Is there any way in Struts2 by which I can get list of namespaces in my App ?
I want this as set or list at runtime .
I am using Struts2 RestActionMapper plugin.
When there invalid namespace is specified for valid action, Struts is throwing namespace error.
But I could not redirected to standard error page when this error occurs. I tried almost all options e.g.global error mapping default namespace etc . Nothing worked. So thought it would be great if I could get list of namespaces in my app, thus i could have checked invalid namespace against my list of valid namespaces and accordingly I could have thrown generic error which would finally result in my standard error page.
I am looking for how to get list of all namespaces in my project.
So basically I want to do something like this.
validNamespaces = getNamespaces();
if(validNamespaces.contains(namespaceRetrivedFromRestPlugin))
{Sysout("This is valid namespace.")}
else
{Sysout("Invalid namespace");}
This is possible, though like Steven has pretty much stated, I'm not convinced that this is the right approach to the problem you state of redirecting to an error page. But, I'll leave that part up to you and use this space to answer the namespace question.
This code will have to be in a Struts2-created object for the injection to work.
private Configuration configuration;
#Inject
public void setConfiguration(Configuration config) {
this.configuration = config;
}
protected Set<String> getNamespaces() {
Set<String> namespaces = Collections.emptySet();
Map<String, Map<String, ActionConfig>> allActionConfigs = this.configuration.getRuntimeConfiguration().getActionConfigs();
if (allActionConfigs != null) {
namespaces = allActionConfigs.keySet();
}
return namespaces;
}
The configuration can also be obtained from a ConfigurationManager. Also, you would obviously want to store these in a variable rather than calling above method over and over. If your object is, say, an interceptor, then you could call this method from the init() method and store it in a class-level variable.
Related
I'm trying to avoid referencing the concrete type library in my main project, but I'm getting this error:
No default instance or named instance 'Default' for requested plugin type StackExchangeChatInterfaces.IClient
1.) Container.GetInstance(StackExchangeChatInterfaces.IClient ,{username=; password=; defaultRoomUrl=; System.Action`2[System.Object,System.Object]=System.Action`2[System.Object,System.Object]})
I've setup my container to scan for assemblies, like so:
var container = new Container(x =>
{
x.Scan(scan =>
{
scan.AssembliesFromApplicationBaseDirectory();
scan.ExcludeNamespace("StructureMap");
scan.WithDefaultConventions();
scan.AddAllTypesOf<IMessageHandlers>();
});
//x.For<IClient>().Use<Client>(); //GetInstance will work if this line is not commented out.
});
When I try to get an instance, I get the error, my code for getting an instance is here:
chatInterface = container
.With("username").EqualTo(username)
.With("password").EqualTo(password)
.With("defaultRoomUrl").EqualTo(roomUrl)
.With<Action<object, object>>(delegate(object sender, object messageWrapper)
{
string message = ((dynamic)messageWrapper).Message;
Console.WriteLine("");
Console.WriteLine(message);
foreach (var item in messageHandlers)
{
item.MessageHandler.Invoke(message, chatInterface);
}
}).GetInstance<IClient>();
If I explicitly map the concrete class to the interface, everything works hunky dory, but that means I need to reference the project that Client is in, which I don't want to do.
This is really interesting. Looks like default conventions are not able to register types with such constructor (tried on both versions 2.6.3 and 3+). I was only registered when only parameterless constructor was specified. Looking at sources of both versions it is really suspicious as it should be registered. Deeper dive into the code would be needed...
Anyway try using custom registration convention:
public class ClientConvention : IRegistrationConvention
{
public void Process(Type type, Registry registry)
{
if (type.IsClass && !type.IsAbstract && !type.IsGenericType &&
type.GetInterfaces().Contains(typeof(IClient)))
{
registry.For(typeof(IClient)).Use(type);
}
}
}
Configure it like this:
var container = new Container(
c => c.Scan(
s =>
{
s.ExcludeNamespace("StructureMap");
s.WithDefaultConventions();
s.Convention<ClientConvention>();
s.AddAllTypesOf<IMessageHandlers>();
}));
and this should work just fine.
