I am developing a component for joomla but I can edit anymore my tables I really dont know why. I have a user that is an owner and a user that is an editor. I log on to both of my accounts and I can't change, add or delete anything. The only thing I can do from my owner account is change the type of share.
I dont know what happened.
It got fixed after I took all the share privileges and re state them.
Related
When a JIRA issue is assigned to me, I keep the issue page open so I can read fields, description, attachments, etc. But the problem is, any place I click, the fields enters in edit mode. I fear change anything by accident, so I was thinking if there is some way to put the ticket in "readonly mode", so I can change something only if I click some "edit" button, or visit a specific url. Is this possible?
There isn't a way to configure this at a user-level, but there is a project level setting to adjust on the applications settings page (if you have admin-level permissions for it). https://_your_url_.atlassian.net/secure/admin/EditApplicationProperties!default.jspa
Someone had requested this as a feature 7 years ago, but it seems like the JIRA development team has not actioned it. (as seen: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRASERVER-29091)
I would like to delete my account by myself.
I tried to find the menu or option in JIRA web, but I could not find.
Does anyone know how to delete my account by myself?
Deleting account is not a recommended way and also you can't delete your own account. You need to ask another user with JIRA Administrator privilage to remove it. Take a look at document for further information.
A little bit update here
Follow the link to to deactivate your account
Delete your Atlasian account
This might be a duplicate of a question already asked but i haven't found the one that suits my condition yet.
I am developing a system where there's a user (not an admin) who is registering himself using devise. What i want is to allow this user to create different users and provide them different set of permissions (so can't be predefined permissions and hence, cant use cancan as far as i am aware). To clarify more, this is the table structure i have come up with yet. Please guide me if i am going on the wrong path here.
USER:
id,
name,
other-details
PERMISSION
id,
name, (name of the section such as gallery, report or users)
create,
edit,
view,
user_id (the user whose permissions are defined here)
Here, create, edit and view are the permissions that the user would have. If the edit is true, he'll be able to edit that particular section. I'm sorry if this is not clear. I found Johan's answer (last one) Database schema for ACL match my scenario however i am not sure if its the right way. Also, i am not sure how to implement the SET mentioned there.
Thanx in advance. Also please feel free to ask for more details if required. I'm clueless about how right this method will be.
P.S: Newbie in Rails Here.
You should use gem devise , cancancan & rolify for it.
Check here for references https://github.com/RolifyCommunity/rolify/wiki/Devise---CanCanCan---rolify-Tutorial.
You should add your all roles with permissions in the ability.rb file
I'm starting to create a lot more features for users in my app. I've run into some app structure issues.
lets say I have User Fooman
Fooman wants to edit his account, delete some objects(wall posts), update his friends list etc.
Fooman is logged in to do all of these. But footman isn't the one using the device at the moment. It's fooman son (foobaby). Foobaby decides to just be a son and delete things erroneously. I have an option for users to delete their account client side. I present them an alert view to confirm that's the choice they meant to select. After they confirm that, another view populates with a 'Destroy' (or delete button) that will delete the User, plus all relations/pointers/data connected to it. Before that button is enabled a password validation check is required so it's not done by a foobaby. However, with Parse, this has proved to be problematic client side. I don't use cloud functions because, well, simply put, at this point in time my app is one platform and doesn't really need to use it.
Is there any workaround anyone has come up with that's quick/efficient, API friendly for validating a textField.text with the [PFUser currentUser].password whilst maintaining security of course.
I code in Objective-C :)
Note: I have tried numerous things but nothing seems to work outside of trying to log them in against the user input (UITextField), which doesn't feel like the right way to do it in my opinion.
I think it's an unusual requirement. The idea of a logged-in user is that the app trusts the user. A persisted logged-in user on the device means that the app trusts whomever is holding the device. So FooBaby is trusted, because FooDad let him hold the phone.
Some apps put up a barrier to establish thoughtfulness, like the Parse data browser requiring that you type the name of a class before you drop it. But this establishes thoughtfulness, not trust. (For a child, I guess it also establishes minimal competence, in case FooBaby knows how to press buttons, but not how to spell).
Otherwise, I can't think of how to do it besides requiring a login, which you mentioned you find unappealing (though you didn't say why). Excluding that, I don't think there's a way to do it without spoiling security with something like keeping an in-the-clear copy of the password.
I now have 2 users whose names are not correctly displayed in the 'welcome' menu at the top right of the page.
The first user married and her surname changed. The new name was entered in ActiveDirectory but her maiden name is still displayed.
In the second case, a LAN id was reallocated to a new department member. The name of the previous user is displayed in the portal.
The AD synchronising appears to be running every night and I can see no errors there. The AD entries for the 2 users appears correct and no hint of the previous data.
What else can I do to force an update of the user information?
I have experenced this before, on the Microsoft blogs there is this helpful post
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/krichie/archive/2006/02/18/534767.aspx
I hope it helps you
This kind of information is stored in the content database's UserInfo table. This article may be useful to you.
Keep in mind that changing the data in the UserInfo table directly is not supported. If you still want to edit this manually, you'll have to use the object model.
No need to change data directly OR manually update the SQL table.
When you remove the user from any group, this also removes the user from the userInfo table in the Microsoft SQL Server database.
When you re-add the user, the user's information is automatically updated in this table.
check the effective permission of user/group by accessing the portal URL link, click on site actions --> site settings -->check effective permissions
make sure to note down the effective permission for user/group without fail
click on all people link above site permissions and search for the user/group name which should still be displaying old name
remove the user/group name from all people
add the user/group name to the required group as per note done in step no. 2
now if user close the browser (refresh the page) and re-login new diaply name would be displayed