Having seen this question on protecting your app from being cracked, I saw that the top answerer mentioned something about being able to see if a device was jailbroken by some internal imbalance in the kernel. Having looked into it a bit more, I discovered the Kernel Architecture Overview guide, and have knowledge of ways to interact with the Mach-BSD kernel. All I need to know is: What am I looking for? Is there some kind of key or internal state that changes when the device is jailbroken in the context of the kernel?
To be clear, I'm not looking for code (I know how to do these things myself), I'm looking for what to look for... As weird as that sounds. I've seen the answers in the linked questions, I know that they work, but I'm wondering about an all kernel route, which seems more of a generic and efficient way to check instead of searching for directories that might change or plist keys that might have different names.
I also don't intend to disable any functionality on the part of the app because of piracy (just show a message or something based on a condition).
All the "modern" kernel patches are based on comex's patches.
the main things which are being patched are:
security.mac.proc_enforce
cs_enforcement_disable (kernel and AMFI)
PE_i_can_has_debugger
vm_map_enter
vm_map_protect
…
Oh, and there are sandbox patches too. If you wanna read more about all these patches I suggest you take a look at iOS Hacker's Handbook.
Edit:
I just came up with a simple idea to check if the device is jailbroken, but I'm not sure if Apple allows the use of these functions:
allocate some memory using mach_vm_allocate()
change the protection of that page via mach_vm_protect() to VM_PROT_READ | VM_PROT_EXECUTE | VM_PROT_COPY
Since the stock iOS doesn't allow VM_PROT_EXECUTE from inside your app this will fail, check the return value of mach_vm_protect(), when not jailbroken, but succeed if the device is jailbroken.
About a year ago, saurik wrote a comment on Hacker News with a list of the "'best practice' patches that jailbreaks install by default". I'd suggest reading that comment for all the details, but here is a preview of what he says (with lots of explanation that I snipped out):
AFC2: allows you to access, over USB, all of / as root instead of just /var/mobile/Media as mobile.
fstab / rw: makes / be mounted read-write.
fstab /var suid dev: allows setuid executables and device nodes on the user data partition.
codesign: allow code that has not been signed by anyone to execute.
codehash: allow processes with "corrupt" pages of code to execute.
rw->rx: supports changing a page of memory from writable to executable.
rwx: allows memory to be marked for write and execute at the same time.
sandbox: allow processes to access files that are outside of their sandbox based on Unix permissions rather than the normal sandbox
rules.
crazeles: a ludicrously complicated hack by planetbeing that neuters the FairPlay DRM checks that cause iBooks to refuse to operate
correctly on jailbroken devices.
Related
This is not really about programming, but I don't know where else to ask it. So I've just downloaded torrent with one file in it - the formal name of file should be "123.avi.exe" (which is typical for viruses and trojans). Now, interesting thing is that name is encoded in UTF16-LE as following bytes:
FFFE3100320033002E002D202E202D202E206900760061002E00650078006500
which gives us strange, partially reversed over ".exe" text (try to move cursor left-to-right and you will be surprised):
123.iva.exe
But the bad part of all - is that utorrent showing non-suspicious ".avi" extension while when you double click it in GUI - it goes as as ".exe" and program runs.
You can test it yourself by creating dummy file with the name I wrote above. How can I protect myself from running files like that on system level?
P.S. I've started similar thread on uTorrent tracker (not yet approved by moderator)
You have possibly found a active attack using a Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in uTorrent and other torrent clients. There has been similar vulnerabilities before: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-674/
It's probably a good idea to contact uTorrent and make them aware of the exploit.
What version of uTorrent do you use?
In general the best protection is to use the newest stable version of programs.
Even if newer uTorrent versions is infested with annoying advertisement, that can be deactivated.
This question may fit better at https://security.stackexchange.com/
This is for a visualisation project on what data gets recorded about us from our phones.
The idea would be to log as much detail as is reasonable to an internal location (probably) on the phone for later analysis, e.g. HTTP requests. It doesn’t need to be secret at all – the subject will be aware they are participating – and it doesn’t have to be 100% automatic; if the phone owner needs to perform some action regularly that’s okay too, although they need to be able to use their phone approximately normally throughout the day.
I can’t find any Apple APIs that look suitable, but that’s hardly surprising. I can find some approaches that would potentially work on OSX (tcpdump, netstat), so perhaps a jailbroken iOS device would support one of those?
