainedModel.Transform(testData);
// 6. - Evalute the model
var metrics = ctx.BinaryClassification.Evaluate(data: predictions);
By using the GetColumn and CreateEnumerable methods, you can find the data that the model didn't predict correctly.
After you the metrics, use the GetColumn method on the predictions that were from the test data set to get the original label values. Then, use the CreateEnuemrable method to get the predictions that will hold the predicted values. Optionally, you can get the sentiment text as well.
var originalLabels = predictions.GetColumn<bool>("Label").ToArray();
var sentimentText = predictions.GetColumn<string>(nameof(SentimentData.SentimentText)).ToArray();
var predictedLabels = context.Data.CreateEnumerable<SentimentPrediction>(predictions, reuseRowObject: false).ToArray();
After getting the data, just loop through one of them (I did a count of the original labels) and you can access the data at each iteration. From there you can check if the actual label doesn't equal the predicted value to only print out the values that the model didn't get correctly.
for (int i = 0; i < originalLabels.Count(); i++)
{
string outputText = String.Empty;
if (originalLabels[i] != predictedLabels[i].Prediction)
{
outputText = $"Text - {sentimentText[i]} | ";
outputText += $"Original - {originalLabels[i]} | ";
outputText += $"Predicted - {predictedLabels[i].Prediction}";
Console.WriteLine(outputText);
}
}
With that you have the data that you need. :)
Hope that helps!
From your comment, I believe the method you are looking for can be found in the keras library. The method should be keras.models.predict_classes as found on their documentation page.
This will provide you with an array of predicted outputs, which you can then compare to the ground truths. Visit the documentation to see the parameters.
Hope this helps!
I have a classification model in TF and can get a list of probabilities for the next class (preds). Now I want to select the highest element (argmax) and display its class label.
This may seems silly, but how can I get the class label that matches a position in the predictions tensor?
feed_dict={g['x']: current_char}
preds, state = sess.run([g['preds'],g['final_state']], feed_dict)
prediction = tf.argmax(preds, 1)
preds gives me a vector of predictions for each class. Surely there must be an easy way to just output the most likely class (label)?
Some info about my model:
x = tf.placeholder(tf.int32, [None, num_steps], name='input_placeholder')
y = tf.placeholder(tf.int32, [None, 1], name='labels_placeholder')
batch_size = batch_size = tf.shape(x)[0]
x_one_hot = tf.one_hot(x, num_classes)
rnn_inputs = [tf.squeeze(i, squeeze_dims=[1]) for i in
tf.split(x_one_hot, num_steps, 1)]
tmp = tf.stack(rnn_inputs)
print(tmp.get_shape())
tmp2 = tf.transpose(tmp, perm=[1, 0, 2])
print(tmp2.get_shape())
rnn_inputs = tmp2
with tf.variable_scope('softmax'):
W = tf.get_variable('W', [state_size, num_classes])
b = tf.get_variable('b', [num_classes], initializer=tf.constant_initializer(0.0))
rnn_outputs = rnn_outputs[:, num_steps - 1, :]
rnn_outputs = tf.reshape(rnn_outputs, [-1, state_size])
y_reshaped = tf.reshape(y, [-1])
logits = tf.matmul(rnn_outputs, W) + b
predictions = tf.nn.softmax(logits)
A prediction is an array of n types of classes(labels). It represents the model's "confidence" that the image corresponds to each of its classes(labels). You can check which label has the highest confidence value by using:
prediction = np.argmax(preds, 1)
After getting this highest element index using (argmax function) out of other probabilities, you need to place this index into class labels to find the exact class name associated with this index.
class_names[prediction]
Please refer to this link for more understanding.
You can use tf.reduce_max() for this. I would refer you to this answer.
Let me know if it works - will edit if it doesn't.