The default type scanning will not pick up concrete types whose constructor functions contain primitive arguments like strings, numbers, or dates. The thinking is that you'd effectively have to explicitly configure those inline dependencies anyway.
"but that means I need to reference the project that Client is in, which I don't want to do."
Does that actually matter? I think you're making things harder than they have to be by trying to eliminate the assembly reference.
I use tomcat 7.0 and JSF 2.1 and I have problem when I call in my .xhtml page something like that: #{homePage.get("userName")}
I get javax.el.ELException: Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at mainPacket.HomePageBean.get(HomePageBean.java:35)
I have ManagedBean like below:
#ManagedBean(name = "homePage")
#ViewScoped
public class HomePageBean {
private Map<String, Object> map;
public HomePageBean() {
map= FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().getSessionMap();
//remove unnecessary values from sessionMap
FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().getSessionMap().clear();
}
public String get(Object s){
return map.get(s).toString();
}
}
When I don't use clear, everything works ok. But I want to clear sessionMap. How to resolve it ?
Thanks
Java is an object oriented language. It doesn't give you a copy of the object everytime you request it. No, it gives you a reference to the object instance in memory. At the moment you invoke Map#clear() on the session map, then the map reference which you obtained just beforehand is basically also emptied, because it points to exactly the same map instance which you just emptied!
Your concrete functional requirement is nowhere mentioned in the question and the whole design in the code posted so far makes honestly no utter sense (I can't imagine any sensible real world use case for this), so it's hard to propose you the right solution. Best what you can get is the advice to add a nullcheck.
public String get(Object s){
Object value = map.get(s);
return (value != null) ? value.toString() : null;
}
You should by the way be very careful with abruptly emptying the session map this way. JSF stores view scoped and session scoped managed beans in there and it's also used by the flash scope.
I have MVC areas in external libraries which have their own area registration code just as a normal MVC area would. This area registration gets called for each dll (module) and I have verified the RouteTable contains all the routes from the loaded modules once loading has been completed.
When I reference these external areas in the main site they get pulled into the bin directory and load up fine. That is, when a request is made for a route that exists in an external library, the correct type is passed to my custom controller factory (Ninject) and the controller can be instantiated.
Once I move these dll's outside of the bin directory however (say to a Modules folder), there appears to be an issue with routing. I have checked that the RouteTable has all the required routes but by the time a request makes its way into the ninject controller factory the requested type is null. From reading here an SO link here this behaviour seems to occur when ASP.NET MVC cannot find the controller matching the requested route or does not know how to make sense of the route.
When loading the modules externally I have ensured that the modules that I want loaded are loaded into the app domain via a call to Assemby.LoadFrom(modulePath);
I did some research and it appears that when attempting to load a library outside of bin you need to specify private probing in app.config as pointed out here;. I have mine set to 'bin\Modules' which is where the mvc area modules get moved too.
Does anyone have any ideas why simply moving an mvc area project outside of the bin folder would cause the requested type passed into the controller factory to be null resulting in the controller to be instantiated?
Edit:
All routes registered in external areas have the namespace of the controller specified in the route
Below is a fragment of code that creates a new Ninject kernel, reads a list of module names from a file to enable, and then goes searching for the enabled modules in the bin/Modules directory. The module is loaded via the assembly loader, has its area(s) registered and then loaded into the ninject kernel.
// comma separated list of modules to enable
string moduleCsv = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Modules.Enabled"];
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(moduleCsv)) {
string[] enabledModuleList = moduleCsv.Replace(" ", "").Split(new char[] { ',' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
_Modules = enabledModuleList ?? new string[0];
// load enabled modules from bin/Modules.