Alternatively, running a custom proxy server would open up a bunch more options, but is there any way to get a mobile device to reliably route through a proxy server?
It appears this question provides a viable proxy-server-based approach:
https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/81102/proxy-settings-for-iphone-3g-connection
Basically, it seems it is possible to route all requests through a proxy server, even over cellular.
There has been a lot of discussion lately about the issues with iCloud and Core Data and how Apple's APIs are currently broken in iOS 5 and possibly iOS 6.
Is it possible, given the current state of Apple's Core Data API, to reliably sync across multiple devices using iCloud?
If so, how would you do this? If not, please recommend an alternative approach.
This blog post will lead you to a chain of recent articles about the travails of developers attempting this approach.
From my own understanding and experience, I believe it is doable, but don't buy into the idea that you will get anything "for free". Depending on your data model, you may be better off syncing your whole persistent store as a document rather than using the documented core data / iCloud approach.
You may have better luck if you're already comfortable with Core Data. Just be sure you think through how to handle several important cases.
One is what to do if the user signs out of their iCloud account. When this happens, the local ubiquitous persistent store is deleted. If it makes sense for the user to still have access to their data, you'll need to manage a copy in local storage, and then manage resynchronizing when they sign back in.
Another is that changes can apparently be quite slow to propagate by default, so you may want to consider an alternative mechanism, such as the key value store, to quickly propagate sufficient information to avoid a bad user experience.
Conflict management is perhaps the most challenging (depending on your model). While the framework provides a mechanism to inform you of conflicts, you are on your own for providing a mechanism to resolve them, and there are reports that the conflict notifications may not be reliable (see linked articles), which seems strongly linked to the lag in updating.
In short, if you go into this understanding that the actual support is pretty bare bones and that you'll need to code very defensively, you may have a chance. There aren't any good recipes out there, so if you do make it work, please come back and tell us what works!
It depends on what you want to do. There are two types of Core Data-iCloud integration, as described here: http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#releasenotes/DataManagement/RN-iCloudCoreData/_index.html
There are broadly speaking two types of Core Data-based application that integrate with iCloud:
Library-style applications, where the application usually has a single persistent store, and data from the store is used throughout the application.
Examples of this style of application are Music and Photos.
Document-based applications, where different documents may be opened at different times during the lifetime of the application.
Examples of this style of application are Keynote and Numbers.
If you're using the library-type, this article is the first of a series that goes into a lot of the problems that will come up: http://mentalfaculty.tumblr.com/post/23163747823/under-the-sheets-with-icloud-and-core-data-the-basics.
You can also check out sessions 218 (for document-based) or 227 (for library-style) of this year's wwdc.
As of iOS 7, the best solution is probably the Ensembles framework: https://github.com/drewmccormack/ensembles
Additionally, there is a promising project which will essentially allow you to do the same thing using a different cloud service.
Here is a link to the repository: https://github.com/nothirst/TICoreDataSync
Project description:
TICoreDataSync is a collection of classes to enable synchronization via the Cloud (including Dropbox) of Core Data-based applications (including document-based apps) between any number of clients running under Mac OS X or iOS. It's designed to be easy to extend if you need to synchronize via an option that isn't already supported.
Reasons for why iCloud is not currently reliable:
"Sometimes, iCloud simply fails to move data from one computer to another."
"Corrupted baselines are [a] common obstacle.... There is no recovery from a corrupted baseline, short of digging in to the innards of your local iCloud storage and scraping everything out, and there is no visible indication that corruption has occurred — syncing simply stops."
"Sometimes, when initializing the iCloud application subsystem, it will simply return an opaque internal error. When it fails, there’s no option to recover — all you can do is try again (and again…) until it finally works."
"[W]hen you turn off the “Documents & Data” syncing option in the iCloud system preferences, the iCloud system deletes all of your locally stored iCloud data[.]"
When you sign out of iCloud, the system moves your iCloud data to a location outside of your application’s sandbox container, and the application can no longer use it.
"In some circumstances (and we haven’t been able to figure out which, yet), iCloud actually changes the object class of an item when synchronizing it. Loosely described, the object class determines the type of the object in the database[.]"
"In some cases (again, not all the time), iCloud may do one of the following:
Owner relationships in an item’s data will point to the wrong owner;
Owner items get lost in synchronization and never appear on computers other than the one on which they were created. (This leads to the item never appearing in the UI on any other machine.) When this happens, bogus relationships get created between blob items and an arbitrary unrelated owner."
