Is there a more succinct way of expressing the following:
if Model.all
array = Model.all
array.each do |a|
a.info
end
end
In my case, Model.all is a helper method (get_all_of_those()).
In the view, I am displaying data in tables based on the results. a.info might be
"<div class='row'>#{a.name}</div>"
Model.all is always truthy and is always an array-like object (Strictly speaking it's ActiveRecord::Relation object in rails 4; an Array in rails 3). You can just do:
Model.all.each do |a|
a.info
end
If there are no models, the loop will not be executed even once.
(Note however, that this code doesn't do anything interesting with models, so you need to update your question with: What do you want the final result to be? There is a chance that you are looking for Model.pluck(:info))
If info is a field in the database, you could do this more efficiently with
array = Model.pluck(:info)
Try this out:
Model.all.find_each do |a|
a.info
end
Read more about find_each in the documentation.
I'm iterating over an array of instances of a Rails model. Here is my code:
product_details.each do |product_detail|
product_detail.label = Backend::ProductGroup.where(product_group_number: product_detail.product_group).first.label
end
The attribute 'label' from 'product_detail' isn't an attribute from my Rails ActiveRecord model. I added it with attr_accessor in my class definition. I did this, because I wanted to add this attribute dynamically, only when I need to do this. When I ran the code without the 'each' iteration in my rails console it works just fine. But when I execute the above code I get the following error message:
NoMethodError: undefined method 'label' for nil:NilClass
Did I do something obviously wrong?
Many thanks in advance.
You likely have several product_detail items that have no matching product_group. So calling .first on the empty collection returns nil. To get around the error, you can test if the product_group was found before proceeding:
product_details.each do |product_detail|
product_group = Backend::ProductGroup.where(product_group_number: product_detail.product_group).first
product_detail.label = product_group.label if product_group
end
You can also do this more efficiently like so:
group_labels = BackEnd::ProductGroup.
where(product_group_number: product_details.map(&:product_group)).
inject({}){|m, g| m[g.product_group_number] = g.label; m}
product_details.each do |product_detail|
product_detail.label = group_labels[product_detail.product_group]
end
This will result in a single database call to grab all related groups, and put the labels in a keyed hash for easy discovery and assignment.
I have a table in Rails and I would like to find all records of a table where a certain function returns true.
What is the best way to do this? I could of course iterate over all the records in the table and use conditional statements to test whether the function, given the individual record, returns true and add it to a list.
Is there any easier way of doing this something along the lines of Model.find(:all, :conditions => {...}) maybe?
Thanks
Class MyModel < ActiveRecord
def self.targetted
find_each.select(&:predicate_method?)
end
def predicate_method?
#something that returns either true or false
end
end
this is a bit more Rails idiomatic :
find_each will fetch your record by batches of 1000. it is better than all for your memory
&:predicate_method : transforming a symbol into a Proc (with the # operator) will actually make your code call the method on each of the passed objects
def record_that_returns_true_for_xfunction
Model.all.select {|record| xfunction(record.some_column) == true}
end
This is seems like what you are looking for. This method will return an array of all the records where xfunction(record.some_column) == true.
This question already has answers here:
How to avoid NoMethodError for nil elements when accessing nested hashes? [duplicate]
(4 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
In Rails we can do the following in case a value doesn't exist to avoid an error:
#myvar = #comment.try(:body)
What is the equivalent when I'm digging deep into a hash and don't want to get an error?
#myvar = session[:comments][#comment.id]["temp_value"]
# [:comments] may or may not exist here
In the above case, session[:comments]try[#comment.id] doesn't work. What would?
You forgot to put a . before the try:
#myvar = session[:comments].try(:[], #comment.id)
since [] is the name of the method when you do [#comment.id].
The announcement of Ruby 2.3.0-preview1 includes an introduction of Safe navigation operator.
A safe navigation operator, which already exists in C#, Groovy, and
Swift, is introduced to ease nil handling as obj&.foo. Array#dig and
Hash#dig are also added.
This means as of 2.3 below code
account.try(:owner).try(:address)
can be rewritten to
account&.owner&.address
However, one should be careful that & is not a drop in replacement of #try. Take a look at this example:
> params = nil
nil
> params&.country
nil
> params = OpenStruct.new(country: "Australia")
#<OpenStruct country="Australia">
> params&.country
"Australia"
> params&.country&.name
NoMethodError: undefined method `name' for "Australia":String
from (pry):38:in `<main>'
> params.try(:country).try(:name)
nil
It is also including a similar sort of way: Array#dig and Hash#dig. So now this
city = params.fetch(:[], :country).try(:[], :state).try(:[], :city)
can be rewritten to
city = params.dig(:country, :state, :city)
Again, #dig is not replicating #try's behaviour. So be careful with returning values. If params[:country] returns, for example, an Integer, TypeError: Integer does not have #dig method will be raised.
The most beautiful solution is an old answer by Mladen Jablanović, as it lets you to dig in the hash deeper than you could with using direct .try() calls, if you want the code still look nice:
class Hash
def get_deep(*fields)
fields.inject(self) {|acc,e| acc[e] if acc}
end
end
You should be careful with various objects (especially params), because Strings and Arrays also respond to :[], but the returned value may not be what you want, and Array raises exception for Strings or Symbols used as indexes.