var moduleList = Directory.GetFiles(Server.MapPath("~" + Path.DirectorySeparatorChar + "bin" + Path.DirectorySeparatorChar + "Modules"), "*.dll");
foreach (string enabledModule in enabledModuleList) {
string modulePath = moduleList.Single(m => m.Contains(enabledModule));
// using code adapted from from AssemblyLoader
var asm = AssemblyLoader.LoadAssembly(modulePath);
// register routes for module
AreaRegistrationUtil.RegisterAreasForAssemblies(asm);
// load into Ninject kernel
kernel.Load(asm);
}
}
This is the crux of the Ninject controller factory that receives the aforementioned Ninject kernel and handles requests to make controllers. For controllers that exist within an assembly in bin/Modules the GetControllerType(...) returns null for the requested controller name.
public class NinjectControllerFactory : DefaultControllerFactory
{
#region Instance Variables
private IKernel _Kernel;
#endregion
#region Constructors
public NinjectControllerFactory(IKernel kernel)
{
_Kernel = kernel;
}
protected override Type GetControllerType(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext requestContext, string controllerName)
{
// Is null for controller names requested outside of bin directory.
var type = base.GetControllerType(requestContext, controllerName);
return type;
}
protected override IController GetControllerInstance(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType)
{
IController controller = null;
if (controllerType != null)
controller = _Kernel.Get(controllerType) as IController;
return controller;
}
}
Update on Ninject Nuget Install
I couldn't get it to install Ninject.MVC3 via NuGet for some reason. Visual Studio was giving some schemaVersion error when clicking the install button (I have installed other Nuget packages like ELMAH btw).
I did find out something else that was interesting though, and that is that if I pass in the extra module assembilies to the NinjectControllerFactory I have and search those when the type cannot be resolved it finds the correct type and is able to build the controller. This leads to another strange problem.
The first route to be requested from an external module is the /Account/LogOn in the auth and registration module. The virtual path provider throws an error here after it has located the view and attempts to render it out complaining of a missing namespace. This causes an error route to fire off which is handled by an ErrorHandling module. Strangely enough, this loads and render fine!
So I am still stuck with two issues;
1) Having to do a bit of a dodgy hack and pass in the extra module assemblies to the NinjectControllerFactory in order to be able to resolve types for Controllers in external modules
2) An error with one particular module where it complains about a namespace not being found
These two issues are obviously connected because the assembly loading just isn't loading up and making everything available that needs to be. If all these mvc areas are loaded from the bin directory everything works fine. So it is clearly a namespacing/assembly load issue.
LoadFrom load the assembly into the loading context. These types are not available to the other classes in the default Load context. Probably this is the reason why the controller is not found.
If you know which assemblies have to be loaded then you should always use Assembly.Load(). If you don't know which assemblies are depolyed in the directory then either guess from the filesnames the assembly names or use Assembly.ReflectionOnlyLoadFrom() (preferably using a temporary AppDomain) to get the assembly names. Then load the assemblies using Assembly.Load() with the assembly name.
If your assemblies contain NinjectModules you can also use kernel.Load() which does what I described above. But it only loads assemblies containing at least one module.
Read up http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd153782.aspx about the different assembly contexts.
Here is a small extract from the Ninject codebase. I removed the unnecessary stuff but did not try to compile or run so probably there are minor issues with this.
public class AssemblyLoader
{
public void LoadAssemblies(IEnumerable<string> filenames)
{
GetAssemblyNames(filenames).Select(name => Assembly.Load(name));
}
private static IEnumerable<AssemblyName> GetAssemblyNames(IEnumerable<string> filenames)
{
var temporaryDomain = CreateTemporaryAppDomain();
try
{
var assemblyNameRetriever = (AssemblyNameRetriever)temporaryDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap(typeof(AssemblyNameRetriever).Assembly.FullName, typeof(AssemblyNameRetriever).FullName);
return assemblyNameRetriever.GetAssemblyNames(filenames.ToArray());
}
finally
{
AppDomain.Unload(temporaryDomain);
}
}
private static AppDomain CreateTemporaryAppDomain()
{
return AppDomain.CreateDomain(
"AssemblyNameEvaluation",
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.Evidence,
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation);
}
private class AssemblyNameRetriever : MarshalByRefObject
{
public IEnumerable<AssemblyName> GetAssemblyNames(IEnumerable<string> filenames)
{
var result = new List<AssemblyName>();
foreach(var filename in filenames)
{
Assembly assembly;
try
{
assembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(filename);
}
catch (BadImageFormatException)
{
// Ignore native assemblies
continue;
}
result.Add(assembly.GetName(false));
}
return result;
}
}
}
Recently I've switched to Ninject 2.0 release and started getting the following error:
Error occured: Error activating SomeController
More than one matching bindings are available.