"Sometimes (without any apparent consistency or repeatability), the associated data for an object (for example, the PDF data for a PDF item, or the web archive data for a Web Archive item) would simply fail to show up on the destination machine. Sometimes it would arrive later (much later — minutes or hours)."
Quoted and paraphrased from these sources:
http://www.imore.com/debug-12-icloud-core-data-sync
http://rms2.tumblr.com/post/46505165521/the-gathering-storm-our-travails-with-icloud-sync
Note: I have seen one article where the author mentions getting it to work for iOS 6+, but they don't provide any examples: http://zaal.tumblr.com/post/46718877130/why-you-want-to-use-core-data-icloud-sync-if-only-it
As a reference, here are Apple's docs on iCloud + Core Data:
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#releasenotes/DataManagement/RN-iCloudCoreData/
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/General/Conceptual/iCloudDesignGuide/Chapters/DesignForCoreDataIniCloud.html
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/cocoa/Conceptual/CoreDataVersioning/vmCloud/vmCloud.html
And here is an example app:
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/General/Conceptual/iCloud101/Introduction/Introduction.html
The Apple developer tutorial on using the iCloud API to manipulate documents might be a good place to start.
Your Third iOS App introduces you to the iCloud document storage APIs. You use these APIs to store and manipulate files in a user’s iCloud storage.
Are there programmatic ways to access GLONASS satellite signal and position data on iOS on a jailbroken device? That is, are there private calls one can make on a jailbroken device, which return this data? (As far as what I've tried, I don't have a jailbroken device, so I can't try anything out yet, but I'm curious as to what is possible there. Thanks.)
Even if your device isn't jailbroken, you can still see what's available to a jailbroken device ... you just can't fully test it yet.
On your development Mac, you have the complete frameworks, public and private, and you can use something like class-dump (or class-dump-z) to inspect them.
Download class-dump, and then on your Mac, you can use a script like this (to dump all the headers out to a folder under /Users/Shared/Headers/):
#!/bin/bash
cd /Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS5.0.sdk/;
for FRAMEWORKS in Frameworks PrivateFrameworks; do
frameworklib=./System/Library/"${FRAMEWORKS}"
for frameworkpath in "${frameworklib}"/*.framework; do
frameworkdir="$(basename "${frameworkpath}")"
frameworkbin="${frameworkdir%.*}"
if [ -f "${frameworkpath}/${frameworkbin}" ]; then
echo "Framework: ${frameworkbin}"
mkdir -p /Users/Shared/Headers/5.0/${frameworkbin}
class-dump -H -o "/Users/Shared/Headers/5.0/${frameworkbin}" "${frameworkpath}/${frameworkbin}"
fi
done
done
Then, you'll be left with headers that show not just the publicly documented APIs, but the private ones, too. Both frameworks that are completely private, and the private parts of public frameworks.
Then, I'd just go to the root folder of where this script dumps out the .h files, and start grepping:
> find . -name '*.h' | xargs grep -i GLONASS
Sadly, that term (GLONASS) doesn't turn up in the 5.0 headers, but as it sounds like you understand this problem domain, you probably could find some better terms to search on.
Unfortunately, the headers just include method prototypes and data definitions. No documentation. So, where there are int parameters, for example, you may need to do some guessing as to what they mean.
But, such is the trial-and-error nature of discovering hidden device capabilities :)
Note: you certainly can test some private APIs on your own non-jailbroken phone, after discovering them with the above process. Other APIs, however, won't work without the device being jailbroken, the app getting out of its sandbox, or maybe having root privileges, or other entitlements.
Well, for starters you are looking in the right direction: if you don't jailbreak you'll have access to Core Location framework & API that can give you location, precision etc, but no info from GPS/GLONASS receiver (not even which of them was used to get location).
But before you go digging around inside framework: do you need to access build in GPS/GLONASS receiver or is external bluetooth one acceptable? Have a look http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bluetooth-gps-status-tool/id422661436?mt=8
The iPhone 4S supports AGPS and GLONASS. I am under the believe that Core Location manages the lower level communication and that my app doesn't care whether the lat/long data is coming from US GPS satellites or Russian GLONASS satellites. Core Location will provide you the correct lat/long info regardless.
