How does one enter multiple lines of code into the rails console?
--edit with problem trying to solve--
I am trying to get a handle on using the collect method and want to try out the following code in the rails console:
first_activities_collection = users.collect |user|
activities = user.activities
first = activities.first
And having difficulty getting it to execute.
I have tried:
first_activities_collection = users.collect |user|
activities = user.activities;
first = activities.first;
end
Maybe I am doing something wrong with .collect?
Separate them with semicolons. If you are typing at a remote console which responds slowly, this often saves time.
Sometimes when using a remote console, I edit the code which I want to run in a text editor, and then cut-and-paste it all into the console at one go. That way if I need to change something or fix a bug, I don't have to type it all in again.
You are missing the do keyword in your loop.
Related
Hello I was trying the update the data in the table using the rails console.
Box.where("code = 'learning'").update(duration: 10)
I ran this command.
The data is temporarily changing.
Box.where("code = 'learning'")
When I run this the precious data is being displayed.
Could anyone let me the issue.
Thank you in advance.
#update updates a single record.
user = User.find_by(name: 'David')
user.update(name: 'Dave')
It will return true/false depending on if the record was actually updated. You can see the validation errors by inspecting the errors object:
user.errors.full_messages
In non user-interactions situations like seed files and the console it can be helpful to use the bang methods such as #update!, #save! and #create! which will raise an exception if the record is invalid.
If you want to update multiple records at once you need to use #update_all:
Box.where("code = 'learning'")
.update_all(duration: 10)
This creates a single SQL update statement and is by far the most performant option.
You can also iterate through the records:
Box.where("code = 'learning'").find_each do |box|
box.update(duration: 10)
end
This is sometimes necissary if the value you are updating must be calculated in the application. But it is much slower as it creates N+1 database queries.
I am trying to implement 2FA(two factor authentication) in my existing rails 4.2.10 application, I have configured many bits.
Issue I am facing is to get/retrieve a code which is valid for 5 minutes and send this code over to user on his defined phone number or email.
I did tried ROTP::TOTP.new(user.otp_secret).at(Time.now), guessing from gem's source code, which seems to work fine and give a valid otp_code in console, but in sessions_controler, as weird as it sounds, user.otp_secret is null, always...
I have posted an issue on the gem.
I don't think this can be bug, rather this is a functionality I want to build.
My stack:
Ruby: 2.4.2
Rails: 4.2.10
Devise: 4
attr_encrypted: 1.4(if it matters)
Additionally, I want to extend drift period(code acceptance time) to 5 minutes. I think that will be easy, but doing it for single code, not universally, or for all codes, this has me thinking for a while now.
My main issue is the first one, getting the code to send through SMS, this is a subproblem, which I think is doable, but if anyone has/had experience with this and can help, that will be great.
UPDATE: I updated attr_encrypted and restarted the system, it started working, also I realized there is a method current_otp in which devise_two_factor adds in the user model, so I started using that. BUT after a few minutes, it is also throwing the same issue of user.otp_secret being nil. Its getting weird...
UPDATE 2/Hacky solution: Weirdly enough, I had to add these 3 methods in user model and everything started working:
def encrypted_otp_secret
self[:encrypted_otp_secret]
end
def encrypted_otp_secret_iv
self[:encrypted_otp_secret_iv]
end
def encrypted_otp_secret_salt
self[:encrypted_otp_secret_salt]
end
As you can suspect, i got here by examining a behavior thatdoing user.encrypted_otp_secret was giving me nil while it was not, even after reloading user model. And doing user[:encrypted_otp_secret] was giving me the actual value.
It seems like a bug in attr_encrypted. I am not sure yet.
For anyone else that runs into this issue, I have found a next step needed to get the current_otp method to work. In the method pre_otp method call
> u = User.find_by(email: 'test#example.com')
> u.otp_required_for_login = true
> u.otp_secret = User.generate_otp_secret
> u.save!
and then you can call u.current_otp...
https://blog.tommyku.com/blog/integrating-two-step-two-factor-authentication-into-rails-4-project-with-devise/
I've been messing around with the Youtube_It gem for the past couple of days as I'm trying to integrate it into a Rails 4 app I'm currently working on.
When I run a search query with it, it outputs an array with a ton of results. As long as I'm in the Rails console, there's no problem with manipulating it. A brief example :
require 'youtube_it'
client = YouTubeIt::Client.new(:dev_key => "dev_key")
data = client.videos_by(:query => "penguin")
data.videos.each { |v| puts v.unique_id }
This outputs a nice, tidy list of all the unique id's that were returned from the query.
When I try to do something similar within a view (I know it shouldn't really be in the view, it's simply there for testing at this point) it just outputs a huge jumbled list of what appears to be XML. This only seems to happen when I try to iterate using .each.