Activation path:
1) Request for SomeController
Suggestions:
1) Ensure that you have defined a binding for SomeController only once.
However, I'm unable to find certain reproduction path. Sometimes it occurs, sometimes it does not.
I'm using NinjectHttpApplication for automatic controllers injection. Controllers are defined in separate assembly:
public class App : NinjectHttpApplication
{
protected override IKernel CreateKernel()
{
INinjectModule[] modules = new INinjectModule[] {
new MiscModule(),
new ProvidersModule(),
new RepositoryModule(),
new ServiceModule()
};
return new StandardKernel(modules);
}
protected override void OnApplicationStarted()
{
RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
RegisterAllControllersIn("Sample.Mvc");
base.OnApplicationStarted();
}
/* ............. */
}
Maybe someone is familiar with this error.
Any advice?
I finally figured this issue out recently. Apparently, the NinjectHttpApplication.RegisterAllControllersIn() function doesn't do all of the proper bindings needed. It binds your concrete controller implementations to IController requests. For example, if you have a controller class called SampleMvcController, which inherits from System.Web.Mvc.Controller. It would do the following named binding during application start:
kernel.Bind<IController>().To(SampleMvcController).InTransientScope().Named("SampleMvc");
But when debugging the NinjectControllerFactory, I find that request are being made for the Ninject Kernel to return an object for the class "SampleMvcController", not for a concrete implementation of IController, using the named binding of "SampleMvc".
Because of this, when the first web request that involves the SampleMvcController is made, it creates a binding of SampleMvcController to itself. This is not thread safe though. So if you have several web requests being made at once, the bindings can potentially happen more than once, and now you are left with this error for having multiple bindings for the SampleMvcController.
You can verify this by quickly refreshing an MVC URL, right after causing your web application to restart.
The fix:
The simplest way to fix this issue is to create a new NinjectModule for your controller bindings, and to load this module during application start. Within this module, you self bind each of your defined controllers, like so:
class ControllerModule : StandardModule {
public override Load() {
Bind<SampleMvcController>().ToSelf();
Bind<AnotherMvcController>().ToSelf();
}
}
But if you don't mind changing the Ninject source code, you can modify the RegisterAllControllersIn() function to self bind each controller it comes across.
I have been dealing with this problem for months. I tried so many options but was unable to come to a solution. I knew that it was a threading problem because it would only occur when there was a heavy load on my site. Just recently a bug was reported and fixed in the ninject source code that solves this problem.
Here is a reference to the issue. It was fixed in build 2.1.0.70 of the Ninject source. The key change was in KernelBase.cs by removing the line
context.Plan = planner.GetPlan(service);
and replacing it with
lock (planner)
{
context.Plan = planner.GetPlan(service);
}
To use this new build with MVC you will need to get the latest build of Ninject then get the latest build of ninject.web.mvc. Build ninject.web.mvc with the new Ninject build.
I have been using this new build for about a week with a heavy load and no problems. That is the longest it has gone without a problem so I would consider this to be a solution.
Are you sure you really are creating a single completely new Kernel from scratch in your OnApplicationStarted every time it's invoked ? If you're not and you're actually creating it once but potentially running the registration bit twice. Remember that you're not guaranteed to only ever have one App class instantiated ever within a given AppDomain.
My answer was a bit more obvious.
I had declared the binding for one of my controllers more than once during refactor of my code.
