This is my first demo project in Nopcommerce and i have tried to make my own plugin but during the time of Build some error is seen. Below are some codes.
namespace Nop.Plugin.Aowi.Testimonial.Data
{
public class TestimonialRecordObjectContext : DbContext , IDbContext
{
public TestimonialRecordObjectContext(string nameOrConnectionString) : base(nameOrConnectionString) { }
#region Implementation of IDbContext
#endregion
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new TestimonialRecordMap());
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
public string CreateDatabaseInstallationScript()
{
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.CreateDatabaseScript();
}
public void Install()
{
//It's required to set initializer to null (for SQL Server Compact).
//otherwise, you'll get something like "The model backing the 'your context name' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database"
Database.SetInitializer<TestimonialRecordObjectContext>(null);
Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(CreateDatabaseInstallationScript());
SaveChanges();
}
public void Uninstall()
{
var dbScript = "DROP TABLE Testimonial";
Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(dbScript);
SaveChanges();
}
public new IDbSet<TEntity> Set<TEntity>() where TEntity : BaseEntity
{
return base.Set<TEntity>();
}
public System.Collections.Generic.IList<TEntity> ExecuteStoredProcedureList<TEntity>(string commandText, params object[] parameters) where TEntity : BaseEntity, new()
{
throw new System.NotImplementedException();
}
public System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<TElement> SqlQuery<TElement>(string sql, params object[] parameters)
{
throw new System.NotImplementedException();
}
public int ExecuteSqlCommand(string sql, bool doNotEnsureTransaction = false, int? timeout = null, params object[] parameters)
{
throw new System.NotImplementedException();
}
}
}
This is the Dependency registrar part
namespace Nop.Plugin.Aowi.Testimonial.Infastructure
{
public class DependencyRegistrar: IDependencyRegistrar
{
private const string CONTEXT_NAME ="nop_object_context_product_view_tracker";
public virtual void Register(ContainerBuilder builder, ITypeFinder typeFinder, NopConfig config)
{
//data context
this.RegisterPluginDataContext<TestimonialRecordObjectContext>(builder, CONTEXT_NAME);
//override required repository with our custom context
builder.RegisterType<EfRepository<TestimonialRecord>>()
.As<IRepository<TestimonialRecord>>()
.WithParameter(ResolvedParameter.ForNamed<IDbContext>(CONTEXT_NAME))
.InstancePerLifetimeScope();
}
public int Order
{
get { return 1; }
}
}
}
Even after cleaning and Building i am getting this error.
Can anyone help me with this. I have done all of this by watching a tutorial so if anyone can help me correct my mistake i will be really greatful.
You just need to implement this method and properties of IDbContext interface, which are described in error log, in your custom context.
for example, how it is done in one of the existing plugin Tax.CountryStateZip:
public void Detach(object entity)
{
if (entity == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("entity");
((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.Detach(entity);
}
public virtual bool ProxyCreationEnabled
{
get { return this.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled; }
set { this.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = value; }
}
public virtual bool AutoDetectChangesEnabled
{
get { return this.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled; }
set { this.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = value; }
}
I cannot get an idea from your code that where is actual issue. But i suggest by an example.
make your install method code like:
public void Install()
{
//create the table
var dbScript = CreateDatabaseScript();
Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(dbScript);
SaveChanges();
}
Add a new class called EfStartUpTask and paste following code:
public class EfStartUpTask : IStartupTask
{
public void Execute()
{
//It's required to set initializer to null (for SQL Server Compact).
//otherwise, you'll get something like "The model backing the 'your context name' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database"
Database.SetInitializer<YourContext>(null);
}
public int Order
{
//ensure that this task is run first
get { return 0; }
}
}
And your DependencyRegistrar :
public class DependencyRegistrar : IDependencyRegistrar
{
public virtual void Register(ContainerBuilder builder, ITypeFinder typeFinder)
{
builder.RegisterType<YourService>().As<YourserviceInterface>().InstancePerLifetimeScope();
//data context
this.RegisterPluginDataContext<YourContext>(builder, "nop_object_context_product_view_tracker");
//override required repository with our custom context
builder.RegisterType<EfRepository<YourEntityClass>>()
.As<IRepository<YourEntityClass>>()
.WithParameter(ResolvedParameter.ForNamed<IDbContext>("nop_object_context_product_view_tracker"))
.InstancePerLifetimeScope();
}
public int Order
{
get { return 1; }
}
}
Note: you have to change YourContext to your context name and same as for entity class
Hope this helps!