When I do something like :
<% data = client.videos_by(:query => "penguin") %>
<%= data.videos[1].unique_id %>
This returns exactly what I was expecting, one unique_id from the index that I chose. Great! But how do I get ALL the unique id's?
That's where I'm stuck and would really appreciate some help! :)
OK, two reasons (working from the gist you gave me on IRC, located here):
1) You are not actually using the same code as in the console. Your console uses puts unique_id which will print the value of the unique ID, but you are just using unique_id which will get the ID... and then do nothing with it. What you want is probably something like data.videos.map(&:unique_id) (or data.videos.map { |v| v.unique_id } in long form) which will return you an array of the IDs.
2) You are using <%=, which means 'evaluate this ruby line and output the return value onto the page'. The return value of an each statement is the object you called each on - ie. data.videos, so that is what is getting printed out.
Right now, my program has a tweeting system. I want to be able to save the current tweet whenever there's an update, and save the last tweeted thing. Then, every 10 minutes, a rake script runs and the tweet gets sent out. This is to prevent multiple tweets. The problem is that I have no way of saving the last tweeted phrase. I've tried using something like:
MY_VARS = {}
in application.rb, and then using MY_VARS[:old] = MY_VARS[:current], but that keeps being overridden. I also tried using the caching in rails, specifically:
Rails.cache.write("current", myTweet)
But that gets overridden to nil everytime the script runs. Does anyone know how I should be doing this?
A good place is to store it at some file, since it's a worker script it's not that important to be fast, in your case
I'm trying to update one of my objects in my rails app and the changes just don't stick. There are no errors, and stepping through with the debugger just reveals that it thinks everything is updating.
Anyway, here is the code in question...
qm = QuestionMembership.find(:first, :conditions => ["question_id = ? AND form_id = ?", q_id, form_id])
qm.position = x
qm.save
For reference sake, QuestionMembership has question_id, form_id, and position fields. All are integers, and have no db constraints.
That is basically my join table between Forms and Questions.
Stepping through the code, qm gets a valid object, the position of the object does get changed to the value of x, and save returns 'true'.
However, after the method exits, the object in the db is unchanged.
What am I missing?
You may not be finding the object that you think you are. Some experimenting in irb might be enlightening.
Also, as a general rule when changing only one attribute, it's better to write
qm.update_attribute(:position, x)
instead of setting and saving. Rails will then update only that column instead of the entire row. And you also get the benefit of the data being scrubbed.
Is there an after_save?
Is the correct SQL being emitted?
In development log, you can actually see the sql that is generated.
For something like this:
qm = QuestionMembership.find(:first, :conditions => ["question_id = ? AND form_id = ?", q_id, form_id])
qm.position = x
qm.save
You should see something to the effect of:
SELECT * FROM question_memberships WHERE question_id=2 AND form_id=6 LIMIT 1
UPDATE question_memberships SET position = x WHERE id = 5
Can you output what sql you are actually seeing so we can compare?
Either update the attribute or call:
qm.reload
after the qm.save
What is the result of qm.save? True or false? And what about qm.errors, does that provide anything that makes sense to you? And what does the development.log say?
I have run into this problem rather frequently. (I was about to say consistently, but I cannot, as that would imply that I would know when it was about to happen.)
While I have no solution to the underlying issue, I have found that it seems to happen to me only when I am trying to update mysql text fields. My workaround has been to set the field to do something like:
qm.position = ""
qm.save
qm.position = x
qm.save
And to answer everyone else... when I run qm.save! I get no errors. I have not tried qm.save?
When I run through my code in the rails console everything works perfectly as evidenced by re-finding the object using the same query brings the expected results.
I have the same issue when using qm.update_attribute(... as well
My workaround has gotten me limping this far, but hopefully someone on this thread will be able to help.
Try changing qm.save to qm.save! and see if you get an exception message.
Edit: What happens when you watch the log on the call to .save!? Does it generate the expected SQL?
Use ./script/console and run this script.. step by step..
see if the position field for the object is update or not when you run line 2
then hit qm.save or qm.save!... to test
see what happens. Also as mentioned by Tim .. check the logs
Check your QuestionMembership class and verify that position does not have something like
attr_readonly :position
Best way to debug this is to do
tail -f log/development.log
And then open another console and do the code executing the save statement. Verify that the actual SQL Update statement is executed.
Check to make sure your database settings are correct. If you're working with multiple databases (or haven't changed the default sqlite3 database to MySQL) you may be working with the wrong database.
Run the commands in ./script/console to see if you see the same behavior.
Verify that a similar object (say a Form or Question) saves.
If the Form or Question saves, find the difference between the QuestionMembership and Form or Question object.
Turns out that it was emitting the wrong SQL. Basically it was looking for the QuestionMembeship object by the id column which doesn't exist.
I was under the impression that that column was unnecessary with has_many_through relationships, although it seems I was misguided.
To fix, I simply added the id column to the table as a primary key. Thanks for all the pointers.