Readline has the so-called 'numeric arguments' that repeats the following command several times, e.g. M-5 a will insert aaaaa. But M-5 9 won't insert 99999. Is there any way to achieve this except typing it literally?
EDIT: I mean the GNU Readline library.
Related
I am trying to use the pipe character "|" in SPSS syntax with strange results:
In the syntax it appears like this:
But when I copy this line from the syntax window to here, this is what I get:
SELECT IF(SEX = 1 SEX = 2).
The pipe just disappears!
If I run this line, this is the output:
SELECT IF(SEX = 1 SEX = 2).
Error # 4007 in column 20. Text: SEX
The expression is incomplete. Check for missing operands, invalid operators,
unmatched parentheses or excessive string length.
Execution of this command stops.
So the pipe is invisible to the program too!
When I save this syntax and reopen it, the pipe is gone...
The only way I found to get SPSS to work with the pipe is when I edited the syntax (adding the pipe) and saved it in an alternative editor (notepad++ in this case). Now, without opening the syntax, I ran it from another syntax using insert command, and it worked.
EDIT: some background info:
I have spss version 23 (+service pack 3) 64 bit.
The same things happens if I use my locale (encoding: windows-1255) or Unicode (Encoding: UTF-8). Suspecting my Hebrew keyboard I tried copying syntax from the web with same results.
Can anyone shed any light on this subject?
Turns out (according to SPSS support) that's a version specific (ver. 21) bug and was fixed in later versions.
I have a text file with unknown character formatting, below is a snapshot
\216\175\217\133\217\136\216\185 \216\167\217\132\217\133\216\177\216\163\216\169 \216\163\217\130\217\136\217\137 \217\134\217\129\217\136\216\176\216\167\217\139 \217\133\217\134 \216\167\217\132\217\130\217\136\216\167\217\134\217\138\217\134
Anyone has an idea how can I convert it to normal text?
This is apparently how Lua stores strings. Each \nnn represents a single byte where nnn is the byte's value in decimal. (A similar notation is commonly used for octal, which threw me off for longer than I would like to admit. I should have noticed that there were digits 8 and 9 in the data!) This particular string is just plain old UTF-8.
$ perl -ple 's/\\(\d{3})/chr($1)/ge' <<<'\216\175\217\133\217\136\216\185 \216\167\217\132\217\133\216\177\216\163\216\169 \216\163\217\130\217\136\217\137 \217\134\217\129\217\136\216\176\216\167\217\139 \217\133\217\134 \216\167\217\132\217\130\217\136\216\167\217\134\217\138\217\134'
دموع المرأة أقوى نفوذاً من القوانين
You would obviously get a similar result simply by printing the string from Lua, though I'm not familiar enough with the language to tell you how exactly to do that.
Post scriptum: I had to look this up for other reasons, so here's how to execute Lua from the command line.
lua -e 'print("\216\175\217\133\217\136\216\185 \216\167\217\132\217\133\216\177\216\163\216\169 \216\163\217\130\217\136\217\137 \217\134\217\129\217\136\216\176\216\167\217\139 \217\133\217\134 \216\167\217\132\217\130\217\136\216\167\217\134\217\138\217\134")'
I'm learning COBOL programming and using GNUCobol (on Linux) to compile and test some simple programs. In one of those programs I have found an unexpected behavior that I don't understand: when reading a sequential file of records, I'm always getting one extra record and, when writing these records to a report, the last record is duplicated.
I have made a very simple program to reproduce this behavior. In this case, I have a text file with a single line of text: "0123456789". The program should count the characters in the file (or 1 chararacter long records) and I expect it to display "10" as a result, but instead I get "11".
Also, when displaying the records, as they are read, I get the following output:
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
(There are two blank spaces between 9 and 11).
This is the relevant part of this program:
FD SIMPLE.
01 SIMPLE-RECORD.
05 SMP-NUMBER PIC 9(1).
[...]
PROCEDURE DIVISION.
000-COUNT-RECORDS.
OPEN INPUT SIMPLE.
PERFORM UNTIL SIMPLE-EOF
READ SIMPLE
AT END
SET SIMPLE-EOF TO TRUE
NOT AT END
DISPLAY SMP-NUMBER
ADD 1 TO RECORD-COUNT
END-READ
END-PERFORM
DISPLAY RECORD-COUNT.
CLOSE SIMPLE.
STOP RUN.
I'm using the default options for the compiler, and I have tried using 'WITH TEST {BEFORE|AFTER}' but the result is the same. What can be the cause of this behavior or how can I get the expected result?
Edit: I tried using an "empty" file as data source, expecting a 0 record count, using two different methods to empty the file:
$ echo "" > SIMPLE
This way the record count is 1 (ls -l gives a size of 1 byte for the file).
$ rm SIMPLE
$ touch SIMPLE
This way the record count is 0 (ls -l gives a size of 0 bytes for the file). So I guess that somehow the compiled program is detecting an extra character, but I don't know how to avoid this.
I found out that the cause of this behavior is the automatic newline character that vim seems to append when saving the data file.
After disabling this in vim this way
:set binary
:set noeol
the program works as expected.
Edit: A more elegant way to prevent this problem, when working with data files created from a text editor, is using ORGANIZATION IS LINE SEQUENTIAL in the SELECT clause.
Since the problem was caused by the data format, should I delete this question?
I searched a lot around but found no answer:
I have to use a lot of command line options which I planed to parse with optarg (which works well for single char) - if I count all arguments the alphabet has to less letters :(
So my plan was to use double letter codes (-a, -ab, -ac ) how can I parse them ?
Would it easier to solve by using boost:programoptions?
I am learning ETS. I did:
Sometab = ets:new(sometable, [bag]).
ets:insert(Sometab, {109, ash, 8}).
Then I typed:
ets:match(Sometab, {109, ash, '$1'}).
However instead of getting 8 - I am getting: ["\b"] as output!
You are getting the correct answer. However, the erlang shell prints [8] as "\b" since the ascii code for backspace is 8.
Erlang has no string type. Strings in erlang are represented simply as a list of integers and the Erlang shell prints this list as a string if the list contains integers withing the ascii range only.
This can indeed be confusing at times.