I am struggling to pass an id successfully into my URL for the nested resource I have set up called Jobs.
The error I am getting when I try to pass the #job object into my link is as follows:
No route matches {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"jobs", :user_id=>1, :id=>nil}
Which clearly shows it can't find the id correctly and so is finding nil
At the moment I have my routes setup as so:
resources :users do
resources :jobs
end
and the link I have is <%= link_to "Edit", edit_user_job_path(#user.id,#job) %>
What is interesting is that if I pass the object #jobs with an 's' on the end it will load the page correctly but when I click on the link will try and add all of that users job id's.
In my controller for edit I have:
def edit
#user = current_user
#job = #user.jobs.find(params[:id])
end
Any help really would be much appreciated :)
UPDATE
Okay I was defining the object on the wrong page of my controller (under edit instead of index). The issue I am now having is Couldn't find Job without an ID
I updated my controller index definition to:
def index
#user = current_user
#jobs = #user.jobs.all
#job = #user.jobs.find(params[:id])
end
And have in my view (jobs#index)
<% #jobs.each do |f| %>
...
<%= link_to "Edit", edit_user_job_path(#user.id,job) %>
...
<% end %>
Any advice would be much appreciated if you know where I am going wrong :)
That error means that #job is nil.
The link is to the edit path, and the controller code you've provided is from the edit action in the controller. It seems unlikely that the edit page links to itself.
Look at the code that's actually rendering that page (it will appear in your stack trace) and you'll find that #job is not set. I suspect that you are on the index page and have something like:
<% #jobs.each do |job| %>
...
<%= link_to "Edit", edit_user_job_path(#user.id,#job) %>
...
<% end %>
If that is the case, then the link should be to job, not #job, i.e.
<%= link_to "Edit", edit_user_job_path(#user.id,job) %>
(expanding on iHiD's comment with his own post)
Using the restful resources means that you are going with the rails defaults, which consequently means that the index page gives you a list of all Jobs, and by default no single special job. If you run rake routes from the command line, you get all the routes, with parameters that are set from the URI. It should give you something like this:
user_jobs GET /users/:user_id/jobs(.:format) jobs#index
As you can see, there is no :id (params[:id]) for the index action.
Related
I have a Comment and Reply.
comment has_many replies
routes.rb
resources :comments do
resources :replies
end
When I open comments/index and then select comments/show I print information about all the replies that are related to that comment.
<% #comment.replies.each do |reply| %>
I can also create another reply. All this works properly.
The problem comes when I decide to edit one of those replies.
<%= link_to 'Edit', edit_comment_reply_path(#comment.replies,reply) %>
The strange thing is that if there is a comment with an ID the same as the ID of the reply that I want to modify, the edit is working properly. It is not even necessary the particular reply that I want to modify to belongs to that comment. But in case I want to edit reply with ID for example 66, but there is not a comment with id 66, I get an error:
Couldn't find Comment with 'id'=65
<%=form_with(model: #reply, url: [Comment.find(params[:id]), #reply]) do |form| %>
This is replies/_form.html.erb which apparently works as an edit form as well. In this case the reply.id is 65 and it is looking for a comment with the same ID which is not present.
Did you try?
<%= link_to 'Edit', edit_comment_reply_path(reply) %>
What do your controllers look like? Also, you shouldn't be able to access replies that do not belong to your comment. Look at using proper scoping and authorization. I would guess the only reason it works is luck; because you do have a comment_id that matches the reply_id, the call does not fail.
Ok, can you also post your comments controller.
A few points:
Make use of authorizations in your relevant functions (suggestion; assuming you're using policies)
def edit
authorize #reply
end
If you plan on passing in the comment id, you should also set_comment (not just in create). That way you can also make sure the reply edit is not executed using a comment that does not belong to your user (or some other unwanted behaviours).
And also, you question talks about looking for Id 66, but the error mentions ID 65. Is that just a typo?
In your RepliesController change the set comment method to
def set_comment
#comment = Comment.find(reply_params[:comment_id])
end
The problem lies in this line of code.
<%= link_to 'Edit', edit_comment_reply_path(#comment.replies,reply) %>
The edit_comment_reply_path method takes #comment as its first argument.
The correct code should be
<%= link_to 'Edit', edit_comment_reply_path(#comment, reply) %>
Provided that you have assigned #comment in your controller edit action.
def edit
#comment = Comment.find(params[:comment_id])
end
Or
before_action :set_comment, only: [:create, :edit]
The point is you must set the #comment in the correct action for the view.
The form_for is incorrect. You can passing in params[:id] which is the id of #reply.
<%= form_with(model: #reply, url: comment_reply_path(#comment, #reply)) do |form| %>
I'm viewing 1 product in show.html.erb and there's a link below that says "View other products from this company". This link_to connects to another non-restful action in same controller which retrieves from DB other products of same company as was shown in show.html.erb.