Mind that there are sometimes several ways to load a dataset. For instance with fashion MNIST the tutorial could lead you to use load_data() and then to create your own structure to interpret a prediction. However you can also load these data by using tensorflow_datasets.load(...) like here after installing tensorflow-datasets which gives you access to some DatasetInfo. So for instance if your prediction is 9 you can tell it's a boot with:
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
_, ds_info = tfds.load('fashion_mnist', with_info=True)
print(ds_info.features['label'].names[9])
When you use softmax, the labels you train the model on are either numbers 0..n or one-hot encoded values. So if original labels of your data are let's say string names, you must map them to integers first and keep the mapping as a variable (such as 0 -> "apple", 1 -> "orange", 2 -> "pear" ...).
When using integers (with loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy'), you get predictions as an array of probabilities, you just find the array index with the max value. You can use this predicted index to reverse-map to your label:
predictedIndex = np.argmax(predictions) // 2
predictedLabel = indexToLabelMap[predictedIndex] // "pear"
If you use one-hot encoded labels (with loss='categorical_crossentropy'), the predicted index corresponds with the "hot" index of your label.
Just for reference, I needed this info when I was working with MNIST dataset used in Google's Machine learning crash course. There is also a good classification tutorial in the Tensorflow docs.
I'm new to neural networks. I've been trying to implement a two layer network to learn the XOR function using the backpropagation algorithm. The hidden layer has 2 units and the output layer is having 1 unit. All units use the sigmoid activation function.
I'm initializing the weights between -1 to +1 and have a +1 bias.
The problem is that the network learns the function very small number of times when re-initialized from scratch using some other random values of weights. It's learning the other boolean functions (AND, OR) in very small number of iterations, almost every time for almost all randomly assigned weights. The problem is with the XOR function - it doesn't converge to optimal values for some values of random weights.
I'm using stochastic gradient descent, backpropagation for learning.
My code : http://ideone.com/IYPW2N
Hidden layer's compute output function code:
public double computeOutput(double[] input){
this.input = input;
output = bias+w[0]*input[0] + w[1]*input[1];
output = 1/(1+Math.pow(Math.E, -output));
return output;
}
Compute Error Function code:
public double computeError(double w, double outputUnitError){
error = (output)*(1-output)*(outputUnitError*w);
return error;
}
Fixing errors for hidden units :
public void fixError(){
for(int i=0;i<input.length;++i) w[i] += n*error*input[i];
}
Output unit's compute output function:
public void computeOutput(double[] input) {
this.input = input;
output = bias+input[0]*w[0]+input[1]*w[1];
output = 1/(1+Math.pow(Math.E, -output));
}
Output unit's computeError function:
public void computeError(double t){
this.t = t;
error = (output)*(1-output)*(t-output);
}
Output Unit's fixError function (updating the weights):
public void fixError() {
for(int i=0;i<w.length;++i) w[i] += n*error*input[i];
}
The code stops training as soon as in any iteration, all examples are classified correctly. It stops otherwise when number of iterations exceeds 90k.
The learning rate is set to 0.05. If the output unit's value is greater than 0.5, it's counted as +1, otherwise a 0.
Training Examples:
static Example[] examples = {
new Example(new double[]{0, 0}, 0),
new Example(new double[]{0, 1}, 1),
new Example(new double[]{1, 0}, 1),
new Example(new double[]{1, 1}, 0)
};
Output from code:
Iterations > 90000, stop...
Displaying outputs for all examples...
0.018861254512881773
0.7270271284494716
0.5007550527204925
0.5024353957353963
Training complete. No of iterations = 45076
Displaying outputs for all examples...
0.3944511789979849
0.5033004761575361
0.5008283246200929
0.2865272493546562
Training complete. No of iterations = 39707
Displaying outputs for all examples...
0.39455754434259843
0.5008762488126696
0.5029579167912538
0.28715696580224176
Iterations > 90000, stop...
Displaying outputs for all examples...
0.43116164638530535
0.32096730276984053
0.9758219334403757
0.32228953888593287
I've tried several values for the learning rate and increased the number of hidden layer units, but still it's not learning XOR.
Please correct me where I'm getting it wrong or if there's a bug in the implementation.
I checked out other threads but did not get any satisfactory solution to my problem.
You are supposed to learn bias too, while your code assumes that bias is constant (you should have weight connected to bias). Without bias, you will not be able to learn XOR.