I cannot figure this one out. I have a N-Tier ASP.MVC application and I am writing my first Unit Test and it seems to fail on my AutoMapper configuration. I have used AutoMapper a million times and never had any problems using it.
I'm sure I am missing something simple, but I have been staring at this for 24 hours now.
Class Library: APP.DOMAIN
public class User : IEntity<int>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[StringLength(20), Required]
public string UserName { get; set; }
}
Class Library: APP.SERVICE
References App.Domain
public class UserViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
}
I have my AutoMapper bootstrapper in the service layer.
public static class AutoMapperBootstrapper
{
public static void RegisterMappings()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
}
}
UserService.cs
public class UserService : IUserService
{
private readonly IUserRepository _userRepository;
public UserService(IUserRepository userRepository)
{
_userRepository = userRepository;
}
public List<UserViewModel> GetUsers()
{
var users = _userRepository.GetAll();
if (users == null)
{
throw new Exception("No users found.");
}
return Mapper.Map<List<UserViewModel>>(users); // FAILS ON AUTOMAPPER
}
}
ASP.MVC Layer: APP.WEB
References App.Service
private void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Register AutoMapper
AutoMapperBootstrapper.RegisterMappings();
Mapper.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
// Code that runs on application startup
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
}
Unit Test Layer:
public class TestUserRepository :IUserRepository
{
public IEnumerable<User> GetAll()
{
var users = new List<User>()
{
new User { Id = 1, UserName = "Mary"},
new User { Id = 2, UserName = "Joe"}
};
return users;
}
}
public class UserServiceTest
{
private IUserService _userService;
private readonly IUserRepository _userRepository;
public UserServiceTest()
{
_userRepository = new TestUserRepository();
}
[Fact]
public void GetUsers_Should_Return_Correct_Number_Of_Users()
{
// Arrange
_userService = new UserService(_userRepository);
// Act
var result = _userService.GetUsers(); // FAILS ON AUTOMAPPER
// Assert
Assert.True(result.Any(u => u.UserName == "Mary"));
}
}
Failing Test Message:
*** Failures ***
Exception
AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException: AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException : Missing type map configuration or unsupported mapping.
Mapping types:
User -> UserViewModel
App.Data.Model.User -> App.Service.ViewModels.UserViewModel
Destination path:
List`1[0]
Source value:
App.Data.Model.User
at App.Service.Services.UserService.GetUsers() in D:\Repositories\App\App.Service\Services\UserService.cs:line 36
at App.Tests.Service.Tests.UserServiceTest.GetUsers_Should_Return_Correct_Number_Of_Users() in D:\Repositories\App\App.Tests\Service.Tests\UserServiceTest.cs:line 34
A little late to the party but have you tried setting the mapping before running the test?
public class UserServiceTest
{
public UserServiceTest()
{
// register the mappings before running the test
AutoMapperBootstrapper.RegisterMappings();
}
...
}
What we would need to do is Inject Custom Mapper Mock as given below. Add all those custom profiles that you have used for that particular class that you are unit testing and inject ConfigureMapper() in the Constructor of that class which is expecting IMapper Object
public IMapper ConfigureMapper()
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddProfile<CustomProfile>();
cfg.AddProfile<UserCustomProfile>();
cfg.AddProfile<UserWorkProfile>();
});
return config.CreateMapper();
}
Hope this solves the issue.
I'm not sure what the problem is, it's been a while since I've last used AutoMapper, but I'm quite sure that the following will work:
return users.Select(Mapper.Map<UserViewModel>);
I have a problem with this line:
var authorDTO = mapper.Map<AuthorCreationDTO>(AuthorinsideDB);
So I change the version of Autormapper
from:
<PackageReference Include="AutoMapper.Extensions.Microsoft.DependencyInjection" Version="7.0.0" />
to
Version="6.0.0"
and it worked.