Can link_to pass the :id of the current product in show to action it's rendering? I'm new to rails and please let me know if question is not making sense. I'm not sure if routes need to be defined as well. Thanks.
products_controller.rb
def show
#company_products = Product.by_company
end
show.html.erb
<%= link_to "View other products from this company", company_products_path(:anchor => "#{#company_products}") %>
routes.rb
get '/company_products_' => 'products#company_products'
I finally resolved it by passing the :id of object in show via link_to to a non-restful action.
I'm open to suggestions if entire #company_products in #show can be passed as it is because I'm first finding if there are any other products for that company and if there are, passing an id only in link_to and in controller#company again running a query to get same data of all products to display. so running same query twice is not DRY.
controller#show remains the same as originally posted.
routes.rb
resources :products do
get :company, on: :member
end
show.html.erb
<%= link_to "View other products from #{#company_name}", company_product_path(#product.company_id) %>
controller#company
def company
#products_of_company = Product.where(company_id: params[:id])
end
Now in company.html.erb, the list is just displayed.
You want to do something like this:
#company_products.each do |company|
link_to "View other products from this company", products_path(company)
end
routes:
resources :products
I'm somewhat new to rails. I'm going through making the classic twitter clone right now. I want to have a search bar on my homepage that allows the user to search for a twitter handle, and if the handle exists, it will send the user to the show page for that twitter handle.
I've been following a RailsCast on how to implement a simple search, but instead of doing it on the index like the video, I want to do it on the show action. I've run into some problems though. The form sits on my user index view.
Here is the error:
ActionController::UrlGenerationError in Users#index
Showing c:/Sites/Projects/twitterapp/twitter/app/views/users/index.html.erb where line #2 raised:
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users"} missing required keys: [:id]
Here is the form:
<%= form_tag(user_path, method: 'get') do %>
<%= text_field_tag(:search, params[:search]) %>
<%= submit_tag("Search", name: nil) %>
<% end %>
Here is my show action:
def show
#user = User.search(params[:search])
end
And here is my search method in my user model:
def self.search(search)
if search
find(:all, conditions:['name LIKE ?', "%#{search}%"])
else
find(:all)
end
end
Actually you cannot use the show method as a search result finder. Because according to the rails convention:
For any resource like users, rails scaffold generates index,new, show, create, update, delete methods based on your routes files.
Thus based on the conventional way, show method always asks for an object. Lets say you are using UserContoller show method. It asks for a user object. Which you haven't provide in the form. that's why :id missing error is given.
I would tell you to do some more learning. And for searching create a different method in a different controller and define that controller method to the routes.rb file. This is the best way to do.
If you still want to use the show method, then change the show methods routing from the routes.rb file. You've to manually declare the show action on routes file.
you are using user_path and path need to inform id from present user
you can do this in action :index but I recommend you to create a action to this
view
<%= form_tag(search_users_path, method: 'get') do %>
<%= text_field_tag(:search, params[:search]) %>
<%= submit_tag("Search", name: nil) %>
<% end %>
routes.rb
resources :users do
post 'search', :on => :collection
end
users_controller.rb
def search
#user = User.search(params[:search])
end
You should to create a view search.html.erb similar as index.html.erb
As Emu and Breno pointed what causing the problem user_path requires an user id
Solution idea:
Why not just point to users index action? like this:
<%= form_tag(users_path, method: 'get') do %>
<%= text_field_tag(:search, params[:search]) %>
<%= submit_tag("Search", name: nil) %>
<% end %>
users_controller.rb:
def index
if params[:search]
#user = User.search(params[:search])
end
end
and you can use ajax remote: true to handle the returned user object
Found your question via Google, but the responses and suggestions didn't work for me. Found another solution that did, so seems worth posting here.
"Search and Filter Rails Models Without Bloating Your Controller":
http://www.justinweiss.com/articles/search-and-filter-rails-models-without-bloating-your-controller/
I am currently implementing the search functionality in a project and I am struggling displaying it on a dedicated search result page.
Being aware of questions on this topic already but being unable to work out a solution due to utter incompetence, I am asking you for the final pointer :).
The search form spawns on the index page which is entries_path and root_path. I'd like to pass on the parameters to a new page, search_path.