Say I have a feature vector [v1,v2,v3],
then I have a decision function a*v1+b*v2+c*v3 =d
how do I get the values (a,b,c,d) using the inforrmation in svm_model?
I saw that these two fields in svm_model
public double[][] sv_coef;// coefficients for SVs in decision functions (sv_coef[k-1][l])
public double[] rho;// constants in decision functions (rho[k*(k-1)/2])
I suspect it could be essential for getting the decision function.
There is also a SVs field in svm_model. Your decision function is wv+b=0, where v = [v1,v2,v3]. Then,
w = SVs' * msv_coef;
b = -.rho;
For multi-class SVM, you may also need another field called Label
if Label(1) == -1
w = -w;
b = -b;
end
Check the FAQ part for more details.
I am implementing Naive Bayes algorithm for text classification. I have ~1000 documents for training and 400 documents for testing. I think I've implemented training part correctly, but I am confused in testing part. Here is what I've done briefly:
In my training function:
vocabularySize= GetUniqueTermsInCollection();//get all unique terms in the entire collection
spamModelArray[vocabularySize];
nonspamModelArray[vocabularySize];
for each training_file{
class = GetClassLabel(); // 0 for spam or 1 = non-spam
document = GetDocumentID();
counterTotalTrainingDocs ++;
if(class == 0){
counterTotalSpamTrainingDocs++;
}
for each term in document{
freq = GetTermFrequency; // how many times this term appears in this document?
id = GetTermID; // unique id of the term
if(class = 0){ //SPAM
spamModelArray[id]+= freq;
totalNumberofSpamWords++; // total number of terms marked as spam in the training docs
}else{ // NON-SPAM
nonspamModelArray[id]+= freq;
totalNumberofNonSpamWords++; // total number of terms marked as non-spam in the training docs
}
}//for
for i in vocabularySize{
spamModelArray[i] = spamModelArray[i]/totalNumberofSpamWords;
nonspamModelArray[i] = nonspamModelArray[i]/totalNumberofNonSpamWords;
}//for
priorProb = counterTotalSpamTrainingDocs/counterTotalTrainingDocs;// calculate prior probability of the spam documents
}
I think I understood and implemented training part correctly, but I am not sure I could implemented testing part properly. In here, I am trying to go through each test document and I calculate logP(spam|d) and logP(non-spam|d) for each document. Then I compare these two quantities in order to determine the class (spam/non-spam).
In my testing function:
vocabularySize= GetUniqueTermsInCollection;//get all unique terms in the entire collection
for each testing_file:
document = getDocumentID;
logProbabilityofSpam = 0;
logProbabilityofNonSpam = 0;
for each term in document{
freq = GetTermFrequency; // how many times this term appears in this document?
id = GetTermID; // unique id of the term
// logP(w1w2.. wn) = C(wj)∗logP(wj)
logProbabilityofSpam+= freq*log(spamModelArray[id]);
logProbabilityofNonSpam+= freq*log(nonspamModelArray[id]);
}//for
// Now I am calculating the probability of being spam for this document
if (logProbabilityofNonSpam + log(1-priorProb) > logProbabilityofSpam +log(priorProb)) { // argmax[logP(i|ck) + logP(ck)]
newclass = 1; //not spam
}else{
newclass = 0; // spam
}
}//for
My problem is; I want to return the probability of each class instead of exact 1's and 0's (spam/non-spam). I want to see e.g. newclass = 0.8684212 so I can apply threshold later on. But I am confused here. How can I calculate the probability for each document? Can I use logProbabilities to calculate it?
The probability of the data described by a set of features {F1, F2, ..., Fn} belonging in class C, according to the naïve Bayes probability model, is
P(C|F) = P(C) * (P(F1|C) * P(F2|C) * ... * P(Fn|C)) / P(F1, ..., Fn)
You have all the terms (in logarithmic form), except for the 1 / P( F1, ..., Fn) term since that's not used in the naïve Bayes classifier that you're implementing. (Strictly, the MAP classifier.)
You'd have to collect frequencies of the features as well, and from them calculate
P(F1, ..., Fn) = P(F1) * ... * P(Fn)