Iv been trying to pass arguments through an addEventListener event in actionscript such as...
target.addEventListener("pComp", rakeSoil(target));
but i get errors.
Iv tried to google but no luck :/
Thanks for replying if you do :)
The target is already passed as part of the event, either event.currentTarget or event.target will be what you want.
If you want something else passed, create a custom event. Add the property to the custom event.
Try adding an additional method as your event listener:
target.addEventListener ("pComp", targetListener);
...
private function targetListener (event:Event):void {
rakeSoil (event.currentTarget);
}
How this is what you want:
{
var target:EventDispatcher = ...;
Function rakeSoil = function (e:Event):void
{
// handle target
}
target.addEventListener("pComp", rakeSoil);
}
rakeSoil is a first class function(or closure), when event is dispatched, it will be invoked, and you can access 'target' in it.
EDIT:
Have a look at Closure (computer science)
I have always found anonymous functions to be more trouble than they are worth. I would simply follow the standard event handler code layout. It's more formal and takes a little more effort up front, but there is no ambiguity and it is far more readable when you return to it a year from now (reduces head-scratching duration):
// Target extends EventDispatcher
private var target:Target;
public function listenToTarget();
{
target = new Target();
target.addEventListener("pComp", pCompHandler);
}
private function pCompHandler(event:Event):void
{
target.rakeSoil();
}
Although, now that I look at it more closely, why are you having this object do something that Target should be capable of handling internally on its own?
Related
Is there way to late initialize for final variables. The problem is many values initialized with entry point to the class, which is not constructor. Hence they cannot be final right now. But in scope of particular class they will not be changed. For ex.
Controller controller;
double width;
void setup(final itemWidth) {
controller = MyController();
width = itemWidth;
}
Could it be possible? Right now I see only solution as a annotation. You might think it's for visual effect. But in fact it helps to avoid unpredictable flow during testing.
It is now possible to late initialize variables. For more information see Dart's documentation. The text below is copied from Dart's documentation:
Late final variables
You can also combine late with final:
// Using null safety:
class Coffee {
late final String _temperature;
void heat() { _temperature = 'hot'; }
void chill() { _temperature = 'iced'; }
String serve() => _temperature + ' coffee';
}
Unlike normal final fields, you do not have to initialize the field in its declaration or in the constructor initialization list. You can assign to it later at runtime. But you can only assign to it once, and that fact is checked at runtime. If you try to assign to it more than once — like calling both heat() and chill() here — the second assignment throws an exception. This is a great way to model state that gets initialized eventually and is immutable afterwards.
For class I have to make a program that calculates the birthday problem
Now I'm having trying to learn kotlin at the same time and I'm having trouble with a little snippet of code:
val checkSet = mutableSetOf<Int>()
generateSequence{ Random.nextInt(n)}.forEach {
if(!checkSet.add(it)) {
return#outForeach
}
}
outForeach#
sum += checkSet.size
As you can see I'm trying to do this with an infinite sequence. Kotlin doesn't accept this as outForeach is an unresolved reference. But this doesn't work either:
val checkSet = mutableSetOf<Int>()
generateSequence{ Random.nextInt(n)}.forEach {
if(!checkSet.add(it)) {
return#forEach
}
}
sum += checkSet.size
This will just start the forEach loop again. Is there a way to implement something as a forEachUntil or so?
p.s. I'm aware that this looks a lot like this question: 'return' doesn't jump out of forEach in Kotlin It's just that I don't really get the answers and I don't know if its applicable here. Also a way to implement forEachUntil seems for me to be far more elegant
Alternatives you may want to consider instead of first:
using a simple while without body:
while (checkSet.add(Random.nextInt(n))); // <- that semicolon is required! otherwise you execute what is coming next within the while
using run with a label:
run outForeach#{
generateSequence{ Random.nextInt(n)}.forEach {
if(!checkSet.add(it)) {
return#outForeach
}
}
}
maybe also takeWhile might be helpful. In this specific case however it is surely not (as it would check against the checkSet and leave us with a sequence that isn't consumed... but if the condition would be different, it may make sense to consider something like take, takeWhile, takeLast, etc.):
generateSequence { Random.nextInt(n) }
.takeWhile(checkSet::add) // as said: for this specific condition it doesn't make sense...
.forEach { /* do nothing except consume the sequence */ } // the same values you added to the set would be available in this step of course
I think I found the solution myself:
val checkSet = mutableSetOf<Int>()
generateSequence{ Random.nextInt(n)}.first { !checkSet.add(it) }
sum += checkSet.size
Basically use the function first() and keep returning false until you want to get out of the loop. And just drop the return of the function first()
I am new to Reactive programming, and I'm trying to observe a boolean value from my ViewModel in order to let my ViewController know when to start/stop the app's loader screen.