UPDATE: After rereading your question perhaps I misunderstood the question to begin with. I don't think you will be able to access the GLONASS satellite signal and position. But good luck with that!
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions concerning problems with code you've written must describe the specific problem — and include valid code to reproduce it — in the question itself. See SSCCE.org for guidance.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a piece of code that is trying to write to disk many files in one second. However, it fails wince I have installed Kaspersky Anrivirus 2011.
Stream:= TFileStream.Create(sName, fmCreate);
The code totally worked with Kaspersky 2010 and also works with Kaspersky 2011 if I disable its scanners (it cannot be totally unloaded from memory - unless it is uninstalled). The code also works if (Kaspersky 2011 is running and) I write to disk slooooowly. So it obviously is not fast enough to handle my disk requests.
The error I get is EFCreateError ('Cannot create xxx file blablabla'). Error is random. Most of the files are written to disk. About 10% fail.
I have tried to get support but is impossible to find a real person at Kaspersky to speak with. Their so called 'support' is actually a FAQ data base. Of course it speaks about how to install the product and related stuff. There is nothing about programing-related issues. Any ideas?
PS: this has repercussions for the entire Delphi community! All our customers will fail to use Delphi software if they are using KIS 2011 as antivirus. For the moment I recommend to my users to disable their antivirus but I need a real solution.
It will be nice if a person with KIS 2011 can confirm the problem. Just create a tiny program that write 200 small files to disk using TFileStream.
UPDATE:
The problem appears ONLY when the file does not exist and it is created (created as opposed to overwritten).
Similar report: https://forums.embarcadero.com/thread.jspa?threadID=32751&tstart=15
Similar report: http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=120561
A possible solution that popped in my mind is to detect if KIS is running and if it is, to put a delay after each writing to disk. Or at leat, let the user know there may be problems. Anybody knows how to detect if a service is running?
I added a delay of 650ms (after each file creation) and the bug is still there). So is not about how fast you write to disk but about how many files you write.
Just uninstalled KIS 2011. The problem does not appear anymore.
Just reinstalled the good old KIS 2010. The bug is still there but it appear rarely (about every 300 files instead of about 30 as in KIS 2011).
The problem was confirmed on a second computer.
NEWS: The crash appears in TFileStream.Create however it may be caused by a function called earlier: TestWriteAccess. If I disable this function, the TFileStream.Create doesn't fail anymore. Well, this doesn't change things too much. No matter which line of code generates the error, the program still fails (randomly) to write files to disk while Kaspersky is running.
Still waiting a response from a real person from Kaspersky...
More automated responses received from Kaspersky support (I sent emails to support in several countries). All pointing to a FAQ database.
I change my status from Kaspersky fan (and customer) to Kaspersky hater because I finally receive an answer from a real person from Kaspersky support and it was plain and simple obnoxious.
To test the code, try to use the code in a loop, to create 1000 files. The program creates a bunch of files (random number) then it fails at StreamFile:= TFileStream.Create.
Update: The issue can be fixed by entering a small delay after creating each file.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1H3_O1z1iEqfh9ZT9u3B0R1tGEj-Hc9o7rAE0LKPr33Y
2013 Update
Starting with this afternoon (after an update) KIS conflicts with Delphi.
Every time I compile a project KIS spikes to 100% CPU utilization. I will have to uninstall it.
2017 Update
All false positive alarms disappeared magically for all my Delphi programs starting with 2017. It seems that it was enough for a program like Kaspersky remove Delphi-generated executables from its virus list; all other smaller antivirus programs followed.
Delphi 7, Win 7 (32), KIS 2011
You need to instruct your users, i.e. Kaspersky's customers, that Kaspersky is interfering with the operation of your software, and that THEY should report it. Express your frustration that you, as a developer, don't have access to a real human being. This is the only way that the anti-malware companies will ever react - bad PR with their paying customers.
Kaspersky = pirate company? Maybe yes, maybe no. Maybe just yet another company with a bad product and nonexistent support. Their "support" consists in a FAQ database and an automatic email answering program. Phones are hooked to answering machines also. Their automated answer keep explaining me how to add my program in KIS "exception" database. I keep replying to those stupid emails that I cannot personally go to all my customers at home and put my program in the "exception" database and that it will be better if they will fix the bug.
When I finally got a non-automatic answer (the only one), the support guy fella is as rude as possible.