Here are my files:
EntriesController
def search
end
def index
#entries = Entry.all.order('entries.created_at DESC')
#entry = Entry.new # My index page also creates new entries.
if params[:search]
#entries = Entry.search(params[:search]).order("created_at DESC")
else
#entries = Entry.all.order("created_at DESC")
end
Model: entry.rb
def self.search(search)
where("content LIKE ? OR created_at LIKE ?", "%#{search}%", "%#{search}%")
end
routes.rb
Rails.application.routes.draw do
resources :entries
root 'entries#index'
get 'new' => 'entries/new'
get 'show' => 'entries/show'
get 'edit' => 'entries/edit'
get 'search' => 'entries/search'
Finally: the form on index
<%= form_tag(entries_path, :method => "get", class: "search-form") do %>
<%= text_field_tag :search, params[:search], placeholder: "Search for previous entries..", class: "form-control" %>
<% end %>
When I change the entries_path to search_path, I am getting a "We're sorry, but something went wrong. If you are the application owner check the logs for more information." – therefore, I suspect it is a routing problem. However, I can't seem to figure it out. The log says:
ActionController::RoutingError (uninitialized constant Entries):
Phew, would love to know what's going on here! Thanks a bunch already.
Change your routes.rb
Rails.application.routes.draw do
root 'entries#index'
resources :entries do
collection do
get :search
end
end
end
change your path in search form on index page:
<%= form_tag(search_entries_path, :method => :get, class: "search-form") do %>
<%= text_field_tag :search, params[:search], placeholder: "Search for previous entries..", class: "form-control" %>
<% end %>
Change your controller's method:
def search
if params[:search]
#entries = Entry.search(params[:search]).order("created_at DESC")
else
#entries = Entry.all.order("created_at DESC")
end
end
create one template for search method under view/entries/search.html.erb
You can here access your #entries object
Points of changes I have made:
1. Changes in routes.rb:
Rails router recognizes URLs and dispatches them to a controller's action. It can also generate paths and URLs, avoiding the need to hardcode strings in your views.
A resource route maps a number of related requests to actions in a single controller. a resourceful route provides a mapping between HTTP verbs and URLs to controller actions. By convention, each action also maps to particular CRUD operations in a database. for more information regarding routes
You can add additional routes that apply to the collection or individual members of the collection.
For Eg:
To add a member route, just add a member block into the resource block:
resources :entries do
member do
get 'preview'
end
end
To add a route to the collection:
resources :entries do
collection do
get 'search'
end
end
A member route will require an ID, because it acts on a member. A collection route doesn't because it acts on a collection of objects. for more info about
difference between collection route and member route in ruby on rails?
2. Which method should I use for search GET or POST?
There are numbers of post available regarding GET and POST request on the web as well as SO. GET and POST both have their place, and if you’re a Web developer you should understand the pros and cons of each of them. Or if you’re too lazy to do that, just remember that Search forms should use GET method. Your users will appreciate it. ;)
Let me define them in short description.
GET to fetch a resource(when you don't want to make any change in your DB), POST to create a resource(when you want to make a change/create in your DB), PUT (or PATCH, these is debate on the matter) to update a resource, DELETE to delete one.
For your reference:
When do you use POST and when do you use GET?
I hope this information may helps you. Good Luck :)
You could use html as a search field on Index page.
<form>
<legend>Search</legend>
<div class='col-xs-4'>
<input type='text' class='form-control' value='<%= params[:search] %>' name='keyword' placeholder='Keyword' >
</div>
</form>
Note: This form would hit your index action of entries controller, So at this point no need to create a search methods as you have created
I have a strange problem. I've been coding in Rails for, off and on, a year. I created a new project recently and used scaffolding. Things were going fine, yesturday I started implementing some favoriting features. Now I have a strange problem. I rolled back the stuff I did last night but still have the problem. First
Entry belongs to user
User has many entries
My Entry show method in my controller is very standard and simple
def show
#user = User.find(params[:user_id])
#entry = #user.entries.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html # show.html.erb
format.json { render :json => #entry }
end
end
When I view the entry from a normal link in the entries index
<%= link_to 'Show', user_entry_path(#user, entry) %>
I takes me to where it should go:
/users/4/entries/11
When I create new things still look good
/users/4/entries/new
Until I click "create entry" or the submit button
<div class="actions">
<%= f.submit %>
</div>
Then it goes to
/entries/20 ...with the error:
ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound in EntriesController#show
Couldn't find User without an ID
If I go back to the entries index however, the file new entry is there and the show link takes me to the right place. Thoughts? Your help is appreciated!
The error message tells you that User.find(params[:user_id]) couldn't find a user with that ID. Try checking the structure of the GET parameters in the server logs.
If your GET path is /entries/20, then the path only has an entry ID and is missing a user ID. You might be able to fix this in your Controller#create by having it redirect to user_entry_path instead of entry_path.
How does your form look like?
I think you have nested routes? Your form should look like following:
<%= form_for [#user, #entry] do |f| %>
<% # your fields %>
<% end %>
Your form seems to point to resources entry, instead of the nested ressource..