I added this to my global.ascx.cs file:
public void RegisterAllControllersInFix(Assembly assembly)
{
RegisterAllControllersInFix(assembly, GetControllerName);
}
public void RegisterAllControllersInFix(Assembly assembly, Func<Type, string> namingConvention)
{
foreach (Type type in assembly.GetExportedTypes().Where(IsController))
Kernel.Bind(type).ToSelf();
}
private static bool IsController(Type type)
{
return typeof(IController).IsAssignableFrom(type) && type.IsPublic && !type.IsAbstract && !type.IsInterface;
}
private static string GetControllerName(Type type)
{
string name = type.Name.ToLowerInvariant();
if (name.EndsWith("controller"))
name = name.Substring(0, name.IndexOf("controller"));
return name;
}
Then called it from my OnApplicationStarted() method as follows:
RegisterAllControllersIn(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
RegisterAllControllersInFix(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
Difficult to know whether this fixed it though because it's so intermittent.
I was wondering if I can capture the result of an action after the result returns and the JSP is rendered. I want to be able to take the entire result (generated HTML) and push it into memcached so I can bring it via Nginx with-out hitting the application server. Any ideas?
PS: I know I can run the interceptor after the action executes but before the result returns and the JSP is rendered, but not after the JSP is rendered.
I haven't found a way to do this inside of struts2, your best bet it to create a servlet Filter and have it modify the OutputStream.
http://onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/11/19/filters.html
Hey I know its quite late now to answer you might have already found out the answer, however for others to benefit I am posting the answer.
One thing that is very similar to what you are doing is done by sitemesh filter.
Yes, filter comes before and after the Struts2 filter itself, so you can mess with the inputs and outputs easily.
But struts does evaluate JSP/freemarker/velocity and generate the final html which is passed to the user. JSP is a bit trickey because internally a servlet is called but check out org.apache.struts2.views.freemarker.FreemarkerResult class, you can see the actual html getting generated in template.process(model, writer);. This writer is actually ServletActionContext.getResponse().getWriter();
Now to get the html all you need to do is
ServletActionContext.getResponse().getWriter().toString() //This does not work out of box. To get the toString() to work you need to use a ResponseWrapper - which is the same method to get result html in Filters. See- Programming Customized Requests and Responses.
Listing to modify resulting html in struts 2. This is not tested, but it is extracted from my code I have written earlier for custom template engine. I will probably post full description in Custom template engine for struts2
public class DecoratorInterceptor implements Interceptor {
public String intercept(ActionInvocation invocation) throws Exception {
final ActionContext context = invocation.getInvocationContext ();
HttpServletResponse responseParent = (HttpServletResponse)
context.get(ServletActionContext.HTTP_RESPONSE);
CharResponseWrapper wrapper = new CharResponseWrapper(responseParent);
ServletActionContext.setResponse(wrapper);
//Actual Action called
String result = invocation.invoke();
String htmlReturned = wrapper.toString();
//play with htmlReturned ...
String modifiedhtml = pushintoMemCache(htmlReturned );
CharArrayWriter car = new CharArrayWriter();
car.write(modifiedhtml );
PrintWriter out = responseParent.getWriter();
out.write(car.toString());
out.flush();
}
#Override
public void destroy() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
#Override
public void init() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
}
Read this article - http://struts.apache.org/2.0.6/docs/interceptors.html
SUMMARY:When you request a resource
that maps to an "action", the
framework invokes the Action object.
But, before the Action is executed,
the invocation can be intercepted by
another object. After the Action
executes, the invocation could be
intercepted again. Unsurprisingly, we
call these objects "Interceptors."
Question: How do you determine if the view has been generated? Do you set a request header or an some sort of a flag to determine if the view has been generated?
You could try throwing a MemCachedException to indicate that it is time to load into a mem cache. Your interceptor code could read
try {
return invocation.invoke();
} catch (MemCachedException mce) {
// Your code to upload to MemCache.
} finally {
// blah blah clean up.
}
Within your interceptor's intercept() method, the ActionInvocation parameter has a getResult() method which returns null before Action execution (i. e. before you call invocation.invoke() in your intercept() method) and contains an implementation of Result afterwards. That object should give you some way to access the data you need, but how this is done probably depends on the class that is actually used.
See also my somewhat related question and the answer I posted after figuring it out.