Possible solutions for Delphi programmers:
* Don't check if the user has write permission to a file (in order not to trigger Kaspersky bug)
* Check if the user has write permission. If the bug appears inform the user that Kaspersky creates problem and it should be temporary disable (while the program is running). Use a TRY EXCEPT block to do this.
Advice (based on my past experience):
Don't always blame your code if you ever received strange bug reports from your users when your program was trying to write to disk. Check also external factors (like existence of Kaspersky antivirus).
UPDATE:
I just applied for a refund. I will go for a chargeback if they won't refund the money (I strongly feel they won't).
Conclusion
When I posted this on StackOverflow I didn't realized the magnitude of the problem and I didn't realized it will deviate so much from initial course. Still I think it is well within the purpose of StackOverflow. We have all learned that sometimes the problems in out programs may not be caused by our faulty code and neither we can control the source of these problems (21 persons voted this question up - which means a lot of other people encountered issues with KIS).
We can just hope that poor designed programs that interacts with user's system at a very low level (such as KIS antivirus program) will be soon fixed so our sales won't suffer (much).
It is just frustrating when your program is labeled "buggy" and you can't do much about it!
Not an answer to solve your problem, but you should inform Kaspersky, probably they don't know there is a virus signature associated with a Delphi library.
And if your program isn't too complex, you might want to try Lazarus/FPC. It's not as good as Delphi, but I've been using it for several years now, and have got good results in Windows/MacOS/Linux.
i had similar problems with kaspersky 2011 when i was trying to add my prog to windows startup using d2010's new TFile.Copy() as well as raw api function:
CopyFile(PChar('C:\chellenger.exe'), PChar('C:\Documents and Settings\Omair\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\chellenger.exe'), False);
my solution was to put my delphi app in vb.net app as a resource, the vb.net app extracted it and put it to startup without false positives . Mixing two languages for your problem might solve your problem too(1 possible solution but a very ugly and nonprofessional solution i admit)
When you create file, any antivirus checks it. There is probably some kind of collision between your application and KAV. Have you tried to combine fmCreate with share modes. You can see in help for TFileStream.Create for available modes.
If the problem is just with kapersky, then just have your program detect if it is running. If so, scale back your file creation / writes to whatever passes their detection. Make sure you have some little status message somewhere that tells the user why things are slow. Incidentally, virus writers already know this which is why those heuristics simply don't work.
After doing that, contact Kapersky and work with them directly to get this resolved.
This gets past your immediate issue and will give you and kapersky time to figure out a long term solution.
Alternatively, you could simply shut kapersky down.. Just make sure you grab all of their watch dogs in the process.. But that tends to be a little more combative.
Creating a huge amount of files sounds like something that isn't necessarily A Good Thing, but you probably have your reasons :)
When you get the error code in Delphi, does KAV pop up any heuristic warnings, or is it completely silent? It wouldn't be weird to get a heuristic "omg, that app is doing something bad!" from creating a ton of new file, but if KAV is silent I'd say it's a bug.
Can you post a delphi executable with the tiniest amount of code that reproduces the bug? And a version that does the same step but only creates one file, it might be interesting to trace with SysInternals' ProcMon.
First, do you really need to test for write permissions by creating a file? Can't you just check the permission directly? I feel that creating a file for that purpose only is a lame way of doing it in any case.
Second, like noted above, it's likely that after you create and then delete a file, there is some intervention by Kaspersky's security mechanisms. Probably a driver tries to check the contents of the file you deleted, and keeps it alive for a while. Like this:
You create the file and open it, incrementing the refcount.
Kaspersky driver notices that and opens the file too. Even if you set share mode deny, as a driver it probably has the power to open it anyway (if Kaspersky could not circumvent sharing denials, any virus could have used the same trick to hide its data!).
You close the file and delete it. When you delete the file, the system just marks it "FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE", but the file is still there until all the handles to it are closed.
Kaspersky continues to scan file, still haven't released the handle.
Therefore the file is still there.
You try to create a new file and the call fails because the old file is still not deleted.
The reason for all this mess is, of course, partly Kaspersky's checking mechanics, but they did nothing especially wrong here. Kaspersky needs to scan the file anyway, hardly anything can be done about that - it's antivirus, for crying out loud. On the other hand, checking permissions by creating and then deleting a file is (probably) very, very wrong. So I guess, you're the one at fault here.
I had the same problem. KIS made all kind of troubles. Until I reinstalled it. So, it was just a faulty installation.