Take this simple example:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var windsorContainer = new WindsorContainer();
windsorContainer.Install(new WindsorInstaller());
var editor = windsorContainer.Resolve<IEditor>();
editor.DoSomething();
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public class WindsorInstaller : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
{
container.AddFacility<TypedFactoryFacility>();
container.Register(Component.For<ISomeOtherDependency>().ImplementedBy<SomeOtherDependency>());
container.Register(Component.For<IReviewingService>().ImplementedBy<ReviewingService>());
container.Register(Component.For<IEditor>().ImplementedBy<Editor>());
container.Register(Component.For<Func<IReviewingServiceFactory>>().AsFactory());
}
}
public interface IEditor
{
void DoSomething();
}
public class Editor : IEditor
{
private readonly Func<IReviewingServiceFactory> _reviewingService;
public Editor(Func<IReviewingServiceFactory> reviewingService)
{
_reviewingService = reviewingService;
}
public void DoSomething()
{
var rs = _reviewingService();
var reviews = new List<string> {"Review #1", "Review #2"};
var reviewingService = rs.Create(reviews);
reviewingService.Review();
}
}
public interface IReviewingServiceFactory
{
IReviewingService Create(IList<string> reviews);
}
public interface IReviewingService
{
void Review();
}
public class ReviewingService : IReviewingService
{
private readonly IList<string> _reviews;
private readonly ISomeOtherDependency _someOtherDependency;
public ReviewingService(IList<string> reviews, ISomeOtherDependency someOtherDependency)
{
_reviews = reviews;
_someOtherDependency = someOtherDependency;
}
public void Review()
{
Console.WriteLine("Reviewing...");
}
}
public interface ISomeOtherDependency
{
}
public class SomeOtherDependency : ISomeOtherDependency
{
}
With this example I would expect the console to output "Reviewing...". However, Windsor throws exceptions:
No component for supporting the service CastleWindsorTypedFactor.IReviewingServiceFactory was found
What is wrong with my Windsor installer?
You registered Func<IReviewingServiceFactory> instead of IReviewingServiceFactory... try replacing
container.Register(Component.For<Func<IReviewingServiceFactory>>().AsFactory());
with
container.Register(Component.For<IReviewingServiceFactory>().AsFactory());
and adapt the code accordingly - then it should work.
Oh, and another thing - you registered your IReviewingService without specifying a lifestyle, which will default to SINGLETON. That is most likely not what you want, because then your reviews argument will only be passed to the instance when is gets created, which only happens the first time the factory is called...! Additional calls to the factory will return the singleton instance.
Therefore: Change the lifestyle of IReviewingService to transient, AND create an appropriate release method signature on the factory interface (e.g. void Destroy(IReviewingService service)).
I'm using AutoMapper in an ASP.NET MVC application. I was told that I should move the AutoMapper.CreateMap elsewhere as they have a lot of overhead. I'm not too sure how to design my application to put these calls in just 1 place.
I have a web layer, service layer and a data layer. Each a project of its own. I use Ninject to DI everything. I'll utilize AutoMapper in both web and service layers.
So what are your setup for AutoMapper's CreateMap? Where do you put it? How do you call it?
Doesn't matter, as long as it's a static class. It's all about convention.
Our convention is that each "layer" (web, services, data) has a single file called AutoMapperXConfiguration.cs, with a single method called Configure(), where X is the layer.
The Configure() method then calls private methods for each area.
Here's an example of our web tier config:
public static class AutoMapperWebConfiguration
{
public static void Configure()
{
ConfigureUserMapping();
ConfigurePostMapping();
}
private static void ConfigureUserMapping()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<User,UserViewModel>();
}
// ... etc
}
We create a method for each "aggregate" (User, Post), so things are separated nicely.
Then your Global.asax:
AutoMapperWebConfiguration.Configure();
AutoMapperServicesConfiguration.Configure();
AutoMapperDomainConfiguration.Configure();
// etc
It's kind of like an "interface of words" - can't enforce it, but you expect it, so you can code (and refactor) if necessary.
EDIT:
Just thought I'd mention that I now use AutoMapper profiles, so the above example becomes:
public static class AutoMapperWebConfiguration
{
public static void Configure()
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddProfile(new UserProfile());
cfg.AddProfile(new PostProfile());
});
}
}
public class UserProfile : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<User,UserViewModel>();
}
}
Much cleaner/more robust.
You can really put it anywhere as long as your web project references the assembly that it is in. In your situation I would put it in the service layer as that will be accessible by the web layer and the service layer and later if you decide to do a console app or you are doing a unit test project the mapping configuration will be available from those projects as well.
In your Global.asax you will then call the method that sets all of your maps. See below:
File AutoMapperBootStrapper.cs
public static class AutoMapperBootStrapper
{
public static void BootStrap()
{
AutoMapper.CreateMap<Object1, Object2>();
// So on...
