I'm trying to use Rails validations for a form text box to see if the text entered matches any existing values in a specific column of a table in the database. Is this possible with Rails?
Basically, like this:
User enters 'Foobar'
Table column values: 'Foobar,test,house,random'
Validation does not pass because 'Foobar' is already in the database.
Thanks!
dwmcc
You can do this in your model with something like validates_uniqueness_of :name or new in Rails 3 you can do multiple validations inline with validates :name, :presence => true, :uniqueness => true
From the Rails API.
Related
I need to do validation on my model on Ruby on Rails.
I have model with 2 fields:
user_id
some_item_id
And I have many rows in DB with the same user_id, but with different some_item_id. And I need avoid duplication of this some_item_id towards to specific user_id.
In Rails exist some 'magic' validation in one line for this?
validates : user_id, :presence => true, :uniqueness => { :scope => : some_item_id }
How can perform a reguler expression to validate for either - or _ in the person username. i dont want to accept any other character like .#()$etc just - or _ so the person can either have a name like mike, mikel_mark or mike-mark. very simple. Thank you
example:
validate_format_of :username, with: "...."
The Rails 3 way to do validations is the following:
validates :username, :format => {:with => /\A[0-9a-z_]+\Z/i}
The form of validate_format_of is more Rails < 3 like and followed the "type of validation" concept, whereas the validates form is attribute based (you write all validations that apply to the attribute in one statement).
Check out the docs here: http://apidock.com/rails/v3.2.13/ActiveModel/Validations/ClassMethods/validates
I have an User model. It has next fields:
attr_accessible :user_name, :first_name, :last_name, :email ....
There is a profile view for the User with 6 blocks. Each of them associated with the various fields. Box 1 - first_name and last_name, Box 2 - user_name and email, etc.
I need to validate all the fields (presence, format, etc). But validators must trigger only for those fields, that has came from a particular block (Box 1 or Box 2, for example).
If I write something like next:
validates :user_name, :presence => true
and I will not edit the block with the *user_name*, I will see the error "user Name can't be blank". I can't use *:allow_blank => true* or nil because it can't(!) be blank!
In two words: I must validate only those fields, that was past from the resquest.
What I can do to solve my problem? Thx
You can add if or unless option to skip of particular condition.
validates :user_name, :presence => true, :if => "first_name.blank? and last_name.blank?"
You can pull the specific fields out of your model and create a model for each block, then you add one_to_one relationships to your User model.
So, I am having some issues with user authentication in embedded documents. I have two documents, one embedded in the other. A business has many members. The models look like this:
class Member
include Mongoid::Document
field :username, type: String
field :password, type: String
embedded_in :business
validates :username, :presence => true, :uniqueness => true, :length => 5..60
end
class Business
include Mongoid::Document
field :name, type: String
embeds_many :members
end
The problem is that it isn't validating the username's uniqueness in each model. When I save a member within a business, I can save a thousand of the same name. This of course is not going to work for a good authentication system. I am using Mongoid 2, Rails 3, and Ruby 1.9
This is a normal behavior when using embedded documents as explained here: MongoID validation
validates_uniqueness_of
Validate that the field is unique in the database: Note that for
embedded documents, this will only check that the field is unique
within the context of the parent document, not the entire database.
I think you want to try to create an Index in the username field that would ensure uniqueness among all the objects of that collection. Something like this:
ensureIndex({username:1},{unique:true});
EDIT: If you want Mongo to throw exception if a document with the same index value exists, you must avoid Mongo to do the “fire and forget” pattern. This means that the database will not wait for a response when you perform an update/write operation on a document.
And you want to pass this parameter: safe:true. By doing so Mongo should raise an exception if for any reason the document can't be inserted.
Hi I wan't to validate the unique combination of 3 columns in my table.
Let's say I have a table called cars with the values :brand, :model_name and :fuel_type.
What I then want is to validate if a record is unique based on the combination of those 3. An example:
brand model_name fuel_type
Audi A4 Gas
Audi A4 Diesel
Audi A6 Gas
Should all be valid. But another record with 'Audi, A6, Gas' should NOT be valid.
I know of this validation, but I doubt that it actually does what I want.
validates_uniqueness_of :brand, :scope => {:model_name, :fuel_type}
There is a syntax error in your code snippet. The correct validation is :
validates_uniqueness_of :car_model_name, :scope => [:brand_id, :fuel_type_id]
or even shorter in ruby 1.9.x:
validates_uniqueness_of :car_model_name, scope: [:brand_id, :fuel_type_id]
with rails 4 you can use:
validates :car_model_name, uniqueness: { scope: [:brand_id, :fuel_type_id] }
with rails 5 you can use
validates_uniqueness_of :car_model_name, scope: %i[brand_id fuel_type_id]
Depends on your needs you could also to add a constraint (as a part of table creation migration or as a separate one) instead of model validation:
add_index :the_table_name, [:brand, :model_name, :fuel_type], :unique => true
Adding the unique constraint on the database level makes sense, in case multiple database connections are performing write operations at the same time.
To Rails 4 the correct code with new hash pattern
validates :column_name, uniqueness: {scope: [:brand_id, :fuel_type_id]}
I would make it this way:
validates_uniqueness_of :model_name, :scope => {:brand_id, :fuel_type_id}
because it makes more sense for me:
there should not be duplicated "model names" for combination of "brand" and "fuel type", vs
there should not be duplicated "brands" for combination of "model name" and "fuel type"
but it's subjective opinion.
Of course if brand and fuel_type are relationships to other models (if not, then just drop "_id" part). With uniqueness validation you can't check non-db columns, so you have to validate foreign keys in model.
You need to define which attribute is validated - you don't validate all at once, if you want, you need to create separate validation for every attribute, so when user make mistake and tries to create duplicated record, then you show him errors in form near invalid field.
Using this validation method in conjunction with ActiveRecord::Validations#save does not guarantee the absence of duplicate record insertions, because uniqueness checks on the application level are inherently prone to race conditions.
This could even happen if you use transactions with the 'serializable' isolation level. The best way to work around this problem is to add a unique index to the database table using ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SchemaStatements#add_index. In the rare case that a race condition occurs, the database will guarantee the field's uniqueness.
Piecing together the other answers and trying it myself, this is the syntax you're looking for:
validates :brand, uniqueness: { scope: [:model_name, :fuel_type] }
I'm not sure why the other answers are adding _id to the fields in the scope. That would only be needed if these fields are representing other models, but I didn't see an indication of that in the question. Additionally, these fields can be in any order. This will accomplish the same thing, only the error will be on the :model_name attribute instead of :brand:
validates :model_name, uniqueness: { scope: [:fuel_type, :brand] }