That is the reason why in the suggested form of this method (below) the (usually ugly) test for .is_a?(Hash) is used instead of (usually better) .respond_to?(:[]):
class Hash
def get_deep(*fields)
fields.inject(self) {|acc,e| acc[e] if acc.is_a?(Hash)}
end
end
a_hash = {:one => {:two => {:three => "asd"}, :arr => [1,2,3]}}
puts a_hash.get_deep(:one, :two ).inspect # => {:three=>"asd"}
puts a_hash.get_deep(:one, :two, :three ).inspect # => "asd"
puts a_hash.get_deep(:one, :two, :three, :four).inspect # => nil
puts a_hash.get_deep(:one, :arr ).inspect # => [1,2,3]
puts a_hash.get_deep(:one, :arr, :too_deep ).inspect # => nil
The last example would raise an exception: "Symbol as array index (TypeError)" if it was not guarded by this ugly "is_a?(Hash)".
The proper use of try with a hash is #sesion.try(:[], :comments).
#session.try(:[], :comments).try(:[], commend.id).try(:[], 'temp_value')
Update: As of Ruby 2.3 use #dig
Most objects that respond to [] expect an Integer argument, with Hash being an exception that will accept any object (such as strings or symbols).
The following is a slightly more robust version of Arsen7's answer that supports nested Array, Hash, as well as any other objects that expect an Integer passed to [].
It's not fool proof, as someone may have created an object that implements [] and does not accept an Integer argument. However, this solution works great in the common case e.g. pulling nested values from JSON (which has both Hash and Array):
class Hash
def get_deep(*fields)
fields.inject(self) { |acc, e| acc[e] if acc.is_a?(Hash) || (e.is_a?(Integer) && acc.respond_to?(:[])) }
end
end
It can be used the same as Arsen7's solution but also supports arrays e.g.
json = { 'users' => [ { 'name' => { 'first_name' => 'Frank'} }, { 'name' => { 'first_name' => 'Bob' } } ] }
json.get_deep 'users', 1, 'name', 'first_name' # Pulls out 'Bob'
say you want to find params[:user][:email] but it's not sure whether user is there in params or not. Then-
you can try:
params[:user].try(:[], :email)
It will return either nil(if user is not there or email is not there in user) or otherwise the value of email in user.
As of Ruby 2.3 this gets a little easier. Instead of having to nest try statements or define your own method you can now use Hash#dig (documentation).
h = { foo: {bar: {baz: 1}}}
h.dig(:foo, :bar, :baz) #=> 1
h.dig(:foo, :zot) #=> nil
Or in the example above:
session.dig(:comments, #comment.id, "temp_value")
This has the added benefit of being more like try than some of the examples above. If any of the arguments lead to the hash returning nil then it will respond nil.
#myvar = session.fetch(:comments, {}).fetch(#comment.id, {})["temp_value"]
From Ruby 2.0, you can do:
#myvar = session[:comments].to_h[#comment.id].to_h["temp_value"]
From Ruby 2.3, you can do:
#myvar = session.dig(:comments, #comment.id, "temp_value")
Another approach:
#myvar = session[:comments][#comment.id]["temp_value"] rescue nil
This might also be consider a bit dangerous because it can hide too much, personally I like it.
If you want more control, you may consider something like:
def handle # just an example name, use what speaks to you
raise $! unless $!.kind_of? NoMethodError # Do whatever checks or
# reporting you want
end
# then you may use
#myvar = session[:comments][#comment.id]["temp_value"] rescue handle
When you do this:
myhash[:one][:two][:three]
You're just chaining a bunch of calls to a "[]" method, an the error occurs if myhash[:one] returns nil, because nil doesn't have a [] method. So, one simple and rather hacky way is to add a [] method to Niclass, which returns nil: i would set this up in a rails app as follows:
Add the method:
#in lib/ruby_extensions.rb
class NilClass
def [](*args)
nil
end
end
Require the file:
#in config/initializers/app_environment.rb
require 'ruby_extensions'
Now you can call nested hashes without fear: i'm demonstrating in the console here:
>> hash = {:foo => "bar"}
=> {:foo=>"bar"}
>> hash[:foo]
=> "bar"
>> hash[:doo]
=> nil
>> hash[:doo][:too]
=> nil
Andrew's answer didn't work for me when I tried this again recently. Maybe something has changed?
#myvar = session[:comments].try('[]', #comment.id)
The '[]' is in quotes instead of a symbol :[]
Try to use
#myvar = session[:comments][#comment.id]["temp_value"] if session[:comments]
I has a model "modela" that has a has_many_through relationship with model "submodelb". In a controller I want to check if modela has any submodelb associated with it. I have tried the two code examples below; however, the both throw the error "undefined method `submodelbs'" if modela does not have any submodelbs. Please help me see what I am doing wrong.
Sample 1:
if !#modela.submodelbs.nil?
#submodelbs = #modela.submodelbs
else
#submodelbs = []
end
Sample 2:
if !#modela.submodelbs.empty?
#submodelbs = #modela.submodelbs
else
#submodelbs = []
end
You can use .present? which is the opposite of blank?
#submodelbs = #modela.submodelbs.present? ? #modela.submodelbs : []
But I think your problem is that #modela may be nil or you may have not defined associations correctly in the model.
The reader method produced by has_many_through always returns something that looks like an Array, so it should never return nil. So, can't you just return #modela.submodelbs always?
I use blank?
unless #modela.submodelbs.blank?
#modela has submodelbs
end
but error messege suggests that you may have something wrong with association definition...
Also what you are trying to achieve can be done with one-liner
#modela.submodelbs ||= []
if submodelbs are nil empty array will be assigned.
Why not just put your checks in a begin...rescue...end block?