It's fairly simple and I want to use this method to avoid unnecessary delegates, since my ViewModel holds the business logic and my ViewController handles the UI.
My problem is this compiler error: Ambiguous reference to member 'subscribe'.
It also adds the two possible candidates, as you can see in the image below:
In my ViewModel, I've declared the observable as PublishSubject:
let done = PublishSubject<Bool>()
And I use it while observing another stream:
func subscribe() {
done.onNext(false)
anotherObservable.subscribe(
// other events observed here but not relevant to this matter
onCompleted: {
self.done.onNext(true)
}).addDisposableTo(rx_disposeBag)
}
And, finally, this is how I'm trying to handle it in the ViewController:
self.model.done.subscribe(
.onNext { isDone in
if isDone {
self.removeLoader()
}
}).addDisposableTo(rx_disposeBag)
I believe there is something simple I'm probably missing, so any help is appreciated.
In your second subscribe should be:
self.model.done.subscribe(onNext: { isDone in
if isDone {
self.removeLoader()
}
}).addDisposableTo(rx_disposeBag)
I'm working in Swift and one of the protocols I'm using needs to return an UnsafeMutablePointer<T> of a particular object.
I have something like this:
#objc var myProperty:UnsafeMutablePointer<someObject>
{
get
{
// I call a class function here to get a 'someObject'
// return object which I need to pass back a pointer to it.
return UnsafeMutablePointer<someObject>
}
}
The problem is that Xcode doesn't like this. It complains that '>' is not a unary operator.
I've also tried removing the UnsafeMutablePointer<> and use an & in front of someObject but it complains that the & is to be used immediately in a list of arguments for a function.
I suppose I just can't find the right syntax for this? Any help would be appreciated.
If someObject has the type SomeClass, then you need to update your declaration like this:
#objc var myProperty:UnsafeMutablePointer<SomeClass>
{
get
{
return UnsafeMutablePointer<SomeClass>(unsafeAddressOf(someObject))
}
}
The generic argument needs to be the type of the returned data, and you also need to intialize a specialized UnsafeMutablePointer with the memory address of the desired object.
So I have an Application Sandbox HTMLLoader object which I create in AIR and simply want to call ActionScript methods from JavaScript. In Flash, this is accomplished through our trusty ExternalInterface.addCallback() function. However in AIR, things are quite a bit different, and I just can't seem to get it to work.
Here is a simplified overview of my project:
My AIR (ActionScript) main:
public class Main extends Sprite {
public var _as3Var:String = "testing";
public function as3Function():void
{
trace("as3Function called from Javascript");
}
public function Main() {
NativeApplication.nativeApplication.addEventListener(InvokeEvent.INVOKE, onInvoke);
}
protected function onInvoke(e:InvokeEvent):void {
NativeApplication.nativeApplication.removeEventListener(InvokeEvent.INVOKE, onInvoke );
var app = new App();
addChild(app);
app.init(new ExternalContainer(), e.currentDirectory, e.arguments);
}
}
And this is how I create my HTMLLoader object:
{
_html = new HTMLLoader();
_html.useCache = false;
_html.runtimeApplicationDomain = ApplicationDomain.currentDomain;
_html.load(new URLRequest("sandbox/AirRoot.html"));
_html.width = 800;
_html.height = 600;
App.ref.addChild(_html);
}
And at last, here is my snippet of JavaScript in my AirRoot.html file which is trying to call the public method as3Function() declared in my Main class:
Exposed.testAs3 = function()
{
air.trace("Exposed.testAs3 called"); /* This works fine. */
air.trace("runtimeVersion:"); /* This works fine. */
air.trace(air.NativeApplication.nativeApplication.runtimeVersion); /* This works fine. */
air.trace("seeing if I can get to AS3 params..."); /* This works fine. */
/* This doesn't work - get the following error: TypeError: Value undefined does not allow function calls. */
air.NativeApplication.nativeApplication.as3Function();
}
What am I missing?
OK, I am going to answer my own question. I promise this was not a ploy to gain more reputation points, but I was seriously confused today but have now found the appropriate answers and documentation - which is usually the main problem to many an engineer's question...
Anyway, the answer:
The AIR HTMLLoader object contains a magical property, HTMLLoader.window, which is a proxy to the JavaScript window object. So setting HTMLLoader.window = AS3Function; is one way - or in relation to my previously included example (assuming I setup a static property called Main which pointed to the Main class):
_html.window.as3Function = Main.as3Function;
And now in JavaScript I can just call as3Function as:
<script>
window.as3Function();
</script>
Another interesting property is the JavaScript "window.htmlLoader" object. It is a proxy to the AS3 HTMLLoader parent object, in my case, the _html object. From this you can access things in relation to the _html object from JavaScript.
I'm not sure if this is a change in the new version of AIR, but you no longer need to reference the window in the javascript call, you can just do this:
<script>
as3Function();
</script>