}
}
Global.asax on application start
just call
AutoMapperBootStrapper.BootStrap();
Now some people will argue against this method violates some SOLID principles, which they have valid arguments. Here they are for the reading.
Configuring Automapper in Bootstrapper violates Open-Closed Principle?
Update: The approach posted here is no more valid as SelfProfiler has been removed as of AutoMapper v2.
I would take a similar approach as Thoai. But I would use the built-in SelfProfiler<> class to handle the maps, then use the Mapper.SelfConfigure function to initialize.
Using this object as the source:
public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public DateTime BirthDate { get; set; }
public string GetFullName()
{
return string.Format("{0} {1}", FirstName, LastName);
}
}
And these as the destination:
public class UserViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
public class UserWithAgeViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string FullName { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
}
You can create these profiles:
public class UserViewModelProfile : SelfProfiler<User,UserViewModel>
{
protected override void DescribeConfiguration(IMappingExpression<User, UserViewModel> map)
{
//This maps by convention, so no configuration needed
}
}
public class UserWithAgeViewModelProfile : SelfProfiler<User, UserWithAgeViewModel>
{
protected override void DescribeConfiguration(IMappingExpression<User, UserWithAgeViewModel> map)
{
//This map needs a little configuration
map.ForMember(d => d.Age, o => o.MapFrom(s => DateTime.Now.Year - s.BirthDate.Year));
}
}
To initialize in your application, create this class
public class AutoMapperConfiguration
{
public static void Initialize()
{
Mapper.Initialize(x=>
{
x.SelfConfigure(typeof (UserViewModel).Assembly);
// add assemblies as necessary
});
}
}
Add this line to your global.asax.cs file: AutoMapperConfiguration.Initialize()
Now you can place your mapping classes where they make sense to you and not worry about one monolithic mapping class.
For those of you who adhere to the following:
using an ioc container
don't like to break open closed for this
don't like a monolithic config file
I did a combo between profiles and leveraging my ioc container:
IoC configuration:
public class Automapper : IWindsorInstaller
{
public void Install(IWindsorContainer container, IConfigurationStore store)
{
container.Register(Classes.FromThisAssembly().BasedOn<Profile>().WithServiceBase());
container.Register(Component.For<IMappingEngine>().UsingFactoryMethod(k =>
{
Profile[] profiles = k.ResolveAll<Profile>();
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
foreach (var profile in profiles)
{
cfg.AddProfile(profile);
}
});
profiles.ForEach(k.ReleaseComponent);
return Mapper.Engine;
}));
}
}
Configuration example:
public class TagStatusViewModelMappings : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Service.Contracts.TagStatusViewModel, TagStatusViewModel>();
}
}
Usage example:
public class TagStatusController : ApiController
{
private readonly IFooService _service;
private readonly IMappingEngine _mapper;
public TagStatusController(IFooService service, IMappingEngine mapper)
{
_service = service;
_mapper = mapper;
}
[Route("")]
public HttpResponseMessage Get()
{
var response = _service.GetTagStatus();
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Accepted, _mapper.Map<List<ViewModels.TagStatusViewModel>>(response));
}
}
The trade-off is that you have to reference the Mapper by the IMappingEngine interface instead of the static Mapper, but that's a convention I can live with.
All of above solutions provide a static method to call (from app_start or any where) that it should call other methods to configure parts of mapping-configuration. But, if you have a modular application, that modules may plug in and out of application at any time, these solutions does not work. I suggest using WebActivator library that can register some methods to run on app_pre_start and app_post_start any where:
// in MyModule1.dll
public class InitMapInModule1 {
static void Init() {
Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
// other stuffs
}
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule1), "Init")]
// in MyModule2.dll
public class InitMapInModule2 {
static void Init() {
Mapper.CreateMap<Blog, BlogViewModel>();
// other stuffs
}
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule2), "Init")]
// in MyModule3.dll
public class InitMapInModule3 {
static void Init() {
Mapper.CreateMap<Comment, CommentViewModel>();
// other stuffs
}
}
[assembly: PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(InitMapInModule2), "Init")]
// and in other libraries...
You can install WebActivator via NuGet.
In addition to the best answer, a good way is using Autofac IoC liberary to add some automation. With this you just define your profiles regardless of initiations.
public static class MapperConfig
{
internal static void Configure()
{
var myAssembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterAssemblyTypes(myAssembly)
.Where(t => t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(Profile))).As<Profile>();
var container = builder.Build();
using (var scope = container.BeginLifetimeScope())
{
var profiles = container.Resolve<IEnumerable<Profile>>();
foreach (var profile in profiles)
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddProfile(profile);
});
}
}
}
}
and calling this line in Application_Start method:
MapperConfig.Configure();
The above code finds all Profile sub classes and initiate them automatically.
Putting all the mapping logic in 1 location is not a good practice for me. Because the mapping class will be extremely large and very hard to maintain.
I recommend put the mapping stuff together with the ViewModel class in the same cs file. You can easily navigate to the mapping definition you want following this convention. Moreover, while creating the mapping class, you can reference to the ViewModel properties faster since they are in the same file.
So your view model class will look like:
public class UserViewModel
{
public ObjectId Id { get; set; }
public string Firstname { get; set; }
public string Lastname { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
}
public class UserViewModelMapping : IBootStrapper // Whatever
{
public void Start()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
}
}
From new version of AutoMapper using static method Mapper.Map() is deprecated. So you can add MapperConfiguration as static property to MvcApplication (Global.asax.cs) and use it to create instance of Mapper.
App_Start
public class MapperConfig
{
public static MapperConfiguration MapperConfiguration()
{
return new MapperConfiguration(_ =>
{
_.AddProfile(new FileProfile());
_.AddProfile(new ChartProfile());
});
}
}
Global.asax.cs
public class MvcApplication : System.Web.HttpApplication
{
internal static MapperConfiguration MapperConfiguration { get; private set; }
protected void Application_Start()
{
MapperConfiguration = MapperConfig.MapperConfiguration();
...
}
}
BaseController.cs
public class BaseController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /Base/
private IMapper _mapper = null;
protected IMapper Mapper
{
get
{
if (_mapper == null) _mapper = MvcApplication.MapperConfiguration.CreateMapper();
return _mapper;
}
}
}
https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/wiki/Migrating-from-static-API
For those who are (lost) using:
WebAPI 2
SimpleInjector 3.1
AutoMapper 4.2.1 (With Profiles)
Here's how I managed integrating AutoMapper in the "new way". Also,
a Huge thanks to this answer(and question)
1 - Created a folder in the WebAPI project called "ProfileMappers". In this folder I place all my profiles classes which creates my mappings:
public class EntityToViewModelProfile : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
CreateMap<User, UserViewModel>();
}
public override string ProfileName
{
get
{
return this.GetType().Name;
}
}
}
2 - In my App_Start, I have a SimpleInjectorApiInitializer which configures my SimpleInjector container:
public static Container Initialize(HttpConfiguration httpConfig)
{
var container = new Container();
container.Options.DefaultScopedLifestyle = new WebApiRequestLifestyle();
//Register Installers
Register(container);
container.RegisterWebApiControllers(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration);
//Verify container
container.Verify();
//Set SimpleInjector as the Dependency Resolver for the API
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver =
new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);
httpConfig.DependencyResolver = new SimpleInjectorWebApiDependencyResolver(container);
return container;
}
private static void Register(Container container)
{
container.Register<ISingleton, Singleton>(Lifestyle.Singleton);
//Get all my Profiles from the assembly (in my case was the webapi)
var profiles = from t in typeof(SimpleInjectorApiInitializer).Assembly.GetTypes()
where typeof(Profile).IsAssignableFrom(t)
select (Profile)Activator.CreateInstance(t);
//add all profiles found to the MapperConfiguration
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
foreach (var profile in profiles)
{
cfg.AddProfile(profile);
}
});
//Register IMapper instance in the container.
container.Register<IMapper>(() => config.CreateMapper(container.GetInstance));
//If you need the config for LinqProjections, inject also the config
//container.RegisterSingleton<MapperConfiguration>(config);
}
3 - Startup.cs
//Just call the Initialize method on the SimpleInjector class above
var container = SimpleInjectorApiInitializer.Initialize(configuration);
4 - Then, in your controller just inject as usually a IMapper interface:
private readonly IMapper mapper;
public AccountController( IMapper mapper)
{
this.mapper = mapper;
}
//Using..
var userEntity = mapper.Map<UserViewModel, User>(entity);
For vb.net programmers using the new Version (5.x) of AutoMapper.
Global.asax.vb:
Public Class MvcApplication
Inherits System.Web.HttpApplication
Protected Sub Application_Start()
AutoMapperConfiguration.Configure()
End Sub
End Class
AutoMapperConfiguration:
Imports AutoMapper
Module AutoMapperConfiguration
Public MapperConfiguration As IMapper
Public Sub Configure()
Dim config = New MapperConfiguration(
Sub(cfg)
cfg.AddProfile(New UserProfile())
cfg.AddProfile(New PostProfile())
End Sub)
MapperConfiguration = config.CreateMapper()
End Sub
End Module
Profiles:
Public Class UserProfile
Inherits AutoMapper.Profile
Protected Overrides Sub Configure()
Me.CreateMap(Of User, UserViewModel)()
End Sub
End Class
Mapping:
Dim ViewUser = MapperConfiguration.Map(Of UserViewModel)(User)
I have successfully setup a simple mvc application that lists teams. I'm using Ninject to inject the appropriate repository depending on the controller (thanks to stack overflow ;). All looks good, except that the repository code looks exactly the same. And I know that's wrong. So my TeamRepository has two classes (for now).
public class SwimTeamRepository : ITeamRepository<SwimTeam>
{
private readonly Table<SwimTeam> _teamTable;
public SwimTeamRepository(string connectionString)
{
_teamTable = (new DataContext(connectionString).GetTable<SwimTeam>());
}
public IQueryable<SwimTeam> Team
{
get { return _teamTable; }
}
}
public class SoccerTeamRepository : ITeamRepository<SoccerTeam>
{
private readonly Table<SoccerTeam> _teamTable;
public SoccerTeamRepository(string connectionString)
{
_teamTable = (new DataContext(connectionString).GetTable<SoccerTeam>());
}
public IQueryable<SoccerTeam> Team
{
get { return _teamTable; }
}
}
They look exactly the same except for the Class and Table name, so clearly I need to re-factor this. What would be the best approach here? Singleton? Factory Method?
Thanks in advance!
You could use generics:
public interface ITeamRepository<T>
{
}
public class TeamRepository<TTeam> : ITeamRepository<TTeam>
where TTeam : Team
{
private readonly Table<TTeam> _teamTable;
public TeamRepository(string connectionString)
{
_teamTable = (new DataContext(connectionString).GetTable<TTeam>());
}
public IQueryable<TTeam> Team
{
get { return _teamTable; }
}
}
public class Team
{
}
public class SwimTeam : Team
{
}
Then use it like so...
public void MyMethod()
{
var repository = new TeamRepository<SwimTeam>();
}
...and set up your IoC container w/ Ninject like so...
public class MyModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<ITeamRepository<SwimTeam>>
.To<TeamRepository<SwimTeam>>();
}
}
public void MyMethod()
{
var repository = kernel.Get<ITeamRepository<SwimTeam>>();
}
If you want to get REAL generic and have a single repository for ALL of your mapped classes, you can do something like this:
public interface IRepository
{
IQueryable<T> Get<T>() where T : class, new();
}
public class Repository : IRepository, IDisposable
{
private DataContext _dataContext;
public Repository(string connectionString)
{
_dataContext = new DataContext(connectionString);
}
public IQueryable<T> Get<T>()
where T : class, new()
{
return _dataContext.GetTable<T>().AsQueryable();
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (_dataContext != null)
{
_dataContext.Dispose();
_dataContext = null;
}
}
}
...which you could call like so (after setting up your Ninject container)...
using (var repository = kernel.Get<IRepository>())
{
var swimTeam = repository.Get<SwimTeam>();
}
Since Ninject takes care of the life-cycle management of your objects, you don't HAVE to wrap the repository in a using statement. In fact, you don't want to use a using statement there at all if you plan to use the repository more than once within the scope of its lifetime. Ninject will automatically dispose of it when it's life-cycle ends.
Here's a good article by Rob Conery on using this kind of technique to reduce the friction of using different ORMs.
EDIT by keeg:
I Think
public class TeamRepository<TTeam> : ITeamRepository<TTeam> where TTeam : Team {}
Should be
public class TeamRepository<TTeam> : ITeamRepository<TTeam> where TTeam : class {}
Please correct if I'm wrong.
Is this what you want?
public class TeamRepository : ITeamRepository<T>
{
private readonly Table<T> _teamTable;
public TeamRepository(string connectionString)
{
_teamTable = (new DataContext(connectionString).GetTable<T>());
}
public IQueryable<T> Team
{
get { return _teamTable